HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Atlantic Division > Ottawa Senators
Notices

NFL hypothetical question

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
12-30-2012, 08:58 PM
  #1
internetdotcom
11 + 15 + 19 = 666
 
internetdotcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Capital O
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,534
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to internetdotcom Send a message via Yahoo to internetdotcom
NFL hypothetical question

Sitting there watching football today, I came up with a hypothetical question. If you took the best quarterback in the NFL (no matter who you think that is), and put him on the worst team (again, whatever team you feel that is), and played them against the best team with the worst quarterback, who do you think would win?

I would say the best team with the worst quarterback, since, although the quarterback is arguably the most important position in sports, football is pretty much the ultimate team game.

What do you all think? Just an inane query to pass the time.

And for extra credit, the age old question : Would you rather fight 100 duck-sized horses, or 1 horse-sized duck, and why?

internetdotcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2012, 10:23 PM
  #2
Das Boot
Jajajaja
 
Das Boot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 659
vCash: 500
Best team would win most of the times. Good defense and a good running back can win games easy.

Das Boot is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2012, 10:34 PM
  #3
internetdotcom
11 + 15 + 19 = 666
 
internetdotcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Capital O
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,534
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to internetdotcom Send a message via Yahoo to internetdotcom
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vodkanator View Post
Best team would win most of the times. Good defense and a good running back can win games easy.
Good point, very true.

But minus points, as u didnt answer the horse/duck question.
Grade : B-

internetdotcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-30-2012, 11:38 PM
  #4
BK201
Registered User
 
BK201's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 6,940
vCash: 500
If you put a top QB on KC they would instantly challenge any team in the NFL.

They put Andrew luck into a 1-15 team now they are 11-5.

BK201 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-31-2012, 12:20 AM
  #5
DJB
Sens best prospect
 
DJB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,764
vCash: 600
The NFL is a QB driven league. Just take a look at some of the bottom teams in the NFL last year that added a QB and how they are this year. 3 of them are in the playoffs with Washington, Indy and Seattle.

QB's win in the NFL.

Go Bills.

DJB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-31-2012, 01:51 AM
  #6
BonkTastic
"Small Sample Size!"
 
BonkTastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bogor, IDN
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,456
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BK201 View Post
If you put a top QB on KC they would instantly challenge any team in the NFL.

They put Andrew luck into a 1-15 team now they are 11-5.
The Chiefs are the exception to the rule. Them and the Jags. Even Aaron Rodgers, Tom Brady or Drew Brees couldn't make those teams winners, at least not the way their rosters are currently put together.

Everyone else? Probably.

The Colts were far better built to win than the Chief were (and they play in a division with the Jags and Titans, which always helps, haha)

BonkTastic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-31-2012, 01:54 AM
  #7
BonkTastic
"Small Sample Size!"
 
BonkTastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bogor, IDN
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,456
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by internetdotcom View Post
And for extra credit, the age old question : Would you rather fight 100 duck-sized horses, or 1 horse-sized duck, and why?
1 horse-sized duck. Ducks are still "big": 100 angry, duck-sized horses stampeding at you is unavoidable death. They'll outrun you for sure, and even at 1/4 the size are strong like crazy.

One horse-sized duck, you've got a chance. Get yourself a weapon, and a one-on-one fight is much more to your advantage. I'll take a "mano a mano" fight over being swarmed any day.

BonkTastic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-31-2012, 09:43 AM
  #8
wilfred
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Bunswick
Posts: 1,296
vCash: 500
I'll take the better team.

Football has as much to do with the o-line and d-line. You give an average QB 2 extra seconds and he becomes an all-star(Matt Cassel when he was a patriot).

Just to argue
I'll take the 100 duck size horses(although horses do like to bite).
Horses can't climb
If you know how strong a small duck's wing is, it would break you in 2(if its 5 times bigger)

wilfred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
12-31-2012, 09:55 AM
  #9
internetdotcom
11 + 15 + 19 = 666
 
internetdotcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Capital O
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,534
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to internetdotcom Send a message via Yahoo to internetdotcom
Quote:
Originally Posted by BK201 View Post
If you put a top QB on KC they would instantly challenge any team in the NFL.

They put Andrew luck into a 1-15 team now they are 11-5.
Nitpicking, but I think Indy was 2 - 14 last year , though I think that was in part that they were on the 'suck for luck' bandwagon (i.e. they were the NFL version of the Edmonton Oilers, except that they tanked one year, not 3 and counting).

Quote:
Originally Posted by BonkTastic View Post
1 horse-sized duck. Ducks are still "big": 100 angry, duck-sized horses stampeding at you is unavoidable death. They'll outrun you for sure, and even at 1/4 the size are strong like crazy.

One horse-sized duck, you've got a chance. Get yourself a weapon, and a one-on-one fight is much more to your advantage. I'll take a "mano a mano" fight over being swarmed any day.
I would agree with this, except that horses are MUCH more than 4 times the size of a duck.

internetdotcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-01-2013, 10:43 AM
  #10
Larionov
Registered User
 
Larionov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ottawa, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 968
vCash: 500
I always view the QB question like goaltending in hockey. A great QB doesn't guarantee that you will win, but bad play from the QB position pretty much guarantees that you will lose. I look at teams like Arizona and Buffalo, and felt bad for their fans and players - no way they could win consistently with the QBs they had.

You didn't always need a spectacular QB to win in the past - Baltimore winning a Super Bowl with Trent Dilfer, and Tampa Bay with Brad Johnson, are two good examples. Those guys weren't brilliant, but they were good game managers who knew their limitations, made smart decisions, and didn't turn the ball over. With a great D and a good running game, that got it done. Over these last few years, though, the passing game has evolved to the point where you wonder if that model will ever get it done again...

Larionov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-01-2013, 12:05 PM
  #11
BK201
Registered User
 
BK201's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 6,940
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonkTastic View Post
The Chiefs are the exception to the rule. Them and the Jags. Even Aaron Rodgers, Tom Brady or Drew Brees couldn't make those teams winners, at least not the way their rosters are currently put together.

Everyone else? Probably.

The Colts were far better built to win than the Chief were (and they play in a division with the Jags and Titans, which always helps, haha)
yes they could easily turn the offenses around

The cheifs don't have a pass game so defenses stack the box against the only offensive threat in charles if they could pass to a premier wide out in Dwayne Bowe they would be set on Offense, defenses would have to actually guard the pass and the rush.

as for JJ they once again have an amazing RB and just need a competent QB to throw to a modest WR core.

both these teams don't have the best defenses but it's obvious by the fact that they just can't score points that a top QB would pretty much turn both these franchises around.

BK201 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-01-2013, 12:22 PM
  #12
Greeningfan14
Registered User
 
Greeningfan14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,702
vCash: 500
100 duck sized horses would be lethal

Greeningfan14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-01-2013, 12:46 PM
  #13
Fenix Rises 2026
Alfie forever!
 
Fenix Rises 2026's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 5,020
vCash: 500
What if you took the best team in the NFL with the best quarterback, but then you made him duck sized?

Fenix Rises 2026 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-01-2013, 01:56 PM
  #14
internetdotcom
11 + 15 + 19 = 666
 
internetdotcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Capital O
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,534
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to internetdotcom Send a message via Yahoo to internetdotcom
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenix Rises 2026 View Post
What if you took the best team in the NFL with the best quarterback, but then you made him duck sized?
What a quack. LOL *badumbapsssh*

internetdotcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-01-2013, 02:13 PM
  #15
The Expert
Registered Expert
 
The Expert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Ottawa
Country: Jersey
Posts: 11,191
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BonkTastic View Post
1 horse-sized duck. Ducks are still "big": 100 angry, duck-sized horses stampeding at you is unavoidable death. They'll outrun you for sure, and even at 1/4 the size are strong like crazy.

One horse-sized duck, you've got a chance. Get yourself a weapon, and a one-on-one fight is much more to your advantage. I'll take a "mano a mano" fight over being swarmed any day.
Depends on the size of these ducks for me, as well as the horse-duck's jumping ability. If it were possible to hypothetically get higher ground and then pick them off one by one, that would be ideal. But the more I think about it, the more unlikely it would work, assuming they are extremely pissed off and blood-thirsty.

The Expert is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-01-2013, 02:13 PM
  #16
FolignoQuantumLeap
A mad Mup
 
FolignoQuantumLeap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: A Blue Box
Country: Canada
Posts: 17,924
vCash: 500
Coaching is much more important than the QB. The Chiefs aren't even that bad at most important positions but they have a terrible head coach. Crennel will always and forever be a defensive co-ordinator. He's great at that job but not head coach material. If they just would have given Hillis and Charles more carries, they'd be almost a .500 team. Instead they put the ball in the hands of Brady Quinn and Matt Cassel far more often than they should have and gave the other team great starting position on so many key drives.

As a Chiefs fan, I'm concerned about the future at QB, but far more concerned about who will replace the coaching staff and GM. The secondary needs a lot of work too. The loss of Brandon Carr was HUGE.

FolignoQuantumLeap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-01-2013, 02:26 PM
  #17
internetdotcom
11 + 15 + 19 = 666
 
internetdotcom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Capital O
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,534
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to internetdotcom Send a message via Yahoo to internetdotcom
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Expert View Post
Depends on the size of these ducks for me, as well as the horse-duck's jumping ability. If it were possible to hypothetically get higher ground and then pick them off one by one, that would be ideal. But the more I think about it, the more unlikely it would work, assuming they are extremely pissed off and blood-thirsty.
I would say that the horse-sized duck would have only the capabilities of any normal duck, it would just be much larger. Similarly for the duck-sized horses.


internetdotcom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-01-2013, 06:41 PM
  #18
BonkTastic
"Small Sample Size!"
 
BonkTastic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Bogor, IDN
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,456
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by FolignoQuantumLeap View Post
...As a Chiefs fan...
Here's my impression of you on Sundays:




BonkTastic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2013, 06:55 AM
  #19
tony d
Thanks for memories
 
tony d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Behind A Tree
Country: Canada
Posts: 34,022
vCash: 500
I'll take the better team as well. A QB is important but a football game is more than just 1 player.

__________________
tony d is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2013, 07:42 AM
  #20
Legend Killer
Registered User
 
Legend Killer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,478
vCash: 1263
I would take an average team with a great qb over a good team with a brutal qb.

But never take the worst team.

Legend Killer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2013, 02:44 PM
  #21
lafite
 
lafite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,209
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenix Rises 2026 View Post
What if you took the best team in the NFL with the best quarterback, but then you made him duck sized?
They already tried that with Doug Flutie. Mixed results I think.

lafite is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:26 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.