HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Calgary - Washington

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
12-18-2012, 06:21 PM
  #1
kresco
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 71
vCash: 500
Calgary - Washington

Calgary gives:

Glencross
Stajan
2014 2nd

Washington gives:
M Johansson


Washington gets:
A very cheap cheap very good LW for their 2nd line who has put up 40-50 pts on a team with low offense. He is a guy who works hard every night he skates hits and scores he is also great on the pk. He has a NTC and has a ranch here but I think he would consider playing with ovi and co on a contender. They get Stajan who was in the dog house last year buried on the 4th line but is very able to put up at least 30 points.

Flames get a great C prospect in Johansson. He had a good year last year and will end up as a decent #1 c or a great #2 C


Last edited by kresco: 12-18-2012 at 10:37 PM. Reason: One sided trade for Calgary
kresco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-18-2012, 06:23 PM
  #2
Prairie Habs
Registered User
 
Prairie Habs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,279
vCash: 500
Washington hangs up immediately and Montreal has Calgary's 2nd this year.

Prairie Habs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-18-2012, 06:28 PM
  #3
Dr Quincy
Registered User
 
Dr Quincy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Country: United States
Posts: 15,274
vCash: 500
I hate to use this line, because is so often overdone, but man:

This is the worst trade proposal I've ever seen here.

Dr Quincy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-18-2012, 06:43 PM
  #4
hlaverty06
Registered User
 
hlaverty06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NJ all day
Country: United States
Posts: 7,281
vCash: 500
Flames need to face it and have to rebuild. But through fair trades..

hlaverty06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-18-2012, 06:44 PM
  #5
nogger
#wemissyoubutler
 
nogger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,175
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by hlaverty06 View Post
Flames need to face it and have to rebuild. But through fair trades..
They are rebuilding, just not in the form of shooting for last place.

nogger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-18-2012, 06:44 PM
  #6
hlaverty06
Registered User
 
hlaverty06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NJ all day
Country: United States
Posts: 7,281
vCash: 500
... Dennis Wideman for 5 years....

hlaverty06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-18-2012, 07:33 PM
  #7
blankall
Registered User
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,191
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hlaverty06 View Post
... Dennis Wideman for 5 years....
Calgary is not doing a tear it down style rebuild. They are changing the type of player they draft and put under contract. They've had great success lately with their drafts. Dennis Wideman has yet to play a game for the Flames, and you've already declared the move a failure.

blankall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-18-2012, 07:49 PM
  #8
capitalsrock
Registered User
 
capitalsrock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Country: United States
Posts: 1,841
vCash: 500
In terms of value it's not even close and I can not possibly ever describe how completely lopsided this trade is. I don't want another infraction for doing absolutely nothing but arguing, but words can not describe how lopsided this is.

capitalsrock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-18-2012, 07:52 PM
  #9
Zoidberg Jesus
Trotzkyist
 
Zoidberg Jesus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Ann Arbor
Country: United States
Posts: 2,744
vCash: 500
Gotta love proposals where one team gives up the two most valuable players in the deal for a bunch of lesser pieces that don't fit any of their needs.

Zoidberg Jesus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-18-2012, 07:57 PM
  #10
capitalsrock
Registered User
 
capitalsrock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Country: United States
Posts: 1,841
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zoidberg Jesus View Post
Gotta love proposals where one team gives up the two most valuable players in the deal for a bunch of lesser pieces that don't fit any of their needs.
Yea, we're just dying to have Brodie to play in the AHL and would love to have Stajan's contract on the fourth line

capitalsrock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-18-2012, 07:58 PM
  #11
avsman
Registered User
 
avsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,500
vCash: 500
No. No no no no no. NO. Seriously did you take anything into mind when coming up with this proposal? It fills zero needs for the caps, in fact I'd argue it creates holes, as well as the value is not close at all

avsman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-18-2012, 08:47 PM
  #12
CapitalsCupFantasy
HFBoards Sponsor
 
CapitalsCupFantasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: United States
Posts: 27,627
vCash: 500
Washington vomits, hangs up.

CapitalsCupFantasy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-18-2012, 08:58 PM
  #13
Roo Mad Bro
U havin a giggle m8?
 
Roo Mad Bro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: PA
Country: United States
Posts: 5,623
vCash: 500
Cot damn is this awful for the Capitals.

Baerstchi has to be included to get Carlson IMO.

Roo Mad Bro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-18-2012, 09:04 PM
  #14
Backlund
Registered User
 
Backlund's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Calgary, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,777
vCash: 50
Doesn't make sense for Washington. Calgary bends them over in this trade.

Backlund is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-18-2012, 10:40 PM
  #15
kresco
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 71
vCash: 500
But Washington agreed to it in NHL 2012 on PS3!
Sorry i guess it was a little one sided I modified this hopefully it is a little more realistic.

kresco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-18-2012, 10:44 PM
  #16
capitalsrock
Registered User
 
capitalsrock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Country: United States
Posts: 1,841
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kresco View Post
But Washington agreed to it in NHL 2012 on PS3!
Sorry i guess it was a little one sided I modified this hopefully it is a little more realistic.
Lol NHL 12 doesn't mean a thing and it's definitely more realistic now.

capitalsrock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-18-2012, 10:45 PM
  #17
Carlzner
Who's Zed?
 
Carlzner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Boulder, CO
Country: United States
Posts: 10,542
vCash: 500
Wow... what was the original proposal?

Carlzner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-18-2012, 10:46 PM
  #18
kresco
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 71
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by capitalsrock View Post
Lol NHL 12 doesn't mean a thing and it's definitely more realistic now.
Lol i was joking about the NHL 2012 hahaha (althought im sure they would say no on the game too)

kresco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-18-2012, 10:47 PM
  #19
kresco
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 71
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Braden Carlzner View Post
Wow... what was the original proposal?
Add Carlson and Tj Brodie
I was a little off my meds I admit

kresco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-18-2012, 11:23 PM
  #20
Devilspuppet666
Registered User
 
Devilspuppet666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,520
vCash: 250
Quote:
Originally Posted by hlaverty06 View Post
Flames need to face it and have to rebuild. But through fair trades..
we need some vets to help shape our younger guys were not the oilers we dont want the #1 pick every season

Devilspuppet666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-18-2012, 11:24 PM
  #21
Halpysback
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 7,830
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Devilspuppet666 View Post
we need some vets to help shape our younger guys were not the oilers we dont want the #1 pick every season
You can easily find those vets any offseason.

All the mentoring in the world won't help you if your younger guys are average.

Halpysback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-18-2012, 11:28 PM
  #22
Devilspuppet666
Registered User
 
Devilspuppet666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,520
vCash: 250
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halpysback View Post
You can easily find those vets any offseason.

All the mentoring in the world won't help you if your younger guys are average.
not saying it will, dont act like i did.

something to keep in mind is we only have gio and widemen signed long term on D, jbo is almost done and unless he turns it around i doubt we'll resign him


AND why would we look in any other off season when we found one this past offseason?

Devilspuppet666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-18-2012, 11:30 PM
  #23
Devilspuppet666
Registered User
 
Devilspuppet666's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,520
vCash: 250
to the OP i would have no interest in trading glencross i dont care much for johansson tbh

Devilspuppet666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-18-2012, 11:36 PM
  #24
Brave Sir Robin
Registered User
 
Brave Sir Robin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 903
vCash: 500
Most non-Caps fans think we're desperate for wingers, which is not true. Johansson can play top 6 wing (and has in the past), so there is no reason to trade him for a winger. Furthermore, Johansson is our only long term 2C option, while we have a couple promising winger prospects.

Brave Sir Robin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-19-2012, 01:37 AM
  #25
sully1410
Registered User
 
sully1410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Turner Valley, Alta.
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,111
vCash: 50
I don't get this place. Hey that guy looks good. Prolly be a star player some day...I'll trade you my left over **** for him k?

You have to give value to get it.

But hey, if being a GM was easy...we'd all be one.

sully1410 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:14 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.