HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Northeast Division > Toronto Maple Leafs
Notices

Someone fill me in on Colborne

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
04-14-2012, 10:53 AM
  #426
New Liskeard
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,660
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyfanz View Post
Easy. Nothing.
If you really believe that, then you honestly don't watch or understand hockey. Explains alot though.

New Liskeard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 11:24 AM
  #427
hockeyfanz
Registered User
 
hockeyfanz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,998
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by New Liskeard View Post
If you really believe that, then you honestly don't watch or understand hockey. Explains alot though.
Funny...I thought the same thing about you. Laughable that folks like yourself think that David Steckel is so superior to someone like Mike Zigomanis. They skate like each other. They both win faceoffs more than an average center and if anything Zigo has a more established NHL career than Steckel. Steckel is pretty un-noticeable on the ice because he doesn't do much. But its typical Leafs fan mentality to herald the accomplishments of a nobody. A replaceable 4th liner who really doesn't do much of anything other than win draws. What else does Steckel do? Don't recall him throwing his big body around much....chipping in with some timely offense...or being an effective penalty killer. Also funny how you guys do nothing but defend every last lousy Leaf, yet they stink. You defend the GM, yet his assembled players fail time and time again. What do you think? The Leafs should just keep the entire roster next year because they will prove us naysayers wrong? Highly doubt it. The roster needs some serious overhauling and you cant keep all these "great players" now can we.

hockeyfanz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 11:42 AM
  #428
thebluemachine*
go ahead, do it
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 11,193
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyfanz View Post
Funny...I thought the same thing about you. Laughable that folks like yourself think that David Steckel is so superior to someone like Mike Zigomanis. They skate like each other. They both win faceoffs more than an average center and if anything Zigo has a more established NHL career than Steckel. Steckel is pretty un-noticeable on the ice because he doesn't do much. But its typical Leafs fan mentality to herald the accomplishments of a nobody. A replaceable 4th liner who really doesn't do much of anything other than win draws. What else does Steckel do? Don't recall him throwing his big body around much....chipping in with some timely offense...or being an effective penalty killer. Also funny how you guys do nothing but defend every last lousy Leaf, yet they stink. You defend the GM, yet his assembled players fail time and time again. What do you think? The Leafs should just keep the entire roster next year because they will prove us naysayers wrong? Highly doubt it. The roster needs some serious overhauling and you cant keep all these "great players" now can we.
Steckel is superior to Zigomanis. One is a NHL'er, the other is an AHL'er.

thebluemachine* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 11:48 AM
  #429
New Liskeard
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 7,660
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyfanz View Post
Funny...I thought the same thing about you. Laughable that folks like yourself think that David Steckel is so superior to someone like Mike Zigomanis. They skate like each other. They both win faceoffs more than an average center and if anything Zigo has a more established NHL career than Steckel. Steckel is pretty un-noticeable on the ice because he doesn't do much. But its typical Leafs fan mentality to herald the accomplishments of a nobody. A replaceable 4th liner who really doesn't do much of anything other than win draws. What else does Steckel do? Don't recall him throwing his big body around much....chipping in with some timely offense...or being an effective penalty killer. Also funny how you guys do nothing but defend every last lousy Leaf, yet they stink. You defend the GM, yet his assembled players fail time and time again. What do you think? The Leafs should just keep the entire roster next year because they will prove us naysayers wrong? Highly doubt it. The roster needs some serious overhauling and you cant keep all these "great players" now can we.
Please dont put words in my mouth and lie, I never once said that and please show the quote where I did say that. If you watched the leafs, you would know that Steckel played on the pk, that is a fact. To suggest from you that all he does is take faceoffs proves that point as clear as day. Because you haven't watched the games, you would also have seen him use his body to position himself with the puck, and create room for other players. It was reported that new jersey was in the market for a pk center for the playoffs, strange that they traded one earlier in the season. Would actually be nice to have debates if posters would stop making things up, and putting their dislike aside and talk about the actual game. How classy is it when posters talk about engaging Burke in a fight, then justify it with said posters height and size. Pathetic and immature.

New Liskeard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 11:54 AM
  #430
hockeyfanz
Registered User
 
hockeyfanz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,998
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by New Liskeard View Post
Please dont put words in my mouth and lie, I never once said that and please show the quote where I did say that. If you watched the leafs, you would know that Steckel played on the pk, that is a fact. To suggest from you that all he does is take faceoffs proves that point as clear as day. Because you haven't watched the games, you would also have seen him use his body to position himself with the puck, and create room for other players. It was reported that new jersey was in the market for a pk center for the playoffs, strange that they traded one earlier in the season. Would actually be nice to have debates if posters would stop making things up, and putting their dislike aside and talk about the actual game. How classy is it when posters talk about engaging Burke in a fight, then justify it with said posters height and size. Pathetic and immature.
Hahaha...when I assume you are saying this about me? I would never ever engage anybody minding their own business in a fight. I'm not some meathead...In fact wasn't it your hero who is always picking fights...the guy who played his hockey career as an AHL goon? The same GM who challenged Kevin Lowe to a barn fight because of a contract dispute?

I don't condone violence but I would certainly stand up for myself if pushed....but my own personal mantra is to walk away from any violence. I don't even like enforcers in hockey. Read my history. Perhaps you are mixing me up with someone else? Or am I simply misunderstanding what you are implying?

I also did not say that Steckel doesn't do anything other than take faceoffs. I said that is all he does well. And I stand by that. He is a useless player when not winning draws.


Last edited by hockeyfanz: 04-14-2012 at 12:04 PM.
hockeyfanz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 12:16 PM
  #431
hockeyfanz
Registered User
 
hockeyfanz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,998
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebluemachine View Post
Steckel is superior to Zigomanis. One is a NHL'er, the other is an AHL'er.
Yeah their career numbers certainly prove it.

Zigo. (31)

NHL 197 21 19 40 -21

Steckel (30)

NHL 385 32 40 72 -14

Actually pretty similiar skill sets and pretty similiar numbers (PPG). Its pretty much a wash unless you think Steckel is a much better skater than Zigomanis. Which I'm not sure is true.

hockeyfanz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 02:18 PM
  #432
thebluemachine*
go ahead, do it
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 11,193
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyfanz View Post
Yeah their career numbers certainly prove it.

Zigo. (31)

NHL 197 21 19 40 -21

Steckel (30)

NHL 385 32 40 72 -14

Actually pretty similiar skill sets and pretty similiar numbers (PPG). Its pretty much a wash unless you think Steckel is a much better skater than Zigomanis. Which I'm not sure is true.
One player is currently a NHL'er in his 5th straight NHL season and the other player has failed to have more then 2 consecutive NHL seasons, he's also currently an AHL'er. That's quite a big difference, clearly there is a lot more to Steckel's skill set if he's been able to stay up with the big club (not just in Toronto mind you for the sake of being unbiased) rather than more down in the minors like Zigo has been doing his entire career.

Zigomanis - 459 AHL games played vs 197 NHL games played

Steckel - 208 AHL games played vs 385 NHL games played

thebluemachine* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 02:32 PM
  #433
8BostonRocker24
Registered User
 
8BostonRocker24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Los Gatos via Boston
Country: China
Posts: 8,934
vCash: 500
Bruins fan's take...

"Little Joe" has boom or bust potential. He still has 35-40-75 upside. He has all the tools to be a top-line, 1.5-way forward. He is okay in his own end but (IMO) has the potential to be very good in his own end if he works on it (The same way Joe Thornton is a very very good 2-way forward now).

The knock on Joe is the same today as it was when Boston traded him, which is the same as when he was drafted. Everyone questions his drive to be the best. Does he have the desire to be a 1st line forward. That is the only thing holding him back.

He has a deadly shot and he might be better suited as a wing down the road (he played wing a lot in college and Providence).

8BostonRocker24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 02:38 PM
  #434
Eb
TML
 
Eb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,166
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotpaws View Post
I'd really love to know what you think Steckel does outside of taking draws ?.
Shut down role. Crabb, Steckel, Connolly was one of our best lines for the latter part of the season.

And the intangibles of playing 5 years in the NHL.

Eb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 05:09 PM
  #435
questhockey
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 479
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gatorade View Post
Personal attacks not required.

You said he shows flashes of brilliance. I was curious to hear about that. From what I saw he is a bust for a 16th overall pick.
Not a knock against you, or what you say. I think he`s a bust in T.O unless they switch him to the wing.
What I dont like in Leafs nation is overhyping players all the time. To be honest lots of 1st rounders dont pan out to ever making the big club. Top 10 usually have great chance, but 11-30 it`s a crap shoot. Amazing how many great players are 2-7th round in comparision to 1st.
eg - Kessel is not someone to build team around...but he is a star...on any team.
eg - Gardiner is overhyped right now as savior of Leafs. After 1 yr?? What happens if he regresses for sophmore year..do we hang him like we are Colborne??

questhockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 06:23 PM
  #436
Stephen
Registered User
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 27,258
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by questhockey View Post
eg - Gardiner is overhyped right now as savior of Leafs. After 1 yr?? What happens if he regresses for sophmore year..do we hang him like we are Colborne??
You don't have to make a decision on anybody to do anything when a kid struggles, this is just a discussion talking about a player's development.

Furthermore, is it just me, or is it hilarious and pathetic how Leafs fans seem to think sophomore slumps are normal/acceptable occurrences in player development? It's like we've had so many garbage prospects that we wouldn't know what to do with linear progression if it happened before our very eyes...

Stephen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 06:42 PM
  #437
beauchamp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Laval, Qc
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,614
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebluemachine View Post
You're right, Steckel only cost us a 4th round pick and he's an effective bottom six NHL'er.


You are devious.

A great career awaits you as a spin doctor.

This whole thread within a thread started as a discussion of what constitutes a bust for a 1st round pick.

For Steckel, you answered that he has played 8 years in the NHL.

I then proclaimed that neither Daigle nor Stefan were busts, as they had played respectively 10 and 7 years in the NHL.

You then added that Steckel was very good at face-offs.

I retorted that players good at one thing, such as face-offs, probably could be found in the 7th round, or as undrafted free agents.

And this is your reply?

Are you trying to drown the fish (yes, I know that can be done, but that's not the point...)?

The barrel has no more bottom and you have reached the floor...

beauchamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 06:45 PM
  #438
beauchamp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Laval, Qc
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,614
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebluemachine View Post
Yeah overall the season sucked, well some of it. The first half was really good. I wouldn't place all the blame on one bottom sixer though or the GM cause there were lot's of injuries to key players (Reimer, etc) and unexpected slumps from players like Kulemin. You just never know, happens to the best of them.
And to the not-as-great as they think they are.

beauchamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 06:52 PM
  #439
beauchamp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Laval, Qc
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,614
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebluemachine View Post
Still haven't found a post where I actually said this?
He doesn't need to.

The number of times where you said should not pay attention to what he says is proof enough.

The list of words drafted by another poster (tonka?) contains more than a few that applies to your advice on him, including liar.

You're too devilishly smart to admit this.

beauchamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 06:55 PM
  #440
beauchamp
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Laval, Qc
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,614
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebluemachine View Post
Sounds like you already need a refresher.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gatorade View Post
You have been saying that Burke is a liar for weeks.
Replace saying by implying and he's 100% right.

beauchamp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 09:42 PM
  #441
Brewsky
King Of The Ice Mugs
 
Brewsky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: King County
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,272
vCash: 653
Send a message via ICQ to Brewsky Send a message via AIM to Brewsky Send a message via MSN to Brewsky Send a message via Yahoo to Brewsky Send a message via Skype™ to Brewsky
He's 6'5" and 200+ pounds.

But he plays like he's 5'9" 165 pounds.

That's what pisses me off. Use your most distinct physical characteristics! How do you now use them!

Brewsky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 09:54 PM
  #442
PresidentCamacho*
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Burlington, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,170
vCash: 500
I've seen him play a bunch of times against the Bulldogs and on TV and I think he makes good passes, cycles and keeps his head up which is good but I don't know if that is going to be good enough for a 2nd line position. His skating needs to improve and his body-checking which is pretty hard to do in the latter stages of player and personal development. I don't think he's a great prospect for the Leafs. I think there is a lot of better ones but they are much further away from reaching the NHL.

PresidentCamacho* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-14-2012, 11:44 PM
  #443
thebluemachine*
go ahead, do it
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 11,193
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by beauchamp View Post


You are devious.

A great career awaits you as a spin doctor.

This whole thread within a thread started as a discussion of what constitutes a bust for a 1st round pick.

For Steckel, you answered that he has played 8 years in the NHL.

I then proclaimed that neither Daigle nor Stefan were busts, as they had played respectively 10 and 7 years in the NHL.

You then added that Steckel was very good at face-offs.

I retorted that players good at one thing, such as face-offs, probably could be found in the 7th round, or as undrafted free agents.

And this is your reply?

Are you trying to drown the fish (yes, I know that can be done, but that's not the point...)?

The barrel has no more bottom and you have reached the floor...
A bust isn't someone who is a NHL'er. There's your lesson for the day.

thebluemachine* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-15-2012, 12:13 AM
  #444
thebluemachine*
go ahead, do it
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 11,193
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by beauchamp View Post
Replace saying by implying and he's 100% right.
No that's not even close beauchamp, replacing other people's words as you just implied would be putting words in my mouth and spinning the truth. Unfortunately for you and Gatorade I did'nt say this. It must suck when you have nothing to back up your claims and if you're going to get so worked up about it you should attempt these silly things on someone who isn't aware of what's really going on in the future.

thebluemachine* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-15-2012, 12:23 AM
  #445
PresidentCamacho*
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Burlington, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,170
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebluemachine View Post
A bust isn't someone who is a NHL'er. There's your lesson for the day.
I'm not sure I agree with that. That might be your definition but other people have different expectations, I'd say. I think he made a pretty fair point in saying that Patrick Stefan was a bust even though he played in the NHL. I guess it comes down to expectations and let's be honest, Joe Colborne was being talked about as a #2 centreman on this team. From that particular reference point maybe he'd might just be a bust, but that isn't to say he won't make the NHL.

I think Joe can be an NHL player, he's just got to put in the effort..

PresidentCamacho* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-15-2012, 12:29 AM
  #446
Stephen
Registered User
 
Stephen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 27,258
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebluemachine View Post
A bust isn't someone who is a NHL'er. There's your lesson for the day.
Bust

noun
8.
a failure.

n.
a failure. : The whole project was a bust from the beginning.
tv.
to reduce someone's rank. (Originally military, now also in

A bust is simply a failure.

Stephen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-15-2012, 09:16 AM
  #447
questhockey
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 479
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen View Post
Furthermore, is it just me, or is it hilarious and pathetic how Leafs fans seem to think sophomore slumps are normal/acceptable occurrences in player development? It's like we've had so many garbage prospects that we wouldn't know what to do with linear progression if it happened before our very eyes...
What you say is kinda the point I'm making on overhyping players.
It IS wrong they slump in T.O sophmore years. I agree. i'm actually a NJ fan, but live in Ont., and support the Leafs as they are very close, and I hardley ever get to see my team play.
So why do Sophmore Leafs struggle often?
1) Is it the media drives them to the brink after a great rookie campaign?
2) Is it coaches pushing them to more ice time/top lines due to hype/overblown expectations?
3) Is it the relentless fans saying "he's as good as (fill in any hall of famer name)"
These are just a few reasons I think it may cause it. IMO only...may not even be fact.
As for Colborne I think he's just mismanaged in T.O. should have never been sent up, then down, then changed to more defensive...and most of all I think he'd make a much better winger. That's all.

questhockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-15-2012, 09:19 AM
  #448
Soul Vibe Funk
Registered User
 
Soul Vibe Funk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 326
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brewsky View Post
He's 6'5" and 200+ pounds.

But he plays like he's 5'9" 165 pounds.

That's what pisses me off. Use your most distinct physical characteristics! How do you now use them!
im 5'9 and 175 and im much more of a savage beast than colborne.You either have that mentality or you dont

Soul Vibe Funk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-15-2012, 09:20 AM
  #449
hockeyfanz
Registered User
 
hockeyfanz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,998
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thebluemachine View Post
One player is currently a NHL'er in his 5th straight NHL season and the other player has failed to have more then 2 consecutive NHL seasons, he's also currently an AHL'er. That's quite a big difference, clearly there is a lot more to Steckel's skill set if he's been able to stay up with the big club (not just in Toronto mind you for the sake of being unbiased) rather than more down in the minors like Zigo has been doing his entire career.

Zigomanis - 459 AHL games played vs 197 NHL games played

Steckel - 208 AHL games played vs 385 NHL games played
Yeah...imagine where the Leafs would have ended up in the standing had they kept the 4th rounder and went with farmhand Zigomanis as their PK/Faceoff specialist. Oh boy...they would have plummetted down the standings. Joke.

hockeyfanz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-15-2012, 09:39 AM
  #450
I am Canadian
Registered User
 
I am Canadian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,093
vCash: 500
I really don't think he will amount to anything.

I am Canadian is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:00 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.