I would love to fire back, but the last thing I need is an infraction from a mod.
And no, you did not catch me. I am a damn good student and absolutely trolled the hell out of my teacher. ***** gave us too many prompts and key points to hit, so I over-analyzed everything to an extreme degree for wasting my time.
I agree. There's no way he wrote a 34 page QUALITY paper, and studied for finals, and did whatever else he said he did. Then again, it is a high school paper which you get at least a B on if you do anything resembling trying.
You have a 4.0 and were panicking that you wouldn't get into UofI? Jeez..
Over a 4.0! Proud of it.
I had no community service and got a respectable 26 on my ACT. 26 is bare minimum usually unless you apply to agriculture. I applied directly into the College of Media as a potential major in advertising.
Thought the same thing. Longer often is not synonymous with better. Being concise is a skill.
Indeed it is. It is also something one has to hone over time; I am at the point where I can just about pare down a 7 page paper into a 4 page paper just by judicious use of phrasing and descriptive nouns.
I commend Culk on being able to write a 32 page paper, but realistically the only time one will need to do such a thing is when writing their thesis. That is clearly not the case in this instance.
I had to analyze 24 pages of work and answer four extensive questions for each and every page. Then I had to oversee an online portion of our online production. That was part one of five. To say all that needed to be said, it ended up being 34 pages. Others had 15 to 25 pages, but I evidently got more in depth.
And now I have sit in this ****ing bilibloteca for 1.5 hours.