So what would you do on a 3 on 2? Just go after the high guy and ignore the puck carrier? This is taught in like minor peewee.
he probably thinks that last goal was dumbas fault... as if reilly could have known the pass was going to happen his responsibility is the puck carrier
if russia wins in regulation they win series as a reg win is 3 points a shootout win only worth 2 since whl won in a shootout last night the 3 points would give russia the series
he probably thinks that last goal was dumbas fault... as if reilly could have known the pass was going to happen his responsibility is the puck carrier
If he cheats on going after the high guy, the carrier walks in alone. He would get destroyed on this board if he did that lol.
he probably thinks that last goal was dumbas fault... as if reilly could have known the pass was going to happen his responsibility is the puck carrier
if russia wins in regulation they win series as a reg win is 3 points a shootout win only worth 2 since whl won in a shootout last night the 3 points would give russia the series
if russia wins in regulation they win series as a reg win is 3 points a shootout win only worth 2 since whl won in a shootout last night the 3 points would give russia the series
If you didn't understand what i was trying to say was, Rielly would have to teleport to cover the puck carrier and the high guy... Do...you...understand?????
Even if Rielly tried to pressure the third man in, his man would be completely open. It's not the defensemen's responsibility to get the late man in, it's the forwards responsibility. Don't understand why we're pointing the finger on Morgan or his D-partner.
If you didn't understand what i was trying to say was, Rielly would have to teleport to cover the puck carrier and the high guy... Do...you...understand?????
So you think he should of followed his guy(the guy who dropped the puck) and just left the shooter all alone? With no backcheckers even close? What I'm saying, is he should of left his guy and pressured the shooter. Do you understand? I know he could of got burnt on that aswell, all I'm saying is he COULD of played it different. No need to act like a child.
So you think he should of followed his guy(the guy who dropped the puck) and just left the shooter all alone? With no backcheckers even close? What I'm saying, is he should of left his guy and pressured the shooter. Do you understand? I know he could of got burnt on that aswell, all I'm saying is he COULD of played it different. No need to act like a child.
I'm done. Do a 3 on 2 drill. You will understand. Bye.