HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Joffrey Lupul

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
08-14-2012, 08:55 PM
  #26
MintoMadDogsKiller18*
Go Leafs Go!
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Leafs Nation
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,263
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CommonMeans View Post
Problem is Lupul won't land the Leafs a #1 C, and Leafs fans won't trade Lupul for a #1 goalie. And as others have stated, trading him would fill another hole. Doesn't seem like he is a wise asset to be trading unless he was part of some fantasy-leagues type trade where mulitple pieces were heading each way.
Doesn't have to be an elite #1 C. And it can be Lupul + for a #1 C.

2 examples of #1 C's we can acquire using Lupul + or just Lupul are David Krejci and Paul Stastny. There are other C's out there I am just giving an example. Fans of other teams cried that they didn't want the likes of Macarthur, Franson, Bozak etc for their players so I thought I would offer up Lupul instead and see what they said.

MintoMadDogsKiller18* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-14-2012, 08:56 PM
  #27
MintoMadDogsKiller18*
Go Leafs Go!
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Leafs Nation
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,263
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Getz2perry View Post
To be fair half of that list is players from toronto... so i think its a team thing!

And anyone who would take lupul over ryan is brain dead.
Agreed. You cannot just blame it on one player.

MintoMadDogsKiller18* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-14-2012, 08:57 PM
  #28
TieClark
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,248
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CommonMeans View Post
Nonsense. Ryan had an "off" year whereas Lupul had a "career" year. The funny part is their numbers were comparable. This doesn't change the fact that Ryan is 4 years younger, has shown to be a lot more consistent, and isn't a defensive liability.
Yeah... because like I said Lupul has been hurt basically his entire career. How easily people forget he was a 7th overall pick and a key piece in the Pronger (in his prime) trade (twice). Ryan is no better defensively than Lupul... to suggest either is anything to write home about defensively is laughable and to try and say your poop smells worse than my poop is also ridiculous.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Getz2perry View Post
To be fair half of that list is players from toronto... so i think its a team thing!

And anyone who would take lupul over ryan is brain dead.
I don't think anyone has said as much

TieClark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-14-2012, 08:57 PM
  #29
TMLKesselftw
Registered User
 
TMLKesselftw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 862
vCash: 500
After next season we will know closer to what we have in Lupul; possibly a ppg forward, an inconsistent forward, or an injury-prone forward....

After next season we can gauge his value a lot better.... As of right now, I'd be down for a Lupul - Krejci deal with sweeteners from either side to even it out.

JVR - Krejci - Kessel
Kadri - Grabo - Kuli

or

Kadri - Krejci - Kessel
JVR - Grabo - Kuli

A stronger line-up then our current one IMO

(Not sure how most Boston fans feel about it, but I remember there being talks of a deal centered around these two before)

TMLKesselftw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-14-2012, 09:05 PM
  #30
Getz2perry
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,715
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TieClark View Post
Yeah... because like I said Lupul has been hurt basically his entire career. How easily people forget he was a 7th overall pick and a key piece in the Pronger (in his prime) trade (twice). Ryan is no better defensively than Lupul... to suggest either is anything to write home about defensively is laughable and to try and say your poop smells worse than my poop is also ridiculous.



I don't think anyone has said as much
Your right on last part my mistake.

To say ryan is no better defensively than lupul is wrong tho, ryan is pretty dependable defensively, he was +1 last season on a terrible ducks team. And +37 for a career where hes played on sub par defensive teams.

Getz2perry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-14-2012, 09:09 PM
  #31
TMLKesselftw
Registered User
 
TMLKesselftw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 862
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Getz2perry View Post
Your right on last part my mistake.

To say ryan is no better defensively than lupul is wrong tho, ryan is pretty dependable defensively, he was +1 last season on a terrible ducks team. And +37 for a career where hes played on sub par defensive teams.
I guess your right, Lupul had a terrible +/- last year of..... +1 on a team with a worse GF/GA ratio then Anaheim.

And yes, his +/- over his career hasn't been so good, but after dealing with a very bad oilers team and a severe injury... I don't expect his past +/- to be comparable to what it is/should be now...

TMLKesselftw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-14-2012, 09:11 PM
  #32
sully1410
Registered User
 
sully1410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Turner Valley, Alta.
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,208
vCash: 400
Lupul + will get you Luongo.

sully1410 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-14-2012, 09:15 PM
  #33
calcal798
Registered User
 
calcal798's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: London
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,332
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sully1410 View Post
Lupul will get you Luongo + something significant.
your right.

calcal798 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-14-2012, 09:17 PM
  #34
Dreakmur
Registered User
 
Dreakmur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Orillia, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,958
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TieClark View Post
Ok... but now you're still leaving a hole on your second line or at least downgrading it substantially imo.
Kadri/MacArthur/Frattin - Grabovski - Kulemin

Dreakmur is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
08-14-2012, 09:18 PM
  #35
TieClark
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,248
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Getz2perry View Post
Your right on last part my mistake.

To say ryan is no better defensively than lupul is wrong tho, ryan is pretty dependable defensively, he was +1 last season on a terrible ducks team. And +37 for a career where hes played on sub par defensive teams.
Lupul was a +1 and 5th on the Leafs last year in +/- and 2 of the players in front of him didn't play 25 games (Kadri and Colborne).

The actual +/- stat is useless other than comparing teammates imo.

TieClark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-14-2012, 09:22 PM
  #36
sully1410
Registered User
 
sully1410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Turner Valley, Alta.
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,208
vCash: 400
Quote:
Originally Posted by calcal798 View Post
your right.
Lol your dreaming.

sully1410 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-14-2012, 09:30 PM
  #37
TieClark
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,248
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dreakmur View Post
Kadri/MacArthur/Frattin - Grabovski - Kulemin
...is a down grade from JVR - Grabo - whoever.

If you're adding a #1 center it's for more than just Lupul and you better hope JVR scores more than 40 points or you're now stuck with 2/3 of a 1st line again.

TieClark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-14-2012, 09:31 PM
  #38
TieClark
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,248
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sully1410 View Post
Lol your dreaming.
No he's not... Vancouver is dreaming they can acquire anything close to Lupul for Luongo. They'd have to add something very significant for the Leafs to take on that atrocity of a contract.

TieClark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-14-2012, 09:44 PM
  #39
sully1410
Registered User
 
sully1410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Turner Valley, Alta.
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,208
vCash: 400
Quote:
Originally Posted by TieClark View Post
No he's not... Vancouver is dreaming they can acquire anything close to Lupul for Luongo. They'd have to add something very significant for the Leafs to take on that atrocity of a contract.
How is it an atrocity. Explain this to me. It's long? So what. It costs money...again...so that? Real world dollars mean nothing to a team like Toronto. In fact he'll make the team money in jersey sales and playoff games. His age bother you? Your best goalie to date was Carmen Eddie at the young age of 37.

If there comes a time where he can't perform, you waive him. He's got a NTC but no NMC.

Lupul however has a past with injuries, and has had one breakout season of 67pts...which could very well be a product of playing with Phil "the Thrill" Kessel.

Will it be a huge +? No. 2nd or 3rd probably. But to try and say that Luongo has less value then Lupul is ridiculous.

sully1410 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-14-2012, 10:28 PM
  #40
Telos
Moderator
In Dean We Trust
 
Telos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Reno, Nv.
Country: United States
Posts: 23,053
vCash: 842
Send a message via ICQ to Telos Send a message via AIM to Telos Send a message via MSN to Telos Send a message via Yahoo to Telos
If he got put on the block, the Kings would be very interested. Not sure what they would deal to get him, but putting him on a line with Richards and Carter would be incentive enough.

__________________

"It has not been a good day. I lost my glasses early this morning and I had to go buy a pair of 79 dollar reading glasses today. 79 bucks. You can literally get them at Costco, three-for-20." - Darryl Sutter's response to going up 2-0 in the series.
Telos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-14-2012, 10:29 PM
  #41
leftwinghockey
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 90
vCash: 500
His value will be substantially higher if he repeats his previous year for even half a season. His legitimization would then make him a true valuable piece but for now his production seems a little too idiosyncratic

leftwinghockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-14-2012, 10:30 PM
  #42
thrillhouse99
Registered User
 
thrillhouse99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 841
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Telos View Post
If he got put on the block, the Kings would be very interested. Not sure what they would deal to get him, but putting him on a line with Richards and Carter would be incentive enough.
Bernier?

thrillhouse99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-14-2012, 10:47 PM
  #43
LeafsLegends
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 113
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by thrillhouse99 View Post
Bernier?
Nope, the only thing we need from LA is somthing you dont want to give up so we should leave it at that.

LeafsLegends is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-14-2012, 10:54 PM
  #44
Alivesi
Registered User
 
Alivesi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 357
vCash: 50
Lupul for Luongo works. Not overpayment, lupul isn't a proven PPG player, and it luongo's contract isn't that bad, considering he posts similar stats to rinne. He will push toronto to the playoffs, and the canucks with some free cap space for later on.

Alivesi is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
08-14-2012, 11:28 PM
  #45
LeafsLegends
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 113
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alivesi View Post
Lupul for Luongo works. Not overpayment, lupul isn't a proven PPG player, and it luongo's contract isn't that bad, considering he posts similar stats to rinne. He will push toronto to the playoffs, and the canucks with some free cap space for later on.
Theres a reason Lou hasnt been traded yet, because Gillis hasnt gotten what he wants. So lets assume he wants a player like lupul who is a 50-60 pt winger. Why hasnt he been traded yet because nobody will pay it. Now if no one will pay it in the summer no one is gonna pay it at the begining of the season when gillis would most like to unload the contract. Think less then Lupul and more like macarthur,franson and lombardi.

LeafsLegends is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-14-2012, 11:55 PM
  #46
IranCondraAffair
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,531
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TieClark View Post
Well the Ducks used him as a salary dump because of his injuries... he was regarded as a top prospect, had numerous injuries and then finally broke out last season (but still missed significant time with an unrelated injury). The only reason a GM would be wary about paying a premium for Lupul is the injuries... which is a legitimate concern.
He was a top prospect almost a decade ago. He's almost thirty.

IranCondraAffair is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
08-14-2012, 11:58 PM
  #47
thrillhouse99
Registered User
 
thrillhouse99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 841
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeafsLegends View Post
Theres a reason Lou hasnt been traded yet, because Gillis hasnt gotten what he wants. So lets assume he wants a player like lupul who is a 50-60 pt winger. Why hasnt he been traded yet because nobody will pay it. Now if no one will pay it in the summer no one is gonna pay it at the begining of the season when gillis would most like to unload the contract. Think less then Lupul and more like macarthur,franson and lombardi.
Honestly I would be happy with lupul for luongo. I think we could be a 7th or 8th place team if that deal was done.

thrillhouse99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-15-2012, 12:13 AM
  #48
TurdFerguson
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 533
vCash: 500
Keep him for now, his value is just not there yet. A career of injuries and underwhelming production isn't entirely remedied by (most of) one season of great play. To hurt his value even more, he's a UFA at the end of this season.

Anyone that actively wants to trade Lupul right now must be really concerned that he can't keep it up and don't believe he can become a perennial 30 goal scorer.

...Or the much more likely scenario where it's August and we all miss hockey.

TurdFerguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-15-2012, 12:46 AM
  #49
TheyAreGoodScaryGood
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,369
vCash: 524
Trade him for luongo, shouldve dealt him for ribeiro at the draft

TheyAreGoodScaryGood is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
08-15-2012, 12:52 AM
  #50
thrillhouse99
Registered User
 
thrillhouse99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 841
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheyAreGoodScaryGood View Post
shouldve dealt him for ribeiro at the draft
I'm glad we didn't. Not a Ribero fan.

thrillhouse99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:59 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.