HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Philadelphia-Edmonton

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
08-21-2012, 06:29 AM
  #1
rihard12345
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mississauga, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 4
vCash: 500
Philadelphia-Edmonton

Theo Peckham

For

Max Talbot

rihard12345 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-21-2012, 06:39 AM
  #2
Giroux tha Damaja
Registered User
 
Giroux tha Damaja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Mount Holly, NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 9,232
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Giroux tha Damaja
I never get a chance to see the Oilers play. One the one hand, he has three points in 54 games. On the other hand his plus minus was even with only three points in 54 games...

Wish I knew more about the player.

Giroux tha Damaja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-21-2012, 06:41 AM
  #3
CanadienKid25
Registered User
 
CanadienKid25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 360
vCash: 50
I don't think the value is quite there. I would rather have Talbot heading into the playoffs then Peckham

CanadienKid25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-21-2012, 06:45 AM
  #4
Kyungnam
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 144
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Giroux tha Damaja View Post
I never get a chance to see the Oilers play. One the one hand, he has three points in 54 games. On the other hand his plus minus was even with only three points in 54 games...

Wish I knew more about the player.
Hard hitting, young defenseman that plays what Don Cherry calls 'old time hockey.'

Plays with an edge, sticks up for players. Needs better agility and speed but his game slowly gets better. Felt his game was stifled by Tom renney.

Kyungnam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-21-2012, 06:53 AM
  #5
iCanada
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,081
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyungnam View Post
Hard hitting, young defenseman that plays what Don Cherry calls 'old time hockey.'

Plays with an edge, sticks up for players. Needs better agility and speed but his game slowly gets better. Felt his game was stifled by Tom renney.
Stifled by Renney and his concussion after that one fight.

I think Pecks is a solid player though, easily has top 4 potential and is already pretty good in his own end and around the boards. I'd say that unless he puts it all together though he is likely a 5/6 guy on a cup contending team.

I'd say the Oilers would need to pitch in more to acquire Talbot.

iCanada is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
08-21-2012, 07:32 AM
  #6
CTU2fan
Registered User
 
CTU2fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,135
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by iCanada View Post
Stifled by Renney and his concussion after that one fight.

I think Pecks is a solid player though, easily has top 4 potential and is already pretty good in his own end and around the boards. I'd say that unless he puts it all together though he is likely a 5/6 guy on a cup contending team.

I'd say the Oilers would need to pitch in more to acquire Talbot.
That sounds about right, I think value is probably relatively close. The idea is intriguing though, adding Luke Schenn and then Theo Peckham would certainly inject some physicality into the Flyers D in a hurry.

CTU2fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-21-2012, 08:03 AM
  #7
1865
Registered User
 
1865's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chester, UK
Country: England
Posts: 9,195
vCash: 50
I don't really want to lose Max, he's done a great job for us at a very manageable cap hit. You'd have to overpay to make us listen I think.

1865 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-21-2012, 08:04 AM
  #8
Slatsmsg
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Airdrie
Posts: 556
vCash: 370
Oilers would definitely need to add a bit but Pecks is a hard nose cuss well suited to Flyer hockey.

Slatsmsg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-21-2012, 09:09 AM
  #9
mfair87
Rookie User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 29
vCash: 500
Talbot is worth all his contract and more come playoff time. Peckham is not worth Talbot in my honest opinion. Max seems like a great locker room guy, and those guys are just hard to give up.

mfair87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-21-2012, 10:08 AM
  #10
JayB
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 334
vCash: 500
Gustaffson+Wellwood for Peckham+Petrell? Maybe we can add 3nd rounder.

JayB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-21-2012, 10:22 AM
  #11
BrindamoursNose
Registered User
 
BrindamoursNose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 5,793
vCash: 500
How can the Flyers get Ryan Jones? HMMM


Last edited by BrindamoursNose: 08-21-2012 at 11:20 AM.
BrindamoursNose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-21-2012, 11:05 AM
  #12
Spongolium*
Potato Magician
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Bridgend,UK
Country: Wales
Posts: 8,653
vCash: 500
Max is one of the only vets in the flyers locker room, and by all accords is a very liked player. I can't see him going anywhere to be honest.

Spongolium* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-21-2012, 11:05 AM
  #13
WeridAl
YuckaFlux
 
WeridAl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: 10ft of Snow
Posts: 1,749
vCash: 500
Edmonton needs size and not another C/LW, Edmonton passes. Peckham had a bad year last year, would rather see what he does this year. Edmonton needs D with grit more then another bottom 6 forward.

If your going to make a proposal, don't insult them with a bunch of smurfs.


Last edited by WeridAl: 08-21-2012 at 11:18 AM.
WeridAl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-21-2012, 11:22 AM
  #14
Stefan Urquelle
Registered User
 
Stefan Urquelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Sherwood Park, AB
Posts: 27
vCash: 500
I think Peckham would fit in pretty well on the Flyers, but not at the cost of Talbot. Maybe a mid-round pick (3rd or 4th) or a B-level prospect.

Stefan Urquelle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-21-2012, 11:24 AM
  #15
FlyingHigh13
Registered User
 
FlyingHigh13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cleveland
Country: United States
Posts: 89
vCash: 500
No, talbot is a glue guy who had a career year and has great relationships with the flyers core. Talbot is loved in Philly too and one of the best energy/bottom 6 forwards in the NHL. Would need overpayment which peckham clearly is underpayment.

FlyingHigh13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-21-2012, 11:42 AM
  #16
ELab2
Registered User
 
ELab2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Atlantic City
Country: United States
Posts: 5,348
vCash: 500
Talbot's the kind of guy that is worth much more to a contending team than he'll ever be in a trade. It would have to be an overpayment and directly targeted at a substantial team beam. Peckham doesn't cut it.

ELab2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-21-2012, 11:47 AM
  #17
Snotbubbles
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,490
vCash: 500
Max Talbot is not a guy that I would trade if I were Philly. After seeing how losing Ian Laperierre affected the Flyers team in 2011, I won't get rid of a Laperierre clone.

Snotbubbles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-21-2012, 11:58 AM
  #18
Philadelphia Ducks
#BringBackBob
 
Philadelphia Ducks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Ontario, Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,350
vCash: 500
No way, Talbot is a central piece for the Flyers, first line pker, great 4th liner and a good 3rd liner if needed. Had a career year in goals.

Philadelphia Ducks is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
08-21-2012, 12:02 PM
  #19
Petro Points
Registered User
 
Petro Points's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,343
vCash: 885
Not sure why EDM would do this.
We already have Belanger and Horcoff as bottom 6C. Talbot plays gritty like Petrell and Eager but is not big nor good at faceoffs. We also have Lander who should become a player like Talbot in a few yrs.

Also, it is better to have depth on D ... A team in today's NHL needs 10 NHL ready Dmen in their system. In EDM's case I fully expect our #7 dman to be playing top 4 minutes at some point in the season due to injuries.

Petro Points is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-21-2012, 12:22 PM
  #20
PALE PWNR
Registered User
 
PALE PWNR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: South Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 4,099
vCash: 1050
Peckham is a guy I would love to acquire, that said I don't know what I would be willing to give up for him. If Edm is looking for size up front and a guy who has a little talent I would try to make an offer around Sestito and a 2nd or something.

PALE PWNR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-21-2012, 12:47 PM
  #21
WeridAl
YuckaFlux
 
WeridAl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: 10ft of Snow
Posts: 1,749
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by PALE PWNR View Post
Peckham is a guy I would love to acquire, that said I don't know what I would be willing to give up for him. If Edm is looking for size up front and a guy who has a little talent I would try to make an offer around Sestito and a 2nd or something.
Pass on Sestito and the Oilers already have two 2013 2nd round picks and really don't need another. I cannot see anyone that the Flyers would be willing to trade that the Oilers would want.

WeridAl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-21-2012, 02:18 PM
  #22
sobrien
RAFFLCOPTER
 
sobrien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Jersey/Memphis
Country: United States
Posts: 6,621
vCash: 500
Flyers need a bonafide #1 going forward, or offense from the point. Peckham offers neither. Our squad shouldn't have problems playing stout defense or hitting. Providing offense may be a hurdle.

sobrien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-21-2012, 03:01 PM
  #23
Flyerfan52
Registered User
 
Flyerfan52's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Country: Canada
Posts: 628
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sobrien View Post
Flyers need a bonafide #1 going forward, or offense from the point. Peckham offers neither. Our squad shouldn't have problems playing stout defense or hitting. Providing offense may be a hurdle.
Talbot would be a huge overpayment for Peckham.

We've got depth defense, it's a #1 (or dang good #2) we need.

Flyerfan52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-21-2012, 04:51 PM
  #24
sobrien
RAFFLCOPTER
 
sobrien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Jersey/Memphis
Country: United States
Posts: 6,621
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flyerfan52 View Post
Talbot would be a huge overpayment for Peckham.

We've got depth defense, it's a #1 (or dang good #2) we need.
That's what I said

sobrien is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-21-2012, 07:49 PM
  #25
Viller
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,044
vCash: 500
Max Talbot will retire a Flyer. Hes the kind of player you never let go of. Heart and soul. He fills the void Ian Lapperriere left quite nicely with alot more scoring.

Viller is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:42 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.