They've already filmed most of the episodes for this season, so he won't be leaving until the end of the year. But if there are future seasons (six seasons and a movie!), he won't be in them.
They've already filmed most of the episodes for this season, so he won't be leaving until the end of the year. But if there are future seasons (six seasons and a movie!), he won't be in them.
Definitely not surprised by that one. My hope is that this upcoming season is good and worthy of fitting into the series. I can be content with his character leaving near the end of the season (assuming its done well). Just hope that that won't be what ends the series. It shouldn't, but you never know, as the end product just might not be up to the same standard without it.
I just can't wait for October 19th.... which happens to be in February this time around.
Definitely not surprised by that one. My hope is that this upcoming season is good and worthy of fitting into the series. I can be content with his character leaving near the end of the season (assuming its done well). Just hope that that won't be what ends the series. It shouldn't, but you never know, as the end product just might not be up to the same standard without it.
I just can't wait for October 19th.... which happens to be in February this time around.
They would have to contrive all sorts of weird reasons to keep the students there past four years, so the show definitely has an expiration date.
They would have to contrive all sorts of weird reasons to keep the students there past four years, so the show definitely has an expiration date.
Did they fully cover 2 semesters throughout the course of each season though? Admittedly since I watched them essentially in one shot, it blurs together a bit. But I do remember coming back from different "breaks" as just being the end of a semester. Or was that how they played off the break within a season?
Did they fully cover 2 semesters throughout the course of each season though? Admittedly since I watched them essentially in one shot, it blurs together a bit. But I do remember coming back from different "breaks" as just being the end of a semester. Or was that how they played off the break within a season?
Each season of the show so far has been a full year of the college. I'm pretty sure they played the break in the season as the break between semesters.
You`re gonna love Cloud Atlas (although I didn`t like the ending much).
One of the few movies that keep you strapped to the chair from start to finish (almost). I didn`t even know how those three hours just flew by. It`s a bit chaotic at the beginning, but sooner or later, you`ll start to understand. It`s worth being patient with this movie. Also, it has a great variety of emotions in it (brutality, love, hatred, humor and many more).
Also, expect more movies with Bond`s new Q in the near future, seems like a solid actor.
Just got the Dark Knight Rises. I slept through parts of it in theatres because we went to the midnight showing and had a lot to drink beforehand, so now I'll finally get to see what I missed out on because I thought it was the weakest of the 3. Must've missed some really good scenes since most of my friends say it was the best one.
I think the TDK was probably the best movie (on its own), but the TDKR was far better for its role in the trilogy (if that makes any sense). I essentially think TDKR was about all you could ask for out of the 3rd movie of a trilogy. Couldn't really think of anything I would have rather seen (well, nothing that was doable at least given circumstances). I loved all 3 movies personally, and they're all different in a way, so its really hard to "rank" them in any way.
Rises definitely tied the loose ends of the series together pretty well, but I still like the what the second movie did with its role. The second movie of a trilogy often has a tough time because it's like a holding pattern until the third one. The Dark Knight did a great job of avoiding that trap.
Rises definitely tied the loose ends of the series together pretty well, but I still like the what the second movie did with its role. The second movie of a trilogy often has a tough time because it's like a holding pattern until the third one. The Dark Knight did a great job of avoiding that trap.
I always look at it as the opposite. The second movie sets the tone for where the series will go and the third movie has the toughest battle because it has to provide the "ending" to the saga, which some will undoubtedly hate, while others will love it. You have to execute it VERY well to get a considerably positive reputation for the movie on the whole. Although, by the same token, the second has a tough time depending on how beloved the first movie was. Sometimes that bar is set too high and there's really nothing that can do to be "good enough." In those cases, its tough to make the second one, but even still that makes the third that much worse, as it either has to be great to redeem the series, or it looks like a terrible money grab that is expected to suck.
bond couldve been 1 hr 45 mins easy, max 2 hours. thats my main beef with these so called 'awesome' movies (harry potter, lotr, whatever). you can have a cerebral plot without unnecessary extended dialogue.
bond couldve been 1 hr 45 mins easy, max 2 hours. thats my main beef with these so called 'awesome' movies (harry potter, lotr, whatever). you can have a cerebral plot without unnecessary extended dialogue.
Agreed. That said, neither of those you mentioned, nor Cloud Atlas, should`ve been shortened. It`s highly individual.
Skyfall on the other hand was a little bit too long for me too.
