Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Central Division > Minnesota Wild
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2

HF Team Board Mock Draft - 7th Overall

View Poll Results: who do you want the Wild to draft 7th overall?
Jacob Trouba 35 36.46%
Morgan Rielly 36 37.50%
Teuvo Teräväinen 13 13.54%
Griffin Reinhart 6 6.25%
Radek Faksa 0 0%
Olli Määttä 5 5.21%
Cody Ceci 1 1.04%
Voters: 96. You may not vote on this poll

Thread Tools
05-21-2012, 08:18 PM
Hockey State Expat
llamapalooza's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: San Francisco
Country: United States
Posts: 7,927
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by squidz View Post
If the Wild view two players as roughly equivalent, and Carolina is worried we might pick "their guy" or worse, trade down to Winnipeg's spot, they would possibly be inclined to move up. Think about the Vikings at their draft. They could trade down because of the threat of someone else moving up.

I don't think it's really likely, but I wouldn't rule out a trade with Carolina.
Bingo. Based on my (limited) knowledge of WPG's organization, they're probably not looking for OFD either. Get WPG and CAR into a bidding war for the Wild's pick, since there's a very good chance they'll both be after Teravainen. Or alternatively, just lie and say that we're going to pick him unless CAR convinces us otherwise. It's not entirely implausible; he fits a mold.

llamapalooza is offline   Reply With Quote
05-21-2012, 08:20 PM
Global Moderator
L'Étoile du Nord
Minnesota's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Country: United States
Posts: 17,991
vCash: 1000
I think both Carolina and Winnipeg would be content picking either Teräväinen or Faksa.

Minnesota is offline   Reply With Quote
05-21-2012, 09:28 PM
30 goal grinder
Casper's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 1,527
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by squidz View Post
I understand what you're saying, but "skilled forwards [are] at a premium" doesn't make a compelling argument to me about drafting one. High-end goalies (in terms of draft position at least) are a rarity in this draft as well, but no one would argue for that to be reason to draft Subban. Our organization's defensive pool has Brodin, a giant empty space, then Seeler and Cuma. Even if there was only a single quality forward in the draft, we might still be better off picking a defenseman. We could pick defensemen with every one of our picks and I wouldn't necessarily say we picked enough of them this year.
Depends on the forward. we still have room in our pool to either get a dynamic scorer or a big, fluid skating center. If we have a chance to fill one of those holes in our pool it would be foolish to take a dman. LIke others have pointed out, we have a better chance of getting a stud dman in the second then a forward.

Now, i don't really see that happening so you'll probably get your wish. Given how close some of these dman are to each other i wouldn't mind trading down. (probably use the extra pick to trade back up in the second to the dismay of some posters here).

Casper is offline   Reply With Quote
05-22-2012, 12:52 AM
Registered User
youvegotit's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,121
vCash: 500
Chose Määttä but would be happy with Trouba

Eliteprospects on Määttä:
A defenceman with a good frame. Very good overall skills, though better defensively. A very patient player who positions himself well. Excellent hockey sense. Doesn't usually go for big hits, but likes to play the body enough to steal the puck. (Matias Strozyk)

Yet in the OHL playoffs Määttä finishes with a 19GP 6G 17A 23PTS stat line. If he keeps improving he should be a really good at both ends of the ice (much like Trouba is projected to be).

youvegotit is offline   Reply With Quote
05-26-2012, 10:03 PM
SauceHockey's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: p
Country: Tokelau
Posts: 4,005
vCash: 500
We do not need Teuvo!

SauceHockey is offline   Reply With Quote
05-26-2012, 11:55 PM
Victorious Secret
Eyebrows Defcon 1
Victorious Secret's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Arkansas
Country: Ireland
Posts: 12,467
vCash: 500
Originally Posted by asdwe1 View Post
We do not need Teuvo!

Victorious Secret is offline   Reply With Quote
05-27-2012, 03:53 AM
SphinX's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Stavanger, Norway
Country: Norway
Posts: 1,565
vCash: 500
It's offcourse most likely that we end up with a D, but what if we went with Gal and than picked D's in the rest of the draft?

Misa like that thought yes

SphinX is offline   Reply With Quote
05-27-2012, 04:35 AM
Global Moderator
Reliable NonSequitur
Avder's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Location: Location.
Country: United States
Posts: 36,800
vCash: 50
If Gal is somehow, by the stars aligning, by moon being in its proper orbit, still available when we pick, we need to grab him.

Avder is offline   Reply With Quote
05-27-2012, 05:05 AM
Par too easy
TZM's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Kerava
Country: Finland
Posts: 2,525
vCash: 500
Gal is the obvious one if he's available. I'm still high on Teuvo if a forward isn't out of the question after Gal is picked.

TZM is offline   Reply With Quote
05-27-2012, 09:49 PM
Registered User
Caior89's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2011
Country: Brazil
Posts: 1,462
vCash: 500
Definitely Trouba, complete package, but there is a high chance that TOR/NYI/ANA draft him.

Caior89 is offline   Reply With Quote

Forum Jump


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:36 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2015 All Rights Reserved.