HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > National Hockey League Talk > Polls - (hockey-related only)

Sakic or Forsberg?

View Poll Results: ?
Joe Sakic 61 55.45%
Peter Forsberg 49 44.55%
Voters: 110. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
12-08-2012, 07:53 AM
  #1
Ceremony
Moderator
Why Not Us?
 
Ceremony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 66,053
vCash: 50
Sakic or Forsberg?

Assuming both remain healthy and you get a full career out of them, which of these would you have built your team around?

__________________
ďItís embarrassing. Iím embarrassed to be here right now. Itís not even funny. And itís just embarrassing, the way we, you know, the energy we have in the room and the way we approach practices and the way we approach this game. Itís not how youíre going to win any games in this league." - Jean-Sebastien Giguere, April 8 2013
Ceremony is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2012, 08:01 AM
  #2
Tomas W
Registered User
 
Tomas W's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4,502
vCash: 500
Forsberg...im a bit biased though. But seriously few players in histroy can mach Peters talent level. He would have score a lot more points if not injured so often.

Tomas W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2012, 08:03 AM
  #3
ottawa*
go habs go
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,003
vCash: 50
Sakic, great player and an even better captain

ottawa* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2012, 08:09 AM
  #4
Jonimaus
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Lund
Country: Sweden
Posts: 2,084
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceremony View Post
Assuming both remain healthy and you get a full career out of them, which of these would you have built your team around?
Then Forsberg.

Jonimaus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2012, 08:36 AM
  #5
Jack Donaghy
Good God Lemon
 
Jack Donaghy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Somerville MA
Country: United States
Posts: 12,401
vCash: 500
I like Forsberg more just because of his style, but Joe was putting up lots of points (100 at age 37, I think) so it's hard to go against him. I'm not sure.

Jack Donaghy is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2012, 10:57 AM
  #6
RECsGuy*
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,478
vCash: 500
Sakic for career, Forsberg for a single game.

RECsGuy* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2012, 02:17 PM
  #7
I Hate Chris Butler
Backlund Fan Club
 
I Hate Chris Butler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Saskatchewan
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,652
vCash: 50
In the imaginary world where there are no injuries, Sakic.

I Hate Chris Butler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2012, 02:31 PM
  #8
SillyRabbit
Registered User
 
SillyRabbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,262
vCash: 1250
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ceremony View Post
Assuming both remain healthy and you get a full career out of them, which of these would you have built your team around?
Makes it Forsberg no question.

SillyRabbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2012, 02:33 PM
  #9
Wrath
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 764
vCash: 500
I think people forget that Sakic was also injured a good number of games in his prime (Dead puck era, between the lockouts). Also some of hie his playoff performances were hindered during that time too.

People always remember Forsberg as the guy plagued with injuries but Sakic had his fair share too.

All said if both are impervious to injury it's pretty close. Forsberg was more physical and dynamic, stronger puck possession game, etc. Sakic was easily the better goal scorer, could be argued to have the higher purely offensive peak (95-96 and 00-01), leadership "intangibles", etc.

Their defensive games were sort of different. Sakic played positional defense quite well by the second half of his career. Forsberg was more physical and all, but mind you neither of them were ever considered shut-down selke-level defensive forwards, even though both garnered second place finishes in selke voting once.

Wrath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2012, 02:41 PM
  #10
MastuhNinks
Registered User
 
MastuhNinks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: The Iron Throne
Posts: 4,149
vCash: 500
Sakic

And I hope people don't extrapolate that Forsberg is the better offensive player because he had a slightly higher points per game (although I understand voting for him for comparable offense + everything else he puts to the table). He only had a higher points per game because he didn't really play past the age of 33, and even using points per game is in his favour because he rarely played full seasons. You could speculate that maybe he would've been able to score at that rate or even higher barring injuries, but it's just that, speculation. Which is really what I don't like about the wording of this poll, because the answer depends so much on how you think a healthy Forsberg would fare. Would he have played better without injuries? Are his stats boosted by the fact that he got a lot of rest and rarely played full seasons? Would he have been able to continue scoring at that rate up into his older years? So many questions...

Just in case anyone is wondering, Forsberg from age 22-32 and Sakic from 20-31 both had a points per game of 1.29. The main difference being that in this time frame Sakic played 864 games to Forsberg's 593. Again, whether or not Forsberg can play at this pace for a prolonged time comes into question, and it's really a question that plays a major role in who you pick in this poll. So I can't really blame people for picking Forsberg, I'm just more of a skeptic and I don't like giving guys credit for what they didn't do while they were injured (even though it might go against the nature of the poll).

MastuhNinks is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2012, 02:41 PM
  #11
Benny FTW
Tool Time Travel
 
Benny FTW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,538
vCash: 50
Sakic, easy choice.

Benny FTW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2012, 02:47 PM
  #12
silkyjohnson50
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 6,772
vCash: 500
As great as Sakic was in the clutch, I'd still rather have Forsberg (assuming good health of course.)

Their peaks may be very close and statistical evidence probably shows that, but Forsberg controlled the game more IMO.

As a Detroit fan who seen the best of these guys throughout the rivalry, I've always described my first hand account of them like this:

Sakic terrified you when Colorado had the puck in the offensive zone, Forsberg terrified you the moment you seen him jump over the boards.

That's not to take anything away from Sakic who obviously has a well rounded game, but that's just the way Forsberg made things seem.

silkyjohnson50 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2012, 02:48 PM
  #13
um
Registered User
 
um's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,761
vCash: 500
joke sakic

um is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2012, 03:00 PM
  #14
Trillmike
Registered User
 
Trillmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,361
vCash: 500
If health isn't an issue, Forsbrg.

Trillmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2012, 03:06 PM
  #15
Fred Taylor
The Cyclone
 
Fred Taylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,294
vCash: 500
Both players were pretty close during their primes but I just happen to think Forsberg was the better player. If health isn't an issue I'd take Forsberg.

Fred Taylor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2012, 06:00 PM
  #16
Machinehead
Richards Supporter
 
Machinehead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: New York New York
Country: United States
Posts: 31,374
vCash: 500
Sakic, very easily.

Forget healthy, I don't care if Forsberg is the Wolverine jacked up on senzu beans, the answer is Joe Sakic.

Machinehead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2012, 08:17 PM
  #17
MrFunnyWobbl
So Aaron Baddeley
 
MrFunnyWobbl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Walking on the moon
Country: Comoros
Posts: 16,893
vCash: 50
Send a message via AIM to MrFunnyWobbl
Forsberg.

MrFunnyWobbl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2012, 10:12 PM
  #18
ottawa*
go habs go
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,003
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Machinehead View Post
Sakic, very easily.

Forget healthy, I don't care if Forsberg is the Wolverine jacked up on senzu beans, the answer is Joe Sakic.
LOOOL

ottawa* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2012, 10:16 PM
  #19
Fripp
Registered User
 
Fripp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Country: United States
Posts: 1,816
vCash: 500
Forsberg is obscenely overrated on this board, so this is going to be closer than it should be.

Fripp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2012, 10:32 PM
  #20
FoppaForsberg*
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 534
vCash: 500
Healthy Forsberg > healthy Sakic. People saying Forsberg is overrated, typical HF logic hahahaha

FoppaForsberg* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2012, 10:53 PM
  #21
nowhereman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 3,294
vCash: 500
A healthy Forsberg, without a moment's hesitation. He was a beast.

nowhereman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2012, 11:11 PM
  #22
Jray42
Registered User
 
Jray42's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Philadelphia
Country: United States
Posts: 2,783
vCash: 86
Forsberg for me.

Jray42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2012, 11:45 PM
  #23
Wrath
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 764
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoppaForsberg View Post
Healthy Forsberg > healthy Sakic. People saying Forsberg is overrated, typical HF logic hahahaha
On HFboards he is....

That said I can see the arguments for both sides of this poll, hence I am abstaining from voting.

Wrath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-08-2012, 11:53 PM
  #24
MeowLeafs
LM is awesome
 
MeowLeafs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Baconland
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,781
vCash: 500
Personally, I am of the belief that Forsberg's style of play is an important factor in what led to his proneness to injuries. If that's the case, you simply can not have a healthy Forsberg with what everyone expects of him. In other words, if he were to remain healthy, he wouldn't have been as good as we remember him today. Flame away.

MeowLeafs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2012, 01:17 AM
  #25
TAnnala
HFBoards Sponsor
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Oulu
Posts: 7,147
vCash: 131
Quote:
Originally Posted by I Hate Jay Feaster View Post
In the imaginary world where there are no injuries, Sakic.
This.

If Forsberg would get free pass on all injuries then Sakic would too. Hard to imagine him getting any worse with no injuries, ever.

If Forsberg is given un-natural heath and Sakic not, it gets harder. Just like Lemieux/Gretzky debates. Still think it is Sakic tough.


Last edited by TAnnala: 12-09-2012 at 01:27 AM.
TAnnala is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:03 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.