HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Prospects
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Prospects Discuss hockey prospects from all over the world and the NHL Draft.

Elias Lindholm vs Barkov

View Poll Results: Who would you take between Barkov and Elias Lindholm
Barkov 116 64.44%
Elias Lindholm 64 35.56%
Voters: 180. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
01-04-2013, 11:04 AM
  #1
jhjhjhjhjhjh*
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 441
vCash: 500
Elias Lindholm vs Barkov

I love both of these guys, Personally I think Lindholm shows more offensive upside than Barkov does but with Barkov's skill and size how can you pass him up? My question is that if you had the choice between the two who would you take?

jhjhjhjhjhjh* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2013, 11:13 AM
  #2
Loffer
Registered User
 
Loffer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,108
vCash: 954
Lindholm seems to be better offensive player.

Loffer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2013, 11:17 AM
  #3
hototogisu
Global Moderator
Poked the bear!!!!!
 
hototogisu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Montreal, QC
Country: Canada
Posts: 33,275
vCash: 500
Awards:
It was Lindholm before the WJCs for me and it still is.

hototogisu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2013, 11:18 AM
  #4
nki
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,185
vCash: 500
Lindholm behind Jones and MacKinnon for me in that order.

nki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2013, 11:24 AM
  #5
jhjhjhjhjhjh*
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 441
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hototogisu View Post
It was Lindholm before the WJCs for me and it still is.
Same for me, loved him at the U18 tourney last year I think he could be a star in the NHL. Would be great to see him in a habs jersey! But for that to happen we would need another 3rd overall pick

jhjhjhjhjhjh* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2013, 11:30 AM
  #6
LeHabsMan
Registered User
 
LeHabsMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Laval
Country: Italy
Posts: 1,781
vCash: 500
Lindholm for me. But I think most people would say Barkov.

LeHabsMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2013, 11:31 AM
  #7
Gaps
Registered User
 
Gaps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,551
vCash: 500
Lindholm's flashier, but I prefer Barkov's strong overall game. I tend to prefer the reliable players over the flashier ones anyway.

Gaps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2013, 11:36 AM
  #8
FishManSam
Bobs Yummy Burgers!
 
FishManSam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: I Bet You Hate T.O
Country: Croatia
Posts: 4,934
vCash: 500
Mackinnon
Barkov
Jones
Drouin
Lindholm

FishManSam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2013, 11:47 AM
  #9
Reikai
Neutral fan
 
Reikai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Helsinki
Posts: 2,673
vCash: 500
Lindholm is the sexy pick right now because Sweden went to the finals and Lindholm is playing well. But lets not forget that Barkov is 9 months younger than Lindholm even though both players are draftable in the next draft.

Barkov's defensive game is just so good that you'll know he'll be a solid defensive guy in the NHL. With Barkov's size that combination alone is a very valuable thing to have. But add his offensive abilities that we didnt really see enough in the WJC's (but have seen in the FEL this season) this guy is a complete package. His skating isnt very fast, sure, but he's determination and work ethic makes me believe that he will actually end up as a pretty good skater. If Barkov was playing for Sweden right now he would look so much better.

I admit i dont know much about Lindholm but what i've seen from him this WJC (he's been great) i just wouldnt be able to pass up on Barkov because of him.

Reikai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2013, 12:00 PM
  #10
Huffman
Registered User
 
Huffman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,300
vCash: 500
Based only on the games I've seen I'd take Lindholm, I have seen him a lot more than Barkov though and I'm sure I haven't seen Barkov at his best. Barkov is having a wonderful season, incredible for a guy that young.

Huffman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2013, 12:03 PM
  #11
NuxFan09
Registered User
 
NuxFan09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,416
vCash: 500
Definitely Lindholm! A super skilled playmaker with a physical, gritty side to him? Sounds a lot like one Peter Forsberg.

NuxFan09 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2013, 12:04 PM
  #12
gifted88
Dante the poet
 
gifted88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Guelph, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,344
vCash: 500
I'm not overly convinced at Barkov's offensive potential at the NHL level but there are too many good things about his game not to take him over Lindholm. Safer pick imo.

gifted88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2013, 12:05 PM
  #13
Ginu
Registered User
 
Ginu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,701
vCash: 500
Is Barkov more likely to become a Jokinen or a Staal? That's the question for me.

Ginu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2013, 12:08 PM
  #14
jhjhjhjhjhjh*
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 441
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by gifted88 View Post
I'm not overly convinced at Barkov's offensive potential at the NHL level but there are too many good things about his game not to take him over Lindholm. Safer pick imo.
I think Barkov will become a good offensive player in the NHL, needs to work on his skating though.

jhjhjhjhjhjh* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2013, 12:25 PM
  #15
Reikai
Neutral fan
 
Reikai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Helsinki
Posts: 2,673
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ginu View Post
Is Barkov more likely to become a Jokinen or a Staal? That's the question for me.
Comparing Barkov to Jokinen is an insult to Barkov IMO. 5 years from now, im pretty sure there's nothing Jokinen does better than Barkov.

Reikai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2013, 12:26 PM
  #16
Phion Keneuf
Top Dawg Ent.
 
Phion Keneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vaughan, Ontario
Country: Italy
Posts: 27,942
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reini29 View Post
Comparing Barkov to Jokinen is an insult to Barkov IMO. 5 years from now, im pretty sure there's nothing Jokinen does better than Barkov.
Hopefully

Jokinen will probably be retired by then

Phion Keneuf is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2013, 12:28 PM
  #17
Reikai
Neutral fan
 
Reikai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Helsinki
Posts: 2,673
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phion Keneuf View Post
Hopefully

Jokinen will probably be retired by then
Well yeah but you know what i mean

Im not saying Barkov will score almost 40 goals multiple times like Jokinen did (i dont know how though, he isnt that good of a scorer) because its unlikely, but he's defensive game and playmaking are top notch. Very good shot and nose for the rebounds aswell + the moves he occasionally shows. Just thinking about it he might surprise and score some crazy numbers in his prime. The only thing holding him back is skating like we all know but he is 17 years old and huge, its understandable thats the thing he needs to improve on.

Reikai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2013, 12:28 PM
  #18
Gaps
Registered User
 
Gaps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 2,551
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reini29 View Post
Comparing Barkov to Jokinen is an insult to Barkov IMO. 5 years from now, im pretty sure there's nothing Jokinen does better than Barkov.
I have to agree with this. Jokinen used to have a major attitude problem (I think it's a bit smaller these days) and he was an alcoholic. These problems factored into his development- or lack of it. The risk of Barkov going the same way is small.

Gaps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2013, 12:45 PM
  #19
thomast
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,600
vCash: 500
I've seen handsfull of Brynas games and alot of Barkov. I might have biased opinion but i try to give small picture about these 2 elite prospects.

Lindholm brings flashier and more entertaining game, Barkov is more of complete player who plays simple and effective game and has high end talent aswell. I might sound biased but i'd take Barkov ahead of Lindholm without thinking twice. Barkov is 9 months younger, is more NHL-ready and is complete package. Lindholm has good two-way game as well but Barkov has elite defensive game for centre foward. Lindholm isn't #1 center for his team in SEL or plays in #1 PK unit, #1PP.

Elias Lindholm is an player who is very usefull because he is very capable as an winger and he's natural center.

I take Barkov because of:

-9 months younger

-More NHL-ready and likely going to step right away into NHL and play in every situation. Lindholm needs atleast 1-2 years of developement.

-Barkov plays simple and effective game which will work in NHL aswell.

-Offensive potential is hard to tell at this point. Lindholm sure looks flashier and faster but Barkov has all the tools to become better offensive player if he isn't already. Barkov is still growing and his skating will get better but never will be as good as Elias Lindholm in that department.

-Better two-way player and controls the all 3-zones better than Lindholm. Is the better player without the puck.

-Size. Barkov is an manchild. His body type will be Jagr, Thornton, Ovechkin-Like

Why i would take Elias Lindholm before Barkov:

-More entertaining player to watch flashier, physical, and plays more intense game.

-Adapt well as an winger and is an natural center which would attract teams beause of the versatility.

-skating. Barkov has the size Lindholm has the amazing skating. Barkov has alot of room to catch Lindholm in the skating department but never will be as good skater as Elias Lindholm.

If i would build an franchise it would be definetly around Barkov because this guy has it all at Elite, amazing level could step into NHL-right away. Is more of the complete player of these 2. In offensive game i don't see much difference except Lindholm is flashier but i believe Barkov has more potential to develope his offensive game because his skating will get better which isn't bad at all but better skating would boost his offensive game into another level.

But i could see some teams taking Lindholm because of the entertaining game, can play at wing or C and still is pretty good two-way player with physical edge.

thomast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2013, 12:46 PM
  #20
TheFatOne
Mr.Negativo
 
TheFatOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Country: Sweden
Posts: 4,380
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gaps View Post
Lindholm's flashier, but I prefer Barkov's strong overall game. I tend to prefer the reliable players over the flashier ones anyway.


lindholm is much more physical than barkov.

TheFatOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2013, 12:47 PM
  #21
toewsintangibles
Registered User
 
toewsintangibles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,325
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ginu View Post
Is Barkov more likely to become a Jokinen or a Staal? That's the question for me.
Eric Staal or Jordan? Jussi or Olli Jokinen?

That's a dumb question to be honest

Quote:
Originally Posted by landskronala View Post
lindholm is much more physical than barkov.
That's just hilarious

toewsintangibles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2013, 12:48 PM
  #22
TheFatOne
Mr.Negativo
 
TheFatOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Country: Sweden
Posts: 4,380
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spezzator View Post
Definitely Lindholm! A super skilled playmaker with a physical, gritty side to him? Sounds a lot like one Peter Forsberg.

Eazy there. I would say he is more like Eric Staal or Patrice Bergeron.

TheFatOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2013, 12:50 PM
  #23
TheFatOne
Mr.Negativo
 
TheFatOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Country: Sweden
Posts: 4,380
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by toewsintangibles View Post



That's just hilarious

why? he hits more + harder and plays more intense game.

TheFatOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2013, 12:51 PM
  #24
toewsintangibles
Registered User
 
toewsintangibles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 1,325
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by landskronala View Post
why? he hits more + harder and plays more intense game
6'3 210 pounds vs 6'0 190 pounds for instance. There never has been any doubts about the roughness of Barkov and Lindholm isn't that physical to begin with..

toewsintangibles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-04-2013, 12:53 PM
  #25
TheFatOne
Mr.Negativo
 
TheFatOne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Country: Sweden
Posts: 4,380
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by toewsintangibles View Post
6'3 210 pounds vs 6'0 190 pounds for instance. There never has been any doubts about the roughness of Barkov and Lindholm isn't that physical to begin with..

lindholm has like 2 + hits in every game. barkov never hits, is not his game.

TheFatOne is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:23 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.