HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Boston-Chicago

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-22-2012, 12:31 AM
  #1
jmoss45
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: EDM
Posts: 852
vCash: 500
Boston-Chicago

To BOS:
Pattty Kane
2nd round pick


To Chi:
David Kreiji
Tim Thomas
David Seidenberg

OR

To BOS:
Pattty Kane


To Chi:
David Kreiji
Tim Thomas



Thoughts?

jmoss45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 12:47 AM
  #2
Momesso
Registered User
 
Momesso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,585
vCash: 500
I think Seidenberg is being criminally underrated here

2nd deal sounds more fair.

Momesso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 12:51 AM
  #3
Bubba88
Toews = Savior
 
Bubba88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bavaria
Country: Germany
Posts: 23,923
vCash: 500
I like the 1st more than the 2nd...
I don't really like the 2nd.

Kane will stay as will Krejci. If you don't want him, Bowman gladly takes him off your hands, just not for Kane or Toews

Thomas to Chiacgo makes soooo much sense, this is the reason it won't happen.

Bubba88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 01:03 AM
  #4
stungun
Registered User
 
stungun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Portland, ME
Country: United States
Posts: 1,407
vCash: 500
bad bad deals, no way. krejci is a great center, look up his points the past few years, plus you want to add seidenberg, that is not happening, maybe something like krejci/mcquaid. still i love kane but dont see him as fitting the bruins mold as they are built right now. i am not that much of a fan of krejci but he does produce, and seids is the #2 defenseman behind chara. no way kane is worth that much. deals around thomas are another story, personally i think he stays, at least until the trade deadline.

stungun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 01:07 AM
  #5
Sarava
Moderator
 
Sarava's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Naperville, IL
Country: United States
Posts: 8,460
vCash: 500
The Hawks can't take on Thomas without Crawford going back. That's way too much combined salary.

Sarava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 01:14 AM
  #6
FakeKidPoker*
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,681
vCash: 500
No deal for Kane.

I'd much sooner do a deal of Toews+ for Stamkos than Trade Kane for Thomas.

FakeKidPoker* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 01:36 AM
  #7
longchange
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 365
vCash: 500
Ah David Seidenberg, good guy

I don't think the Bruins do these deals...agreed with Kane not really fitting in on the Bruins.

longchange is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 05:33 AM
  #8
Tuckerw68
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 416
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by FakeKidPoker View Post
No deal for Kane.

I'd much sooner do a deal of Toews+ for Stamkos than Trade Kane for Thomas.
Do you see that deal (Toews for stamkos) ever happening? Semis pretty damn unlikely from my vantage point. Neither team needs the other guy

Tuckerw68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 08:07 AM
  #9
nmbr_24
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,216
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by longchange View Post
Ah David Seidenberg, good guy

I don't think the Bruins do these deals...agreed with Kane not really fitting in on the Bruins.
I agree. There is no way the Bruins trade David Seidenberg.

nmbr_24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 08:24 AM
  #10
SupremefartMachine
Registered User
 
SupremefartMachine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Vermont
Country: United States
Posts: 2,616
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by nmbr_24 View Post
I agree. There is no way the Bruins trade David Seidenberg.
Also agree. David Seidenberg isn't going anywhere. I also doubt they trade Dennis Krejci as a package deal with Thomas for Kane.

SupremefartMachine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 08:34 AM
  #11
99 steps
to the top
 
99 steps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: RV, IL
Country: United States
Posts: 2,822
vCash: 500
we're not trading Kane.

99 steps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 08:56 AM
  #12
Oates2Neely
Registered User
 
Oates2Neely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: BeanTown
Country: Azores
Posts: 6,742
vCash: 500
In order to complete this deal, Chiarelli must first sign this undrafted free agent David Seidenberg you speak of (any relation to the B's Seidenberg?)

Those deals are laughable.

Boston would love Kane, just not the Chicago Kane,, the Kane Boston wants resides in Winnipeg.

Oates2Neely is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 10:22 AM
  #13
Tuckerw68
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 416
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oates2Neely View Post
In order to complete this deal, Chiarelli must first sign this undrafted free agent David Seidenberg you speak of (any relation to the B's Seidenberg?)

Those deals are laughable.

Boston would love Kane, just not the Chicago Kane,, the Kane Boston wants resides in Winnipeg.
I agree I think a krejci for evader Kane deal is more worth looking into

Tuckerw68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 10:39 AM
  #14
nmbr_24
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 9,216
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SupremefartMachine View Post
Also agree. David Seidenberg isn't going anywhere. I also doubt they trade Dennis Krejci as a package deal with Thomas for Kane.
I bet they don't trade David Kreiji either!

nmbr_24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 11:46 AM
  #15
Highbrow
Alfie, Alfie, Alfie!
 
Highbrow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Toronto, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,649
vCash: 500
The second deal seems pretty fair from a third-party perspective. I think it would improve both sides.

Highbrow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 11:58 AM
  #16
bigbadbruins1
Registered User
 
bigbadbruins1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,613
vCash: 500
The 2nd deal is the best to work from, adding a pick/ prospect (not hamilton) would even the trade out more I think.

All though if I'm Boston I'd be wearing of Kane...
marchand, seguin, and kane would tear the town apart. then again if anyone can get foxwoods out of debt they can

bigbadbruins1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 12:01 PM
  #17
MurrayBannerman
BBall ATD Champion
 
MurrayBannerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: 219
Country: United States
Posts: 20,875
vCash: 1625
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigbadbruins1 View Post
The 2nd deal is the best to work from, adding a pick/ prospect (not hamilton) would even the trade out more I think.

All though if I'm Boston I'd be wearing of Kane...
marchand, seguin, and kane would tear the town apart. then again if anyone can get foxwoods out of debt they can
I wouldn't trade Kane without getting either Hamilton or Seguin.

MurrayBannerman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 12:18 PM
  #18
Alicat
Charge!
 
Alicat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: BOSTON
Country: United States
Posts: 20,570
vCash: 500
No thanks

Alicat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 12:29 PM
  #19
JoeIsAStud
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,751
vCash: 500
The first deal I wouldn't touch, You are valuing Seidenberg as a 2nd round pick, and I don't believe Boston would trade him for your #1. He is Core piece in Boston

The second deal might be possible, but I think the difference between Krejci and Kane is not im THomas. We are talking about a person who was a #1 center, and top point scorer for a Cup champion.

Beyond the talent considerations. I am not sure Kane in Boston would be a good idea at all. Kane and MArchand as a duo could be a dangerous off ice combo

JoeIsAStud is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 01:45 PM
  #20
Oates2Neely
Registered User
 
Oates2Neely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: BeanTown
Country: Azores
Posts: 6,742
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MurrayBannerman View Post
I wouldn't trade Kane without getting either Hamilton or Seguin.
I wouldn't trade Hamilton or Seguin without getting Toews.

Oates2Neely is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 02:16 PM
  #21
Bubba88
Toews = Savior
 
Bubba88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bavaria
Country: Germany
Posts: 23,923
vCash: 500
just keep it simple... Thomas to Chicago for ??

Bubba88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 02:21 PM
  #22
Mainehockey33
27
 
Mainehockey33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Maine
Country: Scotland
Posts: 2,338
vCash: 500
Thomas and Caron for Patrick Sharp

Mainehockey33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 02:31 PM
  #23
Dellstrom
The new age
 
Dellstrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Boston
Country: United States
Posts: 17,279
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mainehockey33 View Post
Thomas and Caron for Patrick Sharp
As much as I'd love Sharp, (Great on the PP and 30 goal scorer every year,) we'd have to add most likely a 1st to that.

An aged goalie good for another 2/3 years and a proven prospect with 2nd line potential won't do much good. For a 30 year old 30 goal scorer.

Dellstrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 03:12 PM
  #24
PatriceBergeronFan
U.S. Army Hooah!
 
PatriceBergeronFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: USA
Country: United States
Posts: 7,741
vCash: 500
Hell no to the first, even if it is David Seids going the other way.

Maybe on the 2nd.

PatriceBergeronFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-22-2012, 03:28 PM
  #25
Blackhawkswincup
Global Moderator
 
Blackhawkswincup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Country: United States
Posts: 100,983
vCash: 340
1st deal = Not that great
2nd deal = Heavily favors the B's

Hawks wont be trading Kane but if they do they can get better then a #2 C and a 38 yr old G with 1 yr left on contract

Blackhawkswincup is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:18 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.