HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Cbj-tor

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
09-02-2012, 01:36 PM
  #1
Jozay
lolwut?
 
Jozay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: In someones closet..
Country: Canada
Posts: 803
vCash: 1280
Cbj-tor

TOR: Brassard

CBJ: Bozak, 3rd, Blacker, Connolly (if CBJ wants him)

I dont really think Brassard is that number one center the leafs need, but I do feel he has plenty of skill and a change of scenery would help him a lot.

Jozay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2012, 01:42 PM
  #2
MillarWithASave
Registered User
 
MillarWithASave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Melbourne, FL
Country: United States
Posts: 3,644
vCash: 500
Remember, quantity doesn't always equal quality.

MillarWithASave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2012, 01:52 PM
  #3
ProstheticConscience
RIP, Jeff.
 
ProstheticConscience's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canuck Nation
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,066
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jozay View Post
TOR: Brassard

CBJ: Bozak, 3rd, Blacker, Connolly (if CBJ wants him)

I dont really think Brassard is that number one center the leafs need, but I do feel he has plenty of skill and a change of scenery would help him a lot.
Often dependent on where that scenery might be...

ProstheticConscience is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2012, 02:02 PM
  #4
Kershaw
stone age hockey
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Oakville, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 21,942
vCash: 160
Send a message via ICQ to Kershaw Send a message via AIM to Kershaw Send a message via MSN to Kershaw Send a message via Yahoo to Kershaw Send a message via Skype™ to Kershaw
Bozak is better than Brassard IMO.

Kershaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2012, 02:06 PM
  #5
LeafsYoungGuns
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Smith Falls, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 612
vCash: 500
massive overpayment if you know what type of prospect Jesse Blacker is. Take him out and its fair.

LeafsYoungGuns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2012, 02:12 PM
  #6
Mayor Bee
New Title Pending
 
Mayor Bee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,884
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jozay View Post
TOR: Brassard

CBJ: Bozak, 3rd, Blacker, Connolly (if CBJ wants him)

I dont really think Brassard is that number one center the leafs need, but I do feel he has plenty of skill and a change of scenery would help him a lot.
Brassard had a change of scenery last year, when Scott Arniel was fired. He really emerged once that happened.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LeafsYoungGuns View Post
massive overpayment if you know what type of prospect Jesse Blacker is. Take him out and its fair.
No, take out Blacker and it becomes a typical crap-for-quality trade.

Mayor Bee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2012, 02:17 PM
  #7
SIDGENO8771
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,275
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mayor Bee View Post
Brassard had a change of scenery last year, when Scott Arniel was fired. He really emerged once that happened.



No, take out Blacker and it becomes a typical crap-for-quality trade.
No, with Blacker this is highway robbery by Columbus. Bozak is better than Brassard ATM. Blacker is a really good prospect.

SIDGENO8771 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2012, 02:21 PM
  #8
LEAFS FAN 4 EVER
GO LEAFS GO
 
LEAFS FAN 4 EVER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,040
vCash: 500
Leafs say no, especially with Jessie Blacker being involved.

LEAFS FAN 4 EVER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2012, 02:22 PM
  #9
Vankiller Whale
Good luck Sharks
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,953
vCash: 540
Seems like a lateral move, plus I don't think Columbus needs any more defensive prospects.

Vankiller Whale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2012, 02:30 PM
  #10
CBJBrassard16
Nash = forever a CBJ
 
CBJBrassard16's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,161
vCash: 500
I started twitching.

CBJBrassard16 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2012, 02:32 PM
  #11
TrueCanuckle
Registered User
 
TrueCanuckle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 268
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vankiller Whale View Post
Seems like a lateral move, plus I don't think Columbus needs any more defensive prospects.
couldn't of said it any better

TrueCanuckle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2012, 02:43 PM
  #12
Mayor Bee
New Title Pending
 
Mayor Bee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,884
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by SIDGENO8771 View Post
No, with Blacker this is highway robbery by Columbus. Bozak is better than Brassard ATM. Blacker is a really good prospect.
That's highly debatable. Brassard, when he was on the ice, was routinely going against the top or second pairing of Central Division teams, while on a line with RJ Umberger and Cam Atkinson. Bozak was going against the top pairing of Northeast Division teams, while on a line with Kessel and Lupul.

Central Division pairings:
Chicago - Keith/Seabrook and Hjalmarsson/Leddy
Detroit - Lidstrom/White and Stuart/Kronwall
Nashville - Weber/Suter and Klein/Josi
St. Louis - Jackman/Shattenkirk and Pietrangelo/Colaiacovo

Northeast Division pairings:
Boston - Chara/Boychuk and Seidenberg/Corvo
Buffalo - Some combination of Regehr/Sekera/Leopold/Myers
Montreal - Gorges/Subban and Diaz/Emelin
Ottawa - Kuba/Karlsson and Gonchar/Cowen

Mayor Bee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2012, 02:50 PM
  #13
CREW99AW
Registered User
 
CREW99AW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 23,237
vCash: 200
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jozay View Post
TOR: Brassard

CBJ: Bozak, 3rd, Blacker, Connolly (if CBJ wants him)

I dont really think Brassard is that number one center the leafs need, but I do feel he has plenty of skill and a change of scenery would help him a lot.
Why is Columbus making this trade?

soon to be ufa Tim Connolly, has negative value: 35 pts in 2011-2012. Due $4m-$4.5m.

Bozak, Blacker and a meh pick?

CREW99AW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2012, 02:54 PM
  #14
electricjib
Registered User
 
electricjib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 2,614
vCash: 50
haha TOR fans moving on from a teams name that shall not be spoken of to other teams finally. Be ready for the limitless supplies of Bozaks and Connoly's!

electricjib is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2012, 03:12 PM
  #15
Intense Rage
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 531
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CREW99AW View Post
Why is Columbus making this trade?

soon to be ufa Tim Connolly, has negative value: 35 pts in 2011-2012. Due $4m-$4.5m.

Bozak, Blacker and a meh pick?
Because Brassard isnt really anything special.

Intense Rage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2012, 03:30 PM
  #16
Mayor Bee
New Title Pending
 
Mayor Bee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 10,884
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by electricjib View Post
haha TOR fans moving on from a teams name that shall not be spoken of to other teams finally. Be ready for the limitless supplies of Bozaks and Connoly's!
Except we already went through all of this when Nash was still around. Bozak, Connolly, Armstrong, Lombardi, Komisarek, and if someone was feeling really generous, Frattin.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Intense Rage View Post
Because Brassard isnt really anything special.
Brassard may yet become a high-scoring forward. His best year was 25 points in 31 games, when he was on a line with Voracek (who couldn't finish) and Chimera (who couldn't stay onside).

Todd Richards did a good job of using him, which was basically sticking him on the second line and first power play unit and letting him create. In the last 10 games of the season, when it was Brassard/Atkinson/Umberger, Atkinson had 5 goals and 5 assists (all in the last 6 games), Umberger had 9 goals and 3 assists, and Brassard had 2 goals and 6 assists. But it was Brassard who was causing all sorts of problems in the offensive zone and allowing the others to have more open ice.

Mayor Bee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2012, 05:07 PM
  #17
vinnybaby
Registered User
 
vinnybaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 318
vCash: 500
No from the Leafs.

Bozak is better than Brassard. He is better defensively, better on faceoffs and they have very similar offensive production. Bozak is also great friends and has good chemistry with Kessel.

The only thing Brassard has on Bozak is a high draft pedigree and he is 2 years younger.

The Leafs wouldn't add a former 2nd rounder with top-4 defensive potential, a 3rd and an overpaid veteran who they could either use or sell at the deadline to the highest bidder. It's not good asset management.

vinnybaby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2012, 05:14 PM
  #18
Roadman
Moving On
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London OH
Country: United States
Posts: 2,135
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinnybaby View Post
No from the Leafs.

Bozak is better than Brassard. He is better defensively, better on faceoffs and they have very similar offensive production. Bozak is also great friends and has good chemistry with Kessel.

The only thing Brassard has on Bozak is a high draft pedigree and he is 2 years younger.
Cool,

Keep him

__________________
__________________

I post, therefore I am.
Roadman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2012, 05:19 PM
  #19
MapleReef
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Nassau Bahamas
Country: Bahamas
Posts: 196
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kershaw View Post
Bozak is better than Brassard IMO.
I agree all the way.

MapleReef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2012, 05:48 PM
  #20
Viqsi
battered but unbowed
 
Viqsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Scary Internet
Country: United States
Posts: 17,735
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Viqsi
Quote:
Originally Posted by SIDGENO8771 View Post
Bozak is better than Brassard ATM.


If anything, it's a wash. Bozak only put up comparable points because he spent all his time centering PPG forwards Phil Kessel and Joffrey Lupul, in a much worse division. And the advanced stats suggest that Brass is worlds better than Bozak at driving the play, but, well, folks only like advanced stats if they reinforce their existing conceits so take that as you will.

FWIW, Brass already got his "change of scenery" by being given creative freedom on the 2nd line. There's no need for us to trade him. Certainly not for a move that's lateral at best and more likely to be a downgrade.

__________________
Remember - when you're a hockey fan, it's not "reckless driving", it's "good forechecking".
"Viqsi, you are our sweet humanist..." --mt-svk on the CBJ boards

Thanks, Howson, for cleaning up MacLean's toxic waste. Welcome, Kekalainen; let's get good things built!
Viqsi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2012, 05:53 PM
  #21
Nathan311
Humongous big
 
Nathan311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,767
vCash: 1125
Send a message via MSN to Nathan311 Send a message via Skype™ to Nathan311
Columbus doesn't want to do this trade, Toronto doesn't want to do this trade.

Yet, here we still are debating it.

Nathan311 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2012, 06:26 PM
  #22
My Sweet Shadow
Registered User
 
My Sweet Shadow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Sioux Lookout, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,252
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan311 View Post
Columbus doesn't want to do this trade, Toronto doesn't want to do this trade.

Yet, here we still are debating it.
It's essentially what most of the proposals on this board boil down to.

Most fans mainly follow their own teams and only see highlights/stat sheets of other teams' players (especially from the other conference). You know your own players a lot better than you know opposing players, and you tend to value what you know a lot higher than what you don't.

Though it can go the other way. You notice the flaws of your players a lot more, so you tend to want to move them for a different piece (even if it's a lateral move); the "shiny new toy" syndrome.

My Sweet Shadow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-03-2012, 03:07 PM
  #23
SeenSchenn2
Have Faith GLG
 
SeenSchenn2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Thornhill, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,464
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MillarWithASave View Post
Remember, quantity doesn't always equal quality.
Where's the quality here exactly, Brassard?

SeenSchenn2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-03-2012, 03:16 PM
  #24
seanlinden
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 15,451
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MillarWithASave View Post
Remember, quantity doesn't always equal quality.
Ok, but we're not really talking about quality here....

Brassard has played almost 300 games in the league, been given ample opportunity to play with one of the best wingers in the game, and has yet to surpass the 50 point barrier. Granted, Bozak hasn't either, but like Brassard he's come close, and has played a full season less.

Straight up might be a better proposal, at which point the Leafs probably politely decline.

As for the original proposal, from a leaf perspective, pass without question.

seanlinden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-03-2012, 03:22 PM
  #25
iPunch
You Lit a Fire
 
iPunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,545
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jozay View Post
TOR: Brassard

CBJ: Bozak, 3rd, Blacker, Connolly (if CBJ wants him)

I dont really think Brassard is that number one center the leafs need, but I do feel he has plenty of skill and a change of scenery would help him a lot.
Then the Leafs don't need him. Pass.


Quote:
Originally Posted by electricjib View Post
haha TOR fans moving on from a teams name that shall not be spoken of to other teams finally. Be ready for the limitless supplies of Bozaks and Connoly's!
Couldn't have come soon enough. A certain teams fans here are a bit irritable and rude.

iPunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:44 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.