HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Atlantic Division > Toronto Maple Leafs
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Leafs ranked 20th by Hockey's Future.

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
12-09-2012, 07:51 AM
  #1
Kyle93
Registered User
 
Kyle93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: GTA
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,885
vCash: 500
It says we are 18 right now. And in any case on our top 5 prospects they haven't factored in Rielly yet. Kadri is still our #1 prospect.

Actually forget what I said I'm stupid

Kyle93 is online now  
Old
12-09-2012, 07:53 AM
  #2
BlueBaron
Registered User
 
BlueBaron's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Toronto, On
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,483
vCash: 500
Difficult to take seriously, but I'm sure the Burke haters will love it.

BlueBaron is offline  
Old
12-09-2012, 07:53 AM
  #3
mapes
Registered User
 
mapes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Halifax
Posts: 21,912
vCash: 500
These lists mean little. How often has Detroit been at the top? Who would you rather be Minnesota or Oilers? Florida or Rangers? I don't care if we were 1 or 30 TBH

mapes is online now  
Old
12-09-2012, 07:59 AM
  #4
onebighockeyfan
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,494
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueBaron View Post
Difficult to take seriously, but I'm sure the Burke haters will love it.
I think they are quite reliable actually. Detroit has been top-10 many times I think.

onebighockeyfan is offline  
Old
12-09-2012, 08:01 AM
  #5
leafspring*
 
leafspring*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,361
vCash: 500
Burke has work to do on our Forward prospects. The rank would be much higher if we categorized. The goalies,and defense is very respectable. The leadership qualities of our top prospects is strong also.

The quality of prospects is not counted in goals,and assists,and thats why this ranking means nothing concerning to me.

leafspring* is offline  
Old
12-09-2012, 08:03 AM
  #6
onebighockeyfan
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,494
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by leafspring View Post
Burke has work to do on our Forward prospects. The rank would be much higher if we categorized. The goalies,and defense is very respectable. The leadership qualities of our top prospects is strong also.

The quality of prospects is not counted in goals,and assists,and thats why this ranking means nothing concerning to me.
Pretty fair to say that if the Leafs were ranked #1 many would be pumped.

onebighockeyfan is offline  
Old
12-09-2012, 08:22 AM
  #7
Leaf Rocket
Leaf Fan Till I Die
 
Leaf Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fredericton, NB
Country: India
Posts: 70,939
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by mapes View Post
These lists mean little. How often has Detroit been at the top? Who would you rather be Minnesota or Oilers? Florida or Rangers? I don't care if we were 1 or 30 TBH
Thank you. Some people get this.

Folks remember this is an opinion. At one point, before Tallon got there, Florida was a top organization along with Columbus Blue jackets. Same with another one called NY Islanders. It's always great to have high picks and high first rounders because you an upper echleon talent in the franchise but that doesn't get you the cup. If you don't believe me look at Islanders, Thrashers, Jackets, Panthers and to some extent even the bolts.

As for Question regarding Oilers or Wilds, wilds didn't get a first overall as well now did they

__________________
Leaf Rocket is offline  
Old
12-09-2012, 08:24 AM
  #8
Drew311
Play Me
 
Drew311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,933
vCash: 500
Gardiner and Frattin graduated from prospect status, so I would assume our ranking took a hit from this.

I still think the Leafs should be between 10 - 15. We simply lack number one goaltending and top line forward prospects, so I guess it's understandable that we're so low.

A lot of Leafs fans get man crushes on their prospects, but reality is most teams are full of mid tier prospects like Leivo, Brown and Cameranesi.

Drew311 is offline  
Old
12-09-2012, 08:24 AM
  #9
Leaf Rocket
Leaf Fan Till I Die
 
Leaf Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fredericton, NB
Country: India
Posts: 70,939
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by pelletier666 View Post
Pretty fair to say that if the Leafs were ranked #1 many would be pumped.
Those who look at stats and are happy yea? However I rather be an organization like the Wilds who have great prospects and high end ones in every corner along with the right supporting casts than just three stars.

Leaf Rocket is offline  
Old
12-09-2012, 08:24 AM
  #10
mapes
Registered User
 
mapes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Halifax
Posts: 21,912
vCash: 500
Florida has been near the top for 10 years. Remember future stars like Weiss and Horton?

mapes is online now  
Old
12-09-2012, 08:29 AM
  #11
Arathor
Registered User
 
Arathor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: By a pointy tower
Country: Canada
Posts: 207
vCash: 500
Tom Wilson is listed as an elite prospect...mentioned in same sentence as Kuznetsov...


Enough said! What a laughable list and even worse write up

Arathor is offline  
Old
12-09-2012, 08:38 AM
  #12
leafspring*
 
leafspring*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,361
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by pelletier666 View Post
Pretty fair to say that if the Leafs were ranked #1 many would be pumped.
Morgan rielly is something to be pumped about,and the way naz is maturing is a symptom of the quality group he plays with.(quality coaching also) That is getting me pumped too. We have some of the most talked about prospects in three leagues in Kadri/Gardiner,Biggs,and Rielly.

Rielly's warriors have a .470 win percentage,and the third lowest goals for in the western hockey league,but he is third in scoring by defensemen in the league. He is the best defenseman in the WHL.

Rielly/Gardiner with Kadri leaves us only 2 players short of a future top power-play unit strictly using prospects as the qualifier. Thats enough to be pumped about for today i think.

leafspring* is offline  
Old
12-09-2012, 08:40 AM
  #13
Mess
Global Moderator
 
Mess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 60,207
vCash: 500
The Hockey Future's Leafs note:

Quote:
20. Toronto Maple Leafs

Strengths: Morgan Rielly leads a strong group of defensive prospects that also includes Matt Finn, Jesse Blacker, and Stuart Percy. In addition, they have a handful of skilled forwards with NHL experience like Nazem Kadri, Joe Colborne, and Carter Ashton.

Weaknesses: Many of the forwards are third and fourth line prospects, who have more grittiness than offensive skill. Additionally, Toronto has a fluid situation in net, both on the NHL level, as well as down the pipeline. The strongest netminder in the system is Mark Owuya, but he is off to a very slow start this season and may go the way of many highly touted Maple Leafs' goaltending prospects of the recent past.

Top 5 Prospects: 1. Morgan Rielly, D; 2. Nazem Kadri, C; 3. Joe Colborne, C; 4. Jesse Blacker, D; 5. Matt Finn, D.

__________________
Signature: There is no greater demonstration of Fan patience then to suggest to "Play the Kids " and be willing to accept the consequences of those actions..
Mess is offline  
Old
12-09-2012, 08:46 AM
  #14
The Naz
With God given hands
 
The Naz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,404
vCash: 500
DET is still riding the Zetterburg/Datsyuk scouting history well into their 30's. That's a bit much. I wouldn't trade their pool for ours if they threw in a couple 1sts to boot. Their best prospects are 23y/o, and their younger ones like Tatar and Jurco are long shots, IMO.

Reilly/Kadri/Colbourne/Finn/Percy vs Smith/Nyquist/Jurco/Tatar/Jarnkrok

I know who I want.

The Naz is offline  
Old
12-09-2012, 09:00 AM
  #15
4evaBlue
Registered User
 
4evaBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,361
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by leafspring View Post
Burke has work to do on our Forward prospects. The rank would be much higher if we categorized. The goalies,and defense is very respectable. The leadership qualities of our top prospects is strong also.

The quality of prospects is not counted in goals,and assists,and thats why this ranking means nothing concerning to me.
The Leafs biggest need for forwards is grit atm, and as the "report card" points out, it's one of the strengths of the current batch of prospects. If one of those players can manage to secure a top 6 role, and a couple of others a bottom 6 role, we're golden. We have plenty of skilled perimeter players on the club.

If Burke can find that elusive #1C from outside, and Kadri (who's now been moved back to center) can take over #2C with Grabo moved over to the wing (where he's playing in the KHL atm), our playmaker dilemmas can be resolved, as well.

Otherwise, I agree with what you've said.

4evaBlue is offline  
Old
12-09-2012, 09:08 AM
  #16
FishManSam
Bobs Yummy Burgers!
 
FishManSam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: I Bet You Hate T.O
Country: Croatia
Posts: 4,967
vCash: 500
Would rather be 20th and know we have impact prospects, then 6th/9th and have our top prospects as Gus/Stalberg etc...

FishManSam is offline  
Old
12-09-2012, 09:09 AM
  #17
dubey
~manlets~
 
dubey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Hockey Mecca
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,609
vCash: 500
Remember when a lot of our prospects were 8.0Bs on this site?

Good times

dubey is offline  
Old
12-09-2012, 09:14 AM
  #18
Pyromaniac3
Registered User
 
Pyromaniac3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Toronto
Country: India
Posts: 3,299
vCash: 500
Just don't have elite forwards or defensemen other than Rielly which is why the ranking is low.

Pyromaniac3 is offline  
Old
12-09-2012, 09:16 AM
  #19
Leaf Rocket
Leaf Fan Till I Die
 
Leaf Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fredericton, NB
Country: India
Posts: 70,939
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by dubey View Post
Remember when a lot of our prospects were 8.0Bs on this site?

Good times
Jonathan quick was 6.5b i think or something like that lol.

Leaf Rocket is offline  
Old
12-09-2012, 09:18 AM
  #20
The Naz
With God given hands
 
The Naz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,404
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyromaniac3 View Post
Just don't have elite forwards or defensemen other than Rielly which is why the ranking is low.
Who does? If you have elite prospects, it's because there is a lockout. Most elite players go right to the NHL.

The Naz is offline  
Old
12-09-2012, 09:25 AM
  #21
The Naz
With God given hands
 
The Naz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,404
vCash: 500
Take MIN prospects, would you trade Granlund for Reilly? Certainly debatable. Granlund is great, but so is Reilly. I'd put them some where very close to each other.

Take both out of the equation and what pool would you rather have?

Coyle/Brodin/Dumba or Kadri/Colborne/Percy(they have Blacker-I think Percy will be better)

I think MIN gets the slight edge, but it's not 19 spots apart, IMO.

The Naz is offline  
Old
12-09-2012, 09:29 AM
  #22
dubey
~manlets~
 
dubey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: The Hockey Mecca
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,609
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Naz View Post
Take MIN prospects, would you trade Granlund for Reilly? Certainly debatable. Granlund is great, but so is Reilly. I'd put them some where very close to each other.

Take both out of the equation and what pool would you rather have?

Coyle/Brodin/Dumba or Kadri/Colborne/Percy(they have Blacker-I think Percy will be better)

I think MIN gets the slight edge, but it's not 19 spots apart, IMO.
Montreal is a better example I think

Both pools are apparently weak enough that their 2nd round picks in the 2012 draft are already their #5 ranked prospects. Their 1st round picks in the 2012 draft are already their #1 ranked prospects.

So the difference between Montreal's 2, 3, 4 (Beaulieu, Leblanc, Tinordi) is almost 12 spots on Toronto. lol

dubey is offline  
Old
12-09-2012, 09:31 AM
  #23
Mess
Global Moderator
 
Mess's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: Canada
Posts: 60,207
vCash: 500
Logic Problem.

Take a 26th NHL team in the NHL overall standings, add (+) the 20th ranked prospect pool (@ HF & Hockey News) = Stanley Cup in how many years?

A bottom 5 NHL team (with over 1/2 current team on expiring contracts next season) & a bottom 10 NHL internal prospect pool seems like a long long way from a Cup winning team based on what exists today within in the organization.

Missing vital components like a #1 Centre & #1 Goalie absent from the organization not found in the current prospect pool nor on the current roster another glaring organizational weakness.

Mess is offline  
Old
12-09-2012, 09:37 AM
  #24
RogerRoeper*
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 21,694
vCash: 500
Means absolutely nothing.

RogerRoeper* is offline  
Old
12-09-2012, 09:49 AM
  #25
The Blue Devil
Registered User
 
The Blue Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,531
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mess View Post
Logic Problem.

Take a 26th NHL team in the NHL overall standings, add (+) the 20th ranked prospect pool (@ HF & Hockey News) = Stanley Cup in how many years?

A bottom 5 NHL team (with over 1/2 current team on expiring contracts next season) & a bottom 10 NHL internal prospect pool seems like a long long way from a Cup winning team based on what exists today within in the organization.

Missing vital components like a #1 Centre & #1 Goalie absent from the organization not found in the current prospect pool nor on the current roster another glaring organizational weakness.
The best thing about 18-22 year olds is that anything can happen. I'd say it's close to impossible to accurately predict how they turn out(especially 18 year olds) no matter what a couple of sites say. Everyone matures differently.

The Blue Devil is online now  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.