HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > National Hockey League Talk > Polls - (hockey-related only)
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2

Scott Stevens vs Chris Pronger

View Poll Results: Better Player
Scott Stevens 66 38.15%
Chris Pronger 107 61.85%
Voters: 173. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
11-16-2012, 11:24 AM
  #1
SMantzas
Church of Corsi
 
SMantzas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Mount Laurel, NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 3,072
vCash: 500
Scott Stevens vs Chris Pronger

Assuming that Pronger's career is over, who was the better player?

Edit- ****. Could a mod add a poll

SMantzas is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-16-2012, 11:43 AM
  #2
spiny norman
Global Moderator
Dinsdale !!!
 
spiny norman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,571
vCash: 500
Added Poll

spiny norman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-16-2012, 12:18 PM
  #3
Ceremony
Moderator
Ten Tons
 
Ceremony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 73,467
vCash: 499
I take Pronger. He had better offense and his 06 playoffs is the best playoffs I've ever seen by a non-goalie.

__________________
“It’s embarrassing. I’m embarrassed to be here right now. It’s not even funny. And it’s just embarrassing, the way we, you know, the energy we have in the room and the way we approach practices and the way we approach this game. It’s not how you’re going to win any games in this league." - Jean-Sebastien Giguere, April 8 2013
Ceremony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-16-2012, 01:08 PM
  #4
I Hate Chris Butler
Backlund Fan Club
 
I Hate Chris Butler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Saskatchewan
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,270
vCash: 50
Pronger had the better peak, but taking everything into account I'd say Stevens because of just how long he was so dominant.

Stevens was better in the playoffs too

I Hate Chris Butler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-16-2012, 01:10 PM
  #5
Jerk Store
Classless
 
Jerk Store's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Aylmer
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,341
vCash: 500
Can't vote, but for me it's Stevens. One of my all time faves.

Jerk Store is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-16-2012, 01:24 PM
  #6
bp spec
Registered User
 
bp spec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 9,941
vCash: 50
Chris Pronger

bp spec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-16-2012, 01:27 PM
  #7
HockeyFan100
Welcome to COL!
 
HockeyFan100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,797
vCash: 500
If I could vote it would be Pronger.

HockeyFan100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-16-2012, 01:33 PM
  #8
OzzyFan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Country: United States
Posts: 1,896
vCash: 500
Peak Pronger, Career Stevens.

OzzyFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-16-2012, 01:39 PM
  #9
MastuhNinks
Registered User
 
MastuhNinks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: The Iron Throne
Posts: 4,472
vCash: 500
Better player I have to go with Pronger. Stevens probably had the better career but I think Pronger was the better player. Seeing him on those Devils teams would've been a treat.

MastuhNinks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-16-2012, 02:01 PM
  #10
HockeyThoughts
Delivering The Truth
 
HockeyThoughts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,347
vCash: 500
Both are obviously tremendous talents, and two of the most dominating physical specimens to ever play in the NHL or the sport of hockey in general. However, while it is arguable that Stevens had both the higher individual offensive peak and higher individual defensive peak, where Pronger shines was in his ability to combine both and suffocate the opposition at both ends of the rink. Furthermore, while both were amazing playoff performers I don't beleive Stevens ever had a playoff campaign like 05-06 where Pronger posted one of the best playoff campaigns in the history of the NHL. He was both the leading scorer on the Edmonton Oilers who went to Game 7 of the SCF as a defenseman as well as the top defensive player in the entire NHL at the time.

What makes Pronger so intriguing is that has such a unique résumé. From an outsiders standpoint, you look at his résumé pre-lockout:
-2000 - Norris Trophy
-2000 - Hart Trophy
-2000 - 1st All Star Team
-1998 + 2004 - 2nd All Star Team
-2002 - Gold Medal

And one would assume Pronger played his best hockey pre-lockout. However, aside from his obvious outstanding Hart Trophy winning season, I believe post-lockout is where Pronger truly played his best hockey, and it is truly a shame that he was robbed of the Norris in the 5 dominating post-lockout regular seasons he posted and the Conn Smythe in the 3 dominating playoff runs he had during this time.

I love Scott Stevens, I really do, I grew up idolizing the guy. But there was never one season he was the undisputed top defenseman like Pronger. Whether that's attributable to tougher competition on a year by year basis, or his almost divine focus to the defensive side of the game -- I don't know, but I can say there were actually several seasons where one could confidently say Pronger was by far the best defenseman, and even best player in the game at that point.

That's why Pronger gets my vote.

HockeyThoughts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-16-2012, 02:06 PM
  #11
Stansfield*
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 992
vCash: 500
At their best, Pronger was the better player but Stevens had the better career. So IDK how to vote.

Stansfield* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-16-2012, 02:35 PM
  #12
Ivan13
Avs/Habs fan
 
Ivan13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Zagreb
Country: Croatia
Posts: 13,489
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceremony View Post
I take Pronger. He had better offense and his 06 playoffs is the best playoffs I've ever seen by a non-goalie.
This depends on which version of Stevens you're talking about.

Ivan13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-16-2012, 02:54 PM
  #13
Mystlyfe
We're Touched
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 12,798
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceremony View Post
I take Pronger. He had better offense and his 06 playoffs is the best playoffs I've ever seen by a non-goalie.
Early in his career, the Capitals considered moving Stevens to wing because his offense was that good. He had five seasons of 60+ points (including once 72 and once 78) and two more that fell just shy (57 and 59). Pronger only hit 60 once, albeit in a lower scoring era and having seasons of 56 and 59 (in 66 games) points as well. Stevens morphed into a defense-only guy later in his career, but he had quite a run as an offensive defenseman.

Mystlyfe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-16-2012, 02:57 PM
  #14
AJMHABS
25days!! New life
 
AJMHABS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Montreal, Qc
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,616
vCash: 500
Pronger is the better player, but I voted Stevens because he had the better career.

AJMHABS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-16-2012, 02:59 PM
  #15
pdd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,578
vCash: 500
Pronger.

Stevens was a dominant defensive defenseman for the last half of his career, and had a few big offensive years. Only once (1994) did he manage to post high offense while playing strong defense.

Pronger had comparable offense to most of Stevens' best offensive years, but was also dominant defensively in those seasons. 99-00, 00-01, and 05-06 are great examples.


Last edited by pdd: 11-16-2012 at 03:08 PM.
pdd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-16-2012, 03:07 PM
  #16
pdd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,578
vCash: 500
Curios question...

Why do people think Stevens had the better career?

Pronger won the Norris and was constantly in the hunt for it from about his fourth or fifth season until the end. He won a Hart. He had a bunch of great playoff runs.

Pronger posted a better career PPG in both the regular season and playoffs than Stevens, and actually posted more playoff points (121 to 118) despite playing 60 fewer games (173 to 233).

Pronger had the better peak, better prime, and better career. Pronger was the second-best defenseman of his era. Stevens ranks #5 at best in his era.

pdd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-16-2012, 03:13 PM
  #17
pdd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,578
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystlyfe View Post
Early in his career, the Capitals considered moving Stevens to wing because his offense was that good. He had five seasons of 60+ points (including once 72 and once 78) and two more that fell just shy (57 and 59). Pronger only hit 60 once, albeit in a lower scoring era and having seasons of 56 and 59 (in 66 games) points as well. Stevens morphed into a defense-only guy later in his career, but he had quite a run as an offensive defenseman.
Pronger also posted 47 in 51 games in 00-01. And during Stevens' run as an offensive defenseman, it's important to note that he wasn't the defensive monster we all remember from New Jersey. He was like a better version of Dion Phaneuf or Kevin Hatcher; defense was a secondary consideration.

Pronger has always played both sides of the puck very well, which is the major driving force that puts him above Stevens. Stevens did one, then the other. Pronger did both at the same time as well as Stevens did them separately.

pdd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-16-2012, 03:23 PM
  #18
Stansfield*
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 992
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by eva unit zero View Post
Curios question...

Why do people think Stevens had the better career?

Pronger won the Norris and was constantly in the hunt for it from about his fourth or fifth season until the end. He won a Hart. He had a bunch of great playoff runs.

Pronger posted a better career PPG in both the regular season and playoffs than Stevens, and actually posted more playoff points (121 to 118) despite playing 60 fewer games (173 to 233).

Pronger had the better peak, better prime, and better career. Pronger was the second-best defenseman of his era. Stevens ranks #5 at best in his era.
Stevens lost the '94 Norris to a better season than Pronger ever had to face, IMO.

He won his Hart by 1 point over Jagr who played 3/4 of the season, color me unimpressed.

His season PPG is marginally higher over nearly 500 fewer games, big whoop.

Pre-lockout Pronger was a playoff choker and was known for taking terrible penalties that cost his team. At the same time Stevens was Captaining a modern dynasty.

Pronger had worse competition in his era, so no big surprise there he ranks higher relative to them. Which 5 do you have over Stevens BTW.

It's close to me, but Stevens player about 600 more games than Pronger which tips the scales.

IMO.
Peak- Pronger
Prime- Stevens
Career- Stevens

Stansfield* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-16-2012, 03:25 PM
  #19
pdd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,578
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivan13 View Post
This depends on which version of Stevens you're talking about.
Not really. Stevens' best seven-year stretch offensively yields an average of about 66 per 82. Pronger's best seven-year stretch brings 61 points. Stevens' 7 are from the end of the 80s into the early 90s, while Pronger's are the early 00's across the lockout.

Similar numbers, much lower scoring league? Pronger was better offensively. AINEC.

And Pronger was Stevens' equal defensively as well, WHILE putting up that kind of offense. The only defenseman who could match or beat Pronger's two-way game was Nicklas Lidstrom. And that's no slight to Pronger.

pdd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-16-2012, 03:30 PM
  #20
pld459666
Registered User
 
pld459666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Danbury, CT
Country: United States
Posts: 16,247
vCash: 873
Stevens was a better offensive defenceman when he played an offensive game.

He averaged 60 points a year from 84-85 thru 93-94

Not to mention over 170PIM's a year.

There's not one aspect of the game that Pronger does that is or was ever better than Stevens and that includes cheap shots.

Stevens in my opinion and it's not close.


Last edited by pld459666: 11-16-2012 at 03:35 PM.
pld459666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-16-2012, 03:34 PM
  #21
Stansfield*
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 992
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by pld459666 View Post
Stevens was a better offensive defenceman when he played an offensive defensive game.

He averaged 60 points a year from 84-85 thru 93-94

Not to mention over 170PIM's a year.

There's not one aspect of the game that Pronger does that is or was ever better than Stevens and that includes cheap shots.

Stevens in my opinion and it's not close.
I'd say Pronger was definitely dirtier. I hated Stevens but we'll never see a player play a more physical clean game than he did in his NJ years.

Stansfield* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-16-2012, 03:35 PM
  #22
pdd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,578
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stansfield View Post
Stevens lost the '94 Norris to a better season than Pronger ever had to face, IMO.

He won his Hart by 1 point over Jagr who played 3/4 of the season, color me unimpressed.
IMO, Pronger didn't deserve the Hart. Bure did. But Pronger did win it, and Stevens was never in consideration for the Hart.

Quote:
His season PPG is marginally higher over nearly 500 fewer games, big whoop.
Playing his offensive prime in a lower scoring era than Stevens' big offensive years.

Quote:
Pre-lockout Pronger was a playoff choker and was known for taking terrible penalties that cost his team. At the same time Stevens was Captaining a modern dynasty.
How did Stevens do in the postseason in the 1980s?

Quote:
Pronger had worse competition in his era, so no big surprise there he ranks higher relative to them. Which 5 do you have over Stevens BTW.
Bourque, Coffey, Chelios, and MacInnis. Leetch could also be argued ahead of Stevens.

Quote:
It's close to me, but Stevens player about 600 more games than Pronger which tips the scales.
So this is your all-time team, then?

Messier-Francis-Howe
Stevens-Chelios
Brodeur

pdd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-16-2012, 03:38 PM
  #23
pdd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,578
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stansfield View Post
I'd say Pronger was definitely dirtier. I hated Stevens but we'll never see a player play a more physical clean game than he did in his NJ years.
The clean-ness of Stevens' game is overrated. He was definitely a dirty OB. Just because his hit on Lindros was clean and gets replayed on youtube a lot doesn't mean every hit was clean.

Stan Mikita won a few Lady Byngs. He was a dirty ******* in his early years.

pdd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-16-2012, 03:39 PM
  #24
pld459666
Registered User
 
pld459666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Danbury, CT
Country: United States
Posts: 16,247
vCash: 873
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stansfield View Post
I'd say Pronger was definitely dirtier. I hated Stevens but we'll never see a player play a more physical clean game than he did in his NJ years.
agree to disagree.

pld459666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-16-2012, 03:42 PM
  #25
Habs 4 Life
No Excuses
 
Habs 4 Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Montreal
Country: Italy
Posts: 33,033
vCash: 500
Close but Pronger

Habs 4 Life is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:49 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.