HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

2012-2013 Rangers Prospects Thread (Player Stats in Post #1; Updated 12/5)

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
11-16-2012, 06:38 PM
  #801
Kane One
Global Moderator
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
 
Kane One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Brooklyn, New NY
Country: United States
Posts: 27,686
vCash: 2680
If the Rangers win the lottery, I won't be that upset since Columbus deserves that pick anyway. If anyone here gets upset, they should stop getting angry about Pittsburgh winning the draft in 2005.

__________________
Kane One is offline  
Old
11-16-2012, 07:13 PM
  #802
CM PUNK
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,283
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaneone View Post
If the Rangers win the lottery, I won't be that upset since Columbus deserves that pick anyway. If anyone here gets upset, they should stop getting angry about Pittsburgh winning the draft in 2005.
The lack of logic in this statement makes my brain hurt lol

CM PUNK is offline  
Old
11-16-2012, 08:05 PM
  #803
haveandare
Registered User
 
haveandare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York
Country: United States
Posts: 5,861
vCash: 500
If we lose this year with this absolutely stacked roster, and then have to lose one of Richards/Gabby/Nash/Staal/McD/Girardi due to a lower cap AND end up somehow being awarded a high first that we already gave to Columbus I am just going to lose it.

haveandare is offline  
Old
11-16-2012, 08:35 PM
  #804
M Gaz
Au revoir Shosanna!
 
M Gaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Long Island
Country: United States
Posts: 1,728
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by haveandare View Post
If we lose this year with this absolutely stacked roster, and then have to lose one of Richards/Gabby/Nash/Staal/McD/Girardi due to a lower cap AND end up somehow being awarded a high first that we already gave to Columbus I am just going to lose it.
This roster is not stacked by any sense of the word. Our depth at center looks quite shakey and there's room for improvement at LW. And to be honest, Rupp/Stralman/Boyle/etc would go before any of those guys you mentioned.

M Gaz is offline  
Old
11-16-2012, 08:57 PM
  #805
Kreider Typical
flex
 
Kreider Typical's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,548
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by NashtyAttack View Post
This roster is not stacked by any sense of the word. Our depth at center looks quite shakey and there's room for improvement at LW. And to be honest, Rupp/Stralman/Boyle/etc would go before any of those guys you mentioned.
top 6 is stacked.

the guys mentioned as potential losses are the guys with the big price tags that would make the biggest impact to the cap.

center depth past stepan is shaky offensively, but our top 6 is our big strength and we don't sacrifice our top pairing defense to have it...we have 3 very good top 3 defenseman, and del zotto. our bottom 6 isn't bad by any means, but certainly not good either. defense past the top 3/4 is a little awkward, but we're certainly more stacked than we have been in a decade. more stacked than most--if not all teams in the league are right now. AND we have the best goalie in the world.

there's no doubt that a full-year lockout hurts us more than most teams since we're the best projected team. next year we have the potential of losing a big impact guy to cap, and that will suck.

edit: lw we have hagelin/kreider/nash... that's an extremely strong top 3 lw on any team in the league. rupp is def good at what he does for the 4th. unless callahan is bumped to our 3rd rw and nash plays 2nd rw... we're strong on that side. most teams don't have 'incredible' minor depth.


Last edited by Kreider Typical: 11-16-2012 at 09:05 PM.
Kreider Typical is offline  
Old
11-16-2012, 10:13 PM
  #806
haveandare
Registered User
 
haveandare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: New York
Country: United States
Posts: 5,861
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by mooskating View Post
top 6 is stacked.

the guys mentioned as potential losses are the guys with the big price tags that would make the biggest impact to the cap.

center depth past stepan is shaky offensively, but our top 6 is our big strength and we don't sacrifice our top pairing defense to have it...we have 3 very good top 3 defenseman, and del zotto. our bottom 6 isn't bad by any means, but certainly not good either. defense past the top 3/4 is a little awkward, but we're certainly more stacked than we have been in a decade. more stacked than most--if not all teams in the league are right now. AND we have the best goalie in the world.

there's no doubt that a full-year lockout hurts us more than most teams since we're the best projected team. next year we have the potential of losing a big impact guy to cap, and that will suck.

edit: lw we have hagelin/kreider/nash... that's an extremely strong top 3 lw on any team in the league. rupp is def good at what he does for the 4th. unless callahan is bumped to our 3rd rw and nash plays 2nd rw... we're strong on that side. most teams don't have 'incredible' minor depth.
Exactly. Well put.

This team is stacked by the standards of the league and its going to be impossible to keep the big names together as soon as next season and it will definitely be impossible to keep them together the following season cap wise. This would be a really good year to, you know...be played.

haveandare is offline  
Old
11-16-2012, 11:36 PM
  #807
Kane One
Global Moderator
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
 
Kane One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Brooklyn, New NY
Country: United States
Posts: 27,686
vCash: 2680
Quote:
Originally Posted by CM PUNK View Post
The lack of logic in this statement makes my brain hurt lol
Keep your comments to yourself, if you were me, you'd get an infraction for that.

But seriously, people here criticize the fact that Pittsburgh got the pick in 2005 because they didn't deserve it, correct? If we won this pick (and didn't trade it to Columbus), do you think that we'd deserve it? No, I don't think anyone would think so. So if we got it, we would be no better than Pittsburgh.

Kane One is offline  
Old
11-17-2012, 04:47 AM
  #808
Kreider Typical
flex
 
Kreider Typical's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,548
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaneone View Post
Keep your comments to yourself, if you were me, you'd get an infraction for that.

But seriously, people here criticize the fact that Pittsburgh got the pick in 2005 because they didn't deserve it, correct? If we won this pick (and didn't trade it to Columbus), do you think that we'd deserve it? No, I don't think anyone would think so. So if we got it, we would be no better than Pittsburgh.
sure we'd deserve it. we would have just given up a season where we would've been the top contender for the cup. we'd deserve some compensation for that-- what makes columbus any more worthy of it-- the fact that they're the reason we're locked out right now?

Kreider Typical is offline  
Old
11-17-2012, 09:10 AM
  #809
CM PUNK
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,283
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaneone View Post
Keep your comments to yourself, if you were me, you'd get an infraction for that.

But seriously, people here criticize the fact that Pittsburgh got the pick in 2005 because they didn't deserve it, correct? If we won this pick (and didn't trade it to Columbus), do you think that we'd deserve it? No, I don't think anyone would think so. So if we got it, we would be no better than Pittsburgh.
but we did trade it and that is the only reason we would win. there is a negative billionty chance that we would win if it was still our pick. hence still better than pittsburgh LOL

CM PUNK is offline  
Old
11-17-2012, 02:32 PM
  #810
Kane One
Global Moderator
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
 
Kane One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Brooklyn, New NY
Country: United States
Posts: 27,686
vCash: 2680
Quote:
Originally Posted by CM PUNK View Post
but we did trade it and that is the only reason we would win. there is a negative billionty chance that we would win if it was still our pick. hence still better than pittsburgh LOL
Yes, but we deserved that pick much more than Pittsburgh and yet both of us had an equal chance to get it.

Kane One is offline  
Old
11-17-2012, 02:32 PM
  #811
Kane One
Global Moderator
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
 
Kane One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Brooklyn, New NY
Country: United States
Posts: 27,686
vCash: 2680
Quote:
Originally Posted by mooskating View Post
sure we'd deserve it. we would have just given up a season where we would've been the top contender for the cup. we'd deserve some compensation for that-- what makes columbus any more worthy of it-- the fact that they're the reason we're locked out right now?
Yeah, okay.

Kane One is offline  
Old
11-17-2012, 04:24 PM
  #812
Jumbo*
TARGET: ACQUIRED
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,720
vCash: 500
Wow, i totally forget we didnt have a first round pick this year, im really going to pissed if there isnt a season now. Because we all know we will land the #1 the year we gave our pick away.

Jumbo* is offline  
Old
11-17-2012, 06:24 PM
  #813
White Plains Batman
Faceoffs? Faceoffs!!
 
White Plains Batman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Westchester, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 2,610
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canon1990 View Post
Wow, i totally forget we didnt have a first round pick this year, im really going to pissed if there isnt a season now. Because we all know we will land the #1 the year we gave our pick away.
The odds of that happening are so few and far between. Playoff teams from last year may not even be in the lottery depending on the agreement.

Also, if there's no agreement, there may not be a draft.

White Plains Batman is offline  
Old
11-17-2012, 06:45 PM
  #814
Jumbo*
TARGET: ACQUIRED
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,720
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by White Plains Batman View Post
The odds of that happening are so few and far between. Playoff teams from last year may not even be in the lottery depending on the agreement.

Also, if there's no agreement, there may not be a draft.
If it goes by the same format it did last time there was a lockout, which i would assume it would, then we would have a 1/30 shot, same odds as every team.

Jumbo* is offline  
Old
11-17-2012, 07:22 PM
  #815
jniklast
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Country: Germany
Posts: 4,713
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canon1990 View Post
If it goes by the same format it did last time there was a lockout, which i would assume it would, then we would have a 1/30 shot, same odds as every team.
That's not how it worked in 2005. Teams had 1,2 or 3 balls depending on how often they made the playoffs in the previous years and whether they had the first overall pick. So not all teams had the same odds.

jniklast is offline  
Old
11-17-2012, 08:01 PM
  #816
BrooklynRangersFan
Change is good.
 
BrooklynRangersFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Brooklyn of course
Country: United States
Posts: 10,204
vCash: 500
Looks like Lindberg is back and scored tonight in a 7-0 laugher over Rogle. (That's the best Rogle can do and Spelling is still on the farm team? Really?)

Any word on Fasth, Swedish posters?

BrooklynRangersFan is online now  
Old
11-17-2012, 09:33 PM
  #817
NYR Viper
Moderator
 
NYR Viper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: PA
Country: United States
Posts: 28,360
vCash: 500
Watching Skjei and Minnesota play Wisconsin right now....

NYR Viper is offline  
Old
11-17-2012, 10:21 PM
  #818
Trxjw
Retired.
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Land of no calls..
Country: United States
Posts: 16,477
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYR Boyler87 View Post
Watching Skjei and Minnesota play Wisconsin right now....
Not getting a ton of ice, but his skating is fantastic.

Trxjw is offline  
Old
11-17-2012, 10:32 PM
  #819
Kreider Typical
flex
 
Kreider Typical's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,548
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaneone View Post
Yeah, okay.
locked out because of smaller clubs and their inability to succeed financially, but either way. we got nash in return, so it was a fair trade at the time. it's all part of doing business. back on topic.

absolutely awesome to hear that lindberg is back


Last edited by Kreider Typical: 11-18-2012 at 02:23 AM.
Kreider Typical is offline  
Old
11-17-2012, 11:12 PM
  #820
wolfgaze
Interesting Cat
 
wolfgaze's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 12,063
vCash: 500
Goal and an assist for St. Croix tonight.

wolfgaze is offline  
Old
11-18-2012, 02:06 AM
  #821
White Plains Batman
Faceoffs? Faceoffs!!
 
White Plains Batman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Westchester, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 2,610
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrooklynRangersFan View Post
Looks like Lindberg is back and scored tonight in a 7-0 laugher over Rogle. (That's the best Rogle can do and Spelling is still on the farm team? Really?)

Any word on Fasth, Swedish posters?
Glad to hear Lindberg is back!

Fasth was out two weeks with a mild shoulder sprain so he's not back yet, probably after American Thanksgiving.

White Plains Batman is offline  
Old
11-18-2012, 03:54 AM
  #822
Skellhell
Registered User
 
Skellhell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: North Pole
Posts: 120
vCash: 500
Lindberg didn't miss any games because of the karjala tournament. The league has a break in the schedule during these type of tournaments. In his 3 games back after the concussion he's scored 2 points, 1+1.
He doesn't seem affected at all, which is good news

Skellhell is offline  
Old
11-18-2012, 10:43 AM
  #823
Cresto
In the pantry
 
Cresto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,502
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skellhell View Post
Lindberg didn't miss any games because of the karjala tournament. The league has a break in the schedule during these type of tournaments. In his 3 games back after the concussion he's scored 2 points, 1+1.
He doesn't seem affected at all, which is good news
Got lucky with the national break Good to have him back for sure... tear it up.

Cresto is offline  
Old
11-18-2012, 09:05 PM
  #824
R S
Renegade Stylings
 
R S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 23,690
vCash: 4250
Sick goal by Shane McColgan tonight, who ended up with a goal and an assist. His goal tonight is very similar to Matt Duchene's against the Penguins last year.

http://saskatoonblades.com/video/index/id/1353293949

R S is offline  
Old
11-18-2012, 09:21 PM
  #825
Kershaw
 
Kershaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Country:
Posts: 25,519
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Renegade Stylings View Post
Sick goal by Shane McColgan tonight, who ended up with a goal and an assist. His goal tonight is very similar to Matt Duchene's against the Penguins last year.

http://saskatoonblades.com/video/index/id/1353293949
Sick goal, but I doubt he will be getting a contract.

I hope he proves me wrong, but I've written him off.

Kershaw is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:19 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.