HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Luongo XIII - UnoLussy (Mod Warning In OP)

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
06-22-2012, 01:22 PM
  #976
Boltsfan2029
Registered User
 
Boltsfan2029's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In deleted threads
Country: United States
Posts: 6,242
vCash: 2200
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanwest View Post
I can't speak for other Vancouver fans. I actually think that if you ignore the salary structure TB makes the most sense for Luongo. He makes you guys a contender immediately, IMO. The problem is that you can't really ignore the salary structure. I'm interested to see what Yzerman's plan is here. Lindback has some good long term promise but he needs to go out and get someone to play at least half the games.
He may make the most sense for Tampa to you, however, he makes no sense for Tampa given the plan the GM has in place, salary or not. He wants his #1 to be the same age range as Stamkos and Hedman, and he has flat out stated no long term contracts. The money wouldn't be a hindrance in and of itself, but, salary/contract combined doesn't work. We could have done it, it's just not in our best interest.

SY has said it's a Garon/Lindback tandem to start and that the goalie search is over for the summer. He's not trying to win the Cup this year (it would be some wonderful gravy, of course), his plan is, and always has been, the long term picture. He's told the fans this, we're prepared for it. And, frankly, no matter how bad Garon/Lindback could be, they can't possibly be worse than last year, when we still managed to get darn close to making the playoffs. SY is planning to upgrade the defense. If the goalies are even just a smidge better, the season should be much better as we will also be (hopefully) starting the season with players who are healthy (last year we had as many as 9-10 starters out injured at the same time).

Boltsfan2029 is offline  
Old
06-22-2012, 01:24 PM
  #977
CommonMeans*
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,087
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Intense Rage View Post
Speaking as a neutral observer...

Is there any point going into the playoffs without believing you have a legitimate shot at winning? I don't see the Leafs as contenders with Luongo ainec, is it actually productive to squeak into the playoffs and get ripped apart in 4-5 games? It seems to be the most likely scenario. It does not make sense to break what you are building for an early playoff exit.
How about the fact that ownership makes approx. 5 mil. in additional revenue per home playoff game.

Let us assume that the Leafs made the playoffs 5 out of the past 7 seasons. Let us also assume that they were swept in each of those years (if we use your no chance model). That equals 50 mil. in revenue to the ownership.

How bad does Luongo's contract look now?

CommonMeans* is offline  
Old
06-22-2012, 01:25 PM
  #978
PoundCake
Go Bolts!
 
PoundCake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Country: United States
Posts: 1,370
vCash: 500
I think we can all agree, even sneaking into the playoffs as the 8th seed is better than not making the playoffs at all.

PoundCake is offline  
Old
06-22-2012, 01:26 PM
  #979
crazycanuck
Registered User
 
crazycanuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,873
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Saurus View Post
$5.3m cap hit for a goaltender that will eventually be surpassed in quality of play by a younger, cheaper alternative is certainly not a pleasant situation. It also doesn't get any rosier once you factor in how that will impact on a teams ability to re-sign players or improve through free agent signings.

Roberto is 33 after all.
Luongo's play was not an issue this year, Schneider's play was just that much better.

Luongo has been very consistant statistically year to year. He’s done nothing that would suggest his play will take a dive. He's 33 ya but all you are doing is speculating with little to no concrete evidence on what his play will be like in 3-5 years.

crazycanuck is offline  
Old
06-22-2012, 01:26 PM
  #980
Kbs
Registered User
 
Kbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,644
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Provost View Post
I made this point fairly far back, so I will repeat it in this context.

At this point (the longest playoff drought in the league with no sign of improving)... it is likely VERY damaging for the Leafs to continue to miss the playoffs.

After losing for so long, you just get into a cycle where you keep losing your players to free agency as fast or faster than you can draft new players. I mean already... who is your longest serving Leaf? Kulemin?

The only way to stop the exodus is to overpay the players to stay (no one wants to lose forever)... that really removes ability to build a winner when every contract is a bad value under the cap.

This year's draft pick is likely going to be a couple of seasons away from being an NHL regular, and most likely a couple of years beyond that before being a significant contributor at the top of the roster (pretty safe that they aren't going to be a complete bust). That puts you 2-4 more years down the road and a lot more existing roster players gone.

Just look at next summer. You have it appears to be exactly 3 forwards signed for the 2013-2014 season.... 4 holes in the top 6 to fill. Add in a couple of RFAs who will likely re-sign and you have 5 forwards committed to your club and maybe a couple of young guys who may be ready to be promoted.

If you don't think that making the playoffs this year and showing some significant improvement and commitment to winning is important, I don't think you are considering A LOT of factors.
You bring up Kulemin being the Leafs longest serving Leaf. What does that have to do with anything? Name a couple big name players the Leafs have lost to free agency over the years.

What indication is there that the Leafs have to overpay to keep their players? Any re-signing that has been made by Burke has been right up there with market value as well as taking each individual player's potential into account.

So what if we have 3 forwards signed for the 2013-14 season? The only forward that is worth being re-signed is Lupul. Not to mention, there are MANY teams that have few forwards signed for the 2013-14 season. The Canucks have 6 forwards signed for the 2013-14 season.

It's pretty funny that Vancouver fans are trying to convince us Leafs fans that Burke needs to sell the farm for Luongo so the Leafs can squeak into the playoffs.

Kbs is offline  
Old
06-22-2012, 01:26 PM
  #981
MikeK
Registered User
 
MikeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,904
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by CommonMeans View Post
How about the fact that ownership makes approx. 5 mil. in additional revenue per home playoff game.

Let us assume that the Leafs made the playoffs 5 out of the past 7 seasons. Let us also assume that they were swept in each of those years (if we use your no chance model). That equals 50 mil. in revenue to the ownership.

How bad does Luongo's contract look now?
Very well said.

MikeK is offline  
Old
06-22-2012, 01:27 PM
  #982
ronnyweed
Registered User
 
ronnyweed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,178
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by rune74 View Post
This is so true, you don't want to become known as the new version of the islanders.
Except nobody important left via free agency or demanded a trade. Burke purposely overhauled the entire roster to get younger. I thought this was common knowledge?

ronnyweed is offline  
Old
06-22-2012, 01:27 PM
  #983
Boltsfan2029
Registered User
 
Boltsfan2029's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In deleted threads
Country: United States
Posts: 6,242
vCash: 2200
Quote:
Originally Posted by CommonMeans View Post
How about the fact that ownership makes approx. 5 mil. in additional revenue per home playoff game.

Let us assume that the Leafs made the playoffs 5 out of the past 7 seasons. Let us also assume that they were swept in each of those years (if we use your no chance model). That equals 50 mil. in revenue to the ownership.

How bad does Luongo's contract look now?
Are you sure about the $5M? I heard it was $1M per game.

Boltsfan2029 is offline  
Old
06-22-2012, 01:27 PM
  #984
mooseOAK*
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 42,437
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by jimmythescot View Post
Luongo and Schneider as about as professional as they come. They've both had numerous chances to screw the team over with no repercussions, but they've never taken it. They're both very popular in the room, and the speculation about Vancouver goalies isn't anything new for either of them.
That was the situation when roles were clearly defined, Luongo as starter and Schneider as backup but that changed in the playoffs.

Here's a parody of Luongo and his backup. In fun but as with all parodies is based on truth:


mooseOAK* is offline  
Old
06-22-2012, 01:28 PM
  #985
ColePens
Global Moderator
save.us.07
 
ColePens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Country: United States
Posts: 24,990
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to ColePens
Quote:
Originally Posted by PoundCake View Post
I think we can all agree, even sneaking into the playoffs as the 8th seed is better than not making the playoffs at all.
As we saw this year.. all you need is a chance. I can tell you the Kings were pretty bad in the last part of the year. They couldn't score goals if their life depended on it. Lethargic looking hockey. Then it started to click and look what happened. A unreal force was born.

So - same goes for Luongo. If he can catch his stride this year and get the demons out of his head, the Nucks could be back in the Finals.

ColePens is offline  
Old
06-22-2012, 01:28 PM
  #986
mooseOAK*
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 42,437
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boltsfan2029 View Post
Are you sure about the $5M? I heard it was $1M per game.
It's been estimated at about $2 million.

mooseOAK* is offline  
Old
06-22-2012, 01:29 PM
  #987
ColePens
Global Moderator
save.us.07
 
ColePens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Country: United States
Posts: 24,990
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to ColePens
By the by, PC.... it's almost time for yet another thread.

ColePens is offline  
Old
06-22-2012, 01:30 PM
  #988
PoundCake
Go Bolts!
 
PoundCake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Country: United States
Posts: 1,370
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ColePens View Post
By the by, PC.... it's almost time for yet another thread.
yupyup

Got it all ready to go. will submit after post ~990

PoundCake is offline  
Old
06-22-2012, 01:30 PM
  #989
MikeK
Registered User
 
MikeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,904
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by mooseOAK View Post
It's been estimated at about $2 million.
Does this included increased fan interest and merchandise sales?

MikeK is offline  
Old
06-22-2012, 01:31 PM
  #990
racerjoe
Registered User
 
racerjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,118
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boltsfan2029 View Post
He may make the most sense for Tampa to you, however, he makes no sense for Tampa given the plan the GM has in place, salary or not. He wants his #1 to be the same age range as Stamkos and Hedman, and he has flat out stated no long term contracts. The money wouldn't be a hindrance in and of itself, but, salary/contract combined doesn't work. We could have done it, it's just not in our best interest.

SY has said it's a Garon/Lindback tandem to start and that the goalie search is over for the summer. He's not trying to win the Cup this year (it would be some wonderful gravy, of course), his plan is, and always has been, the long term picture. He's told the fans this, we're prepared for it. And, frankly, no matter how bad Garon/Lindback could be, they can't possibly be worse than last year, when we still managed to get darn close to making the playoffs. SY is planning to upgrade the defense. If the goalies are even just a smidge better, the season should be much better as we will also be (hopefully) starting the season with players who are healthy (last year we had as many as 9-10 starters out injured at the same time).
I have never been of the mind Lui should go to TBay, thought Shniedes was SY target though, having said that I am curious to know Salary Cap not being an issue (as I think a huge part of the deal was a non starter (Vinny was never waving his NMC)). If you guys were that close to making the playoffs, with from what we can agree was terrible goaltending, what makes you think with a good goalie top 10 in the NHL that you wouldn't have been contenders? Again don't think a trade was ever going to happen between us just curious.

racerjoe is offline  
Old
06-22-2012, 01:31 PM
  #991
NuxFan09
Registered User
 
NuxFan09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: White Rock
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,561
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Diamonddog01 View Post
Wrong on several counts. Florida has already stated Markstrom is returning to the AHL this season.

Columbus has no bearing on Luongo. They may have tried to get Schneider, but I'm sure the price was too steep for their liking.
Fair enough, didn't know what. However, it doesn't change anything. Florida isn't suddenly going to go hard after Luongo, signed for many more years, just because their young stud will be in the minors for another year.

If by the end of next season the Panthers determine that Markstrom isn't panning out, though, then their interest in Luongo would obviously increase tenfold. That still doesn't help the Canucks because for a variety of reasons they're hoping to unload the Luongo contract NOW.

NuxFan09 is offline  
Old
06-22-2012, 01:31 PM
  #992
Provost
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 276
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by rune74 View Post
This is so true, you don't want to become known as the new version of the islanders.
Yep... I am not saying it to be a jerk towards Toronto. Just that being in a swirling vortex of continual losing is not the same as rebuilding.

Edmonton=Rebuilding - lots of great buzz and star players
Islanders=Swirling Vortex of Losing - no noticeable improvement in talent pool or results

For having missed the playoffs for so long, the Leafs are way behind in the prospect department compared with where they should be... even worse than the Islanders who no one is considering an up and coming team.

Provost is offline  
Old
06-22-2012, 01:31 PM
  #993
mooseOAK*
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 42,437
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by racerjoe View Post
Just so people are aware, it is being reported that CBJ is still looking for another goalie. They are still in the luongo hunt... well as much as they were before.
Did they mention what Columbus is going to do with Mason and his $2.9 million?

mooseOAK* is offline  
Old
06-22-2012, 01:31 PM
  #994
Boltsfan2029
Registered User
 
Boltsfan2029's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: In deleted threads
Country: United States
Posts: 6,242
vCash: 2200
Quote:
Originally Posted by mooseOAK View Post
That was the situation when roles were clearly defined, Luongo as starter and Schneider as backup but that changed in the playoffs.

Here's a parody of Luongo and his backup. In fun but as with all parodies is based on truth:

Oh, jeez, I hadn't seen that in years. One of the best ever!

Boltsfan2029 is offline  
Old
06-22-2012, 01:31 PM
  #995
ColePens
Global Moderator
save.us.07
 
ColePens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Pittsburgh
Country: United States
Posts: 24,990
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to ColePens
PC is putting up the new thread, folks. Let's move on over.



ColePens is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:16 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.