HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > Calgary Flames
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Playoffs?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
01-11-2013, 09:27 PM
  #51
TheHudlinator
Registered User
 
TheHudlinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria,BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 20,219
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by slappipappi View Post
You got a 1st line center with PP time getting 40-50 points and you've got a non-playoff team.

Stajan got some points becuase he was getting primo ice time. He needed 70 points to be effective with that ice time.
He was the 2nd line center and only played 17-18 minutes and played plenty of pk time and got less pp time than Grabo he was on the second line for both good years. So false he did not get promo time.

TheHudlinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-11-2013, 11:21 PM
  #52
MarkGio
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,878
vCash: 500
As long as I've been posting on HFBoards this debate about Stajan has taken place. I don't question whether or not he was a very servicable #2 centremen, but under Sutter's regime he has been a plug. That's what I've gathered anyways.

MarkGio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-11-2013, 11:36 PM
  #53
tfong
Registered User
 
tfong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,929
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MVW View Post
Here's my prediction:

1) St. Louis
2) LA
3) Chicago
4) Detroit
5) Vancouver
6) Minnesota
7) Nashville
8) San Jose
9) Dallas
10) Edmonton
11) Calgary
12) Phoenix
13) Anaheim
14) Columbus
Contract years in Anaheim, I think they squeak into 8th with Nashville maybe out.

tfong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 11:40 AM
  #54
pdd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,576
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan13 View Post
Matt Stajan is so bad
Stajan's career with Calgary, before Sutter moved him to the bottom six when Conroy retired:

55 GP, 5-29-34.

That's a 50+ point pace over 82 games. Not great for goal-scoring, but he's an excellent faceoff man and good defensively. Assuming he could recapture that scoring pace (for reference, Mike Cammalleri's 82-game pace last year with Calgary was 32-23-55 and everyone on here had him slotted as 1C no problem) then what's the issue with having him as a 1C where his wingers and defensemen would be better than any he had ever played with before?

pdd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-12-2013, 05:58 PM
  #55
InfinityIggy
No Longer Flammable
 
InfinityIggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Calgary, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,941
vCash: 150
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjw22 View Post
you said scoring 40+ scoring implies goals but still
No it doesn't.....

InfinityIggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:59 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.