HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Jannik Hansen

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
09-20-2012, 06:22 PM
  #1
Oiler Dynasty
Registered User
 
Oiler Dynasty's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 52
vCash: 500
Jannik Hansen

Always liked him as a play, What would Canuck fans want for him?

Oiler Dynasty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-20-2012, 06:27 PM
  #2
Avs44
Registered User
 
Avs44's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Colorado
Country: United States
Posts: 7,131
vCash: 3319
I think Canuck fans are going to want FAR more than you'd be willing to give up. Your probably thinking bottom
6 players/mid spects/picks. Stuff like that. But to the Canucks he is a cheap, 3rd line winger who has a decent scoring touch, solid defensively, can pk, step in to the top 6 in a pinch, speedy, can hit... Only way I can see him being moved is for a clear upgrade. Obviously no team is going to offer that, but there is no other incentive to move him.

Avs44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-20-2012, 06:33 PM
  #3
RandV
It's a wolf
 
RandV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,586
vCash: 50
Vancouver isn't about to trade Hansen obviously, least of all to a division rival.

But if you want to ignore reality for a second and enter fantasy land I'd suggest Gagner for Hansen, probably straight up, would be the value.

RandV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-20-2012, 06:34 PM
  #4
StringerBell
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 10,000
vCash: 500
Tyrann Mathieu or no deal.

StringerBell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-20-2012, 06:35 PM
  #5
Vankiller Whale
Win it for AV
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 22,779
vCash: 5100
A 1st.

Vankiller Whale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-20-2012, 06:37 PM
  #6
Mystifo
Malkin To Kulemin.
 
Mystifo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: YYT
Country: Russian Federation
Posts: 2,374
vCash: 500
A Phil Kessel. (two firsts and a second.)

Mystifo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-20-2012, 06:59 PM
  #7
BannedFromCDC
Registered User
 
BannedFromCDC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: New Westminster
Country: Canada
Posts: 97
vCash: 500
Jones and a 3rd from the Oilers.

BannedFromCDC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-20-2012, 07:01 PM
  #8
Vankiller Whale
Win it for AV
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 22,779
vCash: 5100
Quote:
Originally Posted by BannedFromCDC
Jones and a 3rd from the Oilers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vankiller Whale View Post
A 1st.
Beat you to it.

Vankiller Whale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-20-2012, 07:02 PM
  #9
Todds Chiropractory
Registered User
 
Todds Chiropractory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Vancouver Island
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,970
vCash: 50
Park of a package for a substantial upgrade on wing, part of a package for a substantial upgrade on defense. Only way I could him leaving.

Todds Chiropractory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-20-2012, 07:06 PM
  #10
Nuckles
༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ ( ͡ ᴥ͡)
 
Nuckles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: In front of computer
Country: Canada
Posts: 16,451
vCash: 50
Canucks have no reason to trade him, so it would require a big overpayment.

__________________

Richer's Ghost made my avatar
Nuckles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-20-2012, 09:50 PM
  #11
Cogburn
Trixie Hobbitses
 
Cogburn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,567
vCash: 50
Too high to be reasonable. Seriously, don't ask.

Cogburn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-20-2012, 10:01 PM
  #12
kthsn
Registered User
 
kthsn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,502
vCash: 1785
He's too valuable to our own team by himself sorta like Matt Martin/Wayne Simmonds.

Similar to Simmonds I could see him being moved in a package.

Maybe Hansen+ for Hemsky...anything that's a downgrade isn't really worth it.

kthsn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
09-20-2012, 10:18 PM
  #13
Canucks5551
Registered User
 
Canucks5551's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Vancouver Island
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,035
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Avs44 View Post
I think Canuck fans are going to want FAR more than you'd be willing to give up. Your probably thinking bottom
6 players/mid spects/picks. Stuff like that. But to the Canucks he is a cheap, 3rd line winger who has a decent scoring touch, solid defensively, can pk, step in to the top 6 in a pinch, speedy, can hit... Only way I can see him being moved is for a clear upgrade. Obviously no team is going to offer that, but there is no other incentive to move him.
Dead on. He's the sort of player who fits so well that you only move him for a clear overpayment.

Canucks5551 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-20-2012, 10:28 PM
  #14
professorchaos
Registered User
 
professorchaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Langley
Country: Canada
Posts: 285
vCash: 500
Agree with above posts. Considering his caphit and versatility, Honey Badger is almost impossible to replace.

professorchaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-20-2012, 10:30 PM
  #15
Vancouver Blazers
1973-1975
 
Vancouver Blazers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 7,535
vCash: 500
Hansen is going nowhere.

Vancouver Blazers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-20-2012, 11:27 PM
  #16
hockeywoot
Registered User
 
hockeywoot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: China
Posts: 810
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kthsn View Post
He's too valuable to our own team by himself sorta like Matt Martin/Wayne Simmonds.

Similar to Simmonds I could see him being moved in a package.

Maybe Hansen+ for Hemsky...anything that's a downgrade isn't really worth it.

Good comparison. Our less-talented version of Wayne Simmonds.
Extremely useful player to have. I hope he's in our bottom 6 for years to come.


In terms of value, alot of the suggestions here aren't far off.

However, to get Hansen you would need to overpay, otherwise he'd be part of a package
for a star-level player.

hockeywoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-20-2012, 11:42 PM
  #17
PierreMcGuire*
How dissapointing
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Delta, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,750
vCash: 500
Obviously Hansen hold huge value in the Canucks, and probably won't be traded unless used as a key piece in a deal. If he were to be moved it probably wouldn't be to a divisional rival either.

However ignoring that, Hansen for Paajarvi+ could make sense. Though I'm not sure the Oilers would like it too much, but that's realistically what it would take.

Hansen for Gagner is a trade I would do,doubt the Oilers would be to keen on giving up Gagner for Hansen alone though.

A deal involving Hansen for Hemsky could be interesting, depending on what the Canucks are adding.

At the end of the day Hansen has huge value to the Canucks, and I don't see him getting moved, nor do I want him to be moved.

PierreMcGuire* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2012, 02:27 AM
  #18
wiredmaverick
Registered User
 
wiredmaverick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,066
vCash: 500
He's not worth enough to help get one of your top-6 guys and he's worth too much to give away for any of your bottom-6 guys.

wiredmaverick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2012, 02:36 AM
  #19
mriswith
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 344
vCash: 500
Hansen would cost a lot in trade, it'd take an overpayment that you wouldn't want to do. I'd do something around Hansen for MPS.

mriswith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2012, 06:00 AM
  #20
hlaverty06
Registered User
 
hlaverty06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NJ all day
Country: United States
Posts: 7,270
vCash: 500
Hansen is worth way more to the nucks than you can imagine.

I don't see Nucks fans being willing to let himgo

hlaverty06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2012, 08:31 AM
  #21
Reign Nateo
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,062
vCash: 500
No Hansen.

Reign Nateo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2012, 08:40 AM
  #22
NYVanfan
Registered User
 
NYVanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,896
vCash: 500
i agree w everything in this thread, except ..he is not as good as Simmonds

NYVanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2012, 08:55 AM
  #23
keslerburrows
Registered User
 
keslerburrows's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vernon, Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,642
vCash: 500
No one is getting Hansen. He's way too awesome.

keslerburrows is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2012, 11:00 AM
  #24
dave babych returns
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,918
vCash: 500
I think a good deal for the Canucks involving Jannik Hansen would be one where he's packaged with another forward for a significant upgrade. No point trading him for another third liner (he's versatile enough that moving him for "a different type of player" is pretty pointless) and most teams aren't going to make a one-for-one trade where they are acquiring a clearly inferior player.

I don't know if the Oilers are a good candidate for that type of deal but I think that's what works for the Canucks. We don't really have a strong need to move Hansen for a player at a different position (maybe center, but then we'd be as weak at RW as we are at center now) so it's got to be something that changes the team's depth chart up a bit.

dave babych returns is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2012, 11:02 AM
  #25
Luck 6
\\_______
 
Luck 6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 7,032
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandV View Post
Vancouver isn't about to trade Hansen obviously, least of all to a division rival.

But if you want to ignore reality for a second and enter fantasy land I'd suggest Gagner for Hansen, probably straight up, would be the value.
This isn't far off. This is the kind of deal we'd be looking for if he were moved. The only way I see it happening is if some younger players really step up in camp this year or next year. If that happened, and there was a considerable offer on the table the filled a need, that would be the only way I see Hansen moved.

Luck 6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:44 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.