Disgusting. Every time there's a list of some sort, it's never any good. Seriously, what are these people thinking? Unless the list has specific criteria that we're not aware of or greater specification, then everyone who made this list is really really high on something far more powerful than anything I've ever had.
Aside from the Rangers players that are missing some of those players are just ridiculous. Varly? a good 1/2 season with the Avs, Hedman? Solid defenseman yes but over McD? Tavares is lower than Couture? I don't think so.
Seriously? Myers is on the list and McD isn't? Del Zotto and Myers should be in the same boat and how Myers gets to 24 and DZ isn't on the list is beyond me.
Also, Gabriel Landeskog, future HOF not on list. No. Simmonds over Landeskog?
I am 80% sure this list is either forged or a joke.
When you start reading the list from the top down and you see that at #1 is any name other than Steven Stamkos you can stop reading right there.
No kidding. They try and be all fancy with the "intangibles" but you can't just ignore the tangibles. That makes you dumb, not insightful.
As a Landeskog fan, if you want to talk about intangibles, there's not a single player under 25 that plays with his type of fire and passion. He plays the same game as Captain Cally with more size, speed and skill. The lack of Landeskog on this list just doesn't work.