The following thing popped into my mind after seeing Shane Doan's second goal in the LA - Phoenix game.
The goal was allowed after they reviewed the play. But they only reviewed it once play stopped.
What would have happened if either LA or Phoenix would have scored before play was stopped? Would both goals count? Or only the second? Or only the first?
Was only wondering... hope someone can help out
Last edited by slocal: 05-21-2012 at 10:56 AM.
Reason: added to title
The following thing popped into my mind after seeing Shane Doan's second goal in the LA - Phoenix game.
The goal was allowed after they reviewed the play. But they only reviewed it once play stopped.
What would have happened if either LA or Phoenix would have scored before play was stopped? Would both goals count? Or only the second? Or only the first?
Was only wondering... hope someone can help out
From the rulebook (78.5 Disallowed goals)
Quote:
(vii) When video review confirms the scoring of a goal at one end of the ice, any goal scored at the other end on the same play must be disallowed.
*EDIT -- it's one goal per stoppage of play, a bit further down in the rule book (78.6 p3)
Quote:
Only one goal can be awarded at any stoppage of play. If the apparent goal was scored by Team A, and is subsequently confirmed as a goal by the Video Goal Judge, any goal scored by Team B during the period of time between the apparent goal By Team A and the stoppage of play (Team B’s goal), the Team B goal would not be awarded. However, if the apparent goal by Team A is deemed to have entered the goal, albeit illegally (i.e. distinct kicking motion), the goal shall be disallowed by the Video Goal Judge and since the play should have stopped for this disallowed goal, no goal can be awarded to Team B on the same play. The clock (including penalty time clocks, if applicable) must be re-set to the time of the disallowed Team A goal and play resumed.
The second goal would only count if Phoenix's doesn't count. If Phoenix's goal counts, the clock goes back to the time of the Phoenix goal. The same thing would happen if Phoenix scores again.
__________________
"Trust me I'm an expert, I watched 13 rangers games on NHL center Ice this year through streaming." -Starburst
"I don't even understand what the point of all this arguing is. Are you guys hoping that the other side is going to have an epiphany and go 'Oh, OH! You're right, we ARE going to lose this series!'" -Crease
The following thing popped into my mind after seeing Shane Doan's second goal in the LA - Phoenix game.
The goal was allowed after they reviewed the play. But they only reviewed it once play stopped.
What would have happened if either LA or Phoenix would have scored before play was stopped? Would both goals count? Or only the second? Or only the first?
Was only wondering... hope someone can help out
Phoenix goal would count and the next goal would not. It would be a weird situation if this happened, but I do recall earlier in the season the Sabres scored and it was a full minute before the play stopped and they reviewed that we scored. They ended up having to reset the clock a full minute
Ah that makes sense, thanks a lot guys!
Quite surprised by the time rule though, that's pretty well thought out.
I would have never known myself to look there, but last night at about 2am I was really really bored and read the rule book...so it was fresh in the mind where to look.
I didn't even think about the time, I just assumed they continued playing after awarding the goal accordingly without turning back the clock.
But the continued play would have never happened if the referee would have instantly called it a goal. It would be unfair to let some plays continue and call others dead.
Last edited by Parker McDonald: 05-21-2012 at 11:13 AM.
I think only time this rule would get crazy, would be on a crazy situation such as;
5 minutes left in a game team a is up 2 - 1, team a scores a goal, that is not called on the ice with 4:45 to play.
Play does not stop till 5 seconds to go. Goal is reviewed and counts, and as per the rule, the time goes back to 4:45.
Team B then proceeds to score 2 goals within that 4:45 and wins in ot.
This situation is so far fetched I see the odds of it happening slim to none, but would be one crazy ending
Better yet, the final buzzer sounds (and it's the SCF) and they think they won the cup and start celebrating, then realize they have to continue playing
Is there any instances where a good goal has been waved off after an earlier questionable is made a good goal?
I'm racking my brain and I can't come up with anything.
If you search YouTube there is a clip of a game between SJ-LA where LA "scored" and then before the next whistle for them to review it SJ scored at the other end. The LA goal counted and needless to say HP Pavillion was not happy.
How about : they kick the puck in (barely only seen later on video)with 4:45 left, kill the final 4:45 and without possession in the final 30 seconds commit two penalties, only to realize they must replay the final 4:45 only up one Goal and start off killing a 5 on 3.
