HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > National Hockey League Talk > Polls - (hockey-related only)

RNH vs Gabriel Landeskog

View Poll Results: RNH or GL
RNH now and future 86 48.86%
Lando now and future 51 28.98%
Oilers fan choosing RNH 26 14.77%
Avs fan choosing Lando 13 7.39%
Voters: 176. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
04-15-2012, 01:50 AM
  #76
BattleGuy
HFBoards Sponsor
 
BattleGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: In your bushes
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,569
vCash: 61
Hopkins now and in the future.

BattleGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-15-2012, 08:03 AM
  #77
tony d
The man
 
tony d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Behind A Tree
Country: Canada
Posts: 32,353
vCash: 500
RNH now and in the future.

__________________
People got to learn how to use punctuation. On our radio ads the other day a black man's wallet was reported as missing. Instead of a man's wallet black in colour missing a black man's wallet is missing.
tony d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-15-2012, 08:25 AM
  #78
wedge
Registered User
 
wedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: victoriaville
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,226
vCash: 500
I'll take RNH. The kid is too talented to ignore.

wedge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-15-2012, 01:18 PM
  #79
cgf
Registered User
 
cgf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 9,301
vCash: 500
Both are going to be great players IMO but RNH is the center and will put up more points. I think Landeskog actually scores more goals in their primes but it won't be by enough to offset how many more assist RNH will get. On top of that Landeskog could become a Selke caliber defender to go with the more physical game he brings to the table. RNH is a good defender for his age and should improve himself but I don't see great defense form him the way I see it in Skog.

TLR RNH in the future, but it's close.


Last edited by cgf: 04-15-2012 at 01:55 PM.
cgf is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-15-2012, 01:56 PM
  #80
dookers9
Registered User
 
dookers9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Hockeyville, Canada
Posts: 1,655
vCash: 500
I love Landeskog's complete game. But If I'm in need of a clear #1 C and I see RNH's vision and amazing passing skills when I can puthim between Eberle and Hall (Yakupov?), I take RNH with all respect to the other.

dookers9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-15-2012, 02:19 PM
  #81
The Big Unit
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,142
vCash: 500
I totally believe in choosing by BPA in the draft. In this case the Oilers had the choice to pick either guy and went with RNH and there aren't many that will disagree with the pick. Yes Lando's game is insane and he's a huge asset but RNH IS the Oilers pp and his position as a #1 C is something the Oilers have lacked since Doug Weight. Not only is RNH better but he fill a massive need on this team. RNH everyday of the week.

From the Avs perspective, they have awesome Centres already so getting Landeskog fills a need there too. Essentially draft order has worked out best for both teams, but consider the Avs had 1st overall would they have chosen Lando? IMO they pick RNH and trade assets to fill needs. This is the same problem we have here in Edmonton with the 2012 1st overall.

The Big Unit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-15-2012, 02:35 PM
  #82
Rhino Rilley
Registered User
 
Rhino Rilley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 168
vCash: 500
avs fan that thinks rnh will be the better player in the future while playing the more important position too, he just needs to add some weight to better handle faceoffs and become a good defensive player, i know oilers fans say that rnh is above average defensively but i disagree, what he is good at is sneaky takeaways in the neutral zone but his defensive positioning in the d zone is not above average and he isnt physical enough when behind the net or on the half boards

its odd that landeskog now rnh future isnt an option because that would be winning this poll

Rhino Rilley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-15-2012, 03:05 PM
  #83
cgf
Registered User
 
cgf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 9,301
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Big Unit View Post
I totally believe in choosing by BPA in the draft. In this case the Oilers had the choice to pick either guy and went with RNH and there aren't many that will disagree with the pick. Yes Lando's game is insane and he's a huge asset but RNH IS the Oilers pp and his position as a #1 C is something the Oilers have lacked since Doug Weight. Not only is RNH better but he fill a massive need on this team. RNH everyday of the week.

From the Avs perspective, they have awesome Centres already so getting Landeskog fills a need there too. Essentially draft order has worked out best for both teams, but consider the Avs had 1st overall would they have chosen Lando? IMO they pick RNH and trade assets to fill needs. This is the same problem we have here in Edmonton with the 2012 1st overall.
TBH I would've wanted them to pick Landeskog, I know that there where avs fans that disagreed but I was in love with the kid all season and think he'll become an Iginla or Parise esque winger for us.

Putting that aside I also had reservations because RNH could be an upgrade over Duchene down the road, but I felt much better about going forward with Duchene and Landeskog than RNH and whoever we traded for. It's a little different with centers than wingers cause unless they can play on the wing you can't have as many centers and still make it work as you can wingers. You guys can actually move forward with Hall, Eberle and Yakubov on your team, adding RNH to the Avs would've meant that somebody had to change positions or get traded.

cgf is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:58 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.