HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > Vancouver Canucks
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Rate the Dee

View Poll Results: Rate the D out of 10
0 1 0.81%
1 0 0%
2 0 0%
3 0 0%
4 1 0.81%
5 0 0%
6 3 2.42%
7 27 21.77%
8 51 41.13%
9 33 26.61%
10 3 2.42%
OMG They're Freaking even better than 10! 5 4.03%
Voters: 124. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
01-17-2013, 04:03 PM
  #1
Steve Bennett*
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Yes
Posts: 766
vCash: 500
Rate the Dee

A lot of worries about the second line, but all things considering I reckon the d, the goalies, first third and fourth lines look pretty swell..

What wouldja rate the d going into the season out of 10...

I know what I'd give em...

Edler
Hamhuis
Bieksa
Garrison
Tanev
Ballard
Alberts
Vanderhoof
Barker
Jeff Brown

Steve Bennett* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 04:05 PM
  #2
Spectrefire
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 439
vCash: 500
9/10

Canucks are going in with easily one of the best top six in the league. It drops off after that, but their top 4 core is solid as hell, and Ballard-Tanev make for a really good bottom pairing.

Spectrefire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 04:06 PM
  #3
pahlsson
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,376
vCash: 50
lol vanderhoof

pahlsson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 04:11 PM
  #4
roach9
Registered User
 
roach9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,580
vCash: 500
8/10

Wait for the chemistry, then 9.

roach9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 04:13 PM
  #5
aandbreatheme
Registered User
 
aandbreatheme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 9,238
vCash: 500
One area I'm very excited about this season. For how it looks on paper right now, I'm going to say 8.

aandbreatheme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 04:14 PM
  #6
Canadian Gold X3
It is what it is.
 
Canadian Gold X3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nanaimo B.C
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,456
vCash: 500
Accidentally put 10, but I'd say 9. Not many teams have a better D core than us.

Canadian Gold X3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 04:22 PM
  #7
Scurr
Registered User
 
Scurr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Whalley
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,713
vCash: 500
8 right now

9 if Garrison/Edler works out

10 if ever add a dynamic offensive player

Scurr is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 05:04 PM
  #8
Reverend Mayhem
CRJ + RNH = Sex
 
Reverend Mayhem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Port Coquitlam, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,187
vCash: 940
Send a message via Skype™ to Reverend Mayhem
8...9 if we include the goalies.

Reverend Mayhem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 05:19 PM
  #9
Bourne Endeavor
Moderator
( _)>⌐■-■ (⌐■_■)
 
Bourne Endeavor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,173
vCash: 13357
Need to see how Edler and Garrison pair off but 8-9. If Ballard rebounds, we may boast the best defense in the league.

Bourne Endeavor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 05:51 PM
  #10
Bure All Day
Registered User
 
Bure All Day's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Vancouver Isl.
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,121
vCash: 500
I say 7, maybe 8 if garrison can play at an even higher level than he did in Florida..

For our D to be a 9 or 10, we still need to have that definitive #1 guy or at least a guy like Ehrhoff who could get in the high 50s in points

Bure All Day is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 05:55 PM
  #11
Kip96
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: West Coast
Country: Canada
Posts: 848
vCash: 500
Offensively a 10

Defensively a 6

Kip96 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 06:00 PM
  #12
PG Canuck
Moderator
 
PG Canuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Prince George, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,529
vCash: 1512
Voted 9.

PG Canuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 06:11 PM
  #13
drivier
Registered User
 
drivier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 396
vCash: 500
If we're calling Vandermeer.. Vanderhoof. Can we go with Barkerville for Barker. And maybe Garrison Hot Springs, too?

drivier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 06:12 PM
  #14
Canadian Gold X3
It is what it is.
 
Canadian Gold X3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nanaimo B.C
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,456
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by drivier View Post
If we're calling Vandermeer.. Vanderhoof. Can we go with Barkerville for Barker. And maybe Garrison Hot Springs, too?
Hamnaimo?

Canadian Gold X3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 06:23 PM
  #15
DL44
Registered User
 
DL44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 5,481
vCash: 133
Quote:
Originally Posted by Natureboy1235 View Post
Hamnaimo?
Hamloops is smoother..

Port Alberts is a no brainer.


Edit: 100 Mile Huis?

Sicamhuis

Ballard Coola?


Last edited by DL44: 01-17-2013 at 06:28 PM.
DL44 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 06:31 PM
  #16
Canadian Gold X3
It is what it is.
 
Canadian Gold X3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Nanaimo B.C
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,456
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DL44 View Post
Hamloops is smoother..

Port Alberts is a no brainer.


Edit: 100 Mile Huis?

Sicamhuis

Ballard Coola?
Edlerstoke?

Taneverrce?

Bieksaby?

Canadian Gold X3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 06:44 PM
  #17
professorchaos
Registered User
 
professorchaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Langley
Country: Canada
Posts: 285
vCash: 500
Vanderhoof
Barkerville
Garrison Hot Springs
Ballard Coola
Lac La Hamhuis
Tanelson
Bieksada Island
Albertsford
Edlerby

professorchaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 06:46 PM
  #18
MikeK
Registered User
 
MikeK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,689
vCash: 8000
I voted 7.

MikeK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 07:03 PM
  #19
ferroid
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 452
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kip96 View Post
Offensively a 10

Defensively a 6
What is this I don't even...

ferroid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 07:12 PM
  #20
jigsaw99
Registered User
 
jigsaw99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 3,925
vCash: 500
really liking the Garrison and Edler combo. That's two cannons.

jigsaw99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 07:27 PM
  #21
Outside99*
Sedins off Kas
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,347
vCash: 796
Until they prove otherwise

Outside99* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 07:30 PM
  #22
ItsAllPartOfThePlan
Registered User
 
ItsAllPartOfThePlan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,108
vCash: 500
8 right now

9 if Edler and Garrison gel

10 if above and Ballard comes out flying

ItsAllPartOfThePlan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 07:50 PM
  #23
Vankiller Whale
Maybe HE can score
 
Vankiller Whale's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 24,436
vCash: 5555
Going with 9. Still missing a franchise Dman.

Vankiller Whale is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 08:00 PM
  #24
Nuck This
Registered User
 
Nuck This's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,034
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vankiller Whale View Post
Going with 9. Still missing a franchise Dman.
Edler. He's gonna come into his own this year. I have a feeling Edler and Garrison will dominate. We're gonna have two number one pairings. I honestly think this will be the best defensive core in Canucks history.

Nuck This is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-17-2013, 08:31 PM
  #25
PG Canuck
Moderator
 
PG Canuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Prince George, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,529
vCash: 1512
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vankiller Whale View Post
Going with 9. Still missing a franchise Dman.
Why do people keep saying this? We're perfectly fine, and damn good already without a franchise defensemen. Plus Edler could easily fill that void soon anyways.

PG Canuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.