HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Allen York

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
11-03-2012, 07:56 PM
  #1
palindrom
Registered User
 
palindrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,148
vCash: 500
Allen York

Considering the acquisition of Bobrovsky (24yo) combined with the drafting of Dansk (32th overall 2012) and Korpisalo (62overall 2012).

And Considering Mason is still under contract and Colombus will probably give him a last shoot (24 yo) next year before deciding of his future with the team.

With so many young goalies, York become a little bit redundant in the Colombus system.

Allen York (23yo) did well last year in the NHL with 11gp .920

So if after the training camp Colombus decide to go with Mason/Bobrovsky would a team be willing to acquire York and maybe give him a shoot?

For let say a 4th or 5th round pick or equivalent prospect ?

I could see Montreal acquiring him and let him play with the bulldog this year. trying to develop him to become Price backup in 1-2 years in the future.

palindrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 08:07 PM
  #2
Leafs For Life*
Nothing
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,636
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by palindrom View Post
Considering the acquisition of Bobrovsky (24yo) combined with the drafting of Dansk (32th overall 2012) and Korpisalo (62overall 2012).

And Considering Mason is still under contract and Colombus will probably give him a last shoot (24 yo) next year before deciding of his future with the team.

With so many young goalies, York become a little bit redundant in the Colombus system.

Allen York (23yo) did well last year in the NHL with 11gp .920

So if after the training camp Colombus decide to go with Mason/Bobrovsky would a team be willing to acquire York and maybe give him a shoot?

For let say a 4th or 5th round pick or equivalent prospect ?

I could see Montreal acquiring him and let him play with the bulldog this year. trying to develop him to become Price backup in 1-2 years in the future.
Leafs will take him for a 3rd, which beats your offer.

Leafs For Life* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 08:09 PM
  #3
palindrom
Registered User
 
palindrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,148
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leaffan16 View Post
Leafs will take him for a 3rd, which beats your offer.
Thats good. Colombus wont complain.

what is the role you would give York in Toronto organisation?

palindrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 08:11 PM
  #4
Leafs For Life*
Nothing
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,636
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by palindrom View Post
Thats good. Colombus wont complain.

what is the role you would give York in Toronto organisation?
Well.. if he got a .920 save %, that would tie him for 10th. So backup to Riemer.

Leafs For Life* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 08:11 PM
  #5
palindrom
Registered User
 
palindrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,148
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leaffan16 View Post
Well.. if he got a .920 save %, that would tie him for 10th. So backup to Riemer.
.920% over only 11 games, and he didn't start them all. The sample is so small, his stats are not meaningful.

palindrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 08:14 PM
  #6
Leafs For Life*
Nothing
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,636
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by palindrom View Post
.920% over only 11 games, and he didn't start them all. The sample is so small, his stats are not meaningful.
Still, it shows that he can handle it in the NHL. Would probably change the deal to G. Sparks as iirc we are at the roster limit.

EDIT: Why did he do terrible in the AHL/ECHL? Seemed before this year, he was destroying those leagues, and did well in the top league.

Leafs For Life* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 08:19 PM
  #7
palindrom
Registered User
 
palindrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,148
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leaffan16 View Post
Still, it shows that he can handle it in the NHL. Would probably change the deal to G. Sparks as iirc we are at the roster limit.

EDIT: Why did he do terrible in the AHL/ECHL? Seemed before this year, he was destroying those leagues, and did well in the top league.
He didnt do terrible, he only played 9 AHL games and and 11 ECHL games.

His AHL/ECHL stats are as meaningless than his NHL stats.

Scout report will tell you more about him than his stats.

palindrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 08:22 PM
  #8
jmart21
MISC!!!
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: All Over The Place
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,840
vCash: 500
Why would CLB trade him for a 4th or 5th round pick?

Your post makes it sound as if the blue jackets are saying "we've got Mason/Bob; lets give our goalie prospects away for a bare minimum". Which is irrational. I don't understand why a team would trade a prospect for something that doesn't help them improve. If you don't intend on having a prospect stay in your system and eventually contribute, you use them as a bargaining chip.

jmart21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 08:25 PM
  #9
palindrom
Registered User
 
palindrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,148
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by jmart21 View Post
Why would CLB trade him for a 4th or 5th round pick?

Your post makes it sound as if the blue jackets are saying "we've got Mason/Bob; lets give our goalie prospects away for a bare minimum". Which is irrational. I don't understand why a team would trade a prospect for something that doesn't help them improve. If you don't intend on having a prospect stay in your system and eventually contribute, you use them as a bargaining chip.
I said 4th/5th round as a reference value. I agree an equivalent prospect would make more sense.

palindrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 08:30 PM
  #10
Leafs For Life*
Nothing
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,636
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by palindrom View Post
He didnt do terrible, he only played 9 AHL games and and 11 ECHL games.

His AHL/ECHL stats are as meaningless than his NHL stats.

Scout report will tell you more about him than his stats.
Still, he did well in a short time on a bigger league, and didn't in a worse league. Kinda the opposite of what you would expect.

Hockey's Future
Quote:
Talent Analysis
A big goaltender who covers a lot of net and plays well positionally. He has begun to improve his lateral quickness, but there is still much work to be done. He continues to play well under pressure and played well against quality opponents in his limited time with Columbus this season.

Future
York’s final stretch with the Jackets has shown that he can play at an elite level. After being scared back to the minors in the beginning of the year, the sizeable net minder came back with a purpose and finished the year strong. He will fluctuate between the AHL and NHL next year, but should get more playing time on Columbus.
THN
Quote:
ASSETS: Has a very good frame for the goaltending position. Can play a lot at lower levels.

FLAWS: Needs to add more bulk and consistency to be a successful 'keeper at the highest level.

CAREER POTENTIAL: Backup goaltender with some upside.

Leafs For Life* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 08:34 PM
  #11
palindrom
Registered User
 
palindrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,148
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leaffan16 View Post
Still, he did well in a short time on a bigger league, and didn't in a worse league. Kinda the opposite of what you would expect.

Hockey's Future


THN
he is a product of his team,colombus strong defense improved his stats

palindrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 09:05 PM
  #12
Pigs On The Wing
Registered User
 
Pigs On The Wing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 2,901
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by palindrom View Post
he is a product of his team,colombus strong defense improved his stats
Strong defense?

J. Johnson - Wizniewski
A. Johnson - Lebda
Moore - Savard

That's a strong defense to you? That's what CBJ's defense looked like late last year.

Pigs On The Wing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 09:10 PM
  #13
Leafs For Life*
Nothing
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,636
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Definition View Post
Strong defense?

J. Johnson - Wizniewski
A. Johnson - Lebda
Moore - Savard

That's a strong defense to you? That's what CBJ's defense looked like late last year.
I know that it's stupid that he is arguing the last place team helped his stats, but that's a good to average defence group. And the 3rd+2nd pair are switched.

Leafs For Life* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 09:28 PM
  #14
Vankiller Whale
Maybe HE can score
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,920
vCash: 5555
Quote:
Originally Posted by Definition View Post
Strong defense?

J. Johnson - Wizniewski
A. Johnson - Lebda
Moore - Savard

That's a strong defense to you? That's what CBJ's defense looked like late last year.
Uh...Nikitin-Tyutin?

Vankiller Whale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 09:29 PM
  #15
palindrom
Registered User
 
palindrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,148
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Definition View Post
Strong defense?

J. Johnson - Wizniewski
A. Johnson - Lebda
Moore - Savard

That's a strong defense to you? That's what CBJ's defense looked like late last year.
i was kidding!

palindrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-03-2012, 09:35 PM
  #16
Pigs On The Wing
Registered User
 
Pigs On The Wing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 2,901
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vankiller Whale View Post
Uh...Nikitin-Tyutin?
Tyutin was injured for all of York's starts late in the season. Nikitin should be there though.

Pigs On The Wing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-04-2012, 01:26 AM
  #17
jumptheshark
Give the dog a bone
 
jumptheshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: hf retirement home
Country: United Nations
Posts: 52,292
vCash: 500
He has shown very little to have much value right now.

__________________
trying to fend off exwife number 2
45000/010113
GO SHARKS GO
jumptheshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-04-2012, 01:31 AM
  #18
Mystlyfe
We're Touched
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 12,155
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leaffan16 View Post
Still, it shows that he can handle it in the NHL. Would probably change the deal to G. Sparks as iirc we are at the roster limit.

EDIT: Why did he do terrible in the AHL/ECHL? Seemed before this year, he was destroying those leagues, and did well in the top league.
Not enough time for any of those stats to be even close to meaningful.
http://www.arcticicehockey.com/2010/...ess-goaltender

And even beyond that argument, those stats are even less meaningful given the lack of exposure York has had. "The book" on York has yet to be compiled by other teams' scouting departments at the pro level. Let's see if York can adjust once other teams figure out how to approach York.

Mystlyfe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-04-2012, 07:51 PM
  #19
Shawnathon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 319
vCash: 500
Anyone who saw York last season knows he's nothing special. He went on a 3 game rookie hot streak. Big deal.

Shawnathon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-04-2012, 07:59 PM
  #20
Blackhawkswincup
Global Moderator
 
Blackhawkswincup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Country: United States
Posts: 100,973
vCash: 340
Has no value

Blackhawkswincup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-04-2012, 09:02 PM
  #21
Viqsi
carrying the flag
 
Viqsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Scary Internet
Country: United States
Posts: 20,384
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Viqsi
Why in the world would we want to trade York? He did well by us when we were on national TV, he's still developing, and we still don't know if we have a quality starting goaltender. His NHL stats look good so far, but if he really was that good we'd already be penciling him in as the NHL backup instead of the AHL backup. He needs time, and we intend to give him that. Right now he's AHL fodder (with or without the lockout) while most of our other youngsters are in Europe or the CHL - so there's time available for him to play (he hasn't so far, mostly because he's been injured).

There's absolutely no point in trading him.

__________________
Remember - when you're a hockey fan, it's not "reckless driving", it's "good forechecking".
"Viqsi, you are our sweet humanist..." --mt-svk on the CBJ boards

Thanks, Howson, for cleaning up MacLean's toxic waste. Welcome, Kekalainen; let's get good things built!
Viqsi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-04-2012, 09:16 PM
  #22
Viqsi
carrying the flag
 
Viqsi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Scary Internet
Country: United States
Posts: 20,384
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Viqsi
Quote:
Originally Posted by Definition View Post
Strong defense?

J. Johnson - Wizniewski
A. Johnson - Lebda
Moore - Savard

That's a strong defense to you? That's what CBJ's defense looked like late last year.
Wisniewski was injured for all but one of the games York played late last year. (He relieved Mason in two and started four.)

Defensemen ordered by average time on ice in those games:
JMFJ (0-2-2 -4 6GP, played four games above 30min)
Nikitin (2-4-6 +2 6GP, played about 24-25 min)
Lebda (0-0-0 +0 6GP, played 17-18 minutes on average)
Savard (0-0-0 +0 3GP, played over 15min per night, then swapped with Prout)
Prout (0-0-0 +0 3GP, had two 14-minute games and played 5 min in the other)
AJohnson (0-2-2 -3 6GP, played as many as 17:28 and as few as 7:35; ATOI around 12 minutes or so.)
Moore (0-0-0 +0 4GP, times went from 10 to 16 to 15 to 11 minutes
Wisniewski (0-0-0 +0 1GP, played 25:55 in his only game during that time)

Basically, Jack was willing so we threw him to the wolves so that Niktin might continue to kick ass.

Viqsi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-05-2012, 06:57 AM
  #23
palindrom
Registered User
 
palindrom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 4,148
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Viqsi View Post
Why in the world would we want to trade York? He did well by us when we were on national TV, he's still developing, and we still don't know if we have a quality starting goaltender. His NHL stats look good so far, but if he really was that good we'd already be penciling him in as the NHL backup instead of the AHL backup. He needs time, and we intend to give him that. Right now he's AHL fodder (with or without the lockout) while most of our other youngsters are in Europe or the CHL - so there's time available for him to play (he hasn't so far, mostly because he's been injured).

There's absolutely no point in trading him.
Then why do everyone say he has no value? (i dont share this opinion)

palindrom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-05-2012, 09:41 AM
  #24
coldsteelonice84
Registered User
 
coldsteelonice84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 24,700
vCash: 10592
I wish we had York as our backup, major upgrade.

coldsteelonice84 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-05-2012, 12:01 PM
  #25
Hawkaholic
Registered User
 
Hawkaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: London, Ont.
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,886
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by coldsteelonice84 View Post
I wish we had York as our backup, major upgrade.
Says the guy who thinks Hutton is an upgrade over our back-up.

Hawkaholic is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.