HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Nick Leddy

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
07-13-2012, 08:22 PM
  #1
KovalSNIPE
Registered User
 
KovalSNIPE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 684
vCash: 500
Nick Leddy

Take for what it is because its Hockeybuzz, but its not Eklund. I doubt Leddy will be traded, but the article does kinda make sense: http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog/John-...w-Ye/128/45593

so whats his value?

KovalSNIPE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-13-2012, 08:25 PM
  #2
Blackhawkswincup
Global Moderator
 
Blackhawkswincup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Country: United States
Posts: 103,534
vCash: 340
Quote:
Originally Posted by KovalSNIPE View Post
Take for what it is because its Hockeybuzz, but its not Eklund. I doubt Leddy will be traded, but the article does kinda make sense: http://www.hockeybuzz.com/blog/John-...w-Ye/128/45593

so whats his value?
JJ is actually worse then Eklund

At this point to pry him from Chicago if they were to move him it would be to fill the #2C spot longterm (And no not guy like Gagner before it gets brought up)

Blackhawkswincup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-13-2012, 08:26 PM
  #3
deytookerjaabs
Registered Smut User
 
deytookerjaabs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,475
vCash: 500
Jaeckel, uhg, a thorn in our side. I honestly couldn't say what his value is. If we move him I sure hope we get a goalie or Dman back.

deytookerjaabs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-13-2012, 09:12 PM
  #4
H a w k s
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 383
vCash: 500
Since it's the hawks and we are on HFboards. Leddy is maybe worth a late 7th tops. If he were a oiler of leaf. You couldn't get Crosby, Malkin and Neal for him.

H a w k s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-13-2012, 09:46 PM
  #5
usernam*
#TeamSuccess
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Country: United States
Posts: 4,927
vCash: 500
I'd say if you added a player such as, say, Kim Johnsson, you could maybe get someone like uhh.. Cam Barker?

usernam* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-13-2012, 09:51 PM
  #6
rynryn
Progress to the Mean
 
rynryn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Minny
Country: United States
Posts: 21,424
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Burns4Norris View Post
I'd say if you added a player such as, say, Kim Johnsson, you could maybe get someone like uhh.. Cam Barker?
ooooooo ouch.


rynryn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-13-2012, 11:55 PM
  #7
Iridium128
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 246
vCash: 500
Leddy is too valuable to the Hawks for them to move him unless it helps our 2C problem or is an overpayment.

Iridium128 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-14-2012, 12:05 AM
  #8
Henrik To Daniel
Registered User
 
Henrik To Daniel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Burnaby
Posts: 1,942
vCash: 500
It still boggles my mind why Minny traded Leddy for Barker. I thought Minny was pretty high on Leddy seeing as how he is from the state and he was "Mr. Hockey"

Henrik To Daniel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-14-2012, 12:18 AM
  #9
AmericanDream
Puck You
 
AmericanDream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: I Return to Serenity
Country: United States
Posts: 9,570
vCash: 500
there is ZERO chance Leddy gets moved...ZERO.

Makes no sense, the kid put up almost 40 points as a barely 21 year old 180lb dman... this kid has such a bright future for the Hawks, he can move the puck and should start working more on the power play....

the Hawks absolutely robbed Minny in this deal, you dont trade a kid like Leddy away that you got for snot so damn soon...

AmericanDream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-14-2012, 12:44 AM
  #10
Generic User
Dynamic as they come
 
Generic User's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Twin Cities
Country: United States
Posts: 6,698
vCash: 500

Generic User is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-14-2012, 12:47 AM
  #11
Chris Hansen
VERSTEEG REDEMPTION
 
Chris Hansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 10,191
vCash: 500
Jaeckel is less reliable than the chicken defrosting in my fridge right now.

Chris Hansen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-14-2012, 01:27 AM
  #12
Leaf Rocket
Leaf Fan Till I Die
 
Leaf Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fredericton, NB
Country: India
Posts: 70,633
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackhawkswincup View Post
JJ is actually worse then Eklund

At this point to pry him from Chicago if they were to move him it would be to fill the #2C spot longterm (And no not guy like Gagner before it gets brought up)
As soon as I read this thread I was like I wonder if BWC is going to come over here. LOL!

GRABOVSKI

In all seriousness I can't see him moving either and I don't put much value in anything HockeyBuzz site, if any at all.

He's an excellent defensemen and for a guy so young, he has tons to still prove.

__________________
Leaf Rocket is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-14-2012, 01:42 AM
  #13
needle
Registered User
 
needle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 200
vCash: 500
Well he does mention Plekanec for Leddy (instead of Hammer). I'd pass, but obviously that would help our 2C situation.

As for Luongo, hell freaking no.

needle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-14-2012, 06:40 AM
  #14
Bubba88
Toews = Savior
 
Bubba88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bavaria
Country: Germany
Posts: 24,244
vCash: 500
Leddy is not available. Leddy won't go anywhere unless for big overpayment

Bubba88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-14-2012, 08:02 AM
  #15
rynryn
Progress to the Mean
 
rynryn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Minny
Country: United States
Posts: 21,424
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Henrik To Daniel View Post
It still boggles my mind why Minny traded Leddy for Barker. I thought Minny was pretty high on Leddy seeing as how he is from the state and he was "Mr. Hockey"
pressure by the owner to start winning games now. gambled that Barker could look like he deserved his draft ranking if he was in another system, while Leddy would have probably still been at the U last season if he'd stayed in-system. Chicago got Johnsson out of the deal, too, which i think was more important for them as they were going for a "win now". he got concussed and couldn't play, but chicago did add a $4m rental out of the deal. we lost the gamble, obviously. Then Edmonton picked him up for some reason. Oi.

I'm sure Leddy will be a regular for some time, but he still has issues (still young) to grow out of and was probably moved into the NHL earlier than ideal. I don't know of anyone who would give up a second line center for him at this point. maybe a young tweener who looks like he could hold on to a 2C job. Brodziak is our 3C and i wouldn't trade him for Leddy. All depends on how desperate the team is I guess.

rynryn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-14-2012, 08:15 AM
  #16
zytz
lumberjack
 
zytz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 6,798
vCash: 500
Leddy is very important to th team... highly doubt he leaves unless someone o repays by a lot.

zytz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-14-2012, 09:52 AM
  #17
HockeySensible
Smug Teuvo
 
HockeySensible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,841
vCash: 500
I don't mind Jaeckel's writing for the most part - but the minute he brings up his "sources" and "whispers" of rumors he hears, I just disregard it. The Hawks aren't moving Nick Leddy. Bowman obviously likes Clendening, but I bet he likes Leddy quite a bit more.


Last edited by HockeySensible: 07-14-2012 at 11:07 AM.
HockeySensible is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-14-2012, 11:00 AM
  #18
BoobaFett
Registered User
 
BoobaFett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Dorchester, Ma
Posts: 249
vCash: 500
Krejci for Leddy anyone?

BoobaFett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-14-2012, 11:05 AM
  #19
Sasso09
Registered User
 
Sasso09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 5,904
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by needle View Post
Well he does mention Plekanec for Leddy (instead of Hammer). I'd pass, but obviously that would help our 2C situation.

As for Luongo, hell freaking no.
While I love Leddy, he's at a sell high. There's no Guarantee he will improve much past 40 points. Plekanecis exactly what we need, I'd seriously consider a deal "centered" around that. It would be more ideal to target Schenn or Couturier from Philly but we'd likely have to add. They have an abundance of young center talent and need a player like Leddy.

Sasso09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-14-2012, 11:05 AM
  #20
Sasso09
Registered User
 
Sasso09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 5,904
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoobaFett View Post
Krejci for Leddy anyone?
I would do that trade..... Reluctantly because I love Leddy.

Sasso09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-14-2012, 11:06 AM
  #21
SIDGENO8771
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,275
vCash: 500
Grabovski + 2nd for Saad + Leddy

SIDGENO8771 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-14-2012, 11:09 AM
  #22
HockeySensible
Smug Teuvo
 
HockeySensible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,841
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SIDGENO8771 View Post
Grabovski + 2nd for Saad + Leddy
Trolling? I think so.

HockeySensible is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-14-2012, 11:11 AM
  #23
VanBrett
Registered User
 
VanBrett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Underwater.
Country: Canada
Posts: 512
vCash: 802
Quote:
Originally Posted by SIDGENO8771 View Post
Grabovski + 2nd for Saad + Leddy
Not a Chicago fan, but I wouldn't trade Saad for Grabo + 2nd yet alone add Leddy.

VanBrett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-14-2012, 11:13 AM
  #24
Sasso09
Registered User
 
Sasso09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Chicago
Country: United States
Posts: 5,904
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SIDGENO8771 View Post
Grabovski + 2nd for Saad + Leddy
No thanks. The value isnt there and I personally don't like Grabovski enough to move Leddy

Sasso09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-14-2012, 11:14 AM
  #25
xX Hot Fuss
Registered User
 
xX Hot Fuss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,656
vCash: 500
The Hawks don't have any reason to trade Leddy.

xX Hot Fuss is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:56 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.