HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > Fantasy Hockey Talk > Mock Drafts
Mock Drafts Mock drafts for fun and fantasy here.

2013 NHL Mock Draft (Lottery Based)

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
12-09-2012, 03:55 PM
  #1
LeHabsMan
Registered User
 
LeHabsMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Laval
Country: Italy
Posts: 1,759
vCash: 500
2013 NHL Mock Draft (Lottery Based)

Here is my Mock Draft for the 2013 NHL Draft.

I got the order from DraftPickLottery.com based on the amount of balls each team should have.

1. CLB(from NYR): Nathan MacKinnon
2. CAL: Seth Jones
3. MON: Alexander Barkov
4. NYI: Jonathan Drouin
5. CAR: Elias Lindholm
6. CLB(from LA): Sean Monahan
7. WIN: Hunter Shinkaruk
8. EDM: Rasmus Ristolainen
9. DET: Valeri Nichushkin
10. FLO: Ryan Pulock
11. OTT: Nikita Zadorov
12. DAL: Josh Morrisey
13. MIN: Curtis Lazar
14. ANA: Max Domi
15. TB: Darnell Nurse
16. PHO: Adam Erne
17. SJ: Andre Burakovsky
18. CLB: Robert Hagg
19. TOR: Frederik Gauthier
20. VAN: Jason Dickinson
21: NJ: Zach Fucale
22. COL: Anthony Mantha
23. PHI: Steve Santini
24. WAS: William Carrier
25. BUF: Kerby Rychel
26. BOS: Jacob De La Rose
27. STL: JT Compher
28. CHI: Spencer Martin
29. NAS: Ian McCoshen
30. PIT: Artturi Lekhonen

LeHabsMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2012, 04:27 PM
  #2
hlaverty06
Registered User
 
hlaverty06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NJ all day
Country: United States
Posts: 7,280
vCash: 500
Devils won't draft Fucale. We will use our pick on the Best Forward Available

hlaverty06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2012, 05:03 PM
  #3
LeHabsMan
Registered User
 
LeHabsMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Laval
Country: Italy
Posts: 1,759
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hlaverty06 View Post
Devils won't draft Fucale. We will use our pick on the Best Forward Available
I think Fucale would be a better pick then Mantha, Carrier or Compher for the Devils. He has starting goalie potential where as 2nd line i the tops for those guys. He would be the perfect replacement for Brodeur.

LeHabsMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2012, 05:32 PM
  #4
hlaverty06
Registered User
 
hlaverty06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NJ all day
Country: United States
Posts: 7,280
vCash: 500
Wedgewood and Kinkaid will be ready by time Marty's contract is up

hlaverty06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2012, 05:36 PM
  #5
LeHabsMan
Registered User
 
LeHabsMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Laval
Country: Italy
Posts: 1,759
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hlaverty06 View Post
Wedgewood and Kinkaid will be ready by time Marty's contract is up
I dont think they have the potential that Fucale has. Who would you select in that place?

LeHabsMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2012, 05:43 PM
  #6
hlaverty06
Registered User
 
hlaverty06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NJ all day
Country: United States
Posts: 7,280
vCash: 500
At that pick to be honest i don't know, if were a few spots up, Max Domi

hlaverty06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2012, 05:49 PM
  #7
Vankiller Whale
Maybe HE can score
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 24,141
vCash: 5555
I think NJ should draft Fucale if given the chance.

For Vancouver I would much prefer Mantha to Dickinson.

Vankiller Whale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2012, 05:59 PM
  #8
LeHabsMan
Registered User
 
LeHabsMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Laval
Country: Italy
Posts: 1,759
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vankiller Whale View Post
I think NJ should draft Fucale if given the chance.

For Vancouver I would much prefer Mantha to Dickinson.
That was a tough prediction for me. Dickinson works hard and is very skilled. Mantha takes shifts off but is also skilled. I think they should be drafted a few spots away from each other. It is a teams preference. For Vancouver, I see Dickinson being taken over Mantha.

LeHabsMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2012, 07:42 PM
  #9
LetsGOJackets!!
Registered User
 
LetsGOJackets!!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 2,535
vCash: 500
doing cartwheels in columbus if we get anything

close to MacKinnon, Monahan & Hagg. I wanted to point out to you why this may be a real scenario.. notice the pick that won the lottery was from the Rags, not the original CBJ pick. That is in fact our luck, however, as mentioned this gives us top two line talent and we will take it

LetsGOJackets!! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2012, 11:12 PM
  #10
ALI
Registered User
 
ALI's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 1,217
vCash: 50
Calgary will take Barkov, Lindholm and Monahan over Jones

ALI is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2012, 12:26 AM
  #11
arsmaster
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 16,506
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Habs4TheCup View Post
That was a tough prediction for me. Dickinson works hard and is very skilled. Mantha takes shifts off but is also skilled. I think they should be drafted a few spots away from each other. It is a teams preference. For Vancouver, I see Dickinson being taken over Mantha.
I really like Dickinson.

I think Vancouver would take him over Mantha too.

arsmaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2012, 08:17 AM
  #12
ManByng
Moroz fan
 
ManByng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: St. Albert, Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,535
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALI View Post
Calgary will take Barkov, Lindholm and Monahan over Jones
Barkov i could see, but i'd be shocked if the Flames passed on Jones otherwise. i have heard some say that Jones could be the next Pronger!

ManByng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2012, 11:30 AM
  #13
DEVILS ALL THE WAY*
Yes, I'm a hypocrite
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montreal
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,477
vCash: 500
I wouldn't mind one bit if we took Fucale at #21.

The list of available forwards isn't leaps and bounds better then Fucale plus our current prospects between the pipes aren't locks to crack anything.

If Fucale is the BPA, then we should go with that. There was this goaltender who got drafted in the 1st round a couple of decades ago and he turned out pretty "ok" for us.

The draft is a massive coin flip outside of the top #5... and even then, it's no garantee

DEVILS ALL THE WAY* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2012, 12:01 PM
  #14
HockeySensible
Smug Teuvo
 
HockeySensible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,804
vCash: 500
I'd be good if Chicago took Spencer Martin that late in the first. I think Burakovsky will go higher and I think Darnell Nurse will go before Zadorov and Morissey.

HockeySensible is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2012, 01:16 PM
  #15
Sundinisagod
just give'r
 
Sundinisagod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Zagreb
Country: Croatia
Posts: 7,378
vCash: 500
With Toronto's luck, 19th sounds about right

Sundinisagod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2012, 01:19 PM
  #16
ManByng
Moroz fan
 
ManByng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: St. Albert, Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,535
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DEVILS ALL THE WAY View Post
I wouldn't mind one bit if we took Fucale at #21.

The list of available forwards isn't leaps and bounds better then Fucale plus our current prospects between the pipes aren't locks to crack anything.

If Fucale is the BPA, then we should go with that. There was this goaltender who got drafted in the 1st round a couple of decades ago and he turned out pretty "ok" for us.

The draft is a massive coin flip outside of the top #5... and even then, it's no garantee
^especially from mid 1st on. Fucale might be the best goalie prospect since John Gibson a few drafts ago, and if i was drafting for Jersey and drafting mid round or below, i'd take him, espectially if the Devs have to forefeit the next draft.

ManByng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2012, 05:47 PM
  #17
LeHabsMan
Registered User
 
LeHabsMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Laval
Country: Italy
Posts: 1,759
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ALI View Post
Calgary will take Barkov, Lindholm and Monahan over Jones
I seriously doubt Lindholm and Monahan go over Jones. Barkov maybe but the other two, no.

LeHabsMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2012, 06:07 PM
  #18
DuckJet
#KESBAE
 
DuckJet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Funkytown
Country: Kazakhstan
Posts: 36,389
vCash: 69
Would not complain. Shinkaruk to the Jets. Domi to the Ducks...actually Domi is a great fit for the style Murray wants the Ducks to adopt...again.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsGOJackets!! View Post
close to MacKinnon, Monahan & Hagg. I wanted to point out to you why this may be a real scenario.. notice the pick that won the lottery was from the Rags, not the original CBJ pick. That is in fact our luck, however, as mentioned this gives us top two line talent and we will take it
One of these things is not like the others.


Last edited by DuckJet: 12-10-2012 at 06:13 PM.
DuckJet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2012, 06:49 PM
  #19
Money Baer
COYS
 
Money Baer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Moose Jaw, SK
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,623
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Habs4TheCup View Post
I seriously doubt Lindholm and Monahan go over Jones. Barkov maybe but the other two, no.
You are correct in your assessment. Depending how things go down, Barkov could go ahead of Jones for the Flames but I highly doubt anyone else.

As much as the Flames need a legit #1 C our need for a legit #1 D is there too... BPA for the Flames. That is Jones.

Jones & Baertschi would be a good start to a new core/direction for the Flames... It would also help us "keep" up with the youth movements in MIN, EDM, COL. The NW division will soon be one of the hardest/talented divisions in the league.

Money Baer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2012, 07:58 PM
  #20
HockeySensible
Smug Teuvo
 
HockeySensible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,804
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Habs4TheCup View Post
I seriously doubt Lindholm and Monahan go over Jones. Barkov maybe but the other two, no.
I agree on Monahan.. but I wouldn't be so sure about Lindholm. Everything that's been said about him screams star. Jones and Lindholm are both elite, hard to go wrong and I lean Jones too.. but I wouldn't be shocked to see a team in need of a centre go with Lindholm over Jones.

HockeySensible is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-12-2012, 08:21 AM
  #21
HockeyGuruPitka
Registered User
 
HockeyGuruPitka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,032
vCash: 500
Something tells me there is no way Montreal passes on Drouin. They love the local kids toooo much.

HockeyGuruPitka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-12-2012, 10:30 AM
  #22
LeHabsMan
Registered User
 
LeHabsMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Laval
Country: Italy
Posts: 1,759
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by HockeyGuruPitka View Post
Something tells me there is no way Montreal passes on Drouin. They love the local kids toooo much.
I know but I would love Barkov.

LeHabsMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-13-2012, 01:35 AM
  #23
bobg1
Registered User
 
bobg1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: bc
Country: Canada
Posts: 490
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Habs4TheCup View Post
Here is my Mock Draft for the 2013 NHL Draft.

I got the order from DraftPickLottery.com based on the amount of balls each team should have.

1. CLB(from NYR): Nathan MacKinnon
2. CAL: Seth Jones
3. MON: Alexander Barkov
4. NYI: Jonathan Drouin
5. CAR: Elias Lindholm
6. CLB(from LA): Sean Monahan
7. WIN: Hunter Shinkaruk
8. EDM: Rasmus Ristolainen
9. DET: Valeri Nichushkin
10. FLO: Ryan Pulock
11. OTT: Nikita Zadorov
12. DAL: Josh Morrisey
13. MIN: Curtis Lazar
14. ANA: Max Domi
15. TB: Darnell Nurse
16. PHO: Adam Erne
17. SJ: Andre Burakovsky
18. CLB: Robert Hagg
19. TOR: Frederik Gauthier
20. VAN: Jason Dickinson
21: NJ: Zach Fucale
22. COL: Anthony Mantha
23. PHI: Steve Santini
24. WAS: William Carrier
25. BUF: Kerby Rychel
26. BOS: Jacob De La Rose
27. STL: JT Compher
28. CHI: Spencer Martin
29. NAS: Ian McCoshen
30. PIT: Artturi Lekhonen
Why would Toronto be way down in 19th instead of 5th?

bobg1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-13-2012, 01:45 AM
  #24
BarDownBobo
Registered User
 
BarDownBobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Yak City
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,721
vCash: 500
I'd be pretty happy with Edm picking Ristolainen, but if they were in that spot I'd like to see them move up to pick Barkov, Lindholm or Monahan. Need for a 2C is bigger than DMen for them.

BarDownBobo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-13-2012, 11:24 AM
  #25
General Granny*
 
General Granny*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 986
vCash: 500
If CBJ came out with both McKinnon and Monahan at that draft then......... yeah.

General Granny* is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:15 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.