HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Leafs/Blues

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
07-09-2012, 07:37 AM
  #101
Kadri43
Registered User
 
Kadri43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: noneofyourbusiness
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,735
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bleedblue1223 View Post
i love how people think elliott isn't for real, but they think he makes halak expendable.
this.

Kadri43 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2012, 07:37 AM
  #102
SteenMachine
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Fenton, MO
Country: United States
Posts: 4,146
vCash: 500
Sorry the Blues 2013 6th round pick is untouchable... you'll have to look elsewhere to fill your needs.

SteenMachine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2012, 07:48 AM
  #103
Man Bear Pig
Registered User
 
Man Bear Pig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 8,994
vCash: 500
The two teams aren't good trading partners period. The only realistic player Burke would target is Stewart but we already have plenty of wing depth just like the Blues. Stewart for a dman but then again, can Toronto deal two starting dman in one off-season? that would seem pretty dumb and for a winger, lateral at best.

Man Bear Pig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2012, 08:31 AM
  #104
81Leafs50
Registered User
 
81Leafs50's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 918
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by fst6 View Post
Halak=Rynnas&2ndpick&4thpick
Stewart>>>Gunnarson
Ty Rattie?Kulemin (hard to say, =?)

Anyway trade is already favoring the leafs without the pick. The only think here useful is Gunnarson because hes a lefty but this trade is an absolute no-go
You have to be nuts if you think Rattie will ever score 30 goals in the NHL. Kulemin has.

Kulemin >>> Rattie

I personally do not like Stewart at all. I think Gunnarsson and Kulemin are too much for Stewart and an unproven prospect. Halak is ok.

81Leafs50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2012, 08:39 AM
  #105
ManyIdeas
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 2,025
vCash: 1152
Quote:
Originally Posted by 81Leafs50 View Post
You have to be nuts if you think Rattie will ever score 30 goals in the NHL. Kulemin has.

Kulemin >>> Rattie

I personally do not like Stewart at all. I think Gunnarsson and Kulemin are too much for Stewart and an unproven prospect. Halak is ok.
Sounds good.

ManyIdeas is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2012, 08:43 AM
  #106
Red08
Registered User
 
Red08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 703
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by 81Leafs50 View Post
You have to be nuts if you think Rattie will ever score 30 goals in the NHL. Kulemin has.

Kulemin >>> Rattie

I personally do not like Stewart at all. I think Gunnarsson and Kulemin are too much for Stewart and an unproven prospect. Halak is ok.
OK then. No trade. Glad we both agree.

Red08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2012, 09:58 AM
  #107
Vladys Gumption
Moderator
Trap City
 
Vladys Gumption's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: St. Louis, MO
Country: United States
Posts: 7,263
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by 81Leafs50 View Post
You have to be nuts if you think Rattie will ever score 30 goals in the NHL. Kulemin has.

Kulemin >>> Rattie

I personally do not like Stewart at all. I think Gunnarsson and Kulemin are too much for Stewart and an unproven prospect. Halak is ok.
And kulemin has "proven" he's also capable of putting up 7 goals. I don't think he's normally a 30 goal scorer. So his goal totals are going to fall somewhere in the middle. He's a good player to have. You can't have any clue whether rattie will score 30 in this league because he hasn't played a game yet. Let the kid have a chance to play before you trash him.Also, Rattie hasn't played a single NHL game. For all we know he could flame out, or he could score 50. The kid has some pretty serious skill and he's going to get the chance in 2013to prove it. Halak also happens to be out number one. He's not getting traded, except for ludicrous overpayment

Vladys Gumption is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2012, 10:00 AM
  #108
Oshie97
Registered User
 
Oshie97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,374
vCash: 500
Horrible value for the Blues and does not fill a need as Gunnarson is not the d-man we need to go with Petro.

Oshie97 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-09-2012, 12:42 PM
  #109
TimtheDJ84
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,425
vCash: 560
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarvinSigX View Post
Didn't go so well? He was fine against the Sharks. He had ONE poor outing against the Kings.
He didn't play above and beyond, which was needed. The team takes a lot of that blame, bit don't for one second think if Halak was available, that he wouldn't have been in.

TimtheDJ84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:17 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.