HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Clendening to Minnesota

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
01-09-2013, 04:41 PM
  #26
Sevanston
Moderator
 
Sevanston's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 10,732
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba88 View Post
yep, a team with Keith and Leddy can trade Clenny if it brings us a goalie prospect like Hackett back. I'd be all over this trade
That team with Keith and Leddy had one of the worst power plays in the league last year. Clendening would help that.

So would getting better coaches, but that's not really what this discussion is about.

Sevanston is offline  
Old
01-09-2013, 05:41 PM
  #27
forthewild
Registered User
 
forthewild's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,617
vCash: 500
Hey if you want we'll take Leddy back and close the book on leedygate

as far as Hackett for Clendening, its a tough question, it all depends on what Wild feel about Hackett he was being groomed to go pro next year (backstrom in on his last year)

how about this deal tho

Backstrom (extended by the hawks prior to trade) + Kuempur

for Clendening and 2nd

Chicago gets a solid goalie for this year and next few, plus a solid goalie prospect for the future

Wild get a solid dman

forthewild is offline  
Old
01-09-2013, 06:25 PM
  #28
Minnesota
Moderator
L'Étoile du Nord
 
Minnesota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Minnesota
Country: United States
Posts: 15,335
vCash: 404
Can't we wait to sign Leddy when his contract expires?

Minnesota is offline  
Old
01-09-2013, 06:29 PM
  #29
MurrayBannerman
BBall ATD Champion
 
MurrayBannerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: 219
Country: United States
Posts: 21,698
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by forthewild View Post
Hey if you want we'll take Leddy back and close the book on leedygate

as far as Hackett for Clendening, its a tough question, it all depends on what Wild feel about Hackett he was being groomed to go pro next year (backstrom in on his last year)

how about this deal tho

Backstrom (extended by the hawks prior to trade) + Kuempur

for Clendening and 2nd

Chicago gets a solid goalie for this year and next few, plus a solid goalie prospect for the future

Wild get a solid dman
Might present cap problems.

MurrayBannerman is offline  
Old
01-09-2013, 06:38 PM
  #30
forthewild
Registered User
 
forthewild's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,617
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MurrayBannerman View Post
Might present cap problems.
Wild can eat some money from Backstrom, we can take a dud expiring contract back, it really not an issue, and since Backstrom is a UFA after this year the deal he'll get is going to be in the 2-3 range so it will be affordable for CHI

forthewild is offline  
Old
01-09-2013, 06:42 PM
  #31
MurrayBannerman
BBall ATD Champion
 
MurrayBannerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: 219
Country: United States
Posts: 21,698
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by forthewild View Post
Wild can eat some money from Backstrom, we can take a dud expiring contract back, it really not an issue, and since Backstrom is a UFA after this year the deal he'll get is going to be in the 2-3 range so it will be affordable for CHI
It would probably have to be Frolik and Crawford.

MurrayBannerman is offline  
Old
01-09-2013, 09:43 PM
  #32
zytz
lumberjack
 
zytz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 6,799
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MurrayBannerman View Post
It would probably have to be Frolik and Crawford.
Olesz and Crawford

zytz is offline  
Old
01-09-2013, 11:32 PM
  #33
MurrayBannerman
BBall ATD Champion
 
MurrayBannerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: 219
Country: United States
Posts: 21,698
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by zytz View Post
Olesz and Crawford
Actually, yes.

MurrayBannerman is offline  
Old
01-10-2013, 05:26 AM
  #34
Bubba88
Toews = Savior
 
Bubba88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bavaria
Country: Germany
Posts: 24,249
vCash: 500
I'd love Clenny + Emery or 5th for Hackett if you want that.

I'm sure Bowman would consider this too.

Bubba88 is offline  
Old
01-10-2013, 07:18 AM
  #35
krazyhawk
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Montreal/Nova Scotia
Country: Canada
Posts: 618
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to krazyhawk
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Jan Itor View Post
I'd probably do Clutterbuck for Clendening+
You mean Clutterbuck+ for Clendenning right?

krazyhawk is offline  
Old
01-10-2013, 08:56 AM
  #36
this providence
Chips in Bed Theorem
 
this providence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: St. Paul
Posts: 9,657
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by krazyhawk View Post
You mean Clutterbuck+ for Clendenning right?
Some Hawk fans would swap Hackett for Clendening straight up but you'd expect the Wild to add to Clutterbuck in order to get the same return?

Understand team needs and all, but I believe Clutterbuck is the markedly more valuable player (in regards to Hackett, that is).

__________________

After Meaningless Win - 3/29/12 - Game 77 | SoH-"Who knows, that could have cost us a Cup tonight." | Dooohkay

Last edited by this providence: 01-10-2013 at 09:04 AM.
this providence is offline  
Old
01-10-2013, 04:17 PM
  #37
Bubba88
Toews = Savior
 
Bubba88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bavaria
Country: Germany
Posts: 24,249
vCash: 500
yeah, Wild wouldn't add to Clutterbuck.

Bubba88 is offline  
Old
01-10-2013, 04:36 PM
  #38
kamil27
Registered User
 
kamil27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Country: Poland
Posts: 70
vCash: 500
Regardless, Minnesota will be a contending team with Parise. Clendening IMO wont be added

kamil27 is offline  
Old
01-10-2013, 04:44 PM
  #39
Hawkaholic
Registered User
 
Hawkaholic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: London, Ont.
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,431
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kamil27 View Post
Regardless, Minnesota will be a contending team with Parise. Clendening IMO wont be added
Contending? No
A playoff team? Maybe

Hawkaholic is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:22 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.