There is always an enormous amount of curiosity from North American hockey fans about players who are not yet in the NHL. There had certainly been a buzz about Alexander Radulov's return to the NHL, as fans already knew how talented he was. Unfortunately, not much is known about other international players.
For many, the prospect of being able to bring that player to the National Hockey League is very exciting, and often that player will be highly sought after. Regardless, the player in question must first be identified.
With the return of Radulov to the NHL, who do you believe is his successor as the best player outside of the National Hockey League?
Last edited by JetsAlternate: 03-24-2012 at 06:53 AM.
Those two and Tarasenko are obviously super talented and have great potential, but none of them can be called Europe's very best yet.
You can make a case for Granlund though. Over a PPG in SM-Liiga and completely dominated the World Championships last year. Although as of right now he's not even a top-10 player in the SM-Liiga, been kinda cold after the WJC. Sami Vatanen is by far the best player in the SM-Liiga right now, don't know how he compares to the top player in other European league though. Silfverberg's been great in Sweden this season too...
I think Kevin Dallman is quite a bit better than anyone mentioned here so far.
How can you make this statement when you've never seen him play?
What aspect of Dallman's game makes him better than anybody else?
What do you like/dislike about his play?
In what ways does d-partner Novopashin affect him?
Imo, Dallman's a great offensive d-man in the KHL; a player any team would love to sign.....but also a player that benefits from his circumstance (tones of ice/PP time and sometimes he's allowed to be a 4th forward).
Taken out of his element in Barys, I don't think he's well rounded enough to be more than a #2/3 dman and pp specialist on an Ak Bars or somebody.
How can you make this statement when you've never seen him play?
What aspect of Dallman's game makes him better than anybody else?
What do you like/dislike about his play?
In what ways does d-partner Novopashin affect him?
Imo, Dallman's a great offensive d-man in the KHL; a player any team would love to sign.....but also a player that benefits from his circumstance (tones of ice/PP time and sometimes he's allowed to be a 4th forward).
Taken out of his element in Barys, I don't think he's well rounded enough to be more than a #2/3 dman and pp specialist on an Ak Bars or somebody.
To start with the guy has put up the closest thing to Bobby Orr like numbers that any pro league has seen in 40 years.
Subjective comparisons based on peoples biased observations of players abilities are kind of pointless in terms of a debate. You may be able to explain why you like a player, but arguments on who is better that aren't backed up by some sort of meaningful statistic aren't really worth the time.
For example could you make the argument why Cervenka is better than say Cory Conacher?
Granlund and Silfverberg, don't know much about KHL.. Morozov and Zherdev maybe from there
Morozov is aging, I don't think he is in this discussion any more, but Granlund would be in the top 5, Zherdev still shows flashes of super-stardom. Based on talent alone Zherev by a landslide, but his attitude sucks. His skills are very close to Semins but cries on ice and yells at teammates if he doesn't get passes etc.. Every once in a while he makes that play that wows you and makes you think he could be among the best in the world.
In no particular order gotta be : Kuznetsov, Tarasenko, Granlund, Anisin, Zherdev, Cervenka. Goalie is Ramo, I think he'll be a star in the NHL at some point in his career still.
To start with the guy has put up the closest thing to Bobby Orr like numbers that any pro league has seen in 40 years.
Subjective comparisons based on peoples biased observations of players abilities are kind of pointless in terms of a debate. You may be able to explain why you like a player, but arguments on who is better that aren't backed up by some sort of meaningful statistic aren't really worth the time.
For example could you make the argument why Cervenka is better than say Cory Conacher?
You really have no arguement if you haven't seen Dallman play.
Dallman's a great KHLer but someone like Kirill Koltsov could put up similar numbers if put in the same circumstance.
Seriously, despite the opinions from various posters (from numerous countries) in this thread, it's comical that the only person pimping Dallman is a biased Canadian who's never actually seen him play.
You can't be serious....
