HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > Other Leagues > The AHL
The AHL Discuss the American Hockey League; its players, teams, and games.

AHL pres dave andrews interview

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
08-24-2012, 06:26 PM
  #1
Govment Cheese
Registered User
 
Govment Cheese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 200
vCash: 500
AHL pres dave andrews interview

http://www.xmhomeice.com/onair_audio...%20Andrews.mp3

This was posted in the business of Hockey area, but feel it should also be in here.

There is talk in the interview about reducing the number of AHL regular season games again, 72 game season is a possibility.

Bet ST's prices won't be decrease to reflect the number of home games.

Govment Cheese is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-25-2012, 01:35 PM
  #2
adsfan
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,306
vCash: 500
If I understood correctly, it may be a 72 game season for 2013-14?

adsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-25-2012, 11:34 PM
  #3
AdmiralsFan24
Registered User
 
AdmiralsFan24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Hartland, Wisconsin
Country: United States
Posts: 3,575
vCash: 50
Send a message via AIM to AdmiralsFan24
Hey Dave, how about making teams in different conferences play each other?

AdmiralsFan24 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
08-26-2012, 09:46 AM
  #4
Rumblick
Registered User
 
Rumblick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: I - 78
Country: United States
Posts: 1,829
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdmiralsFan24 View Post
Hey Dave, how about making teams in different conferences play each other?
Not his call - the owners make those decisions.

Rumblick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-26-2012, 06:08 PM
  #5
AdmiralsFan24
Registered User
 
AdmiralsFan24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Hartland, Wisconsin
Country: United States
Posts: 3,575
vCash: 50
Send a message via AIM to AdmiralsFan24
Well obviously not all the owners because I know of several that want a more diverse schedule.

AdmiralsFan24 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
08-26-2012, 06:28 PM
  #6
210
Registered User
 
210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Worcester, MA
Country: United States
Posts: 8,284
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdmiralsFan24 View Post
Well obviously not all the owners because I know of several that want a more diverse schedule.
No, you know several that say they want a more diverse schedule. AHL BoG meetings are done in secret and the only news allowed out of them is done by the AHL themselves. So no one has any idea how the Governors really vote on matters.

210 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-27-2012, 11:50 PM
  #7
Tommy Hawk
Registered User
 
Tommy Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,035
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by 210 View Post
No, you know several that say they want a more diverse schedule. AHL BoG meetings are done in secret and the only news allowed out of them is done by the AHL themselves. So no one has any idea how the Governors really vote on matters.
I was told a few years ago that the legacy AHL (non IHL) teams pretty much voted together on everything. How true, not sure.

Tommy Hawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-28-2012, 07:10 AM
  #8
Cynicaps
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 219
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommy Hawk View Post
I was told a few years ago that the legacy AHL (non IHL) teams pretty much voted together on everything. How true, not sure.
Where would the outliers - Norfolk, Charlotte, St. John's, and Abbotsford - fit in this case? The lines seem somewhat blurred at this point.

I wonder how advantageous it would be for the league to split in two or to be realigned into two ECHL-style pods? Something like this might work best in the long run

Eastern Conference:
STJ/POR/MCH/PRO/WOR
SPR/CT/BRI/ALB/ADK
BNG/WBS/HER/NOR/CLT
SYR/ROC/HAM/TOR/LKE

Western Conference
GR/CHI/RFD/PER/MKE
ABB/OKC/TEX/HOU/SA

Cynicaps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-28-2012, 01:25 PM
  #9
BK Triple Threat
Not Here To Be Liked
 
BK Triple Threat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Middle of nowhere
Posts: 9,515
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynicaps View Post
Where would the outliers - Norfolk, Charlotte, St. John's, and Abbotsford - fit in this case? The lines seem somewhat blurred at this point.

I wonder how advantageous it would be for the league to split in two or to be realigned into two ECHL-style pods? Something like this might work best in the long run

Eastern Conference:
STJ/POR/MCH/PRO/WOR
SPR/CT/BRI/ALB/ADK
BNG/WBS/HER/NOR/CLT
SYR/ROC/HAM/TOR/LKE

Western Conference
GR/CHI/RFD/PER/MKE
ABB/OKC/TEX/HOU/SA
Might as well, and flip names with the ECHL. Every team in the E is located in the US

BK Triple Threat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-28-2012, 04:24 PM
  #10
210
Registered User
 
210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Worcester, MA
Country: United States
Posts: 8,284
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommy Hawk View Post
I was told a few years ago that the legacy AHL (non IHL) teams pretty much voted together on everything. How true, not sure.
That sounds like one of those statements that are made when an owner doesn't get what he wants...

210 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-28-2012, 06:15 PM
  #11
adsfan
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,306
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cynicaps View Post
Where would the outliers - Norfolk, Charlotte, St. John's, and Abbotsford - fit in this case? The lines seem somewhat blurred at this point.

I wonder how advantageous it would be for the league to split in two or to be realigned into two ECHL-style pods? Something like this might work best in the long run

Eastern Conference:
STJ/POR/MCH/PRO/WOR
SPR/CT/BRI/ALB/ADK
BNG/WBS/HER/NOR/CLT
SYR/ROC/HAM/TOR/LKE

Western Conference
GR/CHI/RFD/PER/MKE
ABB/OKC/TEX/HOU/SA
Chicago to Cleveland, who you have in different conferences, is 344 miles. Grand Rapids is 300 miles from Cleveland.

Cleveland to Syracuse, who you have in the same division, is 334 miles. I think LEM should be with your West Conference.

The rest looks good, assuming that Springfield, Albany and Bingo don't move west in the next 3 to 4 years.

Since Milwaukee and Rochester haven't played each other for at least 5 years, the league is already in a de facto split as far as I am concerned.

adsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-29-2012, 11:40 AM
  #12
Cynicaps
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 219
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by adsfan View Post
Chicago to Cleveland, who you have in different conferences, is 344 miles. Grand Rapids is 300 miles from Cleveland.

Cleveland to Syracuse, who you have in the same division, is 334 miles. I think LEM should be with your West Conference.
The problem is a uneven distribution of teams. Yes, Charlotte could stay in the West but they've taken enough lumps being moved from East to West THEN being taken from the Midwest teams to the Texas teams. They had a nice thing going with Norfolk and Hershey before TNSE fouled everything up with the Moose.

Quote:
The rest looks good, assuming that Springfield, Albany and Bingo don't move west in the next 3 to 4 years.
Who's saying that any of them would move, especially West? Would the AHL allow any of them to desert their little clique? I don't see it happening though I could see Albany becoming a team split between the Knick/Pepsi/TUC and Glens Falls down the road.

Quote:
Since Milwaukee and Rochester haven't played each other for at least 5 years, the league is already in a de facto split as far as I am concerned.
In a redone league, schedule making needs to be standardized. Letting the teams drive the car in who plays who doesn't help and if the schedule is reduced even further it creates more problems and gives a negative fan image.

A similar case is the fact that Springfield and Lake Erie have never faced off when a visit of Springfield and CBJ's prospects would make good money for Lake Erie.

Cynicaps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-29-2012, 08:58 PM
  #13
adsfan
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,306
vCash: 500
The rest looks good, assuming that Springfield, Albany and Bingo don't move west in the next 3 to 4 years.

Who's saying that any of them would move, especially West? Would the AHL allow any of them to desert their little clique? I don't see it happening though I could see Albany becoming a team split between the Knick/Pepsi/TUC and Glens Falls down the road.

Those teams had low attendance during the last few years. In Bingo's case, they have a small arena, so their attendance has to be low. Springfield has the league office, so the AHL would avoid having a team move from there. Albany has looked shaky to me, but I could be wrong. I just visit the area every year.

Moving west is related to some NHL teams that want their AHL affiliates closer. I keep hearing rumors that more AHL teams are headed west. The East is thickly planted with AHL teams. There can't be too many more cities out there that could support the AHL that don't have teams. Perhaps some more Canadian cities, in the East or the West, could support an AHL team.

adsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-31-2012, 09:48 PM
  #14
Tommy Hawk
Registered User
 
Tommy Hawk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,035
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by 210 View Post
That sounds like one of those statements that are made when an owner doesn't get what he wants...
It sounds to me like the votes being 16 to 12 on almost everything.....

Tommy Hawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-01-2012, 09:06 AM
  #15
210
Registered User
 
210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Worcester, MA
Country: United States
Posts: 8,284
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommy Hawk View Post
It sounds to me like the votes being 16 to 12 on almost everything.....
Only because you choose to believe that.

Because the voting is usually kept secret from outsiders people surmise that whatever happens in those meeting fits what their perception is. The truth is anyone that really knows never goes on the record as saying about what happened unless they make statements that exactly match the AHL press releases.

210 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-03-2012, 05:56 PM
  #16
adsfan
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2,306
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tommy Hawk View Post
It sounds to me like the votes being 16 to 12 on almost everything.....
Why are 2 AHL teams not voting?

adsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-03-2012, 09:09 PM
  #17
Majik1987
I know kung fu...
 
Majik1987's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Northern Illinois
Country: United States
Posts: 4,188
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by adsfan View Post
Why are 2 AHL teams not voting?
Their representatives refused to travel to the meeting.

__________________
The Chicago Wolves = 2008 Calder Cup Champions!
Majik1987 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.