The Business of HockeyDiscuss the financial and business aspects of the NHL. Franchise sales, valuations, TV contracts, ratings, expansion, relocation, the CBA and work stoppage discussion goes here.
Alberta's Wildrose party proposes lottery to fund NHL arenas
Alberta's Wildrose party has come up with a lottery scheme that it hopes will skate around the politics of funding new NHL hockey arenas in Edmonton and Calgary.
The idea is to use the Oilers and Flames brands and expand a digital lottery game called Keno into 1,000 bars and pubs across the province. Much of the proceeds would help pay for the new facilities.
Wildrose Leader Danielle Smith says about $20 million a year would flow to each city, not directly to the Edmonton Oilers or Calgary Flames organizations.
Don't current digital lottery games and other similar gambling devices generate revenue that goes towards public services like health care?
Simply adding more machines will siphon gambling cash used for other more important expenses.
It would be an interesting social experiment. Have the machines and post labels to describe where their money is directed and see which ones get more play.
Then use all the money for public services anyway.
Don't current digital lottery games and other similar gambling devices generate revenue that goes towards public services like health care?
Simply adding more machines will siphon gambling cash used for other more important expenses.
You could say that about anything. Hell, the mere existence of the Flames and Oilers means that the money that Albertans spend on hockey tickets is money that they can't donate to hospitals and other charitable organizations. Should the Flames and Oilers just relocate to Alabama for the good of hospitals across the country?
Quote:
Originally Posted by VinnyC
This is what I was thinking. And encouraging more gambling doesn't sound very responsible either.
If it was the state's responsibility to discourage behavior because someone somewhere might take it too far, then we wouldn't be able to buy booze, cigarettes, lottery tickets, medication, caffeine, porn, and junk food. What magically makes this different?
You could say that about anything. Hell, the mere existence of the Flames and Oilers means that the money that Albertans spend on hockey tickets is money that they can't donate to hospitals and other charitable organizations. Should the Flames and Oilers just relocate to Alabama for the good of hospitals across the country?
If it was the state's responsibility to discourage behavior because someone somewhere might take it too far, then we wouldn't be able to buy booze, cigarettes, lottery tickets, medication, caffeine, porn, and junk food. What magically makes this different?
No you can't. This is giving money to millionaires to pay other millionaires and avoid property taxes.
So do they want to shift current lottery spending from funding other civic functions, or are they actually talking about trying to encourage more gambling amongst the middle class...?
I have nothing wrong with holding lotteries to fund an arena. If it's now considered fine for teams to force "Personal Seat" Licenses to fund arenas, then a lottery shouldn't be considered wrong either.
__________________
"Trust me I'm an expert, I watched 13 rangers games on NHL center Ice this year through streaming." -Starburst
"I don't even understand what the point of all this arguing is. Are you guys hoping that the other side is going to have an epiphany and go 'Oh, OH! You're right, we ARE going to lose this series!'" -Crease
Don't current digital lottery games and other similar gambling devices generate revenue that goes towards public services like health care?
Simply adding more machines will siphon gambling cash used for other more important expenses.
Not a bad idea, in theory. Better than corporate welfare cheques from municipal governments. Too bad neither of Alberta's two main political parties can be trusted to handle something like this. The right-wingers in the Wild Rose Party, for ideological reasons, will find a way to privatize the profits and socialize the losses once the arena is actually built, while the Tory crooks in power now will give the profits to Redford's relatives and the bills to Albertans.
It's a little bit more complicated than that. From a pure expected value concept, this is almost always true. With the exception of certain progressive jackpot lotteries, you will lose an infinite amount of money if you played a lottery or a scratch ticket an infinite number of times. From an expected utility perspective, however, winning a $10 million lottery jackpot will help you more than the $5 a week you spend on tickets will hurt you, assuming you play responsibly. I rarely play lotteries because I prefer playing poker (as well as other card or dice games) when I have the urge to gamble, and I find it more stimulating to play against people rather than against a house, which is why I don't set foot in casinos even though I'm all for having one in Ottawa proper.
Last edited by StoneColdFlower*: 01-03-2013 at 11:48 PM.
There are many others where it becomes clear why it is in fact quite rational for people to play the lottery.
If you're playing a buck or even $10 a week, I mean yeah, who cares it's not a big deal.
It's when people start dropping $100+ on their own when people are idiots, because mathematically your odds aren't that much better with 100 tickets than they are 1.
You could say that about anything. Hell, the mere existence of the Flames and Oilers means that the money that Albertans spend on hockey tickets is money that they can't donate to hospitals and other charitable organizations. Should the Flames and Oilers just relocate to Alabama for the good of hospitals across the country?
Your argument makes no sense. Hospitals aren't funded by private donations, they're funded by taxes and other sources of government revenue.
Private citizens like us are free to spend our cash however we want, including on frivolous things like hockey games and ipods - though we have a strong incentive to spend our money wisely. Governments are mandated to spend our money wisely.
My point is that adding more gambling machines isn't "free money" as is being implied by the Wildrose. Spending new gambling revenues on a hockey arena is equivalent to spending ordinary tax dollars on one. Therefore it's not immune to scrutiny.
In B.C., the government has their own legalized sportsbook style betting site called playnow.com. They figure since so many people are using the offshore sportsbooks to wager, they might as well try to keep some of that money in province.
Your argument makes no sense. Hospitals aren't funded by private donations, they're funded by taxes and other sources of government revenue.
Hospitals do benefit from private donations either through direct donations or the plethora of 'lotteries' they run every year. They are usually targeted funding but still from private sources.
As for the lottery, for most people it's voluntary and harmless. For the rest, it's a mental addiction and is a problem for them.
Can someone in Alberta correct me if I am wrong here about the party it self.
They are a far right wing border line libratarion party?
They talk about being responsible for yourself, not using government for everything etc. Than they have this which is private business, getting benefit from government run program? Is this not counter to what there party stands for, they are just adding a new layer of government.
This to me from the outside, just seems like pandering, which sure will get votes but than they will become just a regular party, that everyone will hate.
Edit: If anything they should open up gambling laws, let the teams run it themselves and if people chose to buy tickets teams will get money. Wouldn't that be the far right/small government approach.
The only way it would work (without hurting existing lottery revenues) is if the Flames and Oilers brands were directly associated. But there's no way in hell that the NHL would allow gambling to use its brands as a label.
Typical well thought out policy from the Wildrose party.
Loto 649 has a 1 in 26 million chance to win the jackpot.
On aggregate what are the chances of somebody winning it? The chances of my house burning to the ground are pretty slim. But I still buy insurance. Insurance companies make money so mathematically speaking it doesn't make sense to buy insurance. But we do because its better to spend a small amount for the potential savings in case of a huge disaster. The logic behind the loto is no different.
The only way it would work (without hurting existing lottery revenues) is if the Flames and Oilers brands were directly associated. But there's no way in hell that the NHL would allow gambling to use its brands as a label.
Typical well thought out policy from the Wildrose party.
No doubt, I'll quickly be set straight, but I'm certain there was a Flames/Oilers branded lottery back in the .60 Canadian dollar days...
I think they set a target amount, and when reached, the lottery was finished.
