HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > National Hockey League Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
National Hockey League Talk Discuss NHL players, teams, games, and the Stanley Cup Playoffs.

What size arenas could these markets go to and still sell out?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
01-05-2013, 11:57 AM
  #1
DonthaveaCOWEN
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 341
vCash: 500
What size arenas could these markets go to and still sell out?

25,000? 30,000? I doubt each team would be all the same, but these teams combined popularity with their metro size, could definately fill larger arenas. Question is, how large?

Toronto
Montreal
New York
Vancouver

DonthaveaCOWEN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-05-2013, 12:05 PM
  #2
I Hate Chris Butler
Backlund Fan Club
 
I Hate Chris Butler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Saskatchewan
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,274
vCash: 50
They could all sellout 30,000 imo. It would be difficult to see the puck in the nosebleeds I'd imagine.

I Hate Chris Butler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-05-2013, 12:10 PM
  #3
I Am Score*
---BradD---
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Country: United States
Posts: 1,666
vCash: 500
You forgot Rangers and Pittsburgh.

I Am Score* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-05-2013, 12:12 PM
  #4
starling
Registered User
 
starling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Ottawa
Country: Ukraine
Posts: 3,190
vCash: 500
Why they don't build 30000 arenas? Is there some kind of standard they can't go bigger?

starling is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-05-2013, 12:18 PM
  #5
sully1410
Registered User
 
sully1410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Turner Valley, Alta.
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,149
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by starling View Post
Why they don't build 30000 arenas? Is there some kind of standard they can't go bigger?
Harder to control the price of tickets. They make more money off of less seats and way higher ticket prices. Supply and Demand.

sully1410 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-05-2013, 12:33 PM
  #6
DonthaveaCOWEN
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 341
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BradD View Post
You forgot Rangers and Pittsburgh.
Pittsburgh i forgot but New York is there.

DonthaveaCOWEN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-05-2013, 12:36 PM
  #7
Fire Lindy
Trust the System
 
Fire Lindy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,842
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BradD View Post
You forgot Rangers and Pittsburgh.
Sure, if Pittsburgh always has Crosby/Malkin and continues to get lucky as hell in the draft..but that 30,000 arena would look pretty silly if they go back to suckage.

Fire Lindy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-05-2013, 12:39 PM
  #8
DonthaveaCOWEN
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 341
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sully1410 View Post
Harder to control the price of tickets. They make more money off of less seats and way higher ticket prices. Supply and Demand.
This. Baseball's finally starting to figure it out. Aside from the Yanks and Sox, no team can fill a 50,000 stadium on the reg. Better to build a 25-30,000 seat stadium (which they have been doing in recent times) and inflate those prices in correlation with the demand.

DonthaveaCOWEN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-05-2013, 12:39 PM
  #9
Prairie Habs
Registered User
 
Prairie Habs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 3,343
vCash: 500
Is this if sight-lines could magically stay as good as they are now or taking into account that the new seats would basically just have to watch on screens to see anything?

Prairie Habs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-05-2013, 12:53 PM
  #10
IU Hawks fan
They call me 'IU'
 
IU Hawks fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: No longer IU
Country: United States
Posts: 18,785
vCash: 772
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonthaveaCOWEN View Post
This. Baseball's finally starting to figure it out. Aside from the Yanks and Sox, no team can fill a 50,000 stadium on the reg. Better to build a 25-30,000 seat stadium (which they have been doing in recent times) and inflate those prices in correlation with the demand.
1) The Red Sox play in the smallest park in the league, so no, they aren't drawing 50K a game and don't think they could. Their pre-2004 attendance wasn't anything that incredible, but their bandwagon has grown over the years.
2) How many 25,000-30,000 seats stadiums exist in baseball? A: 0

IU Hawks fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-05-2013, 12:53 PM
  #11
Butch 19
King me
 
Butch 19's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: L.A. suburb
Country: United States
Posts: 8,836
vCash: 500
Play every game outside in baseball or football stadiums.

Butch 19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-05-2013, 12:56 PM
  #12
Karter
Registered User
 
Karter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sherbrooke
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,171
vCash: 500
You're forgetting the team with record attendance every time AKA Chicago.

Karter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-05-2013, 05:27 PM
  #13
iamjs
Unregistered User
 
iamjs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 8,903
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RockFlagAndEagle View Post
Sure, if Pittsburgh always has Crosby/Malkin and continues to get lucky as hell in the draft..but that 30,000 arena would look pretty silly if they go back to suckage.
I think they could do 20,000-22,000. Those additional 2-4k seats would be a level higher and would be priced less, which would factor into those not wanting to pay $60 for a 2nd level ticket.

You might - and I emphasize might - hit 25,000 on a rivalry game like the Flyers or the Caps or perhaps even the playoffs, but I don't think it could be done consistently.

But 30,000? Toronto and Montreal without a doubt.

iamjs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-05-2013, 07:17 PM
  #14
useref15
Registered User
 
useref15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 1,905
vCash: 500
I think Philadelphia could do it as well

useref15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-05-2013, 07:33 PM
  #15
jigglysquishy
Registered User
 
jigglysquishy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,389
vCash: 492
Pens without a legend are more likely to relocate than sell out.

jigglysquishy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-05-2013, 07:52 PM
  #16
Hugo Sham
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Montreal
Posts: 10,120
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamjs View Post
I think they could do 20,000-22,000. Those additional 2-4k seats would be a level higher and would be priced less, which would factor into those not wanting to pay $60 for a 2nd level ticket.

You might - and I emphasize might - hit 25,000 on a rivalry game like the Flyers or the Caps or perhaps even the playoffs, but I don't think it could be done consistently.

But 30,000? Toronto and Montreal without a doubt.
montreal and toronto could hit 30K easy. but the arena site lines would be shiite. as it is right now at the Bell Center the top sections feel like nose bleeds...

Hugo Sham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-05-2013, 07:56 PM
  #17
Woll Smoth
Registered User
 
Woll Smoth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mississauga
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,029
vCash: 1205
Quote:
Originally Posted by starling View Post
Why they don't build 30000 arenas? Is there some kind of standard they can't go bigger?
You'd be spending millions of dollars on building the cheapest/worst seats in the building.

Woll Smoth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-05-2013, 07:58 PM
  #18
Lux Aurumque*
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: St. Albert, Alberta
Country: Norway
Posts: 15,653
vCash: 500
Toronto could easily fill a 50,000 person building, if not more.

Lux Aurumque* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-05-2013, 10:31 PM
  #19
black charger
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: GTA
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,865
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Canadian Airlines View Post
Toronto could easily fill a 50,000 person building, if not more.
They could probably sell that many seasons tickets.

black charger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-05-2013, 10:33 PM
  #20
craigcaulks*
Registered Luser.
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: East Van!
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,000
vCash: 500
How about we just make the seats smaller so the sight lines won't be affected by going higher? That might not work in some cities.

craigcaulks* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-05-2013, 10:47 PM
  #21
Colin226
NJ Devils STH
 
Colin226's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Flemington, NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 2,865
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karter View Post
You're forgetting the team with record attendance every time AKA Chicago.
Weren't doing that well only a few years ago

Colin226 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-05-2013, 10:49 PM
  #22
McTankel
HFBoards Sponsor
 
McTankel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Hamburg, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 6,022
vCash: 500
Nearly every NFL team sells out 60-90k for each and every game during the year with some having tens of thousands on waiting list for seasons for decades on end. I am sure those teams could do the same for the NHL as its the main sport in there respective locations, outside of the Rangers due to having an insane population there.

McTankel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-06-2013, 01:56 AM
  #23
Kane One
Global Moderator
🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨
 
Kane One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Brooklyn, New NY
Country: United States
Posts: 27,688
vCash: 2940
Philadelphia could easily do it as well.

__________________
Kane One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-06-2013, 02:17 AM
  #24
BUFSABES1981
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 65
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BradD View Post
You forgot Rangers and Pittsburgh.
pittsburgh lol, man people forget 7 years ago when they were a lottery pick away from moving to KC.

BUFSABES1981 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-06-2013, 10:42 AM
  #25
Mister Hockey
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hockeyland
Country: United States
Posts: 1,055
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BUFSABES1981 View Post
pittsburgh lol, man people forget 7 years ago when they were a lottery pick away from moving to KC.
That was Mario pushing a new arena deal. I loved him as a player, but he almost killed hockey in Pittsburgh.

Mario forsced the Nasland and Zubov's trades. I do not post privite conversations I'had with Pens management. PM me if want to know.

Than the idoit, Howard Baldwin signed him to a contract that said he had to do nothing, but take money. Plus, screw Roger Marino out of 40 million in one year.

That's how Mario is an owner of The Pens. I still say he was the best ever, but he nearly cost hockey in Pittsburgh.

The city screwed up the casino and arena deal too.

The good thing is Mario has really mutured.

Mister Hockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:10 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.