HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Ben Bishop to Oilers

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
01-12-2013, 01:57 AM
  #26
jumptheshark
Give the dog a bone
 
jumptheshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: hf retirement home
Country: United Nations
Posts: 52,292
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoachBadkitten View Post
Agreed. Whoever Jason Riemer is.
Thought I read somewhere his full name was Jason James Riemer?

__________________
trying to fend off exwife number 2
45000/010113
GO SHARKS GO
jumptheshark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 02:23 AM
  #27
misfit
Moderator
 
misfit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: just north of...everything
Posts: 15,554
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leaffan16 View Post
Dubnyk is more proven. Why do you want Bishop?
To back up Dubnyk, would be my guess. Khabibulin is still dealing with an injury and is gone next year when his contract is up. The Oilers also don't have anyone remotely ready to step into the NHL any time soon.

__________________
If you are offended by this post, it's probably because you're ugly.
misfit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 02:36 AM
  #28
oilers4life5
Registered User
 
oilers4life5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: City of Champions
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,337
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by misfit View Post
To back up Dubnyk, would be my guess. Khabibulin is still dealing with an injury and is gone next year when his contract is up. The Oilers also don't have anyone remotely ready to step into the NHL any time soon.
This is exactly what I was thinking and as far as Yann goes this year he has not been very good.

oilers4life5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 02:46 AM
  #29
misfit
Moderator
 
misfit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: just north of...everything
Posts: 15,554
vCash: 50
I think Danis could be ok as a backup to a more proven starter, but an upgrade would definitely be welcomed. I'm not counting on Khabibulin doing much in his final games as an Oiler.

misfit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 03:18 AM
  #30
derriko
Registered User
 
derriko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Indianapolis
Country: United States
Posts: 2,910
vCash: 4116
I would do a 2nd for Bishop personally. A 2nd this year gets you a better player at the draft than it did last year imo. This draft looks like it has solid players well into the 2nd, so I guess that is buy low sell high.

Maybe I would wait until camp is over, so if Lehner beats Bish out for backup duties, Bishop would become expendable. He served his purpose last year keeping the Sens above water when Andy cut his hand, but he deserves a back up spot in the NHL somewhere. Hes proven himself a great AHL goalie already.

Its a minor deal, but it helps both teams imo. It also shows respect to Ben because hes the odd man out here most likely, so we would be giving him a better opportunity. Being known as a respectable franchise has value in itself.

derriko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 03:28 AM
  #31
WeridAl
YuckaFlux
 
WeridAl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: 10ft of Snow
Posts: 1,749
vCash: 500
Danis and Roy looked burtal yesterday and Bunz hasn't been the best in the ECHL. I'd trade a 3rd, maybe a 2nd, no more for Bishop, Oilers right now are fairly weak with D-men in the AHL and need to keep everyone they have.

WeridAl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 07:56 AM
  #32
PPQB
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Ottawa, IL
Country: United States
Posts: 141
vCash: 500
I got to see alot of Bishop in Peoria and always walked away impressed. I'd certainly be willing to give what it takes to get him back in Illinois. Sounds like some Ottawa fans would like a young dman with top 4 upside and others saying they need to keep him for organizational depth. How about something along the lines of?:

Blackhawks get

Big Ben

Senators get

Dylan Olsen
Carter Hutton

PPQB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 08:25 AM
  #33
guyzeur
Registered User
 
guyzeur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,239
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by zeus3007 View Post
Bishop isn't worth a potentially high first. A low first, maybe, but we can't guarantee a low first round pick.
Lehner would get us a first, Bishop`s value hasn't gone down since the Sens acquired him.

A 2nd in a deep draft is more than fair.

For the Sens I would not mind adding to get either Gagner or Hemsky. So we can trade a forward in return of a defenseman.

Quote:
Originally Posted by derriko View Post
I would do a 2nd for Bishop personally. A 2nd this year gets you a better player at the draft than it did last year imo. This draft looks like it has solid players well into the 2nd, so I guess that is buy low sell high.

Maybe I would wait until camp is over, so if Lehner beats Bish out for backup duties, Bishop would become expendable. He served his purpose last year keeping the Sens above water when Andy cut his hand, but he deserves a back up spot in the NHL somewhere. Hes proven himself a great AHL goalie already.

Its a minor deal, but it helps both teams imo. It also shows respect to Ben because hes the odd man out here most likely, so we would be giving him a better opportunity. Being known as a respectable franchise has value in itself.
Quality post


Last edited by guyzeur: 01-12-2013 at 08:32 AM.
guyzeur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 11:52 AM
  #34
dj33habs
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 72
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Qward View Post
Cause he is better
What? Do you have anything smart to say

dj33habs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 11:56 AM
  #35
SpezDispenser
Registered User
 
SpezDispenser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 14,201
vCash: 500
I think the Sens try to add to Bishop in order to get an NHL ready D-man. Bishop's gonna be real good, but there's no room for him in Ottawa.

SpezDispenser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 12:12 PM
  #36
danishh
Dat Stache
 
danishh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: mtl/ott/somewhere
Country: Canada
Posts: 29,654
vCash: 50
i think chicago would outbid edmonton. Might piss off st. louis a bit though.

__________________
RIP Kev.
danishh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-15-2013, 06:03 PM
  #37
oilers4life5
Registered User
 
oilers4life5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: City of Champions
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,337
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpezDispenser View Post
I think the Sens try to add to Bishop in order to get an NHL ready D-man. Bishop's gonna be real good, but there's no room for him in Ottawa.
Would Potter/Peckham + 2nd/3rd rounder get it done?

oilers4life5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-15-2013, 06:15 PM
  #38
Benny FTW
Head Light Fluid
 
Benny FTW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 20,217
vCash: 137
I would do Peckham + 2nd.

Benny FTW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-15-2013, 08:46 PM
  #39
SDig14
Registered User
 
SDig14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,564
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benny FTW View Post
I would do Peckham + 2nd.
I think this is probably fair value for him, just seems pointless to give up that type of package when we have Dubnyk.

I would rather let Dubnyk fail or succeed and respond accordingly.

SDig14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 06:44 PM
  #40
oilers4life5
Registered User
 
oilers4life5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: City of Champions
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,337
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SDig14 View Post
I think this is probably fair value for him, just seems pointless to give up that type of package when we have Dubnyk.

I would rather let Dubnyk fail or succeed and respond accordingly.
With Habby hurt I think it's time to pull the trigger on this deal!

oilers4life5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 09:17 PM
  #41
zeus3007*
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 13,228
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by oilers4life5 View Post
With Habby hurt I think it's time to pull the trigger on this deal!
No its not. We just called up Danis, no need to give up assets for a backup goalie.

zeus3007* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 09:27 PM
  #42
Drew311
Catch The Taste
 
Drew311's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,784
vCash: 500
Keep building team Sweden in Ottawa.

MPS for Bishop + 2nd

Drew311 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 09:31 PM
  #43
misfit
Moderator
 
misfit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: just north of...everything
Posts: 15,554
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drew311 View Post
Keep building team Sweden in Ottawa.

MPS for Bishop + 2nd
Change that 2nd to a 1st and maybe. The Oilers aren't trading Paajarvi for a package with the biggest piece being a backup goalie.

misfit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 09:47 PM
  #44
doglover8891
rajinikanthfan1
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 484
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by oilers4life5 View Post
What would Ottawa want for Bishop to the Oilers?
nail yakapov

joking it will take a 4th round pick and sabourin

doglover8891 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 09:52 PM
  #45
lakai17
Registered User
 
lakai17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,699
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by vdB View Post
Bishop for a 2nd + Teubert is a complete win-win and you know it.
Kyle Bigos + 2nd rounder

or

Teubert + 3rd rounder

You pick.

lakai17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 09:55 PM
  #46
xVolchenkov
Registered User
 
xVolchenkov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 440
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Drew311 View Post
Keep building team Sweden in Ottawa.

MPS for Bishop + 2nd
I could live with that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by misfit View Post
Change that 2nd to a 1st and maybe. The Oilers aren't trading Paajarvi for a package with the biggest piece being a backup goalie.
Ottawa isn't trading a 1st AND a potential starting goalie from a player who has struggled since being drafted.

xVolchenkov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 10:08 PM
  #47
TSA0402
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Ottawa
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,212
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Benny FTW View Post
I would do Peckham + 2nd.
I figure Edmonton would rather trade Teubert, but I've been surprised by them before.

Pretty solid foundation for a deal. And if Bishop is a backup I shudder to think what Dubnyk is. A proven NHL goalie with a terrible record?

TSA0402 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 10:15 PM
  #48
Qward
Moderator
Because! That's why!
 
Qward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Behind you, look out
Posts: 13,224
vCash: 265
Ottawa already has a first round Swede struggling in the AHL, they don't need two.

Qward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 10:26 PM
  #49
Kid Dynamite
Pro Scout
 
Kid Dynamite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 788
vCash: 400
I would pull the trigger on a Peckham + 2nd for Bishop as an Oilers fan.

Kid Dynamite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 10:31 PM
  #50
MetaOil1993
Registered User
 
MetaOil1993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,996
vCash: 450
Deal for Peckham + 2nd for Bishop, Some competition for Dubnyk might be good.

MetaOil1993 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:27 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.