HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

van-dal, van-fla

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
08-12-2012, 09:06 PM
  #1
Red Haired Shanks
Registered User
 
Red Haired Shanks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 75
vCash: 500
van-dal, van-fla

with dallas's recent additions it looks like morrow is expendable and if van fails to land doan he can be the backup plan.

so to van: morrow, oleksiak

to dal: hansen, sweatt, tanev,2013 2nd

hansen,2013 2nd = morrow

sweatt, tanev = oleksiak

van gets morrow who is a great leader and powerforward. can make the canucks tougher to play against and meaner. oleksiak is a huge d prospect much like chara. van needs someone like that to make there back end more dangerous. though he is a project he can crack the roster in 2-3 years if his development goes well. he is a boom or bust risk but van needs a guy like that.

dallas gets hansen. great 2nd-3rd liner, can score, check and hit. he is young and can really help dallas bringing depth to the lineup. plus his cap hit is a lot less than morrow. he had a great year playing on the 3rd line with 39 pts and a plus 18. tanev is a NHL ready stay at home d-man. he can crack the roster now unlike oleksiak who needs to develop more. tanev can be a 5th-6th d-man now and a potential top 4 d-man in the future. sweatt can develop into a good 2nd liner or an above average 3rd liner. he is defensively responsible and very fast. from seeing this guy play myself i can tell he can be a shutdown forward, and very use full throughout the lineup.

then we gotta get rid of a goalie soo

to van: clemmensen, ellerby, shore, 2013 2nd, 2014 3rd
to fla: luongo, freisen

freisen is developing intoo a checking line center. luo is luo

ellerby needs a change, shore can develop into a 2nd liner, and we get a 2nd and a 3rd.
id say thats fair not ridiculousness and not a lowball .

roster
FORWARDS
Daniel Sedin ($6.100m) / Henrik Sedin ($6.100m) / Brenden Morrow ($4.100m)
David Booth ($4.250m) / Ryan Kesler ($5.000m) / Alexandre Burrows ($2.000m)
Mason Raymond ($2.275m) / Maxim Lapierre ($1.000m) / Chris Higgins ($1.900m)
Aaron Volpatti ($0.600m) / Manny Malhotra ($2.500m) / Zack Kassian ($0.870m)
Andrew Ebbett ($0.600m) / Dale Weise ($0.615m)
DEFENSEMEN
Kevin Bieksa ($4.600m) / Dan Hamhuis ($4.500m)
Jason Garrison ($4.600m) / Alexander Edler ($3.250m)
Keith Ballard ($4.200m) / Keaton Ellerby ($0.700m)
Derek Joslin ($0.700m) / Andrew Alberts ($1.225m)
GOALTENDERS
Cory Schneider ($4.000m)
Scott Clemmensen ($1.200m)
------
CAPGEEK.COM TOTALS (follow @capgeek on Twitter)
(these totals are compiled without the bonus cushion)
SALARY CAP: $70,200,000; CAP PAYROLL: $66,885,000; BONUSES: $0
CAP SPACE (24-man roster): $3,315,000

edit: fixed up some typos and missed people


Last edited by Red Haired Shanks: 08-13-2012 at 05:07 PM.
Red Haired Shanks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-12-2012, 09:11 PM
  #2
Shawnathon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 319
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Haired Shanks View Post
with dallas's recent additions it looks like morrow is expendable and if van fails to land doan he can be the backup plan.

so to van: morrow, oleksiak

to dal: hansen, rodin, tanev,2013 2nd

hansen,2013 2nd = morrow

sweatt, tanev = oleksiak

van gets morrow who is a great leader and powerforward. can make the canucks tougher to play against and meaner. oleksiak is a huge d prospect much like chara. van needs someone like that to make there back end more dangerous. though he is a project he can crack the roster in 2-3 years if his development goes well. he is a boom or bust risk but van needs a guy like that.

dallas gets hansen. great 2nd-3rd liner, can score, check and hit. he is young and can really help dallas bringing depth to the lineup. plus his cap hit is a lot less than morrow. he had a great year playing on the 3rd line with 39 pts and a plus 18. tanev is a NHL ready stay at home d-man. he can crack the roster now unlike oleksiak who needs to develop more. tanev can be a 5th-6th d-man now and a potential top 4 d-man in the future. sweatt can develop into a good 2nd liner or an above average 3rd liner. he is defensively responsible and very fast. from seeing this guy play myself i can tell he can be a shutdown forward, and very use full throughout the lineup.

then we gotta get rid of a goalie soo

to van: ellerby, shore, 2013 2nd, 2014 3rd
to fla: luongo, freisen

freisen is developing intoo a checking line center. luo is luo

ellerby needs a change, shore can develop into a 2nd liner, and we get a 2nd and a 3rd.
id say thats fair not ridiculousness and not a lowball .

roster
FORWARDS
Daniel Sedin ($6.100m) / Henrik Sedin ($6.100m) / Brenden Morrow ($4.100m)
David Booth ($4.250m) / Ryan Kesler ($5.000m) / Alexandre Burrows ($2.000m)
Mason Raymond ($2.275m) / Maxim Lapierre ($1.000m) / Chris Higgins ($1.900m)
Aaron Volpatti ($0.600m) / Manny Malhotra ($2.500m) / Zack Kassian ($0.870m)
Andrew Ebbett ($0.600m) / Dale Weise ($0.615m)
DEFENSEMEN
Kevin Bieksa ($4.600m) / Jason Garrison ($4.600m)
Dan Hamhuis ($4.500m) / Alexander Edler ($3.250m)
Keith Ballard ($4.200m) / Keaton Ellerby ($0.700m)
Derek Joslin ($0.700m) / Andrew Alberts ($1.225m)
GOALTENDERS
Cory Schneider ($4.000m)
Scott Clemmensen ($1.200m)
------
CAPGEEK.COM TOTALS (follow @capgeek on Twitter)
(these totals are compiled without the bonus cushion)
SALARY CAP: $70,200,000; CAP PAYROLL: $66,885,000; BONUSES: $0
CAP SPACE (24-man roster): $3,315,000
Nice attempt to disguise a Loungo trade proposal.

Shawnathon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-12-2012, 09:32 PM
  #3
sully1410
Registered User
 
sully1410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Turner Valley, Alta.
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,126
vCash: 50
I think I'd rather have Hansen and Tanev then Morrow

sully1410 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-12-2012, 09:43 PM
  #4
Primetimey
Registered User
 
Primetimey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,634
vCash: 83
Brendan Morrow first line RW?

Primetimey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-12-2012, 09:50 PM
  #5
Modo
Global Moderator
Mo'Benn
 
Modo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Etobicoke
Country: Canada
Posts: 40,395
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by sully1410 View Post
I think I'd rather have Hansen and Tanev then Morrow
And I'd rather have Oleksiak than any piece we're getting back from Vancouver.

__________________
If you're telekinetic and you know it, clap my hands!
Modo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-12-2012, 10:01 PM
  #6
Peter Griffin
Registered User
 
Peter Griffin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Country: Canada
Posts: 26,706
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sully1410 View Post
I think I'd rather have Hansen and Tanev then Morrow
I definitely would. Morrow is a shadow of his former self, wouldn't be surprised to see Hansen put up more points this upcoming season and Tanev could be this team's #4/5 defender as early as next year.

Peter Griffin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-12-2012, 10:10 PM
  #7
mstad101
Registered User
 
mstad101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 3,061
vCash: 500
Does Florida throw in Clemmenson without saying? Or did you fantasy draft him like in NHL 12?

Why Morrow? Hasn't the discussion been a lack of playmaker on the 2nd line?
I know nothing of the prospect, but dislike giving up so much depth in our weaker positions. Remember RW was our weakest position before the acquisition of Kassian and drafting of Jensen.
Also readin our only young and very unproven right side Dman seems a bit wrong when he's 1 of 2 we have ready for NHL time.

mstad101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-12-2012, 10:13 PM
  #8
Offdapost*
Tetrodotoxin!
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 7,812
vCash: 383
i swear to god i will vomit if i see another luongo to Florida trade, for the love of god people we have a log jam at goal tending

Offdapost* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-12-2012, 10:18 PM
  #9
Carlzner
Who's Zed?
 
Carlzner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Boulder, CO
Country: United States
Posts: 10,609
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sully1410 View Post
I think I'd rather have Hansen and Tanev then Morrow
Sure, just ignore getting back a top prospect along with Morrow.

Carlzner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-12-2012, 10:20 PM
  #10
Frozen Failure
Best Threadkiller
 
Frozen Failure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Richardson, TX
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,416
vCash: 2111
Send a message via AIM to Frozen Failure Send a message via Yahoo to Frozen Failure
Nope, as much as I'd like to move Morrow, this kind of stinks if we have to move Oleksiak.

Frozen Failure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-12-2012, 10:24 PM
  #11
Horvat2Virtanen
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Horvat2Virtanen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 33,866
vCash: 50
Take out Oleksiak and Tanev, replace Hansen for Raymond and I see both teams liking it more.

Horvat2Virtanen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-12-2012, 10:25 PM
  #12
Ched Brosky
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,872
vCash: 500
Canucks fan saying Dallas gets ripped off in the 1st deal. Oleksiak is worth a lot. 2nd deal is terrible for Vancouver. They get a back up not even a 1st round pick but a 2nd and 3rd and 2 B level prospects for Luongo and a C level prospect? pretty bad value Luke Schenn straight up would be better than that.

Ched Brosky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-12-2012, 10:29 PM
  #13
MetalGodAOD
Moderator
Star Rangers
 
MetalGodAOD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New York City
Country: United States
Posts: 11,757
vCash: 746
Were not trading Oleksiak for pieces.

MetalGodAOD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-12-2012, 10:41 PM
  #14
Horvat2Virtanen
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Horvat2Virtanen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 33,866
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by UnholyPrince View Post
Were not trading Oleksiak for pieces.
Good. Because we're not trading Tanev and Hansen either. Raymond+ for Morrow?

Horvat2Virtanen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-12-2012, 10:47 PM
  #15
Laus723
Future Now
 
Laus723's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Country: United States
Posts: 27,042
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Silverback91 View Post
Canucks fan saying Dallas gets ripped off in the 1st deal. Oleksiak is worth a lot. 2nd deal is terrible for Vancouver. They get a back up not even a 1st round pick but a 2nd and 3rd and 2 B level prospects for Luongo and a C level prospect? pretty bad value Luke Schenn straight up would be better than that.
Salary, and a goalie (Clem), needs to go back in a Luongo deal, so it's not gonna happen this way.

Maybe include Upshall, but I don't think he's going to send two picks.

__________________
So you're saying there's a chance!
Laus723 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-12-2012, 10:48 PM
  #16
MetalGodAOD
Moderator
Star Rangers
 
MetalGodAOD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New York City
Country: United States
Posts: 11,757
vCash: 746
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Canuck View Post
Good. Because we're not trading Tanev and Hansen either. Raymond+ for Morrow?
We don't want Raymond. We'll keep Morrow and hope he bounces back. Thanks.

MetalGodAOD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-12-2012, 11:09 PM
  #17
Ogi1Kenobi
Registered User
 
Ogi1Kenobi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,196
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by King Canuck View Post
Good. Because we're not trading Tanev and Hansen either. Raymond+ for Morrow?
Not a chance. Oleksiak stays in Dallas.

Morrow had a really bad year, but he's still more valuable than Raymond.

Ogi1Kenobi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-12-2012, 11:33 PM
  #18
Flair Hay
Registered User
 
Flair Hay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,088
vCash: 155
OP is at least in the ball park. Doubt GMJN let's Vancouver scheist a top prospect though. I think Hansen's a very good 3rd liner but at some point if Vancouver is going to actually win a Cup they need more overall grit in their game. Morrow isn't 2010 Olympics self anymore, but he is still a captain that would give a contending team all he's got when the going gets tough. He's exactly what the Canucks should be looking for.

Tanev has great potential as a shut down D but it's hard to see it happening in Vancouver where the too four is set in stone for several more years. He will be of greater use to someone other than Vancouver IMO.

I think from Vancouver's end, Raymond can replace a lot of what Hansen brings. Morrow brings qualities you just can't get out of young players.

Hansen and Tanev for Morrow and a B defense prospect or another bottom sizer?

Flair Hay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-12-2012, 11:51 PM
  #19
ProstheticConscience
Freeman?
 
ProstheticConscience's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canuck Nation
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,466
vCash: 883
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhay1987 View Post
OP is at least in the ball park. Doubt GMJN let's Vancouver scheist a top prospect though. I think Hansen's a very good 3rd liner but at some point if Vancouver is going to actually win a Cup they need more overall grit in their game. Morrow isn't 2010 Olympics self anymore, but he is still a captain that would give a contending team all he's got when the going gets tough. He's exactly what the Canucks should be looking for.

Tanev has great potential as a shut down D but it's hard to see it happening in Vancouver where the too four is set in stone for several more years. He will be of greater use to someone other than Vancouver IMO.

I think from Vancouver's end, Raymond can replace a lot of what Hansen brings. Morrow brings qualities you just can't get out of young players.

Hansen and Tanev for Morrow and a B defense prospect or another bottom sizer?
Uh...nah. I'd rather keep Hansen. Morrow's a nice piece and everything, but as has been said he is coming off a down year. Hansen's a guy we really need. Brings great bang for the buck in the bottom 6, and a cap team needs that.

We wish Raymond brought a lot of what Hansen brings. How Raymond bounces back after last season with a full summer to recuperate is the big question mark, of course. I'd personally rather give the guy a shot to regain 25 goal form than fire him out the door at this point.

ProstheticConscience is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-13-2012, 12:35 AM
  #20
Flair Hay
Registered User
 
Flair Hay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,088
vCash: 155
I'd rather have Raymond as well, but he isn't going to interest too many teams. Raymond has always done pretty well in a checking role. After his 25 goal year everyone seems to hate him for failing to duplicate it. But they are pretty similar players at this point. Hansen has the edge in work ethic for sure, but other than that..

IMO of course, but the Canucks aren't winning four rounds without adding some toughness. Hopefully they can nab Doan and keep both the speedsters.

Flair Hay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-13-2012, 02:20 AM
  #21
Scottrockztheworld*
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,301
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Offdapost View Post
i swear to god i will vomit if i see another luongo to Florida trade, for the love of god people we have a log jam at goal tending
Then don't go in them.....

Scottrockztheworld* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-13-2012, 02:27 AM
  #22
Mr Misty
The Irons Are Back!
 
Mr Misty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 3,241
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bhay1987 View Post
OP is at least in the ball park. Doubt GMJN let's Vancouver scheist a top prospect though. I think Hansen's a very good 3rd liner but at some point if Vancouver is going to actually win a Cup they need more overall grit in their game. Morrow isn't 2010 Olympics self anymore, but he is still a captain that would give a contending team all he's got when the going gets tough. He's exactly what the Canucks should be looking for.

Tanev has great potential as a shut down D but it's hard to see it happening in Vancouver where the too four is set in stone for several more years. He will be of greater use to someone other than Vancouver IMO.

I think from Vancouver's end, Raymond can replace a lot of what Hansen brings. Morrow brings qualities you just can't get out of young players.

Hansen and Tanev for Morrow and a B defense prospect or another bottom sizer?
You contradict yourself in two sentences. The OP makes no sense for Dallas, and Morrow most likely won't be moved.

Mr Misty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-13-2012, 02:28 AM
  #23
Horvat2Virtanen
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Horvat2Virtanen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 33,866
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Offdapost View Post
i swear to god i will vomit if i see another luongo to Florida trade, for the love of god people we have a log jam at goal tending
That's not what your GM thinks..............

Horvat2Virtanen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-13-2012, 02:32 AM
  #24
sully1410
Registered User
 
sully1410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Turner Valley, Alta.
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,126
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Braden Carlzner View Post
Sure, just ignore getting back a top prospect along with Morrow.
Vancouver wants a cup, and effectively doesn't give a **** about a prospect unless they're NHL ready. Hansen is a very valuable bottom six player, and I think Vancouver has less of a chance if winning it all without him.

sully1410 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-13-2012, 02:40 AM
  #25
Imlach a cup
Registered User
 
Imlach a cup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,160
vCash: 500
Van fans shopping Tanev? As a RIT grad and Sabres fan you should shop in our direction. Hockey trade, who would you want.

Imlach a cup is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:40 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.