Proposal: boston - calgary

[TheHudlinator]

Originally Posted by NathanHortonFan

Tavares.

I would rather have Tavares but 2 Glencross's get you more points and cost less. He also is a top pker.

[Fastasaurus]

Originally Posted by lucicfist

Understandable as Calgary has enough wing prospects going forward right now.

LOL at Calgary having enough prospects.

[Haatley]

Originally Posted by Fastasaurus

LOL at Calgary having enough prospects.

You should research before you talk ignorance.

[Djp]

Originally Posted by nogger

Flames say no, that's horrible

How is it?????

Iginala is in a walk year. They get Krecji and a #1 in 2013....and they can resign Iginala in the offseason.

[Cory Trevor]

Dude, Iggy hasn't missed a game in 5 years and he's 35.....sorry. I looked at this again because I love Iginla.

[Alan Ryan]

Originally Posted by blankall

How so? Krejci puts up fewer points, while playing on the most offensively loaded team.

This may not be the best deal for Boston, but it does make sense for Boston to move a centre for a right wing.

You have Seguin, Krejci, Bergeron, Peverley, and Kelly at Centre.

You have Horton and Rolston as natural right wingers.

Seguin and Peverly will do very well on RW this season. Rolston is no longer with the Bruins.

[Oates2Neely]

Igina at this point wouldn't net Krejci alone, never mind Boston adding a 1st. This Iginla trade for a rebuild should have happened 2 years ago to maximize the assets going to Calgary. Now, he's just a rental.

[8spokesontheB]

I would do this deal, but I may have my Jarome-tinted glasses on. I`ve wanted him on the Bruins for years. I honestly do think that for a player like Jarome the B`s can afford to lose Krejci, and pop Seguin into the 1c role. I see Jarome being very effective for a few years yet.

[Fastasaurus]

Originally Posted by Haatley

You should research before you talk ignorance.

Sorry I guess I should have included quality, They have enough, problem is quality not quantity my bad!