HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Northwest Division > Edmonton Oilers
Notices

Has It Hit Anyone Yet?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
07-24-2012, 10:59 PM
  #101
nabob
#GETYOURBAGON
 
nabob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: HF boards
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,514
vCash: 1596
Quote:
Originally Posted by jbean View Post
One (glaring) problem with our top 6 is their ability to take faceoffs. Gagner and RNH is a pretty awful 1-2 punch at the dot.

Faceoffs and physicality are our weaknesses.
Which in turn forces Horcoff and Belanger to play far too many minutes in important situations.

nabob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-24-2012, 11:07 PM
  #102
SephF
Registered User
 
SephF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,497
vCash: 50
Gagner was near 50% last year, that's not too bad. Hopefully RNH improves as he gets older.

SephF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-24-2012, 11:54 PM
  #103
pocketful
"We'll see"
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 552
vCash: 500
In response to this thread, I would like to say that I am extremely excited. Seeing Justin Schultz linked with the Oilers still has me in wonder. Yakupov was a gift who we will absolutely adore. This summer has been great but I can't wait for hockey to begin again.

pocketful is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2012, 12:20 AM
  #104
StraightEdge
SmellsLikeTeenSpirit
 
StraightEdge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Edmonton AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,677
vCash: 119
Was Schultz signed to the same deal as Yakupov but for only two years instead of three?

StraightEdge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2012, 12:20 AM
  #105
Tarus
Fire Mact
 
Tarus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,895
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by nabob View Post
Which in turn forces Horcoff and Belanger to play far too many minutes in important situations.
Which would make the team worse.

Horcoff wasn't even 50% in faceoffs last year, and both players were timid and passive in puck battles and retrevial all year. The over-playing of poorly performing players in an effort to over-compensate for percieved faceoff weakness plagued this team all of last year, rather not see it repeated.

Tarus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2012, 12:25 AM
  #106
okgooil
Registered User
 
okgooil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 10,513
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by StraightEdge View Post
Was Schultz signed to the same deal as Yakupov but for only two years instead of three?
ya, given his age, you get two years of entry level out of him.

okgooil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2012, 01:34 AM
  #107
s7ark
Moderator
Yak Attack
 
s7ark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Country: Canada
Posts: 20,072
vCash: 500
I am happy with the offseason so far. I really thought we were going to screw up the Yakupov pick and miss out on Schultz. Instead we got 2 big pieces for the future. While they may not get us into the playoffs this year, they will be big parts of getting us there down the road.

Would I have liked another top 4 D? Sure, of course, who wouldn't? But if the asking price for those kind of guys included one of the big 4, I am glad we sat tight. If HF is in any way accurate(long shot, I know) and near any halfway decent D did require one of the big 4, and nothing less, then we're better off with passing. We have a number of promising kids coming up the D ranks, and there will always be more trade and FA opportunities in the future. No point in selling off valuable pieces now when we could trade lesser pieces down the road, who will look better later playing with our big 4. And as we improve more and more, UFAs will start to listen to our offers. Eventually someone will probably sign.

It would be good for us to remember that our team is led by kids, who will get better as they age. So for us, doing nothing but waiting can be an improvement. Just because we only added 2 rookies, doesn't mean we still can't jump up(points-wise) in the standings. We did this last season by "only" adding a skinny 18yo rookie and a handful of mostly negative pieces.

s7ark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2012, 02:42 AM
  #108
nexttothemoon
Top 30 for 7 years
 
nexttothemoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,744
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by s7ark View Post
I am happy with the offseason so far. I really thought we were going to screw up the Yakupov pick and miss out on Schultz. Instead we got 2 big pieces for the future. While they may not get us into the playoffs this year, they will be big parts of getting us there down the road.

Would I have liked another top 4 D? Sure, of course, who wouldn't? But if the asking price for those kind of guys included one of the big 4, I am glad we sat tight. If HF is in any way accurate(long shot, I know) and near any halfway decent D did require one of the big 4, and nothing less, then we're better off with passing. We have a number of promising kids coming up the D ranks, and there will always be more trade and FA opportunities in the future. No point in selling off valuable pieces now when we could trade lesser pieces down the road, who will look better later playing with our big 4. And as we improve more and more, UFAs will start to listen to our offers. Eventually someone will probably sign.

It would be good for us to remember that our team is led by kids, who will get better as they age. So for us, doing nothing but waiting can be an improvement. Just because we only added 2 rookies, doesn't mean we still can't jump up(points-wise) in the standings. We did this last season by "only" adding a skinny 18yo rookie and a handful of mostly negative pieces.
I agree with this. Slow but steady organic growth over the long term beats going out and making a splash ala the Flames to try and wedge the team into the playoffs.

This core group is going to feel a lot of accomplishment developing and improving together towards the goal of making the playoffs and becoming perennial contenders.

That doesn't mean solid a piece or two can't be added... but I agree... definitely do not trade any core pieces away just to speed up that organic process that's already underway.

Oddly enough Tambo's dithering, patience and over evaluating tendencies are an asset at this point of the rebuild.

nexttothemoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2012, 06:03 AM
  #109
Hoogaar23
Registered User
 
Hoogaar23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,410
vCash: 500
As for another Dman - why not someone like Pavel Kubina? Huge bruising guy that played some pretty tough competition last year. He just turned 35. 6'4", 258lbs, RH shot, some decent offense to his game. He's lost a step, but I think he would still be a decent option as a 3rd pairing guy, certainly would make the group a bit bigger and tougher.

Or Roszival? Not as big and certainly not as physical, but definitely a better all around dman. Good offense, can play the tough minutes, and is only 33 (going to be 34 in Sept). I'd be fine with a 2-3 year deal for him, though I'm guessing he's probably looking for a retirement deal at this point, and probably for a lot more than I'd be comfortable paying.

Hoogaar23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2012, 09:29 AM
  #110
Turrican
Not a homer
 
Turrican's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Stabmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,852
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoogaar23 View Post
As for another Dman - why not someone like Pavel Kubina? Huge bruising guy that played some pretty tough competition last year. He just turned 35. 6'4", 258lbs, RH shot, some decent offense to his game. He's lost a step, but I think he would still be a decent option as a 3rd pairing guy, certainly would make the group a bit bigger and tougher.

Or Roszival? Not as big and certainly not as physical, but definitely a better all around dman. Good offense, can play the tough minutes, and is only 33 (going to be 34 in Sept). I'd be fine with a 2-3 year deal for him, though I'm guessing he's probably looking for a retirement deal at this point, and probably for a lot more than I'd be comfortable paying.
We don't need Kubina if we already have Andy.

Turrican is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2012, 10:26 AM
  #111
Hoogaar23
Registered User
 
Hoogaar23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,410
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by skywalken View Post
We don't need Kubina if we already have Andy.
Sutton shoots left, Kubina shoots right. And Kubina > Sutton by pretty much by every metric out there except for maybe suspensions.

Hoogaar23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2012, 11:08 AM
  #112
dustrock
Registered User
 
dustrock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,995
vCash: 500
We're going to see some incredible goals this year and possibly the best PP of the last several seasons.

It will be exciting if nothing else.

dustrock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2012, 11:53 AM
  #113
Arpeggio
Registered User
 
Arpeggio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,502
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by dustrock View Post
We're going to see some incredible goals this year and possibly the best PP of the last several seasons.

It will be exciting if nothing else.
That's all I'm expecting as well. When this team is healthy, they should be the fastest, most exciting team to watch in the NHL, outside of the very top teams like Philly, Pittsburgh, Boston, maybe Vancouver.

Last year I thought we'd get periods of hockey where the Oilers would just come at the other team in waves. We didn't get that too often, hopefully this year we will.

Arpeggio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2012, 11:55 AM
  #114
oilphan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,401
vCash: 500
I guess this is the year that HOPE turns to HYPE.

oilphan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2012, 12:01 PM
  #115
Jepprey
Creeper
 
Jepprey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 3,534
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by dustrock View Post
We're going to see some incredible goals this year and possibly the best PP of the last several seasons.

It will be exciting if nothing else.
I think with all the firepower the Oilers have gathered, they could very well be hitting over 25% on the powerplay (70-80 goals). That's just it though, I don't know how the league will be when it comes to PP opportunities next season, but let's just hope that officiating we had last mid-season was just a test?

It's the even strength game we need to worry about to be honest. I think the special teams will be fine.

Jepprey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2012, 12:11 PM
  #116
undertow
Registered User
 
undertow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 586
vCash: 500
if there is another season long lockout, we will still be ranked at the bottom of league. good chance at another top 5 pick. but im stoked to see the talent gathered in last few years with this management group. night and day difference in the defencive prospects in the system.

undertow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2012, 12:13 PM
  #117
RustE
Registered User
 
RustE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,239
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by s7ark View Post
I am happy with the offseason so far. I really thought we were going to screw up the Yakupov pick and miss out on Schultz. Instead we got 2 big pieces for the future. While they may not get us into the playoffs this year, they will be big parts of getting us there down the road.

Would I have liked another top 4 D? Sure, of course, who wouldn't? But if the asking price for those kind of guys included one of the big 4, I am glad we sat tight. If HF is in any way accurate(long shot, I know) and near any halfway decent D did require one of the big 4, and nothing less, then we're better off with passing. We have a number of promising kids coming up the D ranks, and there will always be more trade and FA opportunities in the future. No point in selling off valuable pieces now when we could trade lesser pieces down the road, who will look better later playing with our big 4. And as we improve more and more, UFAs will start to listen to our offers. Eventually someone will probably sign.

It would be good for us to remember that our team is led by kids, who will get better as they age. So for us, doing nothing but waiting can be an improvement. Just because we only added 2 rookies, doesn't mean we still can't jump up(points-wise) in the standings. We did this last season by "only" adding a skinny 18yo rookie and a handful of mostly negative pieces.
Solid glass half full points. But that, imo, is no excuse for placing one's feet on their desk and feeling satisfied with one's self. As the competition have improved themselves, with the current lineup, another lottery pick is more likely then not.


Last edited by RustE: 07-25-2012 at 12:18 PM.
RustE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2012, 12:37 PM
  #118
s7ark
Moderator
Yak Attack
 
s7ark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Country: Canada
Posts: 20,072
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RustE View Post
Solid glass half full points. But that, imo, is no excuse for placing one's feet on their desk and feeling satisfied with one's self. As the competition have improved themselves, with the current lineup, another lottery pick is more likely then not.
No debate that Tambo should be working the phones and looking for another top 4 D(btw, I am still liking the Rozsival idea, if he'd sign here). All I am saying is that he shouldn't be too hasty with moving good pieces right now. Especially when it's likely that we have pieces that will increase their trade value during this coming season. What if Hemsky has a bounce back year feeding Yakupov, now that he's fully healed? Why move Eberle for a Yandle type now, when we might be able to get a similar level of D with Hemsky as the big piece closer to the deadline?

Our goal is the Cup. Not just the playoffs. I am sure Tambo could trade Eberle for a top pairing D right now, and we'd probably make the playoffs this season. But we wouldn't win the Cup, and we'd decrease our chances of winning it in the future by making such a move. The crappiest part of a scorched earth rebuild is the waiting for the kids to mature. Everyone wants us to make the playoffs asap, but it's smarter for us to be patient for right now, imo.

Although I don't think we're a lottery team this year without massive injuries; I think we'll be picking in the 8-12 range next draft. So perhaps I am just more optimistic than some.

s7ark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2012, 04:49 PM
  #119
pSlayer
Registered User
 
pSlayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Edmonton, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 212
vCash: 500
How does our top 6 look for next season? Would we get wrecked out there on a nightly basis?

Hemsky-RNH-Eberle
Hall-Gagner-Yakupov
Smyth-Horcoff-Jones
Eager-Belanger-Petrell
Hordichuk

Smid-Petry
Whitney-J.Shultz
N.Shultz-Sutton
Peckham

Dubnyk
Khabibulin

pSlayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2012, 05:06 PM
  #120
worraps
Registered User
 
worraps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,102
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by pSlayer View Post
How does our top 6 look for next season? Would we get wrecked out there on a nightly basis?

Hemsky-RNH-Eberle
Hall-Gagner-Yakupov
Smyth-Horcoff-Jones
Eager-Belanger-Petrell
Hordichuk

Smid-Petry
Whitney-J.Shultz
N.Shultz-Sutton
Peckham

Dubnyk
Khabibulin
The idea that elite skill gets "wrecked" by checking lines is a myth perpetuated by the jealous.

Our top 6 is young and will make mistakes under pressure but the only thing that is going to fix that is experience.


Last edited by worraps: 07-25-2012 at 06:29 PM.
worraps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2012, 06:00 PM
  #121
blackwater
Registered User
 
blackwater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 706
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by worraps View Post
The idea that elite skill gets "wrecked" by checking lines is a myth perpetuated by the jealous.

Our top 6 is young and will make mistakes under pressure but the only thing that is going to fix that is experience.
agreed. and like ken holland says: our powerplay is our enforcer. now hopefully the oilers can make teams scared to take liberties knowing that they're gonna get lit up by the oil on the powerplay.

that being said, every NHL teams need players with grit, but that grit doesn't necessarily have to be in the top 6 for a team to be successful.

i for one am pretty pleased with the offseason so far, i would rather this team grow through experience than bring in some mediocre players who may or may not gel with the core, just for the sake of making moves.

blackwater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2012, 06:56 PM
  #122
armandh01
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 362
vCash: 500
I think the best thing Tambologna has done his entire tenure has been staying mostly out of this free agent off season. Last thing i want him to do is sign some undeserving player to an absurd contract takes a spot away from a potentially great prospect like Klefbom.

I also estimate us to fight for a playoff spot.

armandh01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2012, 08:03 PM
  #123
phaedrusDH
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 789
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoogaar23 View Post
Sutton shoots left, Kubina shoots right. And Kubina > Sutton by pretty much by every metric out there except for maybe suspensions.
...and skillz.

phaedrusDH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2012, 08:18 PM
  #124
nexttothemoon
Top 30 for 7 years
 
nexttothemoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Northern Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,744
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hoogaar23 View Post
Sutton shoots left, Kubina shoots right. And Kubina > Sutton by pretty much by every metric out there except for maybe suspensions.
Are you an expert?

nexttothemoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-25-2012, 09:47 PM
  #125
Hoogaar23
Registered User
 
Hoogaar23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,410
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by nexttothemoon View Post
Are you an expert?
well done.

Hoogaar23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:06 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.