HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Chicago-Colorado

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
06-23-2012, 11:04 PM
  #26
Trance Kuja
Global Moderator
2nd Coming.
 
Trance Kuja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Earth.
Country: United States
Posts: 46,075
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackhawkswincup View Post
Stastny's value takes a little bit of a hit given his cap hit and past 2 years being down years offensively
That's true, I thought it was a fair deal. But I would be willing to part with Hossa for a #2 center+. I'm in the minority, though.

Trance Kuja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-23-2012, 11:14 PM
  #27
Lonewolfe2015
Registered User
 
Lonewolfe2015's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 11,299
vCash: 239
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackhawkswincup View Post
Stastny's value takes a little bit of a hit given his cap hit and past 2 years being down years offensively
His value takes a hit only to those that haven't been watching him and are unaware of the circumstances of his past two seasons.

Lonewolfe2015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-23-2012, 11:35 PM
  #28
PeterTheGreat
Registered User
 
PeterTheGreat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 7,040
vCash: 500
How about Hjalmarsson for Wilson + Hishon/Sgarbossa ?

PeterTheGreat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-23-2012, 11:41 PM
  #29
CobraAcesS
Registered User
 
CobraAcesS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Seattle
Country: United States
Posts: 4,067
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterTheGreat View Post
How about Hjalmarsson for Wilson + Hishon/Sgarbossa ?
Uh no.. Have you compared Wilson & Hjalmarsson? Wilson brings the same all around game for what will be a cheaper cap hit.

No way as an Avs fan even if Wilson is in a bit of a log jam with us.

We don't "Need D" per say.. Unless it's a young guy with legit top pairing potential or a guy that is already there. Hjalmarsson is another 2nd/3rd pairing guy that we already have a log jam in.

CobraAcesS is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
06-24-2012, 04:31 AM
  #30
forsbergavs32
Registered User
 
forsbergavs32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Fresno,CA
Country: United States
Posts: 2,855
vCash: 425
I'd be willing to somewhat overpay to get Keith if we can't land Suter

Stastny + Barrie/Elliott + 2013 1st rounder for Keith


However, I don't think we will be trading Stastny for awhile considering Duchene and O'Reilly aren't quite there yet, McClement is gone, Sgarbossa isn't quite NHL ready and Hishon is a giant question mark.

forsbergavs32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-24-2012, 05:05 AM
  #31
H a w k s
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 383
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by forsbergavs32 View Post
I'd be willing to somewhat overpay to get Keith if we can't land Suter

Stastny + Barrie/Elliott + 2013 1st rounder for Keith


However, I don't think we will be trading Stastny for awhile considering Duchene and O'Reilly aren't quite there yet, McClement is gone, Sgarbossa isn't quite NHL ready and Hishon is a giant question mark.
Lulz. The hawks are not rebuilding why would they give up Duncan Keith?

H a w k s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-24-2012, 06:10 AM
  #32
JoemAvs
Registered User
 
JoemAvs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Country: Germany
Posts: 2,828
vCash: 250
Quote:
Originally Posted by H a w k s View Post
Lulz. The hawks are not rebuilding why would they give up Duncan Keith?
You kinda just summed up why Avs fans dont like the original proposal.

It might be close to fair value. But it just does nothing for the Avs.
We want the rebuild to be over not extend it.
If we trade away our greatest strength ( center depth), we dont want a rebuilding package back. We want to fill our holes.

Our holes are top pairing LD and Top Line sniper.
If we cant get that for Pauli, we better just keep him.

So if you want Stastny, it has to be for Keith, Hossa, Kane or even Sharp.

Does that make any sense for CHI? Hells to the No!

Does trading Stastny for decent prospects, depth and picks make sense for COL? Hells to the No!

JoemAvs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-24-2012, 06:35 AM
  #33
ndgt10
Registered User
 
ndgt10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Poland
Country: United States
Posts: 4,105
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoemAvs View Post
You kinda just summed up why Avs fans dont like the original proposal.

It might be close to fair value. But it just does nothing for the Avs.
We want the rebuild to be over not extend it.
If we trade away our greatest strength ( center depth), we dont want a rebuilding package back. We want to fill our holes.

Our holes are top pairing LD and Top Line sniper.
If we cant get that for Pauli, we better just keep him.

So if you want Stastny, it has to be for Keith, Hossa, Kane or even Sharp.

Does that make any sense for CHI? Hells to the No!

Does trading Stastny for decent prospects, depth and picks make sense for COL? Hells to the No!
I would include Sharp in a deal for Stastny. What would be your proposal?

ndgt10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-24-2012, 08:01 AM
  #34
Lonewolfe2015
Registered User
 
Lonewolfe2015's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 11,299
vCash: 239
Quote:
Originally Posted by ndgt10 View Post
I would include Sharp in a deal for Stastny. What would be your proposal?
Small problem.

We'd want Sharp to play with Staz. If we moved Staz, we'd have an abundance of top 6/9 wingers and not enough quality centers for them and be hoping McClem re-signs or one of our prospects is more ready for the NHL than they appear at the moment.

Lonewolfe2015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-24-2012, 08:11 AM
  #35
JoemAvs
Registered User
 
JoemAvs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Country: Germany
Posts: 2,828
vCash: 250
Quote:
Originally Posted by ndgt10 View Post
I would include Sharp in a deal for Stastny. What would be your proposal?
To be honest I didnt really know that Sharp turns 32 this year.
Thought he is 28 or something close to Stastny. Basically ruins the premise of a Stazz for him trade. Besides he would fit perfect next to Pauli. If you want to hold me responsible on my first post that I would consider trading Paul for Sharp, i would want something pretty serious added to make up the age gap. So basically Saad or Leddy + or basically a no go for the Hawks.

Sharp being 31 kinda shocks me. I am getting old

JoemAvs is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:11 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.