HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > Other Sports > Football
Football NFL, NCAA, CFL

Playoff Picture

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
12-03-2012, 05:30 PM
  #101
Elway
Doubt your Doubters
 
Elway's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Country: Norfolk Island
Posts: 5,664
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tuggy View Post
I could easily see the Ravens losing their next 4 games.
I agree the ravens aren't a good team

Elway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-04-2012, 12:20 PM
  #102
Marc the Habs Fan
Moderator
Habs fan for Hawks!
 
Marc the Habs Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Longueuil
Country: Canada
Posts: 42,936
vCash: 280
NFC playoff picture:

#1 ATL 11-1 - 7-1 conference record (clinched NFC South)
#2 SF 8-3-1 - 6-3-1 conference record...2-1-1 division record
#3 GB 8-4 - 6-3 conference record...3-0 division record
#4 NYG 7-5 - 6-3 conference record...2-3 division record
#5 CHI 8-4 - 5-3 conference record...2-1 division record - WC 1
#6 SEA 7-5 - 5-4 conference record...0-3 division record - WC 2

IN THE HUNT:

WAS 6-6 - 6-4 conference record...3-1 division record
DAL 6-6 - 5-5 conference record...3-2 division record
TB 6-6 - 3-5 conference record
MIN 6-6 - 4-5 conference record...2-2 division record
STL 5-6-1 - 5-3-1 conference record
NO 5-7 - 3-5 conference record


Last edited by Marc the Habs Fan: 12-09-2012 at 10:38 PM.
Marc the Habs Fan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
12-04-2012, 01:03 PM
  #103
GoneFullHolmgren
no bandwagon allowed
 
GoneFullHolmgren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somewhere in NH
Country: Liechtenstein
Posts: 21,293
vCash: 500
this is a knockout game pretty much for NO this weekend. Lose and they are done.

GoneFullHolmgren is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2012, 10:38 PM
  #104
Marc the Habs Fan
Moderator
Habs fan for Hawks!
 
Marc the Habs Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Longueuil
Country: Canada
Posts: 42,936
vCash: 280
NFC playoff picture:

#1 ATL 11-2 - 7-2 conference record (clinched NFC South)
#2 SF 9-3-1 - 6-3-1 conference record...2-1-1 division record
#3 GB 9-4 - 7-3 conference record...4-0 division record
#4 NYG 8-5 - 7-3 conference record...2-3 division record
#5 SEA 8-5 - 6-4 conference record...1-3 division record - WC 1
#6 CHI 8-5 - 5-4 conference record...2-2 division record - WC 2

IN THE HUNT:

WAS 7-6 - 6-4 conference record...3-1 division record
DAL 7-6 - 5-5 conference record...3-2 division record
MIN 7-6 - 5-5 conference record...3-2 division record
STL 6-6-1 - 5-3-1 conference record
TB 6-7 - 3-6 conference record

Marc the Habs Fan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2012, 10:39 PM
  #105
Blackhawkswincup
Global Moderator
Stanley Cup Forum
 
Blackhawkswincup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Country: United States
Posts: 85,223
vCash: 3762
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marc the Habs Fan View Post
NFC playoff picture:

#1 ATL 11-2 - 7-2 conference record (clinched NFC South)
#2 SF 9-3-1 - 6-3-1 conference record...2-1-1 division record
#3 GB 9-4 - 7-3 conference record...4-0 division record
#4 NYG 8-5 - 7-3 conference record...2-3 division record
#5 SEA 7-8 - 6-4 conference record...1-3 division record - WC 1
#6 CHI 8-5 - 5-4 conference record...2-2 division record - WC 2

IN THE HUNT:

WAS 7-6 - 6-4 conference record...3-1 division record
DAL 7-6 - 5-5 conference record...3-2 division record
MIN 7-6 - 5-5 conference record...3-2 division record
STL 6-6-1 - 5-3-1 conference record
TB 6-7 - 3-6 conference record
The Bears make me

Didn't even realize that Stl crept back into picture ,, That tie really hurts them

Blackhawkswincup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2012, 10:47 PM
  #106
Big Poppa Puck
Cleary=Jerry Gergich
 
Big Poppa Puck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: South Philly
Country: United States
Posts: 12,299
vCash: 500
I posted this in other playoff thread by mistake. Was meant for this one.

Quote:
Fox.


Big Poppa Puck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2012, 10:48 PM
  #107
GKJ
Global Moderator
Entertainment
 
GKJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Do not trade plz
Country: United States
Posts: 102,292
vCash: 3003
That tie helps them. It was against the 49ers on the road.

GKJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2012, 10:54 PM
  #108
No Fun Shogun
Registered User
 
No Fun Shogun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Country: United States
Posts: 12,645
vCash: 1000
Bears hopes on the verge of dying, unfortunately.

No Fun Shogun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-09-2012, 11:01 PM
  #109
Blackhawkswincup
Global Moderator
Stanley Cup Forum
 
Blackhawkswincup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Chicagoland
Country: United States
Posts: 85,223
vCash: 3762
Quote:
Originally Posted by GKJ View Post
That tie helps them. It was against the 49ers on the road.
Hurts them in WC race

Blackhawkswincup is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2012, 04:13 PM
  #110
FakeKidPoker
Registered User
 
FakeKidPoker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,817
vCash: 500
So the Seahawks have a very good chance of playing the Packers in the playoffs?

Probably go in and kick the Packers ass there.

FakeKidPoker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2012, 05:19 PM
  #111
What the Faulk
Gotta Catch 'em All!
 
What the Faulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: North Carolina
Country: United States
Posts: 20,703
vCash: 500
Absolutely nothing has been decided to say anyone has a very good shot at playing anyone right now. About the only thing that seems certain is Richard Sherman missing a playoff game or two. Add in the fact that they're a completely different team on the road and I don't see the Seahawks kicking anyone's ass in the playoffs.

What the Faulk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2012, 05:20 PM
  #112
six sigma
Last name Wilson
 
six sigma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 2,595
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by FakeKidPoker View Post
So the Seahawks have a very good chance of playing the Packers in the playoffs?

Probably go in and kick the Packers ass there.
Much as I'd love to see it, I'm not holding my breath.

I'll be happy with any playoff appearance, rookie QB and all.

six sigma is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2012, 09:19 PM
  #113
monster_bertuzzi
registered user
 
monster_bertuzzi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 26,752
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by What the Faulk View Post
Absolutely nothing has been decided to say anyone has a very good shot at playing anyone right now. About the only thing that seems certain is Richard Sherman missing a playoff game or two. Add in the fact that they're a completely different team on the road and I don't see the Seahawks kicking anyone's ass in the playoffs.
Browner-Trufant is still an above average CB combo if they don't have Sherman. Seattle is a well oiled machine and Wilson surprisingly has only gotten better and better. They are the ultimate darkhorse superbowl team right now.

monster_bertuzzi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2012, 09:50 PM
  #114
What the Faulk
Gotta Catch 'em All!
 
What the Faulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: North Carolina
Country: United States
Posts: 20,703
vCash: 500
Road losses include Arizona, Detroit, Miami, St. Louis and San Francisco, and they barely beat Carolina only because of Cam's AWFUL throw to an open Hartsock on 4th and goal from the 2. They did beat Chicago on the road, but they're awful right now. Seattle isn't winning 3 in a row on the road.

What the Faulk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2012, 10:09 PM
  #115
MurrayBannerman
Party Kane Forever
 
MurrayBannerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: 219
Country: United States
Posts: 12,271
vCash: 3935
Quote:
Originally Posted by monster_bertuzzi View Post
Browner-Trufant is still an above average CB combo if they don't have Sherman. Seattle is a well oiled machine and Wilson surprisingly has only gotten better and better. They are the ultimate darkhorse superbowl team right now.
They have a very good shot at winning that division. They'd be an incredibly scary 2 seed.

MurrayBannerman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2012, 10:29 PM
  #116
What the Faulk
Gotta Catch 'em All!
 
What the Faulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: North Carolina
Country: United States
Posts: 20,703
vCash: 500
Very good shot? I'm not even convinced they'll beat Buffalo this weekend, and they need to pick up 2 games on SF with 3 remaining. It helps that they play them in 2 weeks and SF plays the Pats next week, but let's not go overrating Seattle just yet. Besides, GB would likely grab the #2 *if* Seattle makes up enough ground on SF to win that division.

Though it is interesting to revisit that MNF game in the unlikely event that they do tie for the #2/#3 seed by record.

What the Faulk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2012, 10:32 PM
  #117
GrigsAndGirgs
ForFriendshipDikembe
 
GrigsAndGirgs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 33,577
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by What the Faulk View Post
Very good shot? I'm not even convinced they'll beat Buffalo this weekend, and they need to pick up 2 games on SF with 3 remaining. It helps that they play them in 2 weeks and SF plays the Pats next week, but let's not go overrating Seattle just yet. Besides, GB would likely grab the #2 *if* Seattle makes up enough ground on SF to win that division.
Chan Gailey will assure that. It's a gimme.

GrigsAndGirgs is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2012, 10:34 PM
  #118
GKJ
Global Moderator
Entertainment
 
GKJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Do not trade plz
Country: United States
Posts: 102,292
vCash: 3003
For what its worth, the Seattle/Buffalo game is in Toronto.

GKJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2012, 10:39 PM
  #119
MurrayBannerman
Party Kane Forever
 
MurrayBannerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: 219
Country: United States
Posts: 12,271
vCash: 3935
Quote:
Originally Posted by What the Faulk View Post
Very good shot? I'm not even convinced they'll beat Buffalo this weekend, and they need to pick up 2 games on SF with 3 remaining. It helps that they play them in 2 weeks and SF plays the Pats next week, but let's not go overrating Seattle just yet. Besides, GB would likely grab the #2 *if* Seattle makes up enough ground on SF to win that division.

Though it is interesting to revisit that MNF game in the unlikely event that they do tie for the #2/#3 seed by record.
What I'm saying is, it could easily be within their reach. They'd just have to win some winnable games and beat the 49ers.

MurrayBannerman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2012, 10:53 PM
  #120
Clowe Me
Registered User
 
Clowe Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Redding, Ca
Country: Uzbekistan
Posts: 10,349
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by MurrayBannerman View Post
What I'm saying is, it could easily be within their reach. They'd just have to win some winnable games and beat the 49ers.
Seattle would have to sweep these 3 games and have SF lose 2 out of 3, with one of those being at home vs Ari.

Seattle doesn't have a "good shot" at the division.

Clowe Me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2012, 10:54 PM
  #121
LiquidSnake
Agent of Chaos...
 
LiquidSnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,603
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by GKJ View Post
For what its worth, the Seattle/Buffalo game is in Toronto.
They should try having that game in Vancouver once too. Could attract a solid crowd.

LiquidSnake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2012, 10:55 PM
  #122
LiquidSnake
Agent of Chaos...
 
LiquidSnake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Vancouver, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,603
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clowe Me View Post
Seattle would have to sweep these 3 games and have SF lose 2 out of 3, with one of those being at home vs Ari.

Seattle doesn't have a "good shot" at the division.
Seattle wins all 3 and SF loses to NE and Sea and Sea wins division no?

LiquidSnake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2012, 10:56 PM
  #123
Clowe Me
Registered User
 
Clowe Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Redding, Ca
Country: Uzbekistan
Posts: 10,349
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by LiquidSnake View Post
Seattle wins all 3 and SF loses to NE and Sea and Sea wins division no?
Correct. That can happen, but I wouldn't call that a good shot. SF is still in very good control of their own destiny.

Clowe Me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2012, 10:57 PM
  #124
MurrayBannerman
Party Kane Forever
 
MurrayBannerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: 219
Country: United States
Posts: 12,271
vCash: 3935
Quote:
Originally Posted by Clowe Me View Post
Seattle would have to sweep these 3 games and have SF lose 2 out of 3, with one of those being at home vs Ari.

Seattle doesn't have a "good shot" at the division.
Uh, if they lose to the Pats, likely, and Seattle on the road, very possible, then Seattle is in the driver's seat, assuming they beat Buffalo. Then they'd need to beat STL at home to take care of business.

MurrayBannerman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
12-10-2012, 11:00 PM
  #125
What the Faulk
Gotta Catch 'em All!
 
What the Faulk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: North Carolina
Country: United States
Posts: 20,703
vCash: 500
Seattle starts with the Bills on the road in the closest thing we'll have to Hockey Night In Canada this year, and despite what Grigs said, I expect that to be a competitive game. Remember, less than a month ago Buffalo went into Foxboro and nearly beat the Patriots, who just embarrassed the supposed best team in the NFL on MNF. This doesn't bode well for the 49ers, their opponent on SNF, but I expect their defense to put up more of an effort than the battered Texans' Defense.

Following that, Seattle has two teams it's already lost to (albeit on the road) in SF and STL. The Rams *could* be playing for a playoff spot in that game, so it won't be a piece of cake either. And Richard Sherman is set to be suspended on the 14th, which means for that pivotal game against SF and potentially STL, they'll be without both Browner and Sherman. Seattle may win the other two, but I really can't see SF losing to Seattle with both of those corners out. Following that, I can't see them winning 3 straight on the road to make the SB. Rookie QBs just don't do that, I don't care how good the defense is.

What the Faulk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:48 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.