HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

buf-cgy

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
07-12-2012, 04:29 PM
  #26
DBU
All You Can Do
 
DBU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 17,003
vCash: 50
Jay Feaster is grounded from talking to Darcy Regier, so no.

DBU is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-12-2012, 04:30 PM
  #27
Zip15
Registered User
 
Zip15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 16,951
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by sem1 View Post
Ahhahahaha. Start with baertschi. That's funny.
Ahahahahaa. Yep. If you want Buffalo to even begin thinking about trading Tyler Ennis, anyways.

Zip15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-12-2012, 04:44 PM
  #28
tsujimoto74
Registered User
 
tsujimoto74's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Virginia
Country: United States
Posts: 8,591
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComradeChris View Post

Vanek
Sekera or Stafford
Cgy 3d


Iginla
Glencross
No thank you.

tsujimoto74 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-12-2012, 04:46 PM
  #29
tsujimoto74
Registered User
 
tsujimoto74's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Virginia
Country: United States
Posts: 8,591
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sem1 View Post
Ahhahahaha. Start with baertschi. That's funny.
For Tyler Ennis? Starting with anything less would be the joke.

tsujimoto74 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-12-2012, 04:52 PM
  #30
DBU
All You Can Do
 
DBU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 17,003
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by sem1 View Post
Ahhahahaha. Start with baertschi. That's funny.
Just because Sven is our best prospect doesn't make his comment laughable... Ennis has/is carving out a nice NHL career as a budding first line center. Sven has played all of 5 games.


The Flames won't be moving Sven in any deal any time soon, but if they want Ennis, then Buffalo has every right to ask for Sven.

DBU is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-12-2012, 06:31 PM
  #31
TheHudlinator
Registered User
 
TheHudlinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria,BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,823
vCash: 354
Pass I wouldn't trade Glencross unless we get a young top 6 center with potential to be a #1 he is so underrated. He is our best pker, he is physical and likes to block shots, he was on pace for 59 points and makes less than 3 million. It would take vast overpayment to trade him this is not it.

TheHudlinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-12-2012, 06:33 PM
  #32
TheHudlinator
Registered User
 
TheHudlinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria,BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,823
vCash: 354
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComradeChris View Post

Vanek
Sekera or Stafford
Cgy 3d


Iginla
Glencross
Change Vanek to Hodgson and add a 2nd.

TheHudlinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-12-2012, 08:24 PM
  #33
Girgenburger
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 882
vCash: 500
Original proposal is pretty lopsided I would say. Only piece that interests me as a Sabres fan is Glencross. Comeau and Stempniak are both washed-up underachievers, as Gerbe and Adam still have potential.

However, that being said, I would do Glencross for Stafford.

Girgenburger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-12-2012, 08:27 PM
  #34
tsujimoto74
Registered User
 
tsujimoto74's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Virginia
Country: United States
Posts: 8,591
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGleninator View Post
Change Vanek to Hodgson and add a 2nd.
The original deal is already lopsided in Calgary's favor. Aside from the fact that that trade makes less than zero sense for Buffalo, we all know Feaster doesn't win trades with Darcy Regier as his partner.

tsujimoto74 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-12-2012, 08:34 PM
  #35
TheHudlinator
Registered User
 
TheHudlinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria,BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,823
vCash: 354
Quote:
Originally Posted by tsujimoto74 View Post
The original deal is already lopsided in Calgary's favor. Aside from the fact that that trade makes less than zero sense for Buffalo, we all know Feaster doesn't win trades with Darcy Regier as his partner.
How? Iginla>Vanek, Glencross won't be moved for massive overpayment Stafford is not that.

TheHudlinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-12-2012, 09:35 PM
  #36
sem1
Registered User
 
sem1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 589
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duck Sauce View Post
Just because Sven is our best prospect doesn't make his comment laughable... Ennis has/is carving out a nice NHL career as a budding first line center. Sven has played all of 5 games.


The Flames won't be moving Sven in any deal any time soon, but if they want Ennis, then Buffalo has every right to ask for Sven.

Ya fair enough. I admit I was hasty in my post. Don't wanna be one of those people that act like Sven is the second coming of Gretzky. I do feel however if a trade was gonna be made involving those two the + on calgarys side wouldn't be a lot. I just jumped to conclusions at what he ment Sven + means. I do apologize.

sem1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-12-2012, 09:47 PM
  #37
thadd
Oil4Life
 
thadd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: China
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,849
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to thadd
I know how important GlenX is to Calgary, but Buffalo is losing a lot of skill in this deal.

If Calgary went into a rebuild this would be a pretty good move IMO.

thadd is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-12-2012, 10:42 PM
  #38
GerbeSonOfGloin
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 358
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheGleninator View Post
How? Iginla>Vanek, Glencross won't be moved for massive overpayment Stafford is not that.
Age. We are not contending next year, so there's no reason for us to do this. Find some other team to buy Iginla with younger players.

As for the OP, no thanks. I don't see a need to move most of our forward depth for a winger. If there were a player exactly like Glencross but playing center, it may be worth considering. Even then, we should subtract one player from each side and add a pick from Buffalo's end, because we're not unloading three roster (or near-roster) players for anything less than a 1st liner or 1st pairing guy.

GerbeSonOfGloin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-12-2012, 10:43 PM
  #39
TheHudlinator
Registered User
 
TheHudlinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria,BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,823
vCash: 354
Quote:
Originally Posted by GerbeSonOfGloin View Post
Age. We are not contending next year, so there's no reason for us to do this. Find some other team to buy Iginla with younger players.

As for the OP, no thanks. I don't see a need to move most of our forward depth for a winger. If there were a player exactly like Glencross but playing center, it may be worth considering. Even then, we should subtract one player from each side and add a pick from Buffalo's end, because we're not unloading three roster (or near-roster) players for anything less than a 1st liner or 1st pairing guy.
It may not make sense for Buffalo but in no way is it in Calgary's favor.

TheHudlinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-12-2012, 11:58 PM
  #40
number72
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 5,880
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ComradeChris View Post

Vanek
Sekera or Stafford
Cgy 3d


Iginla
Glencross
Feaster would do this and throw in a 2nd

number72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-13-2012, 01:48 AM
  #41
Johnny Hoxville
Moderator
Formerly MVW
 
Johnny Hoxville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,241
vCash: 50
What about Glencross and Backlund for Ennis and Stafford?

Johnny Hoxville is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-13-2012, 01:53 AM
  #42
tsujimoto74
Registered User
 
tsujimoto74's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Virginia
Country: United States
Posts: 8,591
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MVW View Post
What about Glencross and Backlund for Ennis and Stafford?
Ennis is not getting traded. The end.

tsujimoto74 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-13-2012, 07:46 AM
  #43
HiddenInLight
Registered User
 
HiddenInLight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,007
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruins71 View Post
Don't really see a reason why Calgary does this.

Glencross is a big part of the team and signed to a great deal.

Any trades Calgary makes will be to bring in a top 6 Center IMO.

At this point I'm pretty sure Feaster is on Buffalo's payroll, and nothing would surprise me.

HiddenInLight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-13-2012, 09:39 AM
  #44
Havok89
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,874
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MVW View Post
What about Glencross and Backlund for Ennis and Stafford?
Buffalo isn't moving Tyler Ennis.

Havok89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-13-2012, 10:18 AM
  #45
Johnny Hoxville
Moderator
Formerly MVW
 
Johnny Hoxville's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,241
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Havok89 View Post
Buffalo isn't moving Tyler Ennis.
Come on, you know deep down it would feel good because you guys owe us one.

The Regehr deal was pretty awful.

Johnny Hoxville is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-13-2012, 11:05 AM
  #46
madmike77
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,459
vCash: 500
As others have said it looks ok on paper - until you factor in Glencross' amazing contract. It would really be hard for the Flames to part with that.

madmike77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-13-2012, 03:03 PM
  #47
DropIt
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
Posts: 1,555
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MVW View Post
Come on, you know deep down it would feel good because you guys owe us one.

The Regehr deal was pretty awful.
No it wasnt, I would make that deal again from a Calgary perspective

DropIt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-13-2012, 03:31 PM
  #48
InfinityIggy
Inflammatory Poster
 
InfinityIggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,916
vCash: 133
Quote:
Originally Posted by DropIt View Post
No it wasnt, I would make that deal again from a Calgary perspective
Really?

Byron is looking like a long shot.

Butler is ok but he is a #4 d-man, so we downgraded our d.

And, we gave up a 2nd to get rid of Kotalik...

Not a good trade at all.

InfinityIggy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-13-2012, 03:32 PM
  #49
lakai17
Registered User
 
lakai17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,699
vCash: 50
adds more grit to the Sabres.

lakai17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-13-2012, 03:53 PM
  #50
blankall
Registered User
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,182
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by InfinityIggy View Post
Really?

Byron is looking like a long shot.

Butler is ok but he is a #4 d-man, so we downgraded our d.

And, we gave up a 2nd to get rid of Kotalik...

Not a good trade at all.
Wasn't a fantastic trade for either team really. Regehr ended up falling to 5th on their depth chart. The only reason it worked out better for Buffalo was that Kotalik bolted for Europe, and they weren't on the hook for his contract anymore.

Certainly wasn't a one-sided donkey ****** that some people are making it out to be.

blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:37 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.