HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Central Division > Colorado Avalanche
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Barrie vs Elliott

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
11-21-2012, 04:09 PM
  #1
FoppaForsberg*
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 534
vCash: 500
Barrie vs Elliott

Who do you think has the best chance at reaching their potential?

FoppaForsberg* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-21-2012, 04:17 PM
  #2
Joe Sakic
Goodbye ROR
 
Joe Sakic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Colorado
Country: United States
Posts: 3,787
vCash: 125
Elliott

Joe Sakic is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-21-2012, 05:46 PM
  #3
HockeyFan100
Welcome to COL!
 
HockeyFan100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,808
vCash: 500
Probably at this point I'd say Barrie. Always thought Elliot had more potential, though.

HockeyFan100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-21-2012, 06:33 PM
  #4
cgf
Registered User
 
cgf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 11,336
vCash: 500
Barrie clearly, but I think Elliott could still reach his superior upside also.

cgf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-21-2012, 07:23 PM
  #5
BrickAHL
#NotUs
 
BrickAHL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,154
vCash: 432
Elliott has more potential IMO but Barrie has a better shot at reaching his top potential.

BrickAHL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-21-2012, 07:33 PM
  #6
Nzap
Insert clever phrase
 
Nzap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Middle of Noux
Country: Finland
Posts: 4,111
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrickAHL View Post
Elliott has more potential IMO but Barrie has a better shot at reaching his top potential.
Couldn't have said it better myself.

Nzap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-21-2012, 07:41 PM
  #7
NHL33*
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: New York
Country: Antarctica
Posts: 7,873
vCash: 500
I liked Barrie's hockey intelligence and overall play much more than Elliott's last season since Elliott looked outmatched on most nights (offensively and defensively), but it's hard to say since defensemen have a longer development curve than forwards.

Since I haven't watched either in juniors and barely any with the Monsters, I can only decide based off their NHL play. As a result it's Barrie, but my conclusion is not based on adequate data.

NHL33* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-21-2012, 08:59 PM
  #8
SoundwaveIsCharisma
Moderator
 
SoundwaveIsCharisma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Screw You Blaster
Country: Canada
Posts: 22,055
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to SoundwaveIsCharisma
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrickAHL View Post
Elliott has more potential IMO but Barrie has a better shot at reaching his top potential.
This. Barrie also has a well-rounded game when compared to Elliott (at least from what I've seen), and is more aggressive. I've said it for a while that Barrie will likely be the first one to reach his potential, while Elliott will take much longer to do so. If Elliott ever does put everything together he'll be one of the best offensive-defenders in the league.

SoundwaveIsCharisma is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-21-2012, 08:59 PM
  #9
Lonewolfe2015
Registered User
 
Lonewolfe2015's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 11,463
vCash: 239
I'm more excited about Elliott but I expect more from Barrie.

Elliott has the better skillset and looks like a guy we could see some amazing highlights from down the line. Barrie seemed too reserved in the NHL and unless he opens up a little my hopes for him will start dialing back much more as the years go by. Both are far too offensive-minded to be effective defensively unless they go the Liles route and learn to play positional defense, so what makes them effective is to use their talents on a nightly basis.

Lonewolfe2015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-21-2012, 10:10 PM
  #10
Freudian
Patty likes beef
 
Freudian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Country: Sweden
Posts: 29,369
vCash: 50
Barrie. He seems to have a better balance between confidence to do what he needs to do as an offensive defenseman and still be decent in his own end.

Elliott looks more hesitant to me in all areas of the game. I do like his toolbox better than Barries, even though the difference isn't big.

Hope Barrie keeps playing the way he does. Hope Elliott finds his confidence and starts playing the way he can.

Freudian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-21-2012, 10:23 PM
  #11
GamingGiant
Registered User
 
GamingGiant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Colorado
Country: United States
Posts: 2,744
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrickAHL View Post
Elliott has more potential IMO but Barrie has a better shot at reaching his top potential.
Well said. I agree with this statement for the time being.

GamingGiant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-21-2012, 10:24 PM
  #12
GeoffL19
Registered User
 
GeoffL19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,028
vCash: 800
Barrie's got the heart to go along with his toolset. I'd say he's got a better chance at reaching his potential.

GeoffL19 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-24-2012, 04:26 PM
  #13
mikeyeightseven
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 173
vCash: 500
Anyone know why Elliott is having such a poor season in LE? I keep checking his stats and nothing much changes, except his minus rating

mikeyeightseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-24-2012, 05:33 PM
  #14
Zandar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 388
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikei87 View Post
Anyone know why Elliott is having such a poor season in LE? I keep checking his stats and nothing much changes, except his minus rating
He is fine. Some struggles personally and team wise but no long term concerns. It's mildly expected based on what he is dealing with.

Zandar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-25-2012, 07:36 AM
  #15
Ivan13
Avs/Habs fan
 
Ivan13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Zagreb
Country: Croatia
Posts: 13,496
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffL19 View Post
Barrie's got the heart to go along with his toolset. I'd say he's got a better chance at reaching his potential.
And Stef doesn't?

Ivan13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-25-2012, 04:02 PM
  #16
HockeyFan100
Welcome to COL!
 
HockeyFan100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,808
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivan13 View Post
And Stef doesn't?
His 3 hits in 39 games surely shows he has a lot of heart.

HockeyFan100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-25-2012, 04:18 PM
  #17
Drizzt1
Registered User
 
Drizzt1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 359
vCash: 500
There are a couple of factors I consider when contemplating this (as I listen to the LEM game on radio):-

+ In 2010 / 2011 Kevin Shattenkirk (an obvious offensive dynamo) had 0 goals, 0 assists in 10 games for LEM.

+ My personal opinion, is that Sacco, Quinn and Army may have told Chynoweth to ensure Elliott works solely on his DEFENSIVE game, as we all know how good Elliott is offensively. This "may" reflect his numbers?

+ Elliott had a very short stint at NHL level. What I saw was some defensive flaws that unfortunately stood out a little, BUT his numbers were outstanding. I mean 39 games, 13 points at +2 isn't a dead beat.

+ Barrie also seemed to do very well at NHL levels, and for mine, seemed very Shattenkirquest in his approach (my favorite NHL defensemen was and probably is Shatts - even got a signed puck from him )

+ Barrie has been outstanding at AHL levels.

I could go either way tbh

Drizzt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-25-2012, 04:50 PM
  #18
Lonewolfe2015
Registered User
 
Lonewolfe2015's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 11,463
vCash: 239
I believe some of the LEM-folk have commented on Elliott a few times and keep saying the same thing, his defensive partner is always making mistakes. I have a feeling that Elliott isn't adjusting well to whomever he is paired with and it's causing his game to be thrown off to where he has to clean up the mess rather than play full throttle. But that's just a theory I've been working on.

I still see more potential in Elliott personally. You can't ignore he was the more creative of the two at the NHL level and looks like he has the tools to back up his playing style. Barrie looked outmatched to me and far too hesitant to use his offensive potential to its full potential.

Nothing is set in stone, but I still get chills watching some of Elliott's goals.

Lonewolfe2015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-25-2012, 05:02 PM
  #19
Freudian
Patty likes beef
 
Freudian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Country: Sweden
Posts: 29,369
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonewolfe2015 View Post
I believe some of the LEM-folk have commented on Elliott a few times and keep saying the same thing, his defensive partner is always making mistakes. I have a feeling that Elliott isn't adjusting well to whomever he is paired with and it's causing his game to be thrown off to where he has to clean up the mess rather than play full throttle. But that's just a theory I've been working on.

I still see more potential in Elliott personally. You can't ignore he was the more creative of the two at the NHL level and looks like he has the tools to back up his playing style. Barrie looked outmatched to me and far too hesitant to use his offensive potential to its full potential.

Nothing is set in stone, but I still get chills watching some of Elliott's goals.
I thought it was the opposite. Barrie looked much more comfortable at the NHL level and apart from the goals Elliott didn't really do much right. Even though he put up points early, I wanted him to be sent down for well over a month before he actually was.

Freudian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-25-2012, 05:22 PM
  #20
Lonewolfe2015
Registered User
 
Lonewolfe2015's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 11,463
vCash: 239
Quote:
Originally Posted by Freudian View Post
I thought it was the opposite. Barrie looked much more comfortable at the NHL level and apart from the goals Elliott didn't really do much right. Even though he put up points early, I wanted him to be sent down for well over a month before he actually was.
I won't argue about how comfortable he looked and agree Elliott should have been sent down after he lost his confidence due to defensive lapses (something I still feel being partnered with Hejda could have fixed). But for someone so intelligent and offensive-minded, I can't understand why Barrie hesitated to display that almost at all in the NHL.

Barrie may have demonstrated better defensive play, but he's not going to be asked to play that role in the NHL. The best he can hope for is a Dan Boyle type career defensively where he is not a liability on the ice, to achieve that he needs to use his creativity and not hold back.

Granted he got less time in the NHL than Elliott, I'd just like to see Barrie display his talent before I place him above Elliott.

Lonewolfe2015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-25-2012, 05:33 PM
  #21
Freudian
Patty likes beef
 
Freudian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Country: Sweden
Posts: 29,369
vCash: 50
To be fair to both of them, they were here during bad stretches for the team in general and were asked to do too much. Both of them had problems defensively (Barrie was taking too many hits and Elliott didn't seem comfortable with the physical game).

I think both of them should still be considered long term projects and I guess that's why Avs signed all those marginal defensemen this summer. So we wouldn't have to recall Elliott/Barrie whenever a NHL defender got injured. If both of them spend a full season in the AHL, it's not going to hurt them.

Freudian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-25-2012, 07:32 PM
  #22
Freaky Styley
Registered User
 
Freaky Styley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,864
vCash: 500
Since the first time I've watched them play I've always been a bigger supporter of Barrie, and thought he didn't get enough credit around here (getting included in trade proposals, where Stef was untouchable). Glad to see him having a good start to his pro career and getting noticed.

Freaky Styley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-25-2012, 09:59 PM
  #23
Duchene2MacKinnon
BELIEVE
 
Duchene2MacKinnon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,582
vCash: 250
Quote:
Originally Posted by HockeyFan100 View Post
His 3 hits in 39 games surely shows he has a lot of heart.

Duchene2MacKinnon is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-25-2012, 10:52 PM
  #24
Zandar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 388
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by HockeyFan100 View Post
His 3 hits in 39 games surely shows he has a lot of heart.
What is a "hit" anyways? Not asking but really what do the stat guys consider a "hit"? Something to think about. I've seen guys like Landeskog throw 5 or more hits in a game only to be credited with 2-3 hits that game. Elliott doesn't play a physical game and will not ever play that way. Can he take them to the outside and to the boards? Sure but he's rarely going to plant them into the boards hard enough to be considered a hit.

Zandar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-26-2012, 01:15 AM
  #25
Mouse21*
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,263
vCash: 500
ive watched quite a bit of LEM lately, Elliot has been pretty bad while Barrie is commonly the best player on the ice

Mouse21* is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:07 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.