HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Northwest Division > Vancouver Canucks
Notices

Rate the Dee

View Poll Results: Rate the D out of 10
0 1 0.81%
1 0 0%
2 0 0%
3 0 0%
4 1 0.81%
5 0 0%
6 3 2.42%
7 27 21.77%
8 51 41.13%
9 33 26.61%
10 3 2.42%
OMG They're Freaking even better than 10! 5 4.03%
Voters: 124. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
01-17-2013, 04:03 PM
  #1
Steve Bennett*
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yes
Posts: 765
vCash: 500
Rate the Dee

A lot of worries about the second line, but all things considering I reckon the d, the goalies, first third and fourth lines look pretty swell..

What wouldja rate the d going into the season out of 10...

I know what I'd give em...

Edler
Hamhuis
Bieksa
Garrison
Tanev
Ballard
Alberts
Vanderhoof
Barker
Jeff Brown

Steve Bennett* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 04:05 PM
  #2
Spectrefire
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 234
vCash: 500
9/10

Canucks are going in with easily one of the best top six in the league. It drops off after that, but their top 4 core is solid as hell, and Ballard-Tanev make for a really good bottom pairing.

Spectrefire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 04:06 PM
  #3
pahlsson
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 4,834
vCash: 500
lol vanderhoof

pahlsson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 04:11 PM
  #4
0bjectiveC0mput0r
Registered User
 
0bjectiveC0mput0r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,207
vCash: 50
8/10

Wait for the chemistry, then 9.

0bjectiveC0mput0r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 04:13 PM
  #5
andbreatheme
Registered User
 
andbreatheme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,722
vCash: 500
One area I'm very excited about this season. For how it looks on paper right now, I'm going to say 8.

andbreatheme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 04:14 PM
  #6
The Classless One
Boosh for Boucher
 
The Classless One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nanaimo B.C
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,573
vCash: 117
Accidentally put 10, but I'd say 9. Not many teams have a better D core than us.

The Classless One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 04:22 PM
  #7
Scurr
Registered User
 
Scurr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Whalley
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,018
vCash: 500
8 right now

9 if Garrison/Edler works out

10 if ever add a dynamic offensive player

Scurr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 05:04 PM
  #8
Reverend Mayhem
Let's Go Bruins!
 
Reverend Mayhem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Port Coquitlam, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,920
vCash: 50
Send a message via Skype™ to Reverend Mayhem
8...9 if we include the goalies.

Reverend Mayhem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 05:19 PM
  #9
Bourne Endeavor
Canucks and Habs fan
 
Bourne Endeavor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Country: Canada
Posts: 13,568
vCash: 50
Need to see how Edler and Garrison pair off but 8-9. If Ballard rebounds, we may boast the best defense in the league.

Bourne Endeavor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 05:51 PM
  #10
Bure All Day
Registered User
 
Bure All Day's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Vancouver Isl.
Country: Canada
Posts: 605
vCash: 500
I say 7, maybe 8 if garrison can play at an even higher level than he did in Florida..

For our D to be a 9 or 10, we still need to have that definitive #1 guy or at least a guy like Ehrhoff who could get in the high 50s in points

Bure All Day is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 05:55 PM
  #11
Kip96
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: West Coast
Country: Canada
Posts: 722
vCash: 50
Offensively a 10

Defensively a 6

Kip96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 06:00 PM
  #12
PG Canuck
SnazzyNazzy
 
PG Canuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Prince George, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,572
vCash: 50
Voted 9.

PG Canuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 06:11 PM
  #13
drivier
Registered User
 
drivier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 394
vCash: 500
If we're calling Vandermeer.. Vanderhoof. Can we go with Barkerville for Barker. And maybe Garrison Hot Springs, too?

drivier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 06:12 PM
  #14
The Classless One
Boosh for Boucher
 
The Classless One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nanaimo B.C
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,573
vCash: 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by drivier View Post
If we're calling Vandermeer.. Vanderhoof. Can we go with Barkerville for Barker. And maybe Garrison Hot Springs, too?
Hamnaimo?

The Classless One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 06:23 PM
  #15
DL44
Registered User
 
DL44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 3,905
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Natureboy1235 View Post
Hamnaimo?
Hamloops is smoother..

Port Alberts is a no brainer.


Edit: 100 Mile Huis?

Sicamhuis

Ballard Coola?


Last edited by DL44: 01-17-2013 at 06:28 PM.
DL44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 06:31 PM
  #16
The Classless One
Boosh for Boucher
 
The Classless One's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nanaimo B.C
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,573
vCash: 117
Quote:
Originally Posted by DL44 View Post
Hamloops is smoother..

Port Alberts is a no brainer.


Edit: 100 Mile Huis?

Sicamhuis

Ballard Coola?
Edlerstoke?

Taneverrce?

Bieksaby?

The Classless One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 06:44 PM
  #17
professorchaos
Registered User
 
professorchaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Langley
Country: Canada
Posts: 285
vCash: 500
Vanderhoof
Barkerville
Garrison Hot Springs
Ballard Coola
Lac La Hamhuis
Tanelson
Bieksada Island
Albertsford
Edlerby

professorchaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 06:46 PM
  #18
MikeK
Registered User
 
MikeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,904
vCash: 0
I voted 7.

MikeK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 07:03 PM
  #19
ferroid
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 351
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kip96 View Post
Offensively a 10

Defensively a 6
What is this I don't even...

ferroid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 07:12 PM
  #20
jigsaw99
#fireAV
 
jigsaw99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,436
vCash: 500
really liking the Garrison and Edler combo. That's two cannons.

jigsaw99 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 07:27 PM
  #21
Outside99
Registered User
 
Outside99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,571
vCash: 500
Until they prove otherwise

Outside99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 07:30 PM
  #22
ItsAllPartOfThePlan
Registered User
 
ItsAllPartOfThePlan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,090
vCash: 500
8 right now

9 if Edler and Garrison gel

10 if above and Ballard comes out flying

ItsAllPartOfThePlan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 07:50 PM
  #23
Vankiller Whale
Good luck Sharks
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,148
vCash: 540
Going with 9. Still missing a franchise Dman.

Vankiller Whale is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 08:00 PM
  #24
Nuck This
Registered User
 
Nuck This's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,826
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vankiller Whale View Post
Going with 9. Still missing a franchise Dman.
Edler. He's gonna come into his own this year. I have a feeling Edler and Garrison will dominate. We're gonna have two number one pairings. I honestly think this will be the best defensive core in Canucks history.

Nuck This is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 08:31 PM
  #25
PG Canuck
SnazzyNazzy
 
PG Canuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Prince George, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,572
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vankiller Whale View Post
Going with 9. Still missing a franchise Dman.
Why do people keep saying this? We're perfectly fine, and damn good already without a franchise defensemen. Plus Edler could easily fill that void soon anyways.

PG Canuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:46 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.