HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > Calgary Flames
Notices

OT: opinion on trade offer

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
08-24-2012, 06:45 AM
  #26
Gary83*
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 2,287
vCash: 500
I really wouldn't be making any trades until the game is officially out and you know for sure each player's ratings, players like Babchuk for instance are great in the game, especially now that it's easier to get point shots through, guy has an absolute bomb.

Gary83* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2012, 08:50 AM
  #27
TheHudlinator
Registered User
 
TheHudlinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria,BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,576
vCash: 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesarmstrong22 View Post
actually nvm vermette has to be a typo because the way EA has it set up is it goes the best at every posistion like best lines and if vermette is ahead of hanzal (80) it means vermette must be higher than 80 which leads me to believe he has to be a 83. does that change anybody''s mind on this trade?
No it still isn't good as
Vermette(83) is barely better than Stajan (82)
Klesla (82) > Babchuck (79)
But again Glencross(82) >>>>>>>>>>> 4th

TheHudlinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2012, 12:24 PM
  #28
Flamesarmstrong22
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,318
vCash: 500
Well now I am really considering the trade because not only is vermette a typo but I discovered last night that stajan also has to be a typo. Hudler is in front of him on the depth chart and is rated 81 which means stajan has to be lower than a 81 which leads me to believe that stajan is not a 82 but instead is a 72. Also I already traded babchuk so he would no longer be in the trade, instead it's Chris butler. Trade looks like:

Vermette(83)>>Stajan(72)
Klesla(82)>butler(78)
Glencross(82)>>>>4th

But also he's getting Glencross for a 4th because between the other 4 players involved in the deal he is dropping 11 points from vermette to stajan and 4 points from klesla to butler. That's 15 point drop! Which is pretty big, in a way I think I would be ripping him off. I get the best player in the deal in vermette who is a point higher than Glencross than get another 82 in klesla for two players in the 70's one of them very low 70's (stajan,72)

Flamesarmstrong22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2012, 12:31 PM
  #29
Flamesarmstrong22
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,318
vCash: 500
Line ups after:

Cammalerri(85),vermette(83),iginla(87)
Tanguay(83),cervenka(?),hudler(81)
Bartchi(?),backlund(77),stempniak(80)
Comeau(79),jones(71),jackman(71)
Horak(71),bouma(?),nemisez(?)

Giordano(85),bouwmeester(86)
Klesla(82),wideman(82)
Brodie(?),sarich(80)

Kipprusoff(87)
Bobrovsky(79)

*also im working on another deal around stempniak for chad larose, so possibly sub him in where stempniak is. He is also a 80.

Flamesarmstrong22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2012, 01:44 PM
  #30
InfinityIggy
Inflammatory Poster
 
InfinityIggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,624
vCash: 133
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesarmstrong22 View Post
Well now I am really considering the trade because not only is vermette a typo but I discovered last night that stajan also has to be a typo. Hudler is in front of him on the depth chart and is rated 81 which means stajan has to be lower than a 81 which leads me to believe that stajan is not a 82 but instead is a 72. Also I already traded babchuk so he would no longer be in the trade, instead it's Chris butler. Trade looks like:

Vermette(83)>>Stajan(72)
Klesla(82)>butler(78)
Glencross(82)>>>>4th

But also he's getting Glencross for a 4th because between the other 4 players involved in the deal he is dropping 11 points from vermette to stajan and 4 points from klesla to butler. That's 15 point drop! Which is pretty big, in a way I think I would be ripping him off. I get the best player in the deal in vermette who is a point higher than Glencross than get another 82 in klesla for two players in the 70's one of them very low 70's (stajan,72)
Thats horrible for you, you give up a Top 5ish D, Top 6 Winger and a 3rd line Center for a 2nd Line Center, 4th liner and a 4th round pick.

Simply awful for you.

I doubt Stajan is a 73 lowest I could reasonably see is 78. He is likely an 80-82.

InfinityIggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2012, 02:01 PM
  #31
BVicious
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,055
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by InfinityIggy View Post
Thats horrible for you, you give up a Top 5ish D, Top 6 Winger and a 3rd line Center for a 2nd Line Center, 4th liner and a 4th round pick.

Simply awful for you.

I doubt Stajan is a 73 lowest I could reasonably see is 78. He is likely an 80-82.
How do u guys see everyone's ratings when u can only play the kings and devils? Does the demo allow u to play the GM mode?

BVicious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2012, 02:28 PM
  #32
Thumper17
Registered User
 
Thumper17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 563
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BVicious View Post
How do u guys see everyone's ratings when u can only play the kings and devils? Does the demo allow u to play the GM mode?
You can see some players overalls in H.U.T and there were some overalls posted on the official website.

Thumper17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2012, 02:30 PM
  #33
Flamesarmstrong22
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,318
vCash: 500
^ ea released the ratings for all the teams last week

^^ and they way I see it is I'm giving up a 2nd line winger for a 2nd line center, giving away a bottom pairing Defencman for a #4 solid Defencman and getting rid of stajan and his 3.5 mil cap hit for a 3rd. And if I'm right and stajan's rating is 72, getting a 3rd for him and his contract is amazing. That's just my opinion and I'm pretty sure I'm going to pull the trigger on this trade.

Flamesarmstrong22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2012, 05:10 PM
  #34
FlamesFan6612
#timerixonwho?
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 357
vCash: 50
85 is what Iginla is rated in the game, while i think it is a bit low, it obviously is due to his defensive stats being somewhat low. 85-99 is what the first line players are rated as in the game.

FlamesFan6612 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2012, 05:39 PM
  #35
Thumper17
Registered User
 
Thumper17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 563
vCash: 500
What people seem to forget about the game is that you can actually MAKE Stajan score goals.

Kotalik was a boss for me and after a string of injuries, turned into my No.1 RW and almost got me out of the first round of the playoffs by himself.

The trading in this game really needs to be looked at a different way. You control the players and make them do what you want. Go for the best player. Always.

Thumper17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2012, 06:21 PM
  #36
TheHudlinator
Registered User
 
TheHudlinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria,BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,576
vCash: 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesarmstrong22 View Post
Well now I am really considering the trade because not only is vermette a typo but I discovered last night that stajan also has to be a typo. Hudler is in front of him on the depth chart and is rated 81 which means stajan has to be lower than a 81 which leads me to believe that stajan is not a 82 but instead is a 72. Also I already traded babchuk so he would no longer be in the trade, instead it's Chris butler. Trade looks like:

Vermette(83)>>Stajan(72)
Klesla(82)>butler(78)
Glencross(82)>>>>4th

But also he's getting Glencross for a 4th because between the other 4 players involved in the deal he is dropping 11 points from vermette to stajan and 4 points from klesla to butler. That's 15 point drop! Which is pretty big, in a way I think I would be ripping him off. I get the best player in the deal in vermette who is a point higher than Glencross than get another 82 in klesla for two players in the 70's one of them very low 70's (stajan,72)
Stajan is not 72 as you can see Backlund is rated 77 and Jones is 71 but Jones is on the 3rd line and Backlund is on the 4th and Babchuck is a 79 but is below Butler who is a 78. The lineup is made to be most realistic not purely on player ratings.

TheHudlinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2012, 06:26 PM
  #37
pdd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,578
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesarmstrong22 View Post
Vermette(83)>>Stajan(72)
Klesla(82)>butler(78)
Glencross(82)>>>>4th
You need to re-evaluate how you are laying this out.

Vermette(83)~=Glencross(82)
Klesla(82)>Butler(78)

After that, it's Stajan for a 4th.

pdd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2012, 06:27 PM
  #38
Flamesarmstrong22
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,318
vCash: 500
I'm not trading stajan cuz he sucks in real life but he also sucks in the game. He is a 72, that makes 3.5mil. In exchange im getting a 83 center. That makes my center depth by 11 points! Plus EA has emphasized that players with better ratings will perform better and players with low ratings will play like there rating. If that's true, stajan at 72 will be pretty bad. He is the 3rd worse player on the flames, barely ahead of jones and jackman both at 71

Flamesarmstrong22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2012, 07:05 PM
  #39
TheHudlinator
Registered User
 
TheHudlinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria,BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,576
vCash: 145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesarmstrong22 View Post
I'm not trading stajan cuz he sucks in real life but he also sucks in the game. He is a 72, that makes 3.5mil. In exchange im getting a 83 center. That makes my center depth by 11 points! Plus EA has emphasized that players with better ratings will perform better and players with low ratings will play like there rating. If that's true, stajan at 72 will be pretty bad. He is the 3rd worse player on the flames, barely ahead of jones and jackman both at 71
No he is a 82 he is not a 71.

TheHudlinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-24-2012, 07:42 PM
  #40
Flamesarmstrong22
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,318
vCash: 500
Well even if he is a 82, the deal is done now and I may have screwd myself, but sill i got the other gm to add Boyd Gordon (77) and a 3rd. So it the final deal looks like:

Glencross
Stajan
Butler

FOR

Vermette
Klesla
Gordon
3rd

So it could break down like:

Glencross(82)=vermette(83)
Klesla(82)>butler(78)
Stajan(82)>Gordon(77),3rd

I win 2/3 of this deal. Except for the stajan part. But Gordon and a 3rd still isnt that bad of a return for stajan.

Lineup:
Cammalerri,vermette,iginla
Tanguay,cervenka,hudler
Bartchi,backlund,stempniak
Comeau,Gordon,jackman
Horak,jones,Aliu
Byron,bouma,nemisez

Giordano,bouwmeester
Klesla,wideman
Brodie,sarich
Smith,Carson/savard

Kipprusoff
Bobrovsky
Irving

I think it's pretty solid :$

Flamesarmstrong22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-27-2012, 06:18 PM
  #41
Flames34
Registered User
 
Flames34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Blackville, NB
Country: Canada
Posts: 95
vCash: 500
You made a big mistake man, vermette is only supposed to be a 73

Flames34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-27-2012, 11:47 PM
  #42
Flamesarmstrong22
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,318
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames34 View Post
You made a big mistake man, vermette is only supposed to be a 73
that may be true, but i am hoping that the 73 is a typo and he is instead a 83, which would better suit vermette. If i am wrong, the roster update that comes out after the game is released will hopefully fix that because vermette is not 73 material. And if i am wrong and he ends up being a 73, than yes i did screw up but you take some and you lose some and i was willing to take the risk that the 73 was a typo

Flamesarmstrong22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:59 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.