HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Prospects
Notices

Prospects Discuss hockey prospects from all over the world and the NHL Draft.

team with the best D prospect.

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
11-29-2012, 02:50 AM
  #1
LEAFANFORLIFE23
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 6,656
vCash: 500
team with the best D prospect.

What team do you think has the best group of prospects on D?

LEAFANFORLIFE23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-29-2012, 03:09 AM
  #2
Haatley
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,818
vCash: 681
Pittsburgh easily.
morrow, despres, poulliot, maatta, dumoulin and harrington all in their system. is ridiculous. .ot even including bortuzzo its better than any other clubs d prospects. i dont even think anyones close except maybe columbus.


Last edited by Haatley: 11-29-2012 at 03:20 AM.
Haatley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-29-2012, 03:19 AM
  #3
CSimpson18
Registered User
 
CSimpson18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,236
vCash: 500
Pittsburgh. For high end guys you have to like gardiner-rielly in Toronto or klefbom-Schultz in Edm. Montreal also has some nice pieces although none as flashy.

CSimpson18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-29-2012, 04:08 AM
  #4
Hossa
Registered User
 
Hossa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Abroad
Posts: 9,221
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CSimpson18 View Post
Pittsburgh. For high end guys you have to like gardiner-rielly in Toronto or klefbom-Schultz in Edm. Montreal also has some nice pieces although none as flashy.
Not really a prospect by any definition.

Hossa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-29-2012, 04:44 AM
  #5
AJMHABS
On to Round 2!! :D
 
AJMHABS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Montreal, Qc
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,610
vCash: 500
Pittsburgh easily, followed by Toronto, Montreal, and a few others (not in order)

AJMHABS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-29-2012, 06:51 AM
  #6
Roadman
Moving On
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: London OH
Country: United States
Posts: 2,592
vCash: 500
the CBJ should warrant some consideration. (nod to Haatley)

Top four:
Murray (out for year), Erixson, Moore, and Savard

Solid Prospects:
Goloubef, Weber, Prout, Madaisky

__________________
__________________

I post, therefore I am.
Roadman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-29-2012, 06:58 AM
  #7
CraniumCram
Syracuse '14
 
CraniumCram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Syracuse/Buffalo
Country: United States
Posts: 1,394
vCash: 500
Buffalo makes a case too with a lot of all around talent on D. McNabb and Pysyk have almost both cemented themselves in the top 4 of the future, while guys like Brennan, McCabe, JGL could always surprise and make a name for themselves. Add to that some young guys already starting on D and our future looks bright in that area of the ice.

CraniumCram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-29-2012, 07:34 AM
  #8
birddog*
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 5,988
vCash: 500
Gardiner, Rielly, Finn, Percy, Blacker, merits consideration.

Holzner is ranked the Leafs 9th best D prospect and is pegged to make the team this year.

birddog* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-29-2012, 07:50 AM
  #9
Lonewolfe2015
Registered User
 
Lonewolfe2015's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 10,856
vCash: 239
Defensive prospects have really taken a swing upwards over the recent years for several teams.

Pittsburgh (Pouliot, Morrow, Harrington, Maatta, Dumoulin)
Toronto (Rielly, Finn, Percy, Blacker)
Colorado (Siemens, Elliott, Barrie, Gaunce)
Montreal (Beaulieu, Tinordi, Thrower, Ellis, Dietz)
Edmonton (Schutlz, Klefbom, Marincin, Musil)
Phoenix (Gormley, Murphy, Rundblad)
Minnesota (Dumba, Brodin, Cuma)
NJD (Urbom, Merrill, Severson, Scarlett)
Nashville (Ellis, Blum, Josi)
Columbus (Murray, Erixon, Savard, Goloubef)
Buffalo (McNabb, Pysyk, Gauthier-Leduc, McCabe)

Not a specific order really, but the top 5 stand out as being the best imo.

Lonewolfe2015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-29-2012, 08:29 AM
  #10
blinkman360
Back to Basics
 
blinkman360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Guido Central
Country: United States
Posts: 8,687
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lonewolfe2015 View Post
Defensive prospects have really taken a swing upwards over the recent years for several teams.

Pittsburgh (Pouliot, Morrow, Harrington, Maatta, Dumoulin)
Toronto (Rielly, Finn, Percy, Blacker)
Colorado (Siemens, Elliott, Barrie, Gaunce)
Montreal (Beaulieu, Tinordi, Thrower, Ellis, Dietz)
Edmonton (Schutlz, Klefbom, Marincin, Musil)
Phoenix (Gormley, Murphy, Rundblad)
Minnesota (Dumba, Brodin, Cuma)
NJD (Urbom, Merrill, Severson, Scarlett)
Nashville (Ellis, Blum, Josi)
Columbus (Murray, Erixon, Savard, Goloubef)
Buffalo (McNabb, Pysyk, Gauthier-Leduc, McCabe)

Not a specific order really, but the top 5 stand out as being the best imo.
Pittsburgh wins as far as high-end depth, but I think the Phoenix trio has the most upside.

I also think the Isles should be on this list: Reinhart, deHaan, Donovan, Mayfield, Pokka, Pelech, Kichton, Pedan. Aside from Reinhart there isn't much #1 d-man potential, but a lot of guys who could become solid 2nd pairing defensemen.

blinkman360 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-29-2012, 08:59 AM
  #11
The Podium
Formerly chrisx101
 
The Podium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,284
vCash: 657
Pittsburgh wins solely on depth, Phionex, Columbus, Toronto and Minnesota have the highest cieling, Montreal, Colorado and Anaheim are pretty strong as well.

The Podium is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-29-2012, 09:13 AM
  #12
tony d
Thanks for memories
 
tony d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Behind A Tree
Country: Canada
Posts: 34,184
vCash: 500
Pittsburgh. Lots of potential on their list of defensive prospects.

__________________
tony d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-29-2012, 10:40 AM
  #13
Halak Ness Monster
Registered User
 
Halak Ness Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO
Country: United States
Posts: 970
vCash: 500
Obviously Pittsburgh takes the honor but Phoenix has to be up there:

Brandon Gormley: #2 potential, strong all-around
David Rundblad: PP QB, 2nd pairing if he improves D enough
Connor Murphy: 2nd pairing potential, also strong all-around
Michael Stone: Big defender, some offense, smart
Chris Summers: Never developed offense, good depth though

Halak Ness Monster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-29-2012, 11:12 AM
  #14
Lonewolfe2015
Registered User
 
Lonewolfe2015's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 10,856
vCash: 239
Quote:
Originally Posted by blinkman360 View Post
Pittsburgh wins as far as high-end depth, but I think the Phoenix trio has the most upside.

I also think the Isles should be on this list: Reinhart, deHaan, Donovan, Mayfield, Pokka, Pelech, Kichton, Pedan. Aside from Reinhart there isn't much #1 d-man potential, but a lot of guys who could become solid 2nd pairing defensemen.
Good catch on the Isles, forgot about them. They'd slot up there too, maybe not too high yet because we need to see how their 2012 class progresses, but around the 8-12 area.

I'm not too sold on the Phoenix group personally speaking. They all look promising, but I haven't really been wowed by any of them yet. I'd definitely take Minnesota's top 2 and Columbus' group over Phoenix's.

Lonewolfe2015 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-29-2012, 11:18 AM
  #15
Kulemon
Registered User
 
Kulemon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,279
vCash: 500
Toronto:

Rielly 1-2D
Gardiner 1-2D
Finn 2-4D
Percy 3-4D
Blacker 3-4D
Holzer 4-5D
Granberg 5-6D
etc.

Kulemon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-29-2012, 11:19 AM
  #16
Shrimper
Trick or ruddy treat
 
Shrimper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Essex
Country: United Kingdom
Posts: 67,669
vCash: 50
Pittsburgh wins this hands down.

Shrimper is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-29-2012, 11:22 AM
  #17
Fozz
Registered User
 
Fozz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 6,287
vCash: 500
Whoever drafts Jones.

Fozz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-29-2012, 11:27 AM
  #18
GordieHoweHatTrick
Registered User
 
GordieHoweHatTrick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,704
vCash: 500
Quality over quantity. I'd take Edmonton or Toronto's pool because of the Schultz/Rielly factors alone. I also really like Montreal's group with Tinordi and Beaulieu.

GordieHoweHatTrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-29-2012, 11:30 AM
  #19
hbk
Registered User
 
hbk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,538
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halak Ness Monster View Post
Obviously Pittsburgh takes the honor but Phoenix has to be up there:

Brandon Gormley: #2 potential, strong all-around
David Rundblad: PP QB, 2nd pairing if he improves D enough
Connor Murphy: 2nd pairing potential, also strong all-around
Michael Stone: Big defender, some offense, smart
Chris Summers: Never developed offense, good depth though
If you factor in that OEL is only 20 years old as well there is a strong argument for Phoenix.


Last edited by hbk: 11-29-2012 at 11:57 AM.
hbk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-29-2012, 11:38 AM
  #20
That
Registered User
 
That's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,962
vCash: 500
Pittsburgh for me. It's hard to argue with not only high end talent, but lots of depth and variety. Morrow, Pouliot, Harrington, Despres, Maatta, Dumoulin are all great prospects that have top 4 potential.

Second would be Phoenix. Similar to Pittsburgh in how they have high end talent and depth too, but just not as much. Gormley and Murphy a pair of solid two-way defenders who have top pairing upside, Rundblad has loads of potential, and Stone and Summers provide solid depth.

I couldn't decide between Columbus (Murray, Erixon, Moore, Savard, Goloubef, Reilly), Toronto (Rielly, Blacker, Finn, Percy, Holzer), New York Islanders (Reinhart, de Haan, Mayfield, Pokka, Pedan), and Edmonton (Schultz, Klefbom, Marincin, Gernat, Musil) for the next 3 spots to round out the top 5.

HM mentions to Buffalo (McNabb, Pysyk, Brennan, Gauthier-Leduc, McCabe), Montreal (Tinordi, Beaulieu, Ellis, Bennett, Thrower, Dietz) and Minnesota (Brodin, Dumba, Cuma).


Last edited by That: 11-29-2012 at 04:54 PM. Reason: forgot the Isles
That is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-29-2012, 11:52 AM
  #21
blinkman360
Back to Basics
 
blinkman360's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Guido Central
Country: United States
Posts: 8,687
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by That View Post
Pittsburgh for me. It's hard to argue with not only high end talent, but lots of depth and variety. Morrow, Pouliot, Harrington, Despres, Maatta, Dumoulin are all great prospects that have top 4 potential.

Second would be Phoenix. Similar to Pittsburgh in how they have high end talent and depth too, but just not as much. Gormley and Murphy a pair of solid two-way defenders who have top pairing upside, Rundblad has loads of potential, and Stone and Summers provide solid depth.

I couldn't decide between Columbus (Murray, Erixon, Moore, Savard, Goloubef, Reilly), Toronto (Rielly, Blacker, Finn, Percy, Holzer), and Edmonton (Schultz, Klefbom, Marincin, Gernat, Musil) for the next 3 spots to round out the top 5.

HM mentions to Buffalo (McNabb, Pysyk, Brennan, Gauthier-Leduc, McCabe), Montreal (Tinordi, Beaulieu, Ellis, Bennett, Thrower, Dietz) and Minnesota (Brodin, Dumba, Cuma).
I think either Toronto is being overrated here, or the Isles are being underrated.

If anything the Isles top-5 of Reinhart, Donovan, Mayfield, deHaan and Pokka is at the same level, if not slightly ahead of that Toronto top-5.

Not to mention outside of the top-5, guys like Pelech, Kichton and Pedan are better than any 3 other prospects Toronto can throw out there.

I'd understand if Toronto had another guy with elite potential, but they have the same amount of those guys as NYI: 1.

blinkman360 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
11-29-2012, 11:56 AM
  #22
MoreGore
Registered User
 
MoreGore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2,075
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kulemon View Post
Toronto:

Rielly 1-2D
Gardiner 1-2D
Finn 2-4D
Percy 3-4D
Blacker 3-4D
Holzer 4-5D
Granberg 5-6D
etc.
I admit that I am surprised with the love the Leafs are getting. Gardiner is not a prospect, which makes the list weaker.

Reilly is a great prospect, but after him there is no single guy that really stands out as a very good prospect. Teams would be happy to have the depth that Toronto has though.

I certainly would put them in the 7-11 ranking easily enough.

MoreGore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-29-2012, 11:56 AM
  #23
Petro Points
Registered User
 
Petro Points's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 14,343
vCash: 885
my response to thread title = Bruins
my response to original post = Penguins

Petro Points is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-29-2012, 12:03 PM
  #24
Haatley
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,818
vCash: 681
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kulemon View Post
Toronto:

Rielly 1-2D
Gardiner 1-2D
Finn 2-4D
Percy 3-4D
Blacker 3-4D
Holzer 4-5D
Granberg 5-6D
etc.
Never surprised to see you in here homering the leafs.
Not even close to pens or jackets.

Haatley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
11-29-2012, 12:06 PM
  #25
Smallz
Registered User
 
Smallz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,112
vCash: 500
Saying a young D shouldn't be included in this just because he's already played his rookie season is pretty stupid in my opinion

Who cares who has the best d prospects - the better question is who has the best young D-core moving forward because then you can include a Gardiner, McNabb, Ellis, Josi, etc.

Smallz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:55 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.