HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Cory Schneider and only Cory Schneider!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
11-08-2012, 05:51 PM
  #1
Bourne Endeavor
Moderator
( _)>⌐■-■ (⌐■_■)
 
Bourne Endeavor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,168
vCash: 13357
Cory Schneider and only Cory Schneider!

Since there has been some traction involving Schneider. I thought it best he have his own, lest we get boggled down in Luongo discussions. Therefore, I ask all proposals strictly be kept to those involving Schneider.

On the subject at hand, these were the offers I proposed in the other thread, alongside a few others. And I'd like to gauge Leafdom's reaction. I also preface this by saying I am open to twinks and debates on the offers.



Cory Schneider
Mason Raymond



Joffrey Lupul
Nazem Kadri
Conditional first (only if Lupul does not resign)
------



Cory Schneider



James Van Riemsdyk
1st 2013 or Nazem Kadri
------



Cory Schneider



Mikhail Grabovski (Personally, I would be content straight up but some will argue more)
------



Cory Schneider



Jake Gardiner
Conditional 1st (playoffs or defaults to 2014)
------

My personal choice would be the Lupul trade. He best answers our needs and am confident not only that we can resign him, but he will maintain a 60+ point performance. Admittedly, him being a favorite of mine does lead to partial bias.

Bourne Endeavor is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 05:53 PM
  #2
Vankiller Whale
Maybe HE can score
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 24,430
vCash: 5555
Schneider for Grabovski may be rejected by leafs fans simply because of their centre depth, but valuewise it's a huge win for them.

The others I'm okay with, though.

Vankiller Whale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 05:53 PM
  #3
Winroba
Keep Calm, Kassi On
 
Winroba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,409
vCash: 500
What traction has been had with Schneider?

Winroba is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 05:57 PM
  #4
Bourne Endeavor
Moderator
( _)>⌐■-■ (⌐■_■)
 
Bourne Endeavor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,168
vCash: 13357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winroba View Post
What traction has been had with Schneider?
Nothing official, just discussions in the Lu thread and on the Nuck board that all too often end up buried. I figure this way we can keep the two separate. I'd like to see what Schneider could bring without Lu getting dragged into it.

Bourne Endeavor is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 06:01 PM
  #5
Bernier the Boats
Formerly BBurke
 
Bernier the Boats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,571
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vankiller Whale View Post
Schneider for Grabovski may be rejected by leafs fans simply because of their centre depth, but valuewise it's a huge win for them.

The others I'm okay with, though.
I would accept it.

Bernier the Boats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 06:02 PM
  #6
Seatoo
Never Stop Poasting
 
Seatoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: The Interior of BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,915
vCash: 500
I would do the JVR deal if it was JVR + Kadri + 2013 1st + B Prospect otherwise its an easy no to the rest of the deals.

Seatoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 06:03 PM
  #7
Vankiller Whale
Maybe HE can score
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 24,430
vCash: 5555
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bourne Endeavor View Post
Nothing official, just discussions in the Lu thread and on the Nuck board that all too often end up buried. I figure this way we can keep the two separate. I'd like to see what Schneider could bring without Lu getting dragged into it.
I've tried it a good 2-3 teams since the season ended. Never really succeeded in keeping Luongo out of it, but may as well try. Something that would really appeal to me would be something like this:

To Washington: Schneider, Saad
To Chicago: Holtby
To Vancouver: Kuznetsov

That is, ideally I'd want the return to be a single stud player, but as that's fairly unlikely, JVR + 1st would make the most sense for us from Toronto, imo.

Vankiller Whale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 06:04 PM
  #8
Bernier the Boats
Formerly BBurke
 
Bernier the Boats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,571
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seatoo View Post
I would do the JVR deal if it was JVR + Kadri + 2013 1st + B Prospect otherwise its an easy no to the rest of the deals.
Would you also like Kessel? Perhaps Brian Burke's tie as well?

Bernier the Boats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 06:04 PM
  #9
Bourne Endeavor
Moderator
( _)>⌐■-■ (⌐■_■)
 
Bourne Endeavor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,168
vCash: 13357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vankiller Whale View Post
Schneider for Grabovski may be rejected by leafs fans simply because of their centre depth, but valuewise it's a huge win for them.

The others I'm okay with, though.
That trade is likely my least preferred, if only because it pushes Kesler to the wing. Curious though, what would you add to it?

Bourne Endeavor is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 06:08 PM
  #10
Vankiller Whale
Maybe HE can score
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 24,430
vCash: 5555
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bourne Endeavor View Post
That trade is likely my least preferred, if only because it pushes Kesler to the wing. Curious though, what would you add to it?
I don't know. I'm not too keen on Grabovski being the centrepiece of a Schneider trade, and I have to believe that Leafs fans would prefer a different piece as well. Having 5.5 mil locked up on a 3C(although he is a very solid player) just doesn't seem like good asset management to me.

Vankiller Whale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 06:11 PM
  #11
Bourne Endeavor
Moderator
( _)>⌐■-■ (⌐■_■)
 
Bourne Endeavor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,168
vCash: 13357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seatoo View Post
I would do the JVR deal if it was JVR + Kadri + 2013 1st + B Prospect otherwise its an easy no to the rest of the deals.
See, the thing is. I'm trying not to rip the Leafs off.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vankiller Whale View Post
I've tried it a good 2-3 teams since the season ended. Never really succeeded in keeping Luongo out of it, but may as well try. Something that would really appeal to me would be something like this:

To Washington: Schneider, Saad
To Chicago: Holtby
To Vancouver: Kuznetsov

That is, ideally I'd want the return to be a single stud player, but as that's fairly unlikely, JVR + 1st would make the most sense for us from Toronto, imo.
Oh, I have noticed but here's hoping the third time's the charm!

That would be an ideal trade, although I suspect both Chicago and Washington being a bit gun shy. Both Kuznetsov and Saad are highly regarded. Good value all around though.

Bourne Endeavor is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 06:13 PM
  #12
LiquidSnake
Agent of Chaos...
 
LiquidSnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 27,529
vCash: 883
No thanks. Would take none of those proposals from a Canuck perspective.

LiquidSnake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 06:19 PM
  #13
CanuckLuck
Registered User
 
CanuckLuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Kelowna, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,371
vCash: 500
No thanks. Don't like any piece Toronto has if Schneider is going the other way.

Just watching Schneider gives me the chills. Guy has ice in his veins and I don't like the idea of trading him at all. And even though Eddie Lack is looking poised to make an NHL debut within the next couple of years, he still has a giant question mark. Schneider is the real deal.

CanuckLuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 06:20 PM
  #14
Lucbourdon
Kefka cheers for Van
 
Lucbourdon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 39,517
vCash: 50
I would only do the Gardiner deal, the rest are not close.

Lucbourdon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 06:29 PM
  #15
vanwest
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,030
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LiquidSnake View Post
No thanks. Would take none of those proposals from a Canuck perspective.
Me neither. The objective of any trade should be to improve our team. I don't see how trading Schneider for any of those assets does that, other than the Gardiner trade where we are getting a really good player back but we are already solid on defence. I obviously think very highly of Schneider and think that he will be undervalued because he is not yet a proven starter. He's as blue chip as they come IMO. If we're going to trade him I want a blue chip forward signed to a reasonably favourable deal.

vanwest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 06:32 PM
  #16
Phion Keneuf
Top Dawg Ent.
 
Phion Keneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vaughan, Ontario
Country: Italy
Posts: 27,894
vCash: 500
Grabo is the only one I'd do.

Maybe the Lupul deal if he wants 6ish mil (and van signs him)

Phion Keneuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 06:36 PM
  #17
Bourne Endeavor
Moderator
( _)>⌐■-■ (⌐■_■)
 
Bourne Endeavor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,168
vCash: 13357
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanwest View Post
Me neither. The objective of any trade should be to improve our team. I don't see how trading Schneider for any of those assets does that, other than the Gardiner trade where we are getting a really good player back but we are already solid on defence. I obviously think very highly of Schneider and think that he will be undervalued because he is not yet a proven starter. He's as blue chip as they come IMO. If we're going to trade him I want a blue chip forward signed to a reasonably favourable deal.
I have frequently advocated acquiring Gardiner and using him in another trade, be it immediately or by the deadline, that does address our needs better. As always, Ryan and Perry come to mind.

In any case, these are dependent on how you see the players involved panning out. I like the upside Lupul and JVR have. Perhaps, some minor twinking is needed but I don't feel much. Granted, I am also far more open to the idea of moving Schneider if the return is better.

Bourne Endeavor is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 06:39 PM
  #18
vanwest
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,030
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bourne Endeavor View Post
I have frequently advocated acquiring Gardiner and using him in another trade, be it immediately or by the deadline, that does address our needs better. As always, Ryan and Perry come to mind.

In any case, these are dependent on how you see the players involved panning out. I like the upside Lupul and JVR have. Perhaps, some minor twinking is needed but I don't feel much. Granted, I am also far more open to the idea of moving Schneider if the return is better.
I'm probably in the minority but I'd trade Luongo for a low return and hang onto Schneider even if the return was significantly higher. I'm like the poster above who sees Schneider as the real deal. And that is even though I see Gardiner as the real deal too. He's going to be a stud defenceman IMO.

To me, JVR is basically the same as Luke Schenn who I feel we could have traded Luongo for and Lupul is a year from free agency (I know we get a conditional first) and has had some massive consistency and injury issues. Schneider sets us up in net for quite a while and contrary to many on here I don't think that good young goalies are easy to find or develop.

vanwest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 06:39 PM
  #19
timw33
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Victoria
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,771
vCash: 500
Would absolutely do none of those deals.

Schnieder's value is much, much, much greater than Luongo's and should be reflected as such.

Minimum: Gardiner + 1st + +

timw33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 06:42 PM
  #20
CanuckLuck
Registered User
 
CanuckLuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Kelowna, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,371
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by timw33 View Post
Would absolutely do none of those deals.

Schnieder's value is much, much, much greater than Luongo's and should be reflected as such.

Minimum: Gardiner + 1st + +
This is quite ridiculous. Gardiner and Schneider probably have similar value.

CanuckLuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 06:43 PM
  #21
Bourne Endeavor
Moderator
( _)>⌐■-■ (⌐■_■)
 
Bourne Endeavor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,168
vCash: 13357
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanwest View Post
I'm probably in the minority but I'd trade Luongo for a low return and hang onto Schneider even if the return was significantly higher. I'm like the poster above who sees Schneider as the real deal. And that is even though I see Gardiner as the real deal too. He's going to be a stud defenceman IMO.
That's fair. I'm mostly just gauging whereabouts Schneider's value might be. I know a good portion of our fanbase wants to keep him above all. Perhaps, I just see Lack following a similar path to that of Schneider.

Quote:
Originally Posted by timw33 View Post
Would absolutely do none of those deals.

Schnieder's value is much, much, much greater than Luongo's and should be reflected as such.

Minimum: Gardiner + 1st + +
Did you mean Schneider or Lundqvist?

I'm all for those just not wanting to deal Schneider. That is fair. This... is not.

Bourne Endeavor is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 06:45 PM
  #22
vanwest
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,030
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bourne Endeavor View Post
That's fair. I'm mostly just gauging whereabouts Schneider's value might be. I know a good portion of our fanbase wants to keep him above all. Perhaps, I just see Lack following a similar path to that of Schneider.
If I was guaging value I'd place him as equal to Jake Gardiner.

vanwest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 06:46 PM
  #23
mytor4*
 
mytor4*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,175
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seatoo View Post
I would do the JVR deal if it was JVR + Kadri + 2013 1st + B Prospect otherwise its an easy no to the rest of the deals.

I wonder why.

mytor4* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 07:23 PM
  #24
y2kcanucks
Cult of Personality
 
y2kcanucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Surrey, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 46,468
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to y2kcanucks
Phil Kessel for Cory Schneider.

__________________
http://www.vancitynitetours.com
y2kcanucks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-08-2012, 07:28 PM
  #25
FAMOUSfin
Registered User
 
FAMOUSfin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 865
vCash: 500
Gardiner+1st or Reilly+2nd. No way Schneids gets traded for an injury prone defensive liability who was considered a draft bust up until last year.

FAMOUSfin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:05 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.