HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Buffalo-San Jose

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
06-28-2012, 01:40 PM
  #1
New Sabres Captain
ForFriendshipDikembe
 
New Sabres Captain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 40,090
vCash: 500
Buffalo-San Jose

To San Jose:
Vanek
Adam

To Buffalo:
Clowe
Pavelski

SJ gets a top line goal scoring winger which I've seen some posters saying is a need for the Sharks. Buffalo gets the physical presence they need and Pavelski as a versatile center/winger.

Buffalo adds about 500K in cap. Clowe is UFA next season, Vanek and Pavelski are UFA after 2 years.

The only thing I'm not sure is whether San Jose can afford to trade 2 forwards for 1 like this.

EDIT: per suggestion, adding Adam to the deal.


Last edited by New Sabres Captain: 06-28-2012 at 01:47 PM.
New Sabres Captain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2012, 01:40 PM
  #2
MillarWithASave
#CatsAreComing
 
MillarWithASave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Melbourne, FL
Country: United States
Posts: 4,921
vCash: 500
You're a Buffalo fan...... aren't you...

MillarWithASave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2012, 01:42 PM
  #3
static80
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,841
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrigsAndGirgs View Post
To San Jose:
Vanek

To Buffalo:
Clowe
Pavelski

SJ gets a top line goal scoring winger which I've seen some posters saying is a need for the Sharks. Buffalo gets the physical presence they need and Pavelski as a versatile center/winger.

Buffalo adds about 500K in cap. Clowe is UFA next season, Vanek and Pavelski are UFA after 2 years.

The only thing I'm not sure is whether San Jose can afford to trade 2 forwards for 1 like this.
Call the GM's, let's get this deal moving!!!

static80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2012, 01:44 PM
  #4
New Sabres Captain
ForFriendshipDikembe
 
New Sabres Captain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 40,090
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MillarWithASave View Post
You're a Buffalo fan...... aren't you...
Is it that obvious...

What would SJ need then to make it more workable?

New Sabres Captain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2012, 01:44 PM
  #5
ROBBMACBRUINS
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 67
vCash: 500
would Vanek and adam for clowe and pavelski work?

ROBBMACBRUINS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2012, 01:45 PM
  #6
New Sabres Captain
ForFriendshipDikembe
 
New Sabres Captain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 40,090
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ROBBMACBRUINS View Post
would Vanek and adam for clowe and pavelski work?
Done, I'd be absolutely willing to add Adam for this.

New Sabres Captain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2012, 01:46 PM
  #7
Rivet52
Sabres & Blackhawks
 
Rivet52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 5,832
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Rivet52
I'd do it with or without Adam. I'd miss Vanek but getting those two players is just too good to pass up.

Rivet52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2012, 01:50 PM
  #8
InfinityIggy
No Longer Flammable
 
InfinityIggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,269
vCash: 150
San Jose says no I am thinking...

InfinityIggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2012, 01:51 PM
  #9
MillarWithASave
#CatsAreComing
 
MillarWithASave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Melbourne, FL
Country: United States
Posts: 4,921
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrigsAndGirgs View Post
Is it that obvious...

What would SJ need then to make it more workable?
Stafford + Pick maybe? Possibly more.

MillarWithASave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2012, 01:53 PM
  #10
BigDmitriy
Registered User
 
BigDmitriy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Jose
Country: United States
Posts: 1,089
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to BigDmitriy Send a message via MSN to BigDmitriy Send a message via Yahoo to BigDmitriy
Eh...I probably wouldn't do it since Vanek's contract isn't the best, and Pavelski is really valuable

BigDmitriy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2012, 01:56 PM
  #11
OrrNumber4
Registered User
 
OrrNumber4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Country: Switzerland
Posts: 7,523
vCash: 500
Pavelski, despite a poor playoffs, is one of the best two-way players in the game. He's also one of the best value players in the game. I would not trade him straight up for Vanek.

OrrNumber4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2012, 01:58 PM
  #12
Gilligans Island
Registered User
 
Gilligans Island's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF/Bay Area
Posts: 8,391
vCash: 500
Not a fan of Vanek's contract at all. Pass.

Gilligans Island is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2012, 01:59 PM
  #13
ROBBMACBRUINS
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 67
vCash: 500
Would the sharks be interested in Nash? what would they have to add to clowe and pavelski to land him instead of going after vanek?

ROBBMACBRUINS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2012, 02:01 PM
  #14
Gilligans Island
Registered User
 
Gilligans Island's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF/Bay Area
Posts: 8,391
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ROBBMACBRUINS View Post
Would the sharks be interested in Nash? what would they have to add to clowe and pavelski to land him instead of going after vanek?
Wrong thread but I don't think they'd have to add anything to Clowe+Pavelski to get Nash. Even that is overpayment, IMO, given Nash's ugly cap hit

Gilligans Island is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2012, 02:01 PM
  #15
Arrch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: NorCal
Country: United States
Posts: 4,434
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ROBBMACBRUINS View Post
what would they have to add to clowe and pavelski to land him
Doug Wilson's pink slip.

Arrch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2012, 02:01 PM
  #16
La Cosa Nostra
Eichel welcome 2 BUF
 
La Cosa Nostra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,425
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ROBBMACBRUINS View Post
Would the sharks be interested in Nash? what would they have to add to clowe and pavelski to land him instead of going after vanek?
Vanek>Nash

And did someone say it'd have to be Vanek Stafford and a pick for Clowe and Pavelski?

La Cosa Nostra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2012, 02:03 PM
  #17
Arrch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: NorCal
Country: United States
Posts: 4,434
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by FreddieBisco View Post
And did someone say it'd have to be Vanek Stafford and a pick for Clowe and Pavelski?
To get us interested? Yup.

Arrch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2012, 02:49 PM
  #18
MayDayMayDay
Registered User
 
MayDayMayDay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Central Illinois
Country: United States
Posts: 757
vCash: 500
Clowe and Pavelski are both appealing names, but not interested in trading Vanek.

MayDayMayDay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2012, 02:50 PM
  #19
Hatrick Marleau
Nikolay GOALdobin
 
Hatrick Marleau's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: With JR
Posts: 4,353
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by GrigsAndGirgs View Post
To San Jose:
Vanek
Adam

To Buffalo:
Clowe
Pavelski

SJ gets a top line goal scoring winger which I've seen some posters saying is a need for the Sharks. Buffalo gets the physical presence they need and Pavelski as a versatile center/winger.

Buffalo adds about 500K in cap. Clowe is UFA next season, Vanek and Pavelski are UFA after 2 years.

The only thing I'm not sure is whether San Jose can afford to trade 2 forwards for 1 like this.

EDIT: per suggestion, adding Adam to the deal.
I rather keep Pavelski and Clowe, than getting those players back.

Hatrick Marleau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2012, 03:55 PM
  #20
Inub0i
For the Alliance!
 
Inub0i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: UC Irvine, Irvine
Country: United States
Posts: 8,672
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Inub0i Send a message via MSN to Inub0i Send a message via Skype™ to Inub0i
No thanks. Vanek's contract will be the no-no.

Inub0i is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2012, 04:02 PM
  #21
Perro
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Calgary, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,727
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gilligans Island View Post
Not a fan of Vanek's contract at all. Pass.
You can thank Edmonton for it haha

Perro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2012, 04:05 PM
  #22
McTank
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,844
vCash: 500
Vanek would probably get more than his contract as a ufa and I wouldnt trade vanek for nash

McTank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2012, 04:07 PM
  #23
start winnin
NO MORE TANK BOYS
 
start winnin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 9,066
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheyAreGoodScaryGood View Post
Vanek would probably get more than his contract as a ufa and I wouldnt trade vanek for nash


Forget Pavelski, what would SJ want for Clowe?

start winnin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2012, 04:12 PM
  #24
AJ SF4L
#GoSharks
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: San Jose
Country: United States
Posts: 202
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kishire View Post
Forget Pavelski, what would SJ want for Clowe?
I think the past consensus between San Jose fans and Buffalo fans was



Clowe
Murray



Stafford
Leopold

AJ SF4L is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
06-28-2012, 05:04 PM
  #25
thefifagod
I'm The Survivor
 
thefifagod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,132
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kishire View Post


Forget Pavelski, what would SJ want for Clowe?
It'd be pretty damn close to what he makes now. He certainly wouldn't be making under 6.

thefifagod is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:48 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.