Proposal: oilers and hawks

[Hawkaholic]

If you changed Bolland to Kane, I would do it.

[topchowda]

I might do Eberle, Whitney for Seabs, Bolland

Chicago gets an elite winger and a very good defenseman

Edmonton gets a good shutdown center and elite defenseman

[Hawkaholic]

Originally Posted by topchowda

I might do Eberle, Whitney for Seabs, Bolland

Chicago gets an elite winger and a very good defenseman

Edmonton gets a good shutdown center and elite defenseman

Chicago wouldn't do it.

[Petro Points]

Originally Posted by Hawkaholic

If you changed Bolland to Kane, I would do it.

what if leave Bolland in AND add Kane?

[Puritania]

Terrible for the Hawks.

[couture23]

Originally Posted by Petro Points

what if leave Bolland in AND add Kane?

Well there's the deal-breaker.

[Jamin]

Originally Posted by coldsteelonice84

lol

[Hawkaholic]

Originally Posted by Petro Points

what if leave Bolland in AND add Kane?

Wow, this jsut keeps getting better and better.

To make it even, we should change Gagner to Hemsky.

[Iridium128]

Originally Posted by Hawkaholic

Wow, this jsut keeps getting better and better.

To make it even, we should change Gagner to Hemsky.

And you give us Krueger and we'll give you Q!

[Drydenwasthebest]

Originally Posted by jumptheshark

Been awhile since I made a proposal. Since I spend so much time mocking and flaming other peoples bad proposals I think it is time for me to get raked over the coals

oilers give up


c Sam Gagner
F Paajarvi, Magnus »
C Anton Lander
1st round pick in 2015

for

Dave Bolland
Brent Seabrook

Just brutal for the Hawks. Why would they get rid of the two best players in the deal? A 1st in 2015??? Lol.

If Seabrook ALONE could be had for that garbage, Montreal would have a deal around Seabrook and Plekanec + so fast the Oilers would be left standing on the side of the road wondering what happened.

[DJN21]

I have to ask...and Im being serious not trying to be a jerk here just trying to pick the OP's brain...

What's the rationale behind making it a 2015 1st lol? I mean other than the fact that 3 years from now EDM should be a powerhouse making their 1st a veryyy low pick hence way less enticing?

[gooilgo]

Where should I start........I apologize as an Oiler fan.

[Blackhawkswincup]

For Seabs you are sending Ryan Nugent-Hopkins the Hawks way as foundation of any deal

[South Indian Stunna]

No chance for Seabrook, I have no idea what some fellow Oil fans are thinking.

If we are to make a deal with Chicago, its more plausible for something like Gagner and Klefbom going for Hjalmarsson and Mcneill.

[oilinblood]

Originally Posted by CupofOil

Jezz JTS, why did you have to post this crap deal on the main board?

Sorry Hawks fans, not all Oiler fans think that this is a sane proposal.

what he said.

It makes zero sense and the value is definitely not there. hats off to Chicago fans that give Gagner some credit he is due but obviously this proposal is still way off. Lander and Magnus cant even get the numbers against crappy opponents in a crappy league. Its frankly pathetic.

That deal wont even get you Bolland

[oilinblood]

Originally Posted by coldsteelonice84

best....response...ever. lol

[rockinghockey]

Originally Posted by jumptheshark

Been awhile since I made a proposal. Since I spend so much time mocking and flaming other peoples bad proposals I think it is time for me to get raked over the coals

oilers give up


c Sam Gagner
F Paajarvi, Magnus »
C Anton Lander
1st round pick in 2015

for

Dave Bolland
Brent Seabrook

As an Oiler fan I would be all over this. I don't understand the 1st in 2015. I will say that Gagner is a legit 2C, and Lander will develop into a 3rd liner. Who replaces Seabrock on defense though.

[rockinghockey]

Originally Posted by oilinblood

what he said.

It makes zero sense and the value is definitely not there. hats off to Chicago fans that give Gagner some credit he is due but obviously this proposal is still way off. Lander and Magnus cant even get the numbers against crappy opponents in a crappy league. Its frankly pathetic.

That deal wont even get you Bolland

Now you guys are just making stupid quotes, as if the Hawks wouldn't give up Bolland for that package.

Sorry to say but Gagner alone is worth more than Bolland, would I like to have Bolland in EDM of course put please so say he is better than Gagner is a laugh, Gagner is 23 got 47 points last year not even playing on the top 2 lines all year. His FO% is only 1 percentage below Bolland who is 26 and only got 37 points. Gagner's game continues to develop and get better and if there was a season this year and Gagner playing legit top 6 with legit wingers he would be close to 60 points.

[thadd]

Originally Posted by Hawkaholic

Wow, this jsut keeps getting better and better.

To make it even, we should change Gagner to Hemsky.

YES! PLEASE!!!!

No thanks to sending Gagner away.... but yeah, Chicago won't touch this one in a million years.

[Reverend Mayhem]

That's not a lot back for an Olympian caliber defenseman who recently signed an extension AND Bolland.

[Neatman]

Originally Posted by Blackhawkswincup

For Seabs you are sending Ryan Nugent-Hopkins the Hawks way as foundation of any deal

If Hopkins is moving, it certainly isnt for a defender of Seabrook's calibre.

[PoolChamp]

Originally Posted by rockinghockey

As an Oiler fan I would be all over this. I don't understand the 1st in 2015. I will say that Gagner is a legit 2C, and Lander will develop into a 3rd liner. Who replaces Seabrock on defense though.

since when? looks like a scoring 3rd liner to me.

[BBurke]

Originally Posted by Neatman

If Hopkins is moving, it certainly isnt for a defender of Seabrook's calibre.

.....So you would not like a #1D?

[The Nuge]

Originally Posted by PoolChamp

since when? looks like a scoring 3rd liner to me.

This has been covered a million times. He's a #2C...

[wahoyaho]

Originally Posted by The Nuge

This has been covered a million times. He's a #2C...

Covered where?