HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > Carolina Hurricanes
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Alt and Boucher to Philly for Pither

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
01-13-2013, 08:58 AM
  #1
Boom Boom Anton
Registered User
 
Boom Boom Anton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,367
vCash: 500
Alt and Boucher to Philly for Pither

Per Chip on Twitter

https://twitter.com/ice_chip

"GM Jim Rutherford confirms Canes have traded Brian Boucher and D Mark Alt to Flyers for forward Luke Pither."

Strange why Alt had to be included in this deal.


Last edited by Boom Boom Anton: 01-13-2013 at 09:05 AM.
Boom Boom Anton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-13-2013, 09:05 AM
  #2
wolfofthesteppes
HFBoards Sponsor
 
wolfofthesteppes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Magic Theater
Country: United States
Posts: 827
vCash: 500
I'm confused as to why Alt was included in this.

__________________
Not for everyone . . . for madmen only.
wolfofthesteppes is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-13-2013, 09:09 AM
  #3
Boom Boom Anton
Registered User
 
Boom Boom Anton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,367
vCash: 500
Talent Analysis from HF:

Quote:
Talent Analysis

He is talented offensively, but he tends to shy away from physicality and is not particularly reliable defensively.
So JR threw Alt in on a deal for an AHL/ECHL bordernline non-physical, non-2way player? Alt may have never amounted to anything so it's not a huge deal, but still, seems odd. I hope there is more to this.

Boom Boom Anton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-13-2013, 09:09 AM
  #4
TheBigKahuna
Registered User
 
TheBigKahuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Canes Country
Posts: 2,850
vCash: 500
Pither is a center, 6' 186# and had a tremendous season, his last year in the OHL with 67games 36g 58a 94p 39+/- and 18ppgs.

Hasn't done anything since then though.

TheBigKahuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-13-2013, 09:10 AM
  #5
Joe McGrath
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,508
vCash: 500
This makes no sense at all. An NHL backup and a C level prospect for a guy who is likely to never play in the NHL? Did Alt decide he wants to play football again or something?

Joe McGrath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-13-2013, 09:10 AM
  #6
Oenatzu
Chad-in-the-Box
 
Oenatzu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 1,015
vCash: 500
So basically JR wanted to get rid of Boucher and had to include Alt to make somebody want to take him.

Oenatzu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-13-2013, 09:12 AM
  #7
Oenatzu
Chad-in-the-Box
 
Oenatzu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 1,015
vCash: 500
Also, this means that Ellis or Peters will be the backup this season.

Oenatzu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-13-2013, 09:14 AM
  #8
DaveG
Mod Supervisor
How's the thesis?
 
DaveG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Durham NC
Country: United States
Posts: 31,742
vCash: 562
Oh my this is brutal. Alt may have been struggling this year but he was a rock for Minnesota last year. Just makes no sense.

Alt's the only player involved in this trade that's worth a damn thing IMO.

DaveG is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-13-2013, 09:16 AM
  #9
Boom Boom Anton
Registered User
 
Boom Boom Anton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,367
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oenatzu View Post
So basically JR wanted to get rid of Boucher and had to include Alt to make somebody want to take him.
I thought of that, but Boucher is making $1M for 1 more year. It's not like Kaberle where it was a lot of money for a long time. Waive him if you have to.

Boom Boom Anton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-13-2013, 09:17 AM
  #10
Novacane
My Hero
 
Novacane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Raleigh, NC
Country: United States
Posts: 18,154
vCash: 500
Makes no sense. We give up two low-med. quality players for one low quality player. Unless JR is planning on signing someone right now and had to get rid of contracts, it makes no sense to me.

Novacane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-13-2013, 09:20 AM
  #11
GKJ
Global Moderator
Entertainment
 
GKJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Do not trade plz
Country: United States
Posts: 111,127
vCash: 500
Are the Canes just bailing on Alt? It's not like Pither has proven anything.

GKJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-13-2013, 09:20 AM
  #12
Boom Boom Anton
Registered User
 
Boom Boom Anton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,367
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacane View Post
Makes no sense. We give up two low-med. quality players for one low quality player. Unless JR is planning on signing someone right now and had to get rid of contracts, it makes no sense to me.
Even that doesn't make sense though. They are going to have a back-up goalie no matter what so instead of Boucher, it's now Ellis. They took an AHL contract back in Pither and Alt isn't under contract.

Weird.

Boom Boom Anton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-13-2013, 09:21 AM
  #13
Boom Boom Anton
Registered User
 
Boom Boom Anton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,367
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by GKJ View Post
Are the Canes just bailing on Alt? It's not like Pither has proven anything.
Can't tell. None of us can make any sense of why Alt was included.

Boom Boom Anton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-13-2013, 09:22 AM
  #14
Joe McGrath
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,508
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Novacane View Post
Makes no sense. We give up two low-med. quality players for one low quality player. Unless JR is planning on signing someone right now and had to get rid of contracts, it makes no sense to me.
Alt is in college so he doesn't have a contract. I really don't know the rules though for having college prospects.

Joe McGrath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-13-2013, 09:23 AM
  #15
CanesAvs16
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 562
vCash: 500
Well I read yesterday somewhere that Boucher's family was staying in Philly, so I'm assuming that is why he was traded there. With his injury proned history, maybe Philly wanted another player included in the deal. We didn't need Boucher, and Alt wasn't proving anything. I see this deal more as making room for other players (i.e. Ellis) on the 'Canes.

CanesAvs16 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-13-2013, 09:26 AM
  #16
Psyduck
cephalalgia
 
Psyduck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,344
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oenatzu View Post
So basically JR wanted to get rid of Boucher and had to include Alt to make somebody want to take him.
That was my initial reaction as well. Alt seems like an awful big piece to throw in to make that happen. I guess the organization was no longer high on him.

Psyduck is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-13-2013, 09:26 AM
  #17
impeach estaalo
Registered User
 
impeach estaalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,814
vCash: 500
JR hates prospects and back-up goalies, so this makes sense.

Hopefully this was the "trade that may look funny but it's not because I'm so smart" trade he was talking about.

impeach estaalo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-13-2013, 09:26 AM
  #18
Novacane
My Hero
 
Novacane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Raleigh, NC
Country: United States
Posts: 18,154
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boom Boom Anton View Post
Even that doesn't make sense though. They are going to have a back-up goalie no matter what so instead of Boucher, it's now Ellis. They took an AHL contract back in Pither and Alt isn't under contract.

Weird.
Yeah, for every great move JR makes, he makes a massive head-scratcher to counter it. Now, this isn't the same magnitude of screwing up as say the Corvo contract. But all in all, this trade make no sense. Trade a raw 21 year old defenseman prospect and an aging goalie for a 23 year old ECHL'er who put up less than .3 PPG in the AHL.

Novacane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-13-2013, 09:28 AM
  #19
Joe McGrath
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,508
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Summer Ruutu View Post
JR hates prospects and back-up goalies, so this makes sense.

Hopefully this was the "trade that may look funny but it's not because I'm so smart" trade he was talking about.
Was just thinking about that quote. I just can't think of a reason to dump Alt.

Joe McGrath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-13-2013, 09:28 AM
  #20
DaveG
Mod Supervisor
How's the thesis?
 
DaveG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Durham NC
Country: United States
Posts: 31,742
vCash: 562
Quote:
Originally Posted by GKJ View Post
Are the Canes just bailing on Alt? It's not like Pither has proven anything.
Really not sure on Alt. He's been having a bad season with Minnesota but the talent is there. He's always been a project pick that was going to need all 4 years in college and a couple in the AHL before he was ready. Only thing that makes sense is if Canes brass didn't think he could do anything for us with the logjam we have on D and that it was time to bail.

DaveG is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-13-2013, 09:30 AM
  #21
tarheelhockey
Global Moderator
 
tarheelhockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Triangle
Country: United States
Posts: 33,255
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boom Boom Anton View Post
I thought of that, but Boucher is making $1M for 1 more year. It's not like Kaberle where it was a lot of money for a long time. Waive him if you have to.
Waiving him might mean he ends up in Edmonton or something.

The only way this deal makes a little sense is that JR wanted to do right by Boucher and get him to Philly. It took the Alt/Pither swap to get their buy-in.

Basically a minor-league trade combined with a waiver.

tarheelhockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-13-2013, 09:31 AM
  #22
GKJ
Global Moderator
Entertainment
 
GKJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Do not trade plz
Country: United States
Posts: 111,127
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe McGrath View Post
Alt is in college so he doesn't have a contract. I really don't know the rules though for having college prospects.
You had him until he graduated, so its not like they needed to do anything with him.


I wonder if the trade was really Pither for Alt, and Rutherford just said "you guys just want to take Boucher back, too? We don't want him"

GKJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-13-2013, 09:38 AM
  #23
impeach estaalo
Registered User
 
impeach estaalo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,814
vCash: 500
Things Jim Rutherford hates:
- Prospects
- Draft picks
- Back-up goalies
- Top 4 defensemen
- 1st line wingers
- Having four natural centers in the lineup at the same time
- Playoffs

Things Jim Rutherford loves:
- Chad LaRose
- Nice smiles
- Joe Corvo
- Players under 6'
- Chad LaRose
- Right-handed offensive defensemen
- NTCs
- The waiver wire
- the Plymouth Whalers
- Chad LaRose

Keep this in mind and every move will make sense.

impeach estaalo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-13-2013, 09:39 AM
  #24
Yes We Cam
$6.3 million backup
 
Yes We Cam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Raleigh, NC
Country: United States
Posts: 1,136
vCash: 500
I guess JR wanted to get rid of these American prospects without the speed skating mentality.

I think that Mcbain and Pitkanen are staying put.

Yes We Cam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-13-2013, 09:42 AM
  #25
Chicago Made Punk
MVP #BoltUp
 
Chicago Made Punk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Bronx, NY
Country: United States
Posts: 15,836
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Summer Ruutu View Post
Things Jim Rutherford hates:
- Prospects
- Draft picks
- Back-up goalies
- Top 4 defensemen
- 1st line wingers
- Having four natural centers in the lineup at the same time
- Playoffs

Things Jim Rutherford loves:
- Chad LaRose
- Nice smiles
- Joe Corvo
- Players under 6'
- Chad LaRose
- Right-handed offensive defensemen
- NTCs
- The waiver wire
- the Plymouth Whalers
- Chad LaRose

Keep this in mind and every move will make sense.
Needs moar gritty veterans.

Chicago Made Punk is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:50 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.