Wats I miss you already , I'm sending you my spare NHL 12 disc.
Don't know why you don't trade it, gets you 22.10 off NHL 13.
When I traded it in along with other games I almost got an amazing deal. The guy wasn't that good at math. I traded:
UFC Undisputed 09 = $1.00
MLB the Show 2010 = $4.00
Ghostbusters: the video game = $5.00
NHL 12: $17.00
------------------
Total Worth = $27.00
He worked it out that $27.00 x Bonus 30% = $45.63.
I would have gotten away with it too if it wasn't for my damn conscience. Not sure why I felt the need to tell him after he spent more than 5 minutes trying to convince me to pay extra $20 to get a special edition version.
Desharnais, Plekanec, and Pacioretty are all next behind him. Hamrlik used to be in this group as well, now I'd have to say Cole takes the last top-5 spot.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gally94
I'd prefer if all the games are 1vs1. Also, no 1vsCpu.
I'd also suggest that we create a side site (if thats possible) ala simulated leagues. Would be a lot easier to negociate and everything.
I'd rather 1 vs CPU than just a straight up simulation.
If I can't make a game, and my opponent wants to play, it's his right. And vice versa, IMO.
I'd prefer if all the games are 1vs1. Also, no 1vsCpu.
I'd also suggest that we create a side site (if thats possible) ala simulated leagues. Would be a lot easier to negociate and everything.
We'll have a seperate thread but I'm open to live chat/discussion.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoingItLeBlancWay
we could use skype if everyone is willing to do that
I have skype, I'd do it if people want. If someone knows how to set up an irc channel we could do that too(I haven't used Mirc since I was like 15 but wtv, simple if its web integrated).
I'm open to live options. That will be optional but recommended.
I'd rather 1 vs CPU than just a straight up simulation.
If I can't make a game, and my opponent wants to play, it's his right. And vice versa, IMO.
To be fair most of us are playing GM online because we don't want to face CPUs. At that point, i'd rather just simulate. I will try to play everyone at least once though.
To be fair most of us are playing GM online because we don't want to face CPUs. At that point, i'd rather just simulate. I will try to play everyone at least once though.
Oh I agree, I don't want to play CPUs either. But I'd rather play CPU against a team that someone built along to go with their own strategies, then not play the game at all -- if that makes sense.
What would be awesome is if we could set each season to 29 games or something. That'd be rad. Take 4-6 weeks per season, play everyone once and boom.
Are there any teams looking for defense that would be willing to part with a top 6 centre? Other than Ellis and Weber, any one on my team would be available. I need some scoring, I think.
Desharnais, Plekanec, and Pacioretty are all next behind him. Hamrlik used to be in this group as well, now I'd have to say Cole takes the last top-5 spot.
I'd rather 1 vs CPU than just a straight up simulation.
If I can't make a game, and my opponent wants to play, it's his right. And vice versa, IMO.
I prefer to do simulations, I dont want players to glitch my cpus. Either we play human vs human or we simulate.
Also, is there a place where we can have all the rosters/overalls for nhl 13?
I hope ea knows that the Wings have some good prospects with high potential. Otherwise I'm kinda screwed.
Everyone is available expected Datsyuk who's amazingly 95 overall. Only interested in left handed shots. Willing to trade D for forwards too.
Yeah gamestop/eb games (basically same thing since they merged).
What would you want for Abdelkader? I'm Dallas. Any draft picks or prospects on the table, as well as players on my roster. No one is really untouchable for me.
Well we only need two guys to accept(Pine and I already did). We have 4 Co-commissioners now. I may be the owner of the league and I guess I do have 'last call'(doubt it would ever ever come to that) but in terms of stuff like trades: 2 of any of the 4 need to say yes to the trade. That's it. I'm considering adding 2 more active people to be part of approvals. At that point, it would still be 2 required.(I mean, majority in 4 would be ideal but lets not make too many rules to complicate and slow down the process).
To everyone:
If you want to propose a trade, there will soon be two threads. 1 for league discussion/rules/schedules/general and 1 for league trades/draft talk/rosters.
Well we only need two guys to accept(Pine and I already did). We have 4 Co-commissioners now. I may be the owner of the league and I guess I do have 'last call'(doubt it would ever ever come to that) but in terms of stuff like trades: 2 of any of the 4 need to say yes to the trade. That's it. I'm considering adding 2 more active people to be part of approvals. At that point, it would still be 2 required.(I mean, majority in 4 would be ideal but lets not make too many rules to complicate and slow down the process).
To everyone:
If you want to propose a trade, there will soon be two threads. 1 for league discussion/rules/schedules/general and 1 for league trades/draft talk/rosters.
If no one else steps up, I have the time to commit to the league as a commish. I was going to step up before, but some jerk who picked LA took the spot before me.
Wait so how is this Skype thing going to work? I always thought it was something you do with girls when you're desperate?
das.showrav addz
Quote:
Originally Posted by HawkeyeCB
my skype is;
plekachu14
add me if you want
we could make an entire group for this league
Added. I'm never on but if the league uses it I'll do it. It's not for everybody, I understand. Just if you have it, post your name up and we'll add you.
:
At that point, i'd rather just simulate. I will try to play everyone at least once though.
