HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

What team needs more depth?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
11-13-2012, 07:34 AM
  #1
Leafs For Life*
Nothing
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,636
vCash: 500
What team needs more depth?

So what teams need depth?

My 1st thought is Anaheim but they say to keep a combination of prospects and near 40 year olds in their top 6 will work. No offense but I don't see that working well enough for playoffs.

So what teams?

Leafs For Life* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2012, 07:40 AM
  #2
Exit Dose
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cerritos, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 19,206
vCash: 500
Who gives a **** if we aren't going to win the cup with rookies? We made the playoffs with less talent in '09 and '11. My biggest worry is which Getzlaf we are getting this year.

Exit Dose is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2012, 07:42 AM
  #3
Moore Money
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,597
vCash: 500
every team needs more depth. Especially my team.

Moore Money is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2012, 07:56 AM
  #4
Vipers31
Moderator
Advanced Stagnostic
 
Vipers31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Bergisch Gladbach
Country: Germany
Posts: 11,861
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leaffan16 View Post
My 1st thought is Anaheim but they say to keep a combination of prospects and near 40 year olds in their top 6 will work. No offense but I don't see that working well enough for playoffs.
While I don't disagree entirely with the notion that the Ducks lack depth in certain areas, that comment seems wildly odd. Our three most important players in (and half of) our top-six are Getzlaf, Perry and Ryan - none of which are prospects or near-40-year-olds.

There's one 40-year old in Selanne. Koivu will be centering the third line. We're left with two spots for prospects, and in Palmieri and Holland/Bonino we do have a couple that have proven enough at all lower levels to deserve that chance.

Now, if we were to talk about what happens next year in a scenario that sees us left without Getzlaf or Perry, that's a vastly different matter.

Vipers31 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2012, 07:59 AM
  #5
LEAFANFORLIFE23
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,733
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leaffan16 View Post
So what teams need depth?

My 1st thought is Anaheim but they say to keep a combination of prospects and near 40 year olds in their top 6 will work. No offense but I don't see that working well enough for playoffs.

So what teams?
look at your username that one

LEAFANFORLIFE23 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2012, 08:08 AM
  #6
The Podium
Formerly chrisx101
 
The Podium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,026
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LEAFANFORLIFE23 View Post
look at your username that one
Actually, Toronto needs more talent then depth. Our depth should be the last of our worries

The Podium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2012, 09:25 AM
  #7
sharks9
Registered User
 
sharks9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 9,054
vCash: 500
MTL needs more scoring depth, one more top 6 winger is what we really need, unless Bourque manages to bounce back.

sharks9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2012, 09:29 AM
  #8
SLAPSHOT723
Moderator
Johnny Rockets
 
SLAPSHOT723's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 17,090
vCash: 500
I've always thought the Lightning had the worst bottom-6.

SLAPSHOT723 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2012, 09:33 AM
  #9
gabeliscious
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,813
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLAPSHOT723 View Post
I've always thought the Lightning had the worst bottom-6.
imo leafs


lombardi-mclemment-frattin
brown-steckel-connolly

gabeliscious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2012, 09:42 AM
  #10
SLAPSHOT723
Moderator
Johnny Rockets
 
SLAPSHOT723's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 17,090
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by gabeliscious View Post
imo leafs


lombardi-mclemment-frattin
brown-steckel-connolly
That's not terrible. I like all of those players, but Connolly there doesn't make sense.

SLAPSHOT723 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2012, 09:58 AM
  #11
The Podium
Formerly chrisx101
 
The Podium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,026
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by gabeliscious View Post
imo leafs


lombardi-mclemment-frattin
brown-steckel-connolly
Quote:
Originally Posted by SLAPSHOT723 View Post
That's not terrible. I like all of those players, but Connolly there doesn't make sense.
Hes way off

Kulemin/MacArthur - Bozak/Mcclement - Frattin
Brown - Steckel/McClement - Komarov

Will be our bottom 6, dont expect Connolly or Lombardi to be here for long

The Podium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2012, 10:14 AM
  #12
dave babych returns
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 4,365
vCash: 500
"What teams need depth?" coming from a Leafs fan reads pretty much like "who can we trade our crap to?"

dave babych returns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2012, 11:25 AM
  #13
AJMHABS
25days!! New life
 
AJMHABS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Montreal, Qc
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,617
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sharks9 View Post
MTL needs more scoring depth, one more top 6 winger is what we really need, unless Bourque manages to bounce back.
I would say we would need a prospect of Gally's caliber, a winger preferably like Drouin or Shinkaruk in this year's draft. And I don't think Bourque bounces back, but I hope he does because we need more secondary scoring.

AJMHABS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2012, 11:42 AM
  #14
LEAFANFORLIFE23
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,733
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisx101 View Post
Actually, Toronto needs more talent then depth. Our depth should be the last of our worries
while it is true we need talent I feel we need GOOD bottom 6 guys see bolland clutterbuck clarkson for examples. Brown and Mcclement are solid but not enough. Winnik would have been nice.

LEAFANFORLIFE23 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2012, 11:44 AM
  #15
sharks9
Registered User
 
sharks9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Canada
Posts: 9,054
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisx101 View Post
Hes way off

Kulemin/MacArthur - Bozak/Mcclement - Frattin
Brown - Steckel/McClement - Komarov

Will be our bottom 6, dont expect Connolly or Lombardi to be here for long
Wait, then what does your top 6 look like? I thought Kulemin/Macarthur were your 2nd line wingers, possibly JVR if we doesn't work out at center.


Quote:
Originally Posted by AJMHABS View Post
I would say we would need a prospect of Gally's caliber, a winger preferably like Drouin or Shinkaruk in this year's draft. And I don't think Bourque bounces back, but I hope he does because we need more secondary scoring.
I don't think we need a prospect that good, although obviously it would be nice. I think either Leblanc or Gallagher will be able to step into a 2nd line role next year, though it depends on how much they improve in Hamilton this year.

sharks9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2012, 11:52 AM
  #16
JuniorNelson
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: E.Vancouver
Country: Australia-Aboriginal
Posts: 4,916
vCash: 894
Vancouver is almost without depth. They have one offensive line that does not function if it is not complete. There are only two, maybe three legit NHL prospects in the minors. Shockingly, behind Luongo there is only Schnieder with any NHL (60 games) experience in net!

JuniorNelson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2012, 11:52 AM
  #17
struckbyaparkedcar
Zemgus Da Gawd
 
struckbyaparkedcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Country: Cote DIvoire
Posts: 10,771
vCash: 500
Buffalo could use a defensively apt center for the bottom six.

Vancouver has a bunch of ****** third line grinders, but the utter inability of their bottom eight forwards to create their own shots has, and will continue to be a huge issue.

struckbyaparkedcar is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2012, 12:06 PM
  #18
struckbyaparkedcar
Zemgus Da Gawd
 
struckbyaparkedcar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Upstate NY
Country: Cote DIvoire
Posts: 10,771
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exit Dose View Post
Who gives a **** if we aren't going to win the cup with rookies? We made the playoffs with less talent in '09 and '11. My biggest worry is which Getzlaf we are getting this year.
Yeah, I like Anheim's depth forwards/D way more than any point in the past four years, and they made the playoffs two of those times. 100% agree that it comes down to Getzlaf, and to a lesser extent, Hiller.

struckbyaparkedcar is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2012, 12:11 PM
  #19
AJMHABS
25days!! New life
 
AJMHABS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Montreal, Qc
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,617
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sharks9 View Post
I don't think we need a prospect that good, although obviously it would be nice. I think either Leblanc or Gallagher will be able to step into a 2nd line role next year, though it depends on how much they improve in Hamilton this year.
We don't need one of star caliber, but another who is a sure-fire 1st liner. I wrote that wrong my bad.

AJMHABS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2012, 01:02 PM
  #20
Hawkaholic
Registered User
 
Hawkaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: London, Ont.
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,439
vCash: 500
Chicagos bottom 6 could use some re-tooling.

Bickell - *Bolland* - Shaw
*Carcillo* - Mayers - Frolik

Mayers, Frolik, Bickell, and Shaw could use an upgrade.
Happy with Bolland, and Carcillo though.

Hawkaholic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2012, 01:28 PM
  #21
The Podium
Formerly chrisx101
 
The Podium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,026
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sharks9 View Post
Wait, then what does your top 6 look like? I thought Kulemin/Macarthur were your 2nd line wingers, possibly JVR if we doesn't work out at center.
Lupul - Bozak/acquired C - Kessel
Kulemin/MacArthur - Grabovski - JVR

I dont expect JVR to work at C, meaning only 1 of Kulemin/Macarthur will be in the top 6, the other is on the 3rd line.

The Podium is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2012, 01:54 PM
  #22
HiddenInLight
Registered User
 
HiddenInLight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,014
vCash: 500
Assuming our youth pans out, the sabres are actually in fairly good shape right now. If we have some severe growing pains though our lack of veteran talent at center could create some issues for us. As it stands we look like:

Vanek - Hodgeson - Pomminville
Foligno - Ennis - Stafford
Leino - Grigorenko - Ott
Gerbe - Girgensons - Kaleta

Tropp (Next year, out for season with injury)
McCormick
Armia (Next year)

Myers - Sekera
Ehrhoff - Sulzer
Leopold - Regehr

McNabb
Brennan
Weber
Pysyk


That is scary young down the middle.

HiddenInLight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2012, 03:10 PM
  #23
shultzyfeelinirie20
Registered User
 
shultzyfeelinirie20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Michigan
Posts: 520
vCash: 500
^^ yeah you sabres fan should be pretty happy you guys have some good young talent and nice bottom 6 players

shultzyfeelinirie20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2012, 03:18 PM
  #24
Seatoo
Never Stop Poasting
 
Seatoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: The Interior of BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,047
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sharks9 View Post
MTL needs more scoring depth, one more top 6 winger is what we really need, unless Bourque manages to bounce back.
Would MTL be interested in a Ballard for Bourque swap?

Seatoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-13-2012, 03:44 PM
  #25
Mafoofoo
:facepalm:
 
Mafoofoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Country: United States
Posts: 13,260
vCash: 500
Sharks need more offensive depth since after the strong top 6 it's a no man's land in terms of scoring.

Mafoofoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:09 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.