HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Northeast Division > Montreal Canadiens
Notices

The Philadelphia Model?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
04-14-2012, 02:58 PM
  #126
Teufelsdreck
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 12,764
vCash: 500
It took balls for Gainey to delete 10 regulars but ir didn't work out. The hormones have to be coordinated with the prefrontal lobe. If they're not, some other team ends up eating the Habs' lunch. As for Burke, his impulses have planted landmines on the Leafs' road to respectability. Their 9-3-1 start to the season was a mirage.

Teufelsdreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 03:33 PM
  #127
habitue*
 
habitue*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,580
vCash: 500
The Philadelphia and Pittsburg models...

Giroux
Brière
Talbot
Couturier
Vorachek
Bourdon
Fleury
Crosby
Letang
Dupuis


What do they have in common ?

All Q graduates


maybe the habs should work harder scouting and drafting kids from the Q ????

habitue* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 03:40 PM
  #128
Mrb1p
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Citizen of the world
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,049
vCash: 450
Oh..wait i've been saying this since forever and when I go on a trip its right heh?

Oh and also... The philly model is a gamble model. We took alot of them. See what it did ?

What if couturier was drafted while they were choosing and they choose a bust ? What if Schenn never becomes better than a third liner ?

They'll have traded Carter vs Voracek-Bust and Richards for a second line winger and a third.
(Sure this didnt happen ..But you get the point.)

What if Gomez had 4 60 points + season? What if Mcdonagh busted ?
What if camalleri scored 40 for three-four seasons?

You can go the safer way then..the Detroit way... Draft BPA develop him slowly and when he's perfectly baked bring him up !


Last edited by Mrb1p: 04-14-2012 at 03:55 PM.
Mrb1p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 03:55 PM
  #129
MathMan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,366
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poulet Kostopoulos View Post
Are people jumping the gun again? They've won two PO games in a row, not two Cups in a row. With the way they start games, they could be trailing 0-2 in the serie and nobody would be talking about their "model" now. Kudos for the comebacks but their "model" has proven little.
Not to mention mercilessly exploiting a below-average goaltender on a cold spell.

Seriously, it's the playoffs. Do you think 4-3 games should be the model, let alone EIGHT TO FIVE?

Their offensive guys look utterly fantastic because people only look at boxcar goals-assist-points. Oh, how awesome. Meanwhile, Philly has allowed 8 goals in two playoff games. If the Pens hadn't been generally even more of a sieve than they've been, where would they be? Aren't you supposed to play defense and have great goaltending to be considered great?

I still don't like the contract to Pronger, I still don't like the Carter and Richards trade (they don't seem to be hurting LA any) and I think the Bryzgalov contract is ridiculous.

Despite their short-term success, I am thoroughly unimpressed with Holmgren.

(Though I wish the Habs were so lucky that the guys in front of them would draft like dolts and let a player of Couturier's caliber fall to 8th. EIGHTH, for crying out loud.)

MathMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 04:00 PM
  #130
Mrb1p
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Citizen of the world
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,049
vCash: 450
Quote:
Originally Posted by MathMan View Post
(Though I wish the Habs were so lucky that the guys in front of them would draft like dolts and let a player of Couturier's caliber fall to 8th. EIGHTH, for crying out loud.)
I'm with you, I had three players ahead of him for christ sake..

I can't see Scheifele, Strome, Zibanejad(even freaking Huberdeau..) having better careers than him. I had RNH, Landeskog and Larsson over him and after that it was by a MILE !

Mrb1p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 04:57 PM
  #131
DAChampion
Registered User
 
DAChampion's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Canberra, Australia
Country: Australia
Posts: 3,827
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teufelsdreck View Post
It took balls for Gainey to delete 10 regulars but ir didn't work out. The hormones have to be coordinated with the prefrontal lobe. If they're not, some other team ends up eating the Habs' lunch. As for Burke, his impulses have planted landmines on the Leafs' road to respectability. Their 9-3-1 start to the season was a mirage.
No,

Balls would have meant trading them at the deadline.

DAChampion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 05:00 PM
  #132
DAChampion
Registered User
 
DAChampion's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Canberra, Australia
Country: Australia
Posts: 3,827
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mrb1p View Post
Oh..wait i've been saying this since forever and when I go on a trip its right heh?

Oh and also... The philly model is a gamble model. We took alot of them. See what it did ?

What if couturier was drafted while they were choosing and they choose a bust ? What if Schenn never becomes better than a third liner ?

They'll have traded Carter vs Voracek-Bust and Richards for a second line winger and a third.
(Sure this didnt happen ..But you get the point.)

What if Gomez had 4 60 points + season? What if Mcdonagh busted ?
What if camalleri scored 40 for three-four seasons?

You can go the safer way then..the Detroit way... Draft BPA develop him slowly and when he's perfectly baked bring him up !


Detroit lucked out to draft Datsyuk and Zetterberg in the 7th and 6th round. That's how their team is built, genuine luck, as opposed to the educated guess of thinking Brayden Schenn or Ryan McDonagh will be great players. It was also obvious that Gomez was past his prime.

As we move further and further from the 2007 Cup Finals, as the luck of drafting Zetterberg and Datsyuk fails into irrelevance due to the aging process, Detroit will become worse and worse. This year they only have a 50% chance of making it past the first round.

DAChampion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 05:06 PM
  #133
MathMan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,366
vCash: 500
Also keep in mind that Holmgren has Pronger on a 35+ contract until 2018 and Bryzgalov on a standard contract until 2020. Both with NMCs, so no hiding him in the minors like the Habs might for Gomez.

MathMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 05:08 PM
  #134
HabsSlappy
Registered User
 
HabsSlappy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 926
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAChampion View Post


Detroit lucked out to draft Datsyuk and Zetterberg in the 7th and 6th round. That's how their team is built, genuine luck, as opposed to the educated guess of thinking Brayden Schenn or Ryan McDonagh will be great players. It was also obvious that Gomez was past his prime.

As we move further and further from the 2007 Cup Finals, as the luck of drafting Zetterberg and Datsyuk fails into irrelevance due to the aging process, Detroit will become worse and worse. This year they only have a 50% chance of making it past the first round.
Not to mention that Detroit is in for a rude awakening when Lidstrom retires. They are a totally different team with him in the lineup. It is a staggering difference.

everyone says they will just sign Ryan Suter and not miss a beat, but Ryan Suter is far from Lidstrom.

HabsSlappy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 05:13 PM
  #135
DAChampion
Registered User
 
DAChampion's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Canberra, Australia
Country: Australia
Posts: 3,827
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MathMan View Post
Also keep in mind that Holmgren has Pronger on a 35+ contract until 2018 and Bryzgalov on a standard contract until 2020. Both with NMCs, so no hiding him in the minors like the Habs might for Gomez.
You're grasping at straws.

The point is that Philly is a comprehensively superior team.

It doesn't negate that when you nitpick about the fact they're "stuck" with Chris Pronger. We wish we had Chris Pronger.

DAChampion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 05:14 PM
  #136
DAChampion
Registered User
 
DAChampion's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Canberra, Australia
Country: Australia
Posts: 3,827
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by HabsSlappy View Post
Not to mention that Detroit is in for a rude awakening when Lidstrom retires. They are a totally different team with him in the lineup. It is a staggering difference.

everyone says they will just sign Ryan Suter and not miss a beat, but Ryan Suter is far from Lidstrom.
Right, and they probably won't get Suter.

I'm really tired about hearing about the Detroit model. It is pure luck. Philly, Pittsburgh, Boston, represent three distinct, genuine strategies.

DAChampion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 05:16 PM
  #137
hockeyfan2k11
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,538
vCash: 500
Anyone remember any notable Flyers players who walked for nothing? Flyers always tend to get something for their players.

Holmgren is one hell of a GM but the Flyers are one hell of an organization, solid scouting, solid management and ownership.

hockeyfan2k11 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 05:57 PM
  #138
NORiculous
Registered User
 
NORiculous's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,618
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ECWHSWI View Post
4 years ago : Wings model
3 years ago : Pens model
2 years ago : Hawks model
last year : Bruins model
this year : Flyers model

next year ? ? ?
Habs model












LOL

NORiculous is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 06:26 PM
  #139
MathMan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 16,366
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAChampion View Post
The point is that Philly is a comprehensively superior team.
Now, maybe, once Gauthier went to work and dismantled the roster.

At the beginning of the season, not so much.

MathMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 06:47 PM
  #140
buddahsmoka1
Registered User
 
buddahsmoka1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 24,040
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyfan2k11 View Post
Anyone remember any notable Flyers players who walked for nothing? Flyers always tend to get something for their players.

Holmgren is one hell of a GM but the Flyers are one hell of an organization, solid scouting, solid management and ownership.
Kim Johnsson
Mark Recchi
Sami Kapanen
Tony Amonte
Mike Knuble
Jason Smith
Alexei Zhamnov

Shall I continue?

buddahsmoka1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 07:06 PM
  #141
Franked
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 258
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by buddahsmoka1 View Post
Kim Johnsson
Mark Recchi
Sami Kapanen
Tony Amonte
Mike Knuble
Jason Smith
Alexei Zhamnov

Shall I continue?
Most of those were washed up players, and/or were gone before Holmgren was made Gm. Knuble would be the only one on the list that fits the "notable player allowed to walk for nothing" under Holmgren.

Franked is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 07:17 PM
  #142
hockeyfan2k11
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,538
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by buddahsmoka1 View Post
Kim Johnsson
Mark Recchi
Sami Kapanen
Tony Amonte
Mike Knuble
Jason Smith
Alexei Zhamnov

Shall I continue?
I said notable. Zhamnov?

hockeyfan2k11 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 07:20 PM
  #143
SouthernHab
Registered User
 
SouthernHab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: USA
Country: United States
Posts: 5,438
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by FinnHab73 View Post
We need GM with balls, like Holmgren. If Molson and Savard find right guy to office, only sky is the limit.
One more reason why Brisebois should not be named GM. He is balls-less like Gauthier.

Starting to think that Hextall is what this franchise needs.

Hextall GM. Roy coach. This team would no longer be considered ******* for sure.

SouthernHab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 07:22 PM
  #144
Mrb1p
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Citizen of the world
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,049
vCash: 450
Quote:
Originally Posted by DAChampion View Post


Detroit lucked out to draft Datsyuk and Zetterberg in the 7th and 6th round. That's how their team is built, genuine luck, as opposed to the educated guess of thinking Brayden Schenn or Ryan McDonagh will be great players. It was also obvious that Gomez was past his prime.

As we move further and further from the 2007 Cup Finals, as the luck of drafting Zetterberg and Datsyuk fails into irrelevance due to the aging process, Detroit will become worse and worse. This year they only have a 50% chance of making it past the first round.
Detroit lucked out ? Detroit has done this for 20 years now. They got far more superior player than you think. When people like Filpulla and Ericsson are depth players you know the team knows what it takes. Also theres something sepcial about good ol' motor city. They've been like that since i've been a kid. (I didnt live the shady days of the franchise)
Oh and every team has 50% chances of winning a hockey game. Its a team vs a team.

Mrb1p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 07:37 PM
  #145
buddahsmoka1
Registered User
 
buddahsmoka1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 24,040
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franked View Post
Most of those were washed up players, and/or were gone before Holmgren was made Gm. Knuble would be the only one on the list that fits the "notable player allowed to walk for nothing" under Holmgren.
Uh, they are free agents, of course they will be older. Most of those players were lost just prior to Holmgren getting hired, which saw a huge makeover of the club (a number of free agents leaving, not unlike what Gauthier received as a team).

Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyfan2k11 View Post
I said notable. Zhamnov?
Zhamnov is nearly a PPG player in the NHL...He had a great career in Chicago.

Define what you mean by 'notable'? Which team loses multiple superstars? Most of those players were pretty good players.

buddahsmoka1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 07:37 PM
  #146
Kriss E
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 17,163
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyfan2k11 View Post
I said notable. Zhamnov?
Zhamnov had 18pts in 20games when he joined the Flyers during the season. Not quite sure what's funny about that..

Kriss E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 08:18 PM
  #147
hockeyfan2k11
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 4,538
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by buddahsmoka1 View Post
Uh, they are free agents, of course they will be older. Most of those players were lost just prior to Holmgren getting hired, which saw a huge makeover of the club (a number of free agents leaving, not unlike what Gauthier received as a team).



Zhamnov is nearly a PPG player in the NHL...He had a great career in Chicago.

Define what you mean by 'notable'? Which team loses multiple superstars? Most of those players were pretty good players.
Zhamnov spent 20 games with Philly and was a rental. He was not a notable player when he left. He went on to do nothing afterwards.

Philly does not lose KEY pieces for nothing with no backup plan. There may be the odd player but it's not an epidemic like it is in Montreal who discards players like a used kleenex.

hockeyfan2k11 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 08:42 PM
  #148
habitue*
 
habitue*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,580
vCash: 500
The Philadelphia and Pittsburg models...

Giroux
Brière
Talbot
Couturier
Vorachek
Bourdon
Fleury
Crosby
Letang
Dupuis


What do they have in common ?

All Q graduates


maybe the habs should work harder scouting and drafting kids from the Q ????

habitue* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 08:55 PM
  #149
Mrb1p
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Citizen of the world
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,049
vCash: 450
Quote:
Originally Posted by habitue View Post
The Philadelphia and Pittsburg models...

Giroux
Brière
Talbot
Couturier
Vorachek
Bourdon
Fleury
Crosby
Letang
Dupuis


What do they have in common ?

All Q graduates


maybe the habs should work harder scouting and drafting kids from the Q ????

Y U DOUBLE POST HABITUE??!!

Lol

Mrb1p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 09:47 PM
  #150
Habs 4 Life
No Excuses
 
Habs 4 Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Montreal
Country: Italy
Posts: 30,089
vCash: 722
Quote:
Originally Posted by habitue View Post
The Philadelphia and Pittsburg models...

Giroux
Brière
Talbot
Couturier
Vorachek
Bourdon
Fleury
Crosby
Letang
Dupuis


What do they have in common ?

All Q graduates


maybe the habs should work harder scouting and drafting kids from the Q ????
What about Boston

Bergeron
Marchand
Krejci

Also I get your point but the draft is all about luck, you think teams wouldn't love some of the players we have drafted later on? You want the Habs to simply draft 7 Q players every year?

Habs BTW had no shot at drafting, Crosby, Fleury, Voracek and Couturier

Habs 4 Life is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:57 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.